Perry (MS) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Perry (MS) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Perry (MS)
3,251
Total Investors in Perry (MS)
769
Investor Owned SFR in Perry (MS)
691(21.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
686
SFR Owned
580
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
83
SFR Owned
117
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 691 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Perry County, Acquiring 100% of Q4 Investor Purchases
In Perry County, MS, landlords own 691 SFR properties, representing 21.3% of the total market, with individuals holding 83.9% of these. Q4 saw landlords acquire 34.4% of all SFR sales, exclusively driven by mom-and-pop investors. While overall landlords are net buyers, they paid a significant premium over homeowners in Q4, signaling unique market dynamics.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual investors own 83.9% of Perry County's 691 landlord-held SFR properties.
A significant 94.8% of investor-owned properties are held entirely in cash (655 properties), while 97.7% are rented (675 properties). Companies own 117 SFR properties (16.9%), lagging significantly behind individual investors.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a 36.3% premium over homeowners in Q4, acquiring properties at $229,174 versus $168,116.
The pricing disparity between landlords and homeowners has been highly volatile, swinging from a 41.2% discount in Q2 to a 93.9% premium in Q1. No distinct landlord purchases were recorded for Q4 2025 in the acquisition timeframe data, indicating limited investor transaction volume in the current quarter.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 34.4% of Q4 SFR properties, acquiring 11 of 32 total sales.
All landlord purchases in Q4 (100.0%) were made by mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), with institutional investors (Tier 09) showing no activity. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, acquiring 8 properties, despite being represented by 11 distinct entities.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 97.2% of investor-owned SFR.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone account for 79.1% of all investor-owned properties. Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold a minimal 0.1% of the total investor-owned portfolio in Perry County. No acquisition price data by tier was provided.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties, controlling 66.7% in that tier.
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, holding 90.3% of single-property (Tier 01) and 82.0% of two-property (Tier 02) assets. Companies hold 93.3% of properties in the 11-20 tier, indicating increasing corporate presence in slightly larger portfolios.
Geographic Distribution
MS-Perry-39476 leads Perry County with 292 investor-owned properties.
MS-Perry-39462 exhibits the highest investor ownership rate at 26.7%, followed closely by MS-Perry-39425 at 23.6%. The top four sub-geographies by property count (39476, 39423, 39462, 39425) also feature among the top five by ownership percentage, demonstrating concentrated activity in key areas.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers in Perry County, with 57 purchases vs 9 sells in 2025.
In Q3 2025, landlords maintained their net buyer status with 9 buys against 7 sells. Institutional investors (1000+ tier) showed a neutral position in 2024, with 1 buy and 1 sell, indicating no net accumulation or divestment. Information on average buy/sell prices and landlord-to-landlord transaction percentages was not provided for all landlords or institutional investors.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for 32.6% of all Q4 transactions, with 14 transactions out of 43.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) conducted all 14 landlord transactions, while institutional investors showed no activity. Single-property (Tier 01) transactions had an average purchase price of $229,174, but no inter-landlord sales were recorded for any tier.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual investors own 83.9% of Perry County's 691 landlord-held SFR properties.
Detailed Findings

Individual landlords are the dominant force in Perry County, owning 580 (83.9%) of the 691 investor-owned SFR properties, significantly outweighing the 117 properties (16.9%) held by companies.

A remarkable 94.8% (655 properties) of the landlord-owned portfolio in Perry County was acquired entirely in cash, highlighting a strong preference for unfinanced assets among investors.

The vast majority of landlord-owned properties, 97.7% (675 properties), are utilized as rentals, underscoring the investor-focused nature of these holdings within the county.

With 686 individual landlords compared to 83 company landlords, individuals represent 89.2% of all landlord entities, despite owning an average of 0.85 properties per entity versus 1.41 for companies.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a 36.3% premium over homeowners in Q4, acquiring properties at $229,174 versus $168,116.
Detailed Findings

In a reversal of typical market trends, landlords in Perry County paid a significant premium of $61,058 (36.3%) more than traditional homeowners in Q4 2025, with average acquisition prices of $229,174 compared to $168,116.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners has been highly inconsistent across 2025: landlords secured a substantial 41.2% discount ($97,379) in Q2, but paid premiums of 7.2% ($9,373) in Q3 and an extraordinary 93.9% ($150,447) in Q1.

Despite listed average acquisition prices, the data indicates 0 distinct SFR properties were actually purchased by landlords in Q4 2025, Q3 2025, Q2 2025, Q1 2025, or any other timeframe provided, suggesting extremely low recorded acquisition activity in recent periods.

For the entire Year 2025, the average acquisition price for landlords was $226,241, drastically higher than the $94,850 average for Year 2024, indicating a sharp rise in per-property costs when transactions did occur.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 34.4% of Q4 SFR properties, acquiring 11 of 32 total sales.
Detailed Findings

Landlords captured a substantial share of the Q4 2025 SFR market in Perry County, purchasing 11 properties, which accounts for 34.4% of the total 32 SFR purchases made during the quarter.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were the exclusive players among investors in Q4, responsible for 100.0% of all landlord purchases, totaling 11 properties. Institutional investors (Tier 09) recorded no purchases in the quarter.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) dominated Q4 purchasing activity, acquiring 8 properties. Intriguingly, these 8 properties were purchased by 11 distinct entities, suggesting a higher number of new entrants or very specific acquisition patterns.

Small landlords (Tier 06-10) also contributed to Q4 activity, with a single entity purchasing 3 properties, representing 27.3% of all landlord acquisitions for the quarter.

The data underscores a highly fragmented and individual-driven investor market in Perry County, particularly for Q4, with smaller investors being the sole contributors to market share.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 97.2% of investor-owned SFR.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords, encompassing Tiers 01-04 (1-10 properties), collectively control an overwhelming 97.2% of all investor-owned SFR properties in Perry County, representing 683 out of 691 total properties.

The single-property landlord (Tier 01) segment forms the backbone of the investor market, owning 556 properties, which alone constitutes 79.1% of the entire investor-held SFR inventory.

In stark contrast to media narratives, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) maintain a negligible footprint in Perry County, holding just 1 property, which translates to a mere 0.1% of the total investor-owned SFR.

The distribution reveals a strong concentration at the lowest tiers, with the top three tiers (1, 2, and 3-5 properties) together accounting for 94.2% of investor-owned properties.

Mid-size landlords (Tiers 05-08) hold a combined 5.6% of investor-owned properties, further reinforcing the dominance of smaller-scale investors in this market.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties, controlling 66.7% in that tier.
Detailed Findings

The shift in ownership dynamics from individuals to companies occurs within the small landlord segment: individual investors dominate Tiers 01-05, but companies gain majority control starting at the 6-10 property tier (66.7% company-owned).

Individual investors exhibit strong concentration in the smallest tiers, owning 90.3% of properties in Tier 01 (single-property) and 82.0% in Tier 02 (two-property), confirming the 'mom-and-pop' nature of the majority of the market.

Company ownership dramatically escalates in the Small-medium (11-20 property) tier, where they own 93.3% of properties, signaling this as a critical point for corporate-scale investment in Perry County.

Even within the small landlord 3-5 property tier, individual investors still hold the majority at 57.4%, though company presence is notable at 42.6%.

The data illustrates a clear progression where smaller portfolios are almost exclusively individual-owned, but as portfolio size increases beyond 5 properties, companies rapidly become the dominant owner type.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
MS-Perry-39476 leads Perry County with 292 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Within Perry County, the zip code MS-Perry-39476 stands out as the primary hub for investor activity, boasting the highest count of investor-owned properties at 292, representing a 22.1% ownership rate.

MS-Perry-39462 exhibits the highest concentration of investor-owned housing by percentage, with 26.7% of its total SFR properties held by landlords, followed by MS-Perry-39425 at 23.6% and MS-Perry-39423 at 23.5%.

The top four sub-geographies by total investor-owned property count (MS-Perry-39476, 39423, 39462, 39425) are consistently among the areas with the highest investor ownership rates, indicating a strong correlation between high volume and high market penetration in these specific zip codes.

Conversely, MS-Perry-39465, while ranking 4th in investor-owned property count with 61 properties, shows a comparatively lower investor ownership rate of 13.6%, suggesting a larger overall SFR market in that area with less intensive landlord penetration.

The geographic data highlights a clear pattern of investor interest concentrated within a few key zip codes in Perry County, both in terms of sheer property volume and the percentage of the local market they command.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are strong net buyers in Perry County, with 57 purchases vs 9 sells in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Perry County are firmly in a net buyer position, acquiring significantly more properties than they sell: Year 2025 recorded 57 purchases against only 9 sales, resulting in a net gain of 48 properties.

This buying trend is consistent, with landlords also being net buyers in Q3 2025 (9 buys vs. 7 sells) and Year 2024 (45 buys vs. 9 sells), demonstrating sustained growth in their portfolios.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) presented a neutral transaction profile in Year 2024, with 1 buy and 1 sell, suggesting a stable, rather than expansive or contractive, strategy for this specific tier.

The provided data lacks specifics on the percentage of buy/sell transactions occurring between landlords, or the average buy and sell prices for different timeframes, limiting insights into inter-landlord market liquidity and implied profit margins.

The robust buy/sell ratio, particularly over the last two years, signals a healthy and expanding investor market driven by acquisition rather than divestment for the overall landlord segment in Perry County.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 32.6% of all Q4 transactions, with 14 transactions out of 43.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Perry County were active participants in the Q4 2025 market, contributing 14 transactions, which represents a substantial 32.6% share of the total 43 SFR transactions during the quarter.

All landlord transactions in Q4 were driven by mom-and-pop investors (Tier 01-04), totaling 14 transactions, whereas institutional investors (Tier 09) registered no transactions during this period.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, completing 11 transactions at an average purchase price of $229,174, indicating strong activity among new or very small-scale investors.

No transactions were recorded as being bought from other landlords (0.0% inter-landlord) for any tier, suggesting that landlords are primarily acquiring properties from non-landlord sellers in Q4.

The average purchase price for small landlords (Tier 06-10) in Q4 was not available, despite recording 3 transactions, indicating a data gap for this segment's pricing behavior.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Perry County's Investor Market Amidst High Q4 Premiums
Holdings
Landlords in Perry County own 691 SFR properties, representing 21.3% of the total SFR market, with individual investors holding 580 properties (83.9%) and companies owning 117 properties (16.9%).
Pricing
Landlords paid an average of $229,174 in Q4, a significant 36.3% premium over traditional homeowners at $168,116, signaling an unusual shift in local market dynamics.
Activity
Q4 saw landlords purchase 11 properties, comprising 34.4% of all SFR sales, with new single-property landlords (Tier 01) contributing 8 of these acquisitions through 11 distinct entities.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 97.2% of investor housing in Perry County, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a mere 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors hold 83.9% of all landlord-owned properties, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios with 6-10 properties and above, controlling 66.7% in the 6-10 tier and 93.3% in the 11-20 tier.
Transactions
Overall, landlords are net buyers with 57 buys versus 9 sells in 2025, but institutional investors maintained a neutral position in 2024 with 1 buy and 1 sell.
Market Narrative

Perry County's real estate investor landscape is predominantly shaped by individual, mom-and-pop landlords, who collectively control an overwhelming 97.2% of the 691 investor-owned SFR properties. This segment comprises 83.9% of all investor-owned housing, with single-property landlords alone accounting for 79.1% of the portfolio. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.1% of the market, indicating that the 'Wall Street landlord' narrative does not align with the local reality in Perry County.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 saw landlords acquire 34.4% of all SFR purchases, with this activity exclusively driven by mom-and-pop tiers. Notably, landlords paid a substantial 36.3% premium over traditional homeowners in Q4, acquiring properties at $229,174 compared to $168,116, a significant reversal from typical market trends and a highly volatile pricing pattern throughout 2025. Despite this, landlords remained net buyers in 2025 with 57 purchases against 9 sales, suggesting continued confidence in the market, while institutional activity remained neutral or minimal.

The data from Perry County clearly illustrates a market dominated by individual, smaller-scale investors, contradicting popular perceptions of institutional control. The high acquisition premiums paid by landlords in Q4 2025, coupled with their sustained net buyer position, highlight a unique and competitive local market. This suggests that despite the elevated costs, the underlying appeal and rental potential of SFR properties in Perry County remain strong for individual investors, shaping a distinctly fragmented and locally-driven investment environment.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 04:45 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyPerry (MS)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail