Lee (MS) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Lee (MS) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Lee (MS)
25,951
Total Investors in Lee (MS)
3,070
Investor Owned SFR in Lee (MS)
3,804(14.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,351
SFR Owned
2,162
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
719
SFR Owned
1,651
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 3,804 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop investors dominate Lee County, MS, as Q4 sees zero landlord transactions.
Landlords in Lee County, MS own 3,804 SFR properties, 14.7% of the market, with individuals holding 56.8% and mom-and-pop investors controlling a significant 81.5%. Critically, Q4 2025 recorded zero landlord purchases, halting market activity, while 2024 saw landlords as net buyers at a 3.5x ratio.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 3,804 SFR properties in Lee County, MS, primarily by individuals (56.8%).
Individual investors own 2,162 properties compared to 1,651 for companies. A significant 96.7% (3,680 properties) are rented, with 89.5% acquired via cash.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No Q4 landlord acquisitions occurred, reflecting zero market entry for the period.
In prior periods, average acquisition prices for landlords stood at $192,241 in 2024 and $130,888 from 2020-2023, though no properties were recorded for these periods.
Current Quarter Purchases
Lee County, MS recorded zero landlord purchases in Q4 2025, indicating no new market entries.
Both mom-and-pop (Tier 01-04) and institutional (Tier 09) investors showed no purchasing activity during Q4.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Lee County, MS, controlling 81.5% of all investor-owned SFR properties.
Single-property owners (Tier 01) alone hold 50.4% (1,998 properties), while institutional investors (Tier 09) represent a mere 0.3% (12 properties).
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies achieve majority ownership starting at Tier 6-10 portfolios in Lee County, MS.
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, holding 79.6% of single-property (Tier 01) and 58.6% of (Tier 03-05) properties, while companies concentrate in larger portfolios like Tier 21-50 (85.0%).
Geographic Distribution
Zip codes 38801 and 38804 lead Lee County, MS in investor-owned property count and percentage.
MS-Lee-38801 has 1,529 properties (17.3%), closely followed by MS-Lee-38804 with 958 properties (17.5%), indicating key investment hubs. MS-Lee-38879 shows the highest ownership rate at 21.1%.
Historical Transactions
Lee County, MS landlords were net buyers in 2024, acquiring 3.5x more properties than they sold.
Overall, landlords executed 7 buy transactions against 2 sell transactions, resulting in a net gain of 5 properties. Institutional transaction data for this period is unavailable.
Current Quarter Transactions
Zero landlord transactions were recorded in Lee County, MS during Q4 2025.
No SFR transactions occurred in Q4, resulting in 0.0% landlord market share. Both mom-and-pop and institutional tiers showed no activity.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 3,804 SFR properties in Lee County, MS, primarily by individuals (56.8%).
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Lee County, MS, collectively own a substantial portfolio of 3,804 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, representing 14.7% of the total SFR market of 25,951 properties.

Individual investors lead in property ownership, controlling 2,162 SFR properties (56.8%) of the landlord-held stock, significantly outweighing company ownership at 1,651 properties (43.4%).

The vast majority of investor-owned properties in Lee County, MS, are rental-focused, with 3,680 properties (96.7%) being rented, underscoring the market's strong orientation towards the rental segment.

Cash acquisitions dominate the market, accounting for 3,403 (89.5%) of landlord-owned properties, while only 401 properties (10.5%) are financed, indicating a preference for debt-free investments.

Out of 3,070 distinct landlord entities, individual landlords make up the overwhelming majority with 2,351 entities (76.6%), compared to 719 company landlords (23.4%), reflecting a market driven by numerous smaller-scale investors.

The ratio of individual to company landlords stands at approximately 3.27 to 1 (2,351 individuals vs. 719 companies), further emphasizing the prevalence of individual ownership within the Lee County, MS investor landscape.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No Q4 landlord acquisitions occurred, reflecting zero market entry for the period.
Detailed Findings

Lee County, MS experienced no landlord acquisition activity in Q4 2025, with a reported 0 distinct SFR properties purchased by landlords, making direct price comparisons for the quarter impossible.

Despite the lack of recent purchases, historical data indicates average landlord acquisition prices of $192,241 for 2024 and $130,888 for the 2020-2023 period, though these periods also reported zero distinct properties acquired by landlords.

The absence of landlord purchases in recent periods (2024, Q4 2025) suggests a pause in investor market entry or acquisition strategies within Lee County, MS.

Given the reported zero properties acquired in 2024 and 2020-2023, the provided average acquisition prices ($192,241 and $130,888 respectively) cannot be used to infer recent price appreciation or market trends.

Crucially, without any transactional data for Q4 2025, it is impossible to assess how landlord acquisition prices compare to traditional homeowners, or if any price gaps are present or trending.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Lee County, MS recorded zero landlord purchases in Q4 2025, indicating no new market entries.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, Lee County, MS registered a complete absence of SFR purchase activity, with 0 total SFR purchases and 0 landlord purchases, translating to 0.0% landlord market share.

This unprecedented lack of activity extends across all investor segments, as both mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) and institutional investors (Tier 09) reported 0 distinct SFR properties purchased during the quarter.

The data clearly indicates no new landlord entities entered the Lee County, MS market in Q4 2025, nor were there any recorded purchases by existing investors across any tier.

Without any recorded purchases, it is impossible to identify which investor tiers, if any, demonstrated higher activity or concentration during Q4 2025.

The zero transaction volume in Q4 2025 suggests a significant halt or pause in real estate investment activity for SFR properties in Lee County, MS.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Lee County, MS, controlling 81.5% of all investor-owned SFR properties.
Detailed Findings

The ownership landscape in Lee County, MS is overwhelmingly characterized by small-scale investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04, 1-10 properties) controlling a dominant 81.5% of all investor-owned SFR properties.

Specifically, single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone of the market, holding 1,998 properties, accounting for a significant 50.4% share of the total investor-owned portfolio.

In stark contrast to media narratives, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold a minimal footprint in Lee County, MS, owning only 12 properties, which translates to a mere 0.3% of the total investor-owned SFR market.

The distribution beyond mom-and-pop reveals a gradual tapering, with small-medium landlords (Tiers 11-50) holding 14.6% (579 properties) and medium-large (51-100 properties) representing 3.5% (138 properties).

The granular tier data showcases a high concentration at the lowest tier, with Tier 01, Tier 02, and Tier 03-05 collectively accounting for 73.5% of all investor-owned properties, underscoring the localized nature of SFR investment in this county.

Data on acquisition prices by tier and the number of entities within each tier were not provided, preventing an analysis of pricing strategies or average portfolio sizes across different investor segments.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
Companies achieve majority ownership starting at Tier 6-10 portfolios in Lee County, MS.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smaller end of the spectrum in Lee County, MS, comprising 79.6% of single-property (Tier 01) owners and a significant 58.7% of two-property (Tier 02) owners.

A distinct crossover point occurs at the 'Small landlord (6-10 properties)' tier, where company ownership surpasses individual ownership for the first time, with companies holding 74.4% of properties compared to individuals at 25.6%.

As portfolio size increases, company concentration escalates significantly; for example, in the 'Small-medium (21-50 properties)' tier, companies own 85.0% of properties, while individuals hold only 15.0%.

The 'Small-medium (11-20 properties)' tier also shows strong company dominance, with companies owning 80.3% of properties, signaling their preference for mid-sized portfolios over smaller ones.

This clear pattern indicates that while individuals are the primary force in the initial stages of property investment, companies rapidly become the dominant owner type as portfolio sizes expand beyond the mom-and-pop threshold of 5 properties.

Data on acquisition prices split by owner type within each tier was not provided, precluding an analysis of potential pricing differences between individual and company investors for comparable portfolio sizes.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Zip codes 38801 and 38804 lead Lee County, MS in investor-owned property count and percentage.
Detailed Findings

Within Lee County, MS, specific zip codes emerge as hotspots for investor activity, with MS-Lee-38801 leading by volume with 1,529 investor-owned properties, and MS-Lee-38804 closely behind with 958 properties.

These two zip codes not only lead in sheer property count but also exhibit high investor ownership rates, with MS-Lee-38804 at 17.5% and MS-Lee-38801 at 17.3%, suggesting a concentration of investment within these dense areas.

While not a leader in raw property count, MS-Lee-38879 demonstrates the highest investor ownership penetration in Lee County, MS, with an impressive 21.1% of its SFR properties held by investors, closely followed by MS-Lee-38860 at 20.0%.

The top 5 regions by investor-owned count (MS-Lee-38801, 38804, 38866, 38849) broadly overlap with the top 5 by percentage (MS-Lee-38879, 38860, 38804, 38801, 38849), indicating that higher volumes often correlate with higher market penetration in Lee County, MS.

The lowest investor ownership rates are not discernable from the provided data, preventing a full analysis of the least concentrated investment areas.

Acquisition pricing data by geographic region was not provided, limiting the ability to analyze if investors are paying more or less in these high-activity areas.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
Lee County, MS landlords were net buyers in 2024, acquiring 3.5x more properties than they sold.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Lee County, MS demonstrated a strong net buyer position in 2024, with 7 buy transactions significantly outpacing 2 sell transactions, resulting in a net acquisition of 5 properties.

This activity translates into a buy-to-sell ratio of 3.5x for all landlords in 2024, indicating a clear pattern of portfolio expansion rather than divestment within the county.

However, the provided data does not include historical transaction trends for Q4 or Q3, limiting a comprehensive understanding of changes in the buy/sell ratio over shorter timeframes.

Information regarding the percentage of transactions occurring between landlords (inter-landlord trading) is not available, which prevents an analysis of market liquidity and internal investor-to-investor dynamics.

Crucially, there is no transactional data provided for institutional investors (1000+ tier), making it impossible to ascertain their net position or compare their behavior to the overall landlord market.

Average buy and sell prices for 2024 were not included in the data, preventing an assessment of implied profit margins or pricing strategies from these transactions.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Zero landlord transactions were recorded in Lee County, MS during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Lee County, MS experienced a complete absence of SFR transaction activity in Q4 2025, with 0 total transactions recorded, leading to 0 landlord transactions and a 0.0% landlord share of the market.

This indicates a freeze in market dynamics for the quarter, as no distinct SFR properties were bought or sold by any landlord entity across all tiers, including both mom-and-pop (Tier 01-04) and institutional (Tier 09) investors.

The lack of Q4 transaction data precludes any analysis of average purchase prices by tier, inter-landlord trading activity, or specific tier-based pricing strategies for the current quarter.

Without any recorded transactions, it is impossible to determine which investor tiers were most active or how their Q4 activity compares to their overall ownership distribution in Lee County, MS.

The reported $0 average purchase prices for Tier 01 and Tier 09 investors directly reflect the absence of any buying activity in Q4 2025.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Lee County, MS with 81.5% ownership amidst zero Q4 market activity.
Holdings
Landlords in Lee County, MS collectively own 3,804 SFR properties, constituting 14.7% of the total SFR market of 25,951 properties. Individual investors hold 2,162 properties (56.8%) of this portfolio, significantly more than companies at 1,651 properties (43.4%).
Pricing
No landlord acquisition pricing data is available for Q4 2025 due to zero recorded transactions, preventing a comparison to traditional homeowner prices for the period. Historically, average landlord acquisition prices were $192,241 in 2024 and $130,888 from 2020-2023, though these were also periods of zero recorded purchases.
Activity
Q4 2025 saw a complete standstill in Lee County, MS, with 0 landlord purchases, resulting in a 0.0% share of all SFR sales. Consequently, no new landlords (Tier 01) entered the market, and no investor tiers showed any purchasing activity during the quarter.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) overwhelmingly control 81.5% of investor-owned housing in Lee County, MS, with single-property owners alone holding 50.4%. Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) maintain a minimal presence, owning just 0.3% of the market.
Ownership Type
While individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, companies become the majority owners at the 'Small landlord (6-10 properties)' tier. Individual landlords make up 76.6% of all landlord entities (2,351 individuals vs. 719 companies).
Transactions
Landlords in Lee County, MS were net buyers in 2024, with a 3.5x buy/sell ratio (7 buys vs 2 sells), indicating portfolio growth; however, Q4 2025 recorded zero transactions. No institutional investor transaction data is available to assess their net position.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in Lee County, MS is fundamentally shaped by small-scale, individual investors. Out of 25,951 total SFR properties, landlords own 3,804, representing 14.7% of the market. Individual investors constitute the majority, holding 2,162 properties (56.8%) compared to companies with 1,651 properties (43.4%), and mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) collectively control a dominant 81.5% of this portfolio.

However, recent market activity shows a significant slowdown; Q4 2025 registered zero landlord purchases or sales, making it impossible to assess current pricing trends or compare acquisition prices to traditional homeowners. While 2024 saw landlords as net buyers with a 3.5x buy-to-sell ratio, this momentum ceased in the current quarter. Geographic hotspots like MS-Lee-38801 and MS-Lee-38804 lead in investor-owned property counts and percentages, yet even these areas reported no Q4 transactions.

This data reveals a market in Lee County, MS where individual, small-scale investors are the primary force in ownership, contrary to narratives of institutional dominance. The complete halt in Q4 landlord transactions suggests a pause or shift in investment behavior, potentially influenced by broader economic factors or a lack of available inventory. Future quarters will be critical to determine if this signals a temporary slowdown or a more significant change in investor engagement within the county.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 04:40 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyLee (MS)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price