Lawrence (MS) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Lawrence (MS) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Lawrence (MS)
4,134
Total Investors in Lawrence (MS)
1,004
Investor Owned SFR in Lawrence (MS)
905(21.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
809
SFR Owned
717
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
195
SFR Owned
207
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 905 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Lawrence County's investor market is 99% mom-and-pop, with zero Q4 2025 purchase activity.
Investors own 905 SFR properties, representing 21.9% of the market in Lawrence County. Ownership is overwhelmingly dominated by small, individual landlords (99.0% share), with no institutional presence. The market showed no activity in Q4 2025, with zero properties purchased or transacted by investors.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 905 SFRs (21.9% of market), with individuals holding a 79.2% majority.
The vast majority of investor properties, 881 out of 905, are owned outright with cash, while only 24 are financed. Across the county, there are 809 individual landlords compared to 195 company investors. A total of 884 investor-owned properties are classified as rentals.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No landlord purchases were recorded in Q4 2025, preventing price comparisons.
Due to a complete lack of landlord purchasing activity in the most recent quarters, no data is available to compare landlord vs. homeowner prices or to analyze pricing trends. Historical data from 2020-2023 also shows zero acquisitions.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords made zero purchases in Q4 2025, representing 0.0% of market activity.
Both mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) and institutional investors (Tier 09) recorded zero purchases this quarter. This indicates a complete halt in investor acquisition activity across all portfolio sizes.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 99.0% of investor-owned SFRs, with zero institutional ownership.
Single-property landlords alone own 76.8% of all investor-held SFRs. No pricing data is available by tier due to lack of recent transaction activity. The market has no investors in the medium (21-1000) or institutional (1000+) tiers.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals dominate all tiers; no crossover to company majority ownership exists.
Individuals own the majority of properties in every active tier, including 75.8% of single-property portfolios and 83.8% of 6-10 property portfolios. There is no institutional presence for either owner type. No pricing data is available to compare individual vs. company acquisitions.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in Monticello (39654), with 405 properties at a 21.7% ownership rate.
The highest investor ownership rate is found in the 39191 zip code at 42.1%. Following Monticello, the highest counts of investor-owned homes are in Silver Creek (39663) with 214 properties and Oma (39140) with 109.
Historical Transactions
No historical transaction data is available for analysis.
Without buy-sell transaction records for any timeframe, it is impossible to determine if landlords are net buyers or sellers, calculate landlord-to-landlord sales rates, or analyze price margins. This applies to both the overall landlord market and the non-existent institutional segment.
Current Quarter Transactions
No landlord transactions occurred in Q4 2025, resulting in a 0.0% market share.
The complete lack of Q4 transactions means no analysis of pricing by tier or inter-landlord trading is possible. Both mom-and-pop and institutional tiers recorded zero transaction activity.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 905 SFRs (21.9% of market), with individuals holding a 79.2% majority.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 21.9% share of the Single-Family Residential market in Lawrence County, with a portfolio of 905 properties out of a total of 4,134.

The market is dominated by individual investors, who own 717 properties (79.2% of the investor portfolio), while companies own the remaining 207 properties (22.9%).

This individual dominance is also reflected in the landlord entity count, with 809 individual landlords making up the vast majority compared to just 195 company entities.

A striking financial characteristic of this market is the preference for cash ownership. An overwhelming 881 investor-owned properties are held free and clear, while only 24 properties are financed, indicating low leverage among local investors.

The rental focus is clear, with 884 of the 905 properties being rented, confirming the primary business model for investors in the area.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No landlord purchases were recorded in Q4 2025, preventing price comparisons.
Detailed Findings

Analysis of acquisition pricing is not possible for Lawrence County, as there were no recorded SFR purchases by landlords in Q4 2025.

Consequently, a direct price comparison between landlords and traditional homeowners for the current quarter cannot be made.

Looking at historical data provides no further insight, as there were also zero properties acquired by landlords between 2020 and 2023 according to the available data.

This absence of purchasing activity over an extended period suggests a highly stable or stagnant investor market with very low turnover.

Without transaction data, it is impossible to determine price appreciation trends or whether a landlord discount exists in this market.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Landlords made zero purchases in Q4 2025, representing 0.0% of market activity.
Detailed Findings

The investor purchase market in Lawrence County was completely dormant in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring zero new SFR properties.

This lack of activity means investors accounted for 0.0% of the total 0 SFR purchases recorded in the county during the quarter.

No new landlords entered the market, as the single-property (Tier 01) category saw zero new entities making purchases.

The inactivity was universal across all investor sizes, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) and mid-size investors making no acquisitions.

Similarly, institutional investors (1000+ properties) were not a factor, recording zero purchases, which aligns with their overall absence in the county.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 99.0% of investor-owned SFRs, with zero institutional ownership.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Lawrence County is exclusively defined by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own a staggering 99.0% of all investor-held SFRs.

Single-property landlords are the bedrock of the market, with 719 properties accounting for 76.8% of the entire investor portfolio.

The next largest tiers are small landlords with 3-5 properties (10.0% share) and two-property owners (8.2% share), further cementing the dominance of small investors.

There is absolutely no presence from institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties), who own 0.0% of the market.

Due to the lack of recent purchasing activity, no meaningful analysis of acquisition prices by tier can be conducted.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
Individuals dominate all tiers; no crossover to company majority ownership exists.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the dominant force across every single investor tier in Lawrence County, with no crossover point where companies become the majority owners.

In the largest tier, single-property owners, individuals hold 559 properties (75.8%) compared to 178 for companies (24.2%).

This pattern continues up the scale; for example, in the 6-10 property tier, individuals own 31 homes (83.8%) versus just 6 for companies (16.2%).

Even in the 11-20 property tier, individuals own 8 of the 9 properties (88.9%).

The complete absence of institutional investors means there is no data to compare individual versus company ownership in the larger tiers.

Due to a lack of transactions, it's not possible to compare acquisition prices between individuals and companies within any tier.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in Monticello (39654), with 405 properties at a 21.7% ownership rate.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Lawrence County is geographically concentrated, with the top five zip codes accounting for the vast majority of the 905 investor-owned properties.

The zip code 39654 (Monticello) is the epicenter of investor activity, containing 405 investor-owned SFRs, which translates to a high ownership rate of 21.7%.

The highest penetration rate is in 39191 (Sontag), where investors own 42.1% of the SFR housing stock, despite having a smaller absolute number of properties.

Other key areas of concentration include 39663 (Silver Creek) with 214 investor properties (23.9% rate) and 39140 (Oma) with 109 properties (26.8% rate).

The zip code 39641 (New Hebron) has 101 investor-owned homes, representing a 16.7% ownership rate.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Key Insight
No historical transaction data is available for analysis.
Detailed Findings

A comprehensive analysis of historical transaction trends is not possible for Lawrence County due to the absence of available data.

There are no records of buy or sell transactions for landlords across any of the analyzed timeframes, including Q4 2025, Q3 2025, or annually.

Consequently, key metrics such as the buy/sell ratio, which indicates whether landlords are net buyers or sellers, cannot be calculated.

It is also impossible to determine the level of inter-landlord activity, as the percentage of properties bought from or sold to other landlords is unknown.

Similarly, the data does not allow for a comparison of average buy prices versus sell prices to infer potential profit margins or market dynamics.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
No landlord transactions occurred in Q4 2025, resulting in a 0.0% market share.
Detailed Findings

The investor transaction market in Lawrence County was entirely inactive in Q4 2025, with zero transactions involving landlords recorded.

This inactivity resulted in landlords having a 0.0% share of the total 0 SFR transactions that occurred during the quarter.

Transaction volumes were zero across all investor tiers, from single-property owners to the largest portfolios.

As a result of no purchases, there is no data on average purchase prices by tier, preventing any analysis of pricing strategies among different investor sizes.

Furthermore, with no recorded buys, the level of inter-landlord trading activity for the quarter was non-existent.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Dominated by small investors holding 99% of properties, Lawrence County's market saw zero Q4 investor activity.
Holdings
Landlords own 905 SFR properties, representing 21.9% of Lawrence County's market, with individual investors holding a commanding 717 properties (79.2%) compared to companies' 207 (22.9%).
Pricing
No landlord purchases were recorded in Q4 2025, making a price comparison against traditional homeowners impossible and indicating a stagnant market.
Activity
Investor activity came to a standstill in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 0 properties, accounting for 0.0% of all sales, and no new landlords entering the market.
Market Share
The market is entirely controlled by small landlords (1-10 properties), who own 99.0% of all investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have zero presence.
Ownership Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate every portfolio tier, from single-property owners (75.8% individual-owned) to the 11-20 property tier (88.9%), with no crossover point to company majority.
Transactions
With zero buys and zero sells recorded in Q4 2025, landlords were neither net buyers nor net sellers, reflecting a complete lack of transactional movement in the investor market.
Market Narrative

In Lawrence County, the real estate investor market is characterized by a deep-rooted, small-scale structure. Investors command a significant 21.9% of the single-family housing market with 905 properties. This landscape is overwhelmingly shaped by local, individual investors who own 79.2% of these homes, dwarfing corporate ownership. The market structure analysis reveals that 'mom-and-pop' landlords (owning 1-10 properties) control a near-total 99.0% of the investor-owned housing stock, while large-scale institutional investors have absolutely no footprint in the county.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 signaled a market at a complete standstill. There were zero purchases and zero sales by investors, indicating a lack of both acquisition and disposition. This inactivity prevents any analysis of pricing advantages against homeowners or trends in property values. Financially, the existing portfolio is remarkably stable and low-risk, with 881 of 905 properties (97.4%) owned outright with cash, suggesting a strategy of long-term holds rather than leveraged, speculative buying.

The key takeaway for the Lawrence County housing market is its insulation from broader, institutional-driven real estate trends. It is a hyper-local market defined by individual capital and long-term rental strategies. The lack of recent activity suggests a mature, saturated market with low turnover, where existing landlords are holding assets rather than expanding or exiting. This stability could mean fewer opportunities for new investors but also a more predictable rental environment for tenants.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 01:26 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyLawrence (MS)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct