Humphreys (MS) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Humphreys (MS) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Humphreys (MS)
2,193
Total Investors in Humphreys (MS)
502
Investor Owned SFR in Humphreys (MS)
462(21.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
474
SFR Owned
440
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
28
SFR Owned
30
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 462 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Dormant Q4 Investor Market with Overwhelming Mom-and-Pop Dominance in Humphreys County
Landlords in Humphreys County, Mississippi, own 462 SFR properties, with an overwhelming 95.2% held by individual investors. The Q4 2025 market saw no recorded SFR purchases or transactions by either landlords or homeowners, indicating extreme market dormancy. Small landlords (1-10 properties) control an immense 99.4% of all investor-owned housing, with institutional presence being negligible.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual Landlords Own 95.2% of SFR Properties in Humphreys County
Of the 462 investor-owned properties in Humphreys County, 451 (97.6%) are held as cash properties, while only 11 (2.4%) are financed. Nearly all (98.0%) of landlord-owned properties are rented, demonstrating a strong rental-focused portfolio.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Humphreys County Saw No Recorded Landlord Acquisitions in Q4 2025 or Recent Years
The only historical acquisition data available shows 0 properties purchased between 2020-2023 at an average price of $44,200, which suggests extremely limited or non-existent investment activity during that period. No pricing data is available to compare landlord acquisitions against traditional homeowners for Q4 2025 or other recent timeframes due to a complete absence of recorded purchases.
Current Quarter Purchases
Q4 2025 Saw Zero Landlord or SFR Purchases in Humphreys County
With no recorded purchases in Q4 2025, there was no landlord share of the market, nor any activity from mom-and-pop (Tier 01-04) or institutional (Tier 09) landlords. This indicates an entirely inactive acquisition market for SFR properties in Humphreys County during the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 99.4% of SFR Holdings in Humphreys County
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone dominate, owning 403 properties or 85.6% of the total investor portfolio. Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold only 1 property, representing a minimal 0.2% share, underscoring the almost complete absence of large-scale corporate ownership.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual Investors Dominate All Observed Tiers in Humphreys County, No Company Crossover Point
For example, in the 3-5 property tier, individuals own 25 properties (83.3%) compared to companies owning 5 properties (16.7%). Single-property owners are 95.1% individual, while even in the 6-10 property tier, individuals still hold 94.4% of properties, demonstrating limited corporate penetration across all landlord sizes.
Geographic Distribution
MS-Humphreys-39038 Leads Investor-Owned Property Count in Humphreys County
MS-Humphreys-39038 also has a significant investor ownership rate of 21.5%, while MS-Humphreys-39166 boasts the highest ownership rate at 31.1% with 38 properties. This shows a high concentration of investor activity within specific zip codes in Humphreys County, Mississippi.
Historical Transactions
Humphreys County Reports No Historical Landlord Transactions, Signaling Stagnant Market
Due to a complete absence of recorded buy or sell transactions for all landlords and institutional investors across all timeframes, it is impossible to determine if landlords are net buyers or sellers, calculate buy/sell ratios, or compare buy/sell prices. This indicates a market devoid of recent liquidity and investment churn.
Current Quarter Transactions
Humphreys County Saw No Landlord Transactions in Q4 2025
With 0 total transactions in Q4 2025, landlords held a 0.0% share of the market, and there was no activity from any investor tier. This complete lack of transactional data prevents analysis of pricing by tier or inter-landlord trading activity for the quarter.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual Landlords Own 95.2% of SFR Properties in Humphreys County
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Humphreys County, Mississippi, collectively hold a portfolio of 462 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, representing 21.1% of the county's total SFR market of 2,193 properties. This significant concentration highlights the role of investors in the local housing landscape.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord sector in Humphreys County, owning 440 SFR properties, which accounts for 95.2% of all investor-owned SFR. In contrast, company-owned properties number only 30, making up a mere 6.5% of the total investor portfolio, challenging the narrative of corporate dominance in this market.

By entity count, individual landlords also represent the vast majority, with 474 individuals making up 94.4% of the 502 total landlords in the county, compared to just 28 company landlords. This significant disparity underscores the mom-and-pop nature of the investor market.

A striking 97.6% of landlord-owned properties (451 out of 462) are held outright as cash, with only 11 properties (2.4%) being financed. This high proportion of cash acquisitions points to a market where investors typically fund purchases without traditional mortgages.

Virtually all landlord-owned properties are focused on rental income, with 453 properties classified as rented. This indicates that the vast majority of investor holdings serve as non-owner-occupied rental units, fulfilling a critical role in the county's housing supply.

The portfolio composition reveals minimal financing activity, with only 11 properties being financed, contrasting sharply with the 451 cash properties. This trend suggests either strong liquidity among investors or a preference for avoiding debt in property acquisition within Humphreys County.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Humphreys County Saw No Recorded Landlord Acquisitions in Q4 2025 or Recent Years
Detailed Findings

A critical analysis of acquisition pricing data for Humphreys County, Mississippi, reveals a complete absence of recorded landlord or homeowner SFR purchases in Q4 2025, signaling an exceptionally dormant market for new acquisitions.

The available historical data points to similarly minimal activity, with 0 properties recorded as purchased by landlords during the entire 2020-2023 period. The stated average acquisition price of $44,200 for this period lacks context due to the absence of actual transactions, indicating data scarcity rather than robust market activity.

Without any recorded landlord or homeowner purchases in Q4 2025, it is impossible to establish current price comparisons between these buyer types. This lack of transactional data prevents an assessment of any potential pricing advantages or disadvantages for landlords.

Similarly, the absence of Q4 2025 acquisition data means there are no trends to analyze regarding changes in the landlord-homeowner price gap quarter-over-quarter. This market segment appears to be at a standstill.

Due to the comprehensive lack of recent acquisition data, it's not possible to determine any price appreciation trends from the pandemic era (2020-2023) to Q4 2025. The market simply shows no observable recent movement in purchase activity.

Furthermore, the data does not allow for a comparison of acquisition prices between individual and company landlords, as neither entity type recorded any purchases in Q4 2025 or the most recent historical periods, pointing to a universally inactive purchasing environment for investors in Humphreys County.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Q4 2025 Saw Zero Landlord or SFR Purchases in Humphreys County
Detailed Findings

Q4 2025 brought a complete halt to SFR purchase activity in Humphreys County, Mississippi, with 0 total SFR purchases recorded by any buyer type, including landlords. This signifies a profoundly stagnant market for new acquisitions during the quarter.

Consequently, landlords made 0 purchases in Q4 2025, resulting in a 0.0% share of the overall SFR purchase market. This reflects a period of absolute dormancy for investor activity in the county.

Given the absence of any landlord purchases, both mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) and institutional investors (Tier 09) recorded 0 acquisitions. This means 0.0% of landlord purchases came from mom-and-pops and 0.0% from institutions, as there were no purchases at all.

The lack of Q4 activity also indicates that no new landlords, including single-property (Tier 01) entrants, joined the market through purchases during this period. The absence of any transactional entities across all tiers underscores the current market inactivity.

With 0 properties acquired, the concept of average properties per entity by tier becomes moot for Q4 2025, as no entities were active in purchasing. This paints a picture of a market entirely devoid of new investment.

This complete lack of Q4 purchase activity across all tiers suggests that Humphreys County's SFR market experienced a significant pause in investor interest and transactional momentum, making it difficult to analyze buying patterns or concentrations for the period.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 99.4% of SFR Holdings in Humphreys County
Detailed Findings

The distribution of investor-owned properties in Humphreys County, Mississippi, reveals an overwhelming concentration within the smallest landlord segments. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) collectively control 99.4% of all investor-owned SFR properties, a dominant share of 469 properties.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone of the investor market, owning 403 distinct SFR properties, which accounts for a substantial 85.6% of the total landlord-owned portfolio. This highlights the prevalence of first-time or small-scale investors.

In stark contrast to the mom-and-pop dominance, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have a negligible presence in Humphreys County, holding only 1 property, which constitutes a mere 0.2% of the total landlord-owned SFR portfolio. This defies the common narrative of institutional takeover in this particular market.

Due to the absence of any recorded acquisitions in Q4 2025 or other recent timeframes, there is no current data to assess how acquisition prices might vary by investor tier. The available data primarily reflects existing ownership rather than recent transactional pricing.

Analyzing the number of entities per tier shows 403 single-property entities (Tier 01) holding 403 properties, while smaller landlords (Tier 02-04) collectively hold 65 properties across numerous entities, reinforcing the dispersed nature of ownership.

The average portfolio size per entity drastically decreases from Tier 01 (1 property per entity) to larger tiers (e.g., Tier 05-08 with 1 property across multiple entities, indicating sparse representation), further emphasizing the small-scale nature of investment in Humphreys County.

Comparing the current tier distribution to past periods is not possible due to a lack of historical acquisition data for specific tiers, preventing an analysis of how ownership concentration may have evolved over time in Humphreys County.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
Individual Investors Dominate All Observed Tiers in Humphreys County, No Company Crossover Point
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate company ownership across all observed portfolio tiers in Humphreys County, Mississippi. There is no clear crossover point where companies become the majority owners, even in larger, mid-size landlord tiers.

In the smallest tier, Single-property (Tier 01), individual investors own 389 properties (95.1%), significantly outpacing the 20 properties (4.9%) held by companies. This pattern of individual preference holds true as portfolio sizes increase.

For example, in the 3-5 property tier, individuals own 25 properties (83.3%), while companies hold 5 properties (16.7%). Similarly, in the 6-10 property tier, individual ownership stands at 17 properties (94.4%) against 1 property (5.6%) for companies, highlighting minimal corporate influence.

Due to the complete absence of recent acquisition pricing data for Q4 2025 or other timeframes, it is not possible to compare how individual versus company acquisition prices might differ within each tier. The market shows no recent transactional activity to analyze such pricing strategies.

The highest concentration of individual ownership by percentage is evident in tiers like Single-property (95.1%) and 6-10 properties (94.4%), confirming individuals as the pervasive force in the county's investor market.

Conversely, the highest company concentration is observed in the 3-5 property tier at 16.7%, though this still represents a small minority compared to individual holdings. Overall, company ownership remains negligible across all tiers.

Without historical acquisition data by owner type and tier, it is not possible to analyze how growth patterns might differ between individual and company investors over time in Humphreys County. The current data reflects a market overwhelmingly shaped by individual landlords.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
MS-Humphreys-39038 Leads Investor-Owned Property Count in Humphreys County
Detailed Findings

Within Humphreys County, Mississippi, the zip code MS-Humphreys-39038 emerges as the leader in investor-owned properties, accounting for 323 SFR units. This sub-geography alone represents a significant portion of the county's total investor-owned housing.

Following closely, MS-Humphreys-38754 has 57 investor-owned properties, while MS-Humphreys-39166 holds 38. These top three zip codes demonstrate a clear geographic concentration of investor activity within Humphreys County.

When examining investor ownership rates, MS-Humphreys-39166 stands out with the highest percentage, where 31.1% of all SFR properties are investor-owned. This indicates a high penetration of landlords within this specific area.

MS-Humphreys-39194 also shows a strong investor presence with 25.4% of its SFR properties being investor-owned, placing it as the second highest by rate. The third highest rate is MS-Humphreys-39038 at 21.5%, which also leads in total count.

The data shows a strong correlation between high property count and high ownership percentage in several top regions, such as MS-Humphreys-39038, which leads in count and ranks third in percentage. This suggests that areas with a large number of investor properties also tend to have a higher proportion of their housing stock owned by landlords.

Conversely, sub-geographies with lower investor ownership rates are not explicitly provided in the top 5 list, but the focus on these high-concentration areas highlights where investor influence is most pronounced within the county.

Without acquisition pricing data for these specific sub-geographies, it is not possible to analyze how investor purchase prices vary across different regions within Humphreys County. The current insights are limited to ownership patterns and density.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Key Insight
Humphreys County Reports No Historical Landlord Transactions, Signaling Stagnant Market
Detailed Findings

A comprehensive review of historical transaction data for Humphreys County, Mississippi, reveals a complete absence of recorded buy or sell transactions for all landlords across all timeframes. This signals an exceptionally stagnant market with no discernible investor buying or selling activity.

Given the 0 recorded buy transactions and 0 recorded sell transactions for all landlords, it is impossible to determine if the overall landlord market is a net buyer or seller, or to calculate a buy/sell ratio. The data simply indicates no market movement.

Similarly, institutional investors (Tier 1000+) also recorded 0 buy and 0 sell transactions across all available timeframes. This indicates that even the largest investors are not actively transacting in Humphreys County, underscoring a universally dormant market.

With no recorded buy or sell transactions, it is not possible to determine what percentage of buy or sell transactions involve inter-landlord trades. The absence of any activity means no market liquidity or property exchange between investors.

The lack of any transaction data also precludes an analysis of average buy prices versus average sell prices, making it impossible to infer implied profit margins for landlords in Humphreys County. There is no pricing movement to evaluate.

The consistent 0 transaction counts across all historical timeframes (Q4 2025, Q3 2025, Q2 2025, 2024, 2020-2023, All Time) for both all landlords and institutional investors highlights a sustained period of market inactivity. There are no changing buy/sell ratios or volume trends to observe.

The absence of institutional transaction patterns further reinforces the overall market dormancy. Institutional investor behavior mirrors the general landlord market, which is characterized by a complete lack of transactional data, providing no insights into their accumulation or divestment strategies in Humphreys County.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Humphreys County Saw No Landlord Transactions in Q4 2025
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, Humphreys County, Mississippi, experienced a complete absence of SFR transactions, with 0 total transactions recorded by any party, including landlords. This signifies a profoundly inactive market for property exchanges during the quarter.

Consequently, landlords were involved in 0 transactions in Q4 2025, resulting in a 0.0% share of the overall transaction market. This reflects a period of absolute dormancy for investor and general market activity in the county.

Given the lack of any landlord transactions, it is impossible to analyze how transaction volumes vary across investor tiers, as all tiers recorded 0 transactions. This indicates a uniform inactivity across all segments of the investor market.

The absence of Q4 transactions also means there is no data to determine average purchase prices by tier, making it impossible to identify which investor sizes might pay more or less for properties. All average purchase prices are $0 due to lack of activity.

Similarly, there was no inter-landlord trading activity, as 0 properties were bought from other landlords. This indicates a complete lack of liquidity within the investor-to-investor segment of the market for the quarter.

Without any purchase price data, it is not possible to determine a price spread between the highest and lowest paying tiers. The market's stillness precludes any pricing comparisons or insights into tier-specific strategies.

The complete inactivity across all tiers in Q4 2025 (0 transactions for both mom-and-pop and institutional segments) starkly contrasts with the existing ownership distribution, which shows mom-and-pop landlords holding a significant majority. This suggests a market where existing holdings are stable but no new activity is occurring.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Humphreys County: Dormant Market with 99.4% Mom-and-Pop Dominance and No Q4 Activity
Holdings
Landlords in Humphreys County, Mississippi, own 462 SFR properties, constituting 21.1% of the total SFR market. Individual investors command 95.2% of these holdings (440 properties), while companies own a mere 6.5% (30 properties).
Pricing
There were no recorded landlord or homeowner SFR purchases in Humphreys County in Q4 2025, precluding any current price comparison or discount analysis. Historical data shows 0 acquisitions between 2020-2023, indicating prolonged market inactivity.
Activity
Q4 2025 saw no recorded SFR purchases in Humphreys County by landlords or any other buyers, resulting in a 0.0% landlord purchase share. This signifies an entirely dormant acquisition market, with no new landlord formation.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 99.4% of investor-owned housing in Humphreys County. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.2% share, underscoring extreme mom-and-pop dominance.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate all observed tiers in Humphreys County, with no tier showing companies as majority owners. For instance, in the 3-5 property tier, individuals own 83.3% of properties compared to companies at 16.7%.
Transactions
Landlords in Humphreys County recorded 0 buy and 0 sell transactions in Q4 2025 and historically, making it impossible to determine a net buyer/seller status. Institutional investors also showed 0 transactions, indicating a completely illiquid market.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in Humphreys County, Mississippi, is characterized by an overwhelming dominance of individual, small-scale landlords and a profoundly stagnant transactional market. Landlords collectively own 462 SFR properties, representing a significant 21.1% of the county's total SFR market. Critically, individual investors hold 95.2% of these properties, totaling 440 units, compared to a marginal 6.5% owned by companies. This structure, where mom-and-pop landlords control 99.4% of all investor-owned housing, starkly contrasts with national narratives of corporate market takeover.

Humphreys County's investor behavior in Q4 2025 and recent years points to an extremely inactive market. There were no recorded SFR purchases by landlords or traditional homeowners in Q4 2025, indicating a complete halt in acquisition activity. This dormancy extends to transaction patterns, with no historical buy or sell transactions recorded for either all landlords or institutional investors. Consequently, no pricing comparisons to homeowners, buy/sell ratios, or insights into potential profit margins can be discerned, as the market lacks any discernible movement.

The overall picture for Humphreys County signals a market of stable, long-term holdings predominantly by individual investors, with almost no recent activity or liquidity. The negligible presence of institutional investors (owning only 1 property or 0.2%) further solidifies the local, small-investor nature of the market. This scenario suggests a mature market with limited churn, where existing small landlords maintain their portfolios rather than actively expanding or divesting, presenting a unique, localized dynamic in the broader housing landscape.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 04:30 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyHumphreys (MS)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct