Harrison (MS) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Harrison (MS) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Harrison (MS)
63,370
Total Investors in Harrison (MS)
10,006
Investor Owned SFR in Harrison (MS)
11,991(18.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
8,376
SFR Owned
7,489
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
1,630
SFR Owned
4,573
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 11,991 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Harrison County with 78.6% Ownership, Securing 21.1% Discounts.
Harrison County landlords own 11,991 SFR properties (18.9% of the market), primarily mom-and-pop investors who control 78.6% of the portfolio. Landlords obtained a significant 21.1% discount compared to homeowners in Q4, driving their 22.5% share of Q4 purchases. While overall landlords are strong net buyers (2.71x buy/sell ratio), institutional investors showed net neutral activity in Q4.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Harrison County landlords own 11,991 SFR properties, with individuals holding 62.5% of the portfolio.
An overwhelming 95.0% of these properties are rented, primarily acquired with cash (87.3%). Individual landlords make up 83.7% of all landlord entities in Harrison County.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a significant 21.1% discount in Q4 2025, paying $225,110 versus homeowners' $285,275.
This $60,165 discount in Q4 represents a widening gap, up from a 15.2% discount ($45,202) in Q2 2025. Landlord acquisition prices in Harrison County have appreciated by 7.4% since the 2020-2023 period.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 166 SFR properties in Q4 2025, capturing 22.5% of total market purchases.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) dominated with 80.4% of landlord purchases (135 properties), while institutional investors only bought 4.8% (8 properties). Harrison County saw 133 new single-property landlords enter the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 78.6% of investor-owned SFR housing.
Single-property landlords alone hold 51.0% (6,316 properties) of the market, dwarfing institutional investors who manage only 0.4% (53 properties). This signifies a highly fragmented and localized ownership landscape in Harrison County.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors dominate small portfolios, but companies assume majority ownership at the 6-10 property tier.
Companies represent 53.6% of owners in the 6-10 property tier and soar to 90.6% in the 51-100 property tier. This marks a significant shift in investor type as portfolio size increases within Harrison County.
Geographic Distribution
Zip codes 39503 and 39501 lead Harrison County with 2,752 and 2,286 investor-owned properties respectively.
Zip code 39501 also shows the highest investor ownership rate at 35.6%, followed closely by 39530 at 34.8%. This highlights strong concentration in these core areas of Harrison County.
Historical Transactions
All landlords in Harrison County remained strong net buyers in Q4, with a 2.71x buy/sell ratio.
They purchased 222 properties while selling 82, showing a consistent accumulation trend across 2024 and 2025. In contrast, institutional investors were net neutral in Q3 and Q4 2025 (11 buys vs 11 sells).
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for 20.3% of all 1,091 Q4 transactions, making 222 property purchases.
Institutional investors pay 2.2% less than single-property landlords ($228,243 vs $233,449), and over half (54.5%) of their purchases were from other landlords. The highest volume came from single-property landlords (133 transactions) in Harrison County.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Harrison County landlords own 11,991 SFR properties, with individuals holding 62.5% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Harrison County's real estate market sees significant investor activity, with landlords owning 11,991 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, representing 18.9% of the total SFR market of 63,370 properties. This high penetration underscores the importance of investor activity in the local housing landscape.

Individual investors, often referred to as mom-and-pop landlords, are the dominant force in the county's SFR rental market, owning 7,489 properties (62.5%) compared to companies which hold 4,573 properties (38.1%). This indicates a largely decentralized ownership structure, challenging narratives of corporate dominance.

The vast majority of landlord-owned properties, 11,390 (95.0%), are rented, highlighting that investor activity in Harrison County is primarily geared towards providing rental housing. This demonstrates a strong focus on generating rental income rather than speculative short-term holdings.

A remarkable 87.3% of investor-owned properties, totaling 10,464, were acquired with cash, signifying a strong financial position among landlords in the county and a preference for debt-free assets. Only 1,527 properties (12.7%) are financed, indicating a low reliance on mortgages.

The sheer number of individual landlords, 8,376, dwarfs company entities at 1,630, establishing a ratio of approximately 5.14 individual landlords for every company. Despite companies owning 38.1% of properties, they represent only 16.3% of the landlord entities, indicating larger average portfolios for company owners.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a significant 21.1% discount in Q4 2025, paying $225,110 versus homeowners' $285,275.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Harrison County consistently demonstrate superior acquisition strategies, securing an average price of $225,110 in 2025-Q4, a substantial $60,165 (21.1%) less than the $285,275 paid by traditional homeowners. This significant discount highlights landlords' ability to find and close deals below market rates.

The pricing advantage for landlords has notably widened over the year. After a 15.2% discount ($45,202) in Q2 2025, the gap expanded to 19.5% ($55,792) in Q1, and further to 21.4% ($60,994) in Q3, culminating in the 21.1% discount in Q4. This trend suggests landlords are increasingly adept at acquiring properties at more favorable prices relative to the broader market.

Despite fluctuations in the discount, landlord acquisition prices have shown overall appreciation. The average price for landlords in 2025 was $233,012, a 7.4% increase from the $209,643 average seen during the 2020-2023 pandemic-era boom. This indicates continued market value growth for investor-held assets.

The quarterly landlord acquisition prices exhibit volatility, peaking at $251,932 in Q2 2025 before settling back to $225,110 in Q4. This suggests a dynamic market where pricing opportunities shift, but landlords maintain a structural advantage against homeowners.

For the full year 2025, landlord average acquisition prices stood at $233,012, slightly below the $237,813 average from 2024. This marginal decline could indicate a slight cooling or increased negotiating leverage for landlords in the current year compared to the preceding one.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 166 SFR properties in Q4 2025, capturing 22.5% of total market purchases.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Harrison County actively engaged in the market, purchasing 166 Single Family Residential properties. This volume represents a significant 22.5% share of the total 738 SFR properties sold in the quarter, indicating their continued influence on local housing dynamics.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were the driving force behind Q4 investor activity, accounting for 135 properties or 80.4% of all landlord purchases. This robust participation from smaller investors contrasts sharply with institutional investors (Tier 09), who acquired only 8 properties (4.8%).

The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) exhibited the highest purchase activity, with 97 properties acquired by 133 entities. This signifies a vibrant entry point for new investors or existing landlords expanding their portfolios minimally, making up 57.7% of all landlord-purchased properties this quarter.

The presence of 133 new entities identified as single-property landlords in Q4 2025 suggests a healthy influx of new individual investors entering the rental market. This trend underscores the continued accessibility and appeal of SFR investments for smaller players.

Despite institutional investors (Tier 09) having large portfolios, their Q4 purchase activity in Harrison County was limited to 8 properties across 2 entities. This indicates a very selective or cautious approach from larger players compared to the widespread activity observed among smaller investor tiers.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 78.6% of investor-owned SFR housing.
Detailed Findings

The structure of investor-owned SFR properties in Harrison County is dominated by smaller landlords, with mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04) collectively controlling a substantial 78.6% of the market. This equates to 9,735 properties, highlighting their foundational role in the local rental housing supply.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone of the investor market, owning 6,316 properties, which represents 51.0% of all landlord-held SFRs. Their significant presence underscores that the typical investor in Harrison County is an individual with a single rental unit.

In stark contrast to the small landlord dominance, institutional investors (Tier 09), those owning 1000+ properties, maintain a minimal footprint, controlling only 53 properties or 0.4% of the total investor-owned SFR market. This severely challenges the common perception of widespread institutional control in this county.

The distribution of properties beyond mom-and-pop tiers shows a gradual decline in percentage as portfolio size increases, with Tiers 11-20 (4.5%), 21-50 (6.6%), 51-100 (6.5%), and 101-1000 (3.3%) each holding relatively small shares. This reinforces the fragmented nature of ownership, even among mid-sized landlords.

The combined share of all larger investor tiers (11+ properties, Tiers 05-09) amounts to 21.3% (4.5% + 6.6% + 6.5% + 3.3% + 0.4%), totaling 2,643 properties. This confirms that the vast majority of investor-owned housing in Harrison County is held by smaller entities.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors dominate small portfolios, but companies assume majority ownership at the 6-10 property tier.
Detailed Findings

A clear transition in ownership dynamics emerges as portfolio sizes increase in Harrison County: individual landlords overwhelmingly dominate the smallest tiers, but companies quickly become the primary owners in larger portfolios. Single-property (Tier 01) ownership is 85.4% individual vs 14.6% company.

The critical crossover point where company ownership surpasses individual ownership occurs in the small landlord Tier 06-10. Here, companies own 53.6% of properties (378 properties) compared to individuals at 46.4% (327 properties), signaling a strategic shift for portfolio expansion.

For larger tiers, company dominance becomes even more pronounced. In the small-medium (11-20) tier, companies own 82.0% (459 properties), escalating to 90.6% (727 properties) in the medium-large (51-100) tier. This trend highlights the increasing prevalence of corporate structures for managing larger portfolios.

Individual investors, while strong in the smaller tiers, still maintain a presence in larger portfolios, owning 101 properties (18.0%) in the 11-20 tier and 75 properties (9.4%) in the 51-100 tier. This indicates a segment of private individuals with substantial property holdings.

The distribution clearly illustrates that while the "face" of the rental market in Harrison County is largely individual, larger-scale operations involving multiple properties are predominantly managed by company entities, indicating a strategic preference for corporate structures for portfolio growth.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Zip codes 39503 and 39501 lead Harrison County with 2,752 and 2,286 investor-owned properties respectively.
Detailed Findings

Investor-owned properties in Harrison County are highly concentrated within specific zip codes, with MS-Harrison-39503 leading by count with 2,752 properties and MS-Harrison-39501 following with 2,286 properties. These two areas alone represent a significant portion of the county's investor portfolio.

The highest investor ownership rates are found in MS-Harrison-39501, where 35.6% of SFR properties are investor-owned, and MS-Harrison-39530, with a 34.8% investor ownership rate. These figures indicate particularly deep market penetration by landlords in these areas.

A clear correlation exists between high property counts and high investor ownership percentages in Harrison County. Zip codes 39501, 39507, and 39530 appear prominently in both the top-by-count and top-by-percentage lists, suggesting these are central hubs for rental housing activity.

MS-Harrison-39507 stands out with 1,192 investor-owned properties and a 22.1% ownership rate, positioning it as another key area for investor operations, albeit with a slightly lower density compared to the top two percentage leaders.

The geographic distribution signals that investors are strategically focusing their holdings within specific, high-demand areas of Harrison County, rather than spreading thinly across the entire region. This concentration creates distinct sub-markets for investor activity.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
All landlords in Harrison County remained strong net buyers in Q4, with a 2.71x buy/sell ratio.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Harrison County are decisively net buyers, consistently acquiring more properties than they sell. In Q4 2025, they bought 222 properties and sold 82, resulting in a strong 2.71x buy/sell ratio, indicating continued confidence in market accumulation.

This net buying trend is consistent throughout the year, with total 2025 transactions showing 1,021 buys against 347 sells, a 2.94x buy/sell ratio. This follows a similar pattern in 2024 where landlords executed 1,084 buys and 288 sells, a 3.76x ratio, demonstrating a sustained growth strategy.

In contrast to overall landlord behavior, institutional investors (1000+ tier) exhibited a net neutral position in Q4 2025, buying 11 properties and selling 11. This mirrors their Q3 2025 activity (15 buys vs 15 sells), suggesting a period of balancing portfolios rather than aggressive expansion or divestment.

Despite recent neutrality, institutional investors were net buyers for the full year 2025, with 56 buys against 41 sells, resulting in a 1.37x buy/sell ratio. This indicates a cautious but still accumulative strategy over a longer horizon.

The overall market liquidity for landlords remains high, with quarterly buy volumes consistently above 220 properties and sell volumes remaining below 105. This dynamic ensures a healthy flow of properties for investor acquisition.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 20.3% of all 1,091 Q4 transactions, making 222 property purchases.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were involved in a substantial portion of Harrison County's Q4 2025 market, participating in 222 transactions, which represents 20.3% of the total 1,091 SFR transactions. This shows their continued active engagement in the market.

Transaction activity is heavily concentrated among single-property landlords (Tier 01), who accounted for 133 transactions. This dominance aligns with their high overall ownership share and highlights their significant impact on quarterly market liquidity and entry-level investment.

An intriguing pricing strategy appears across tiers: while single-property landlords (Tier 01) paid an average of $233,449, institutional investors (Tier 09) secured properties at a slightly lower average of $228,243, representing a 2.2% discount. However, the widest price spread was between Tier 03-05 ($97,450) and Tier 06-10 ($271,634).

Inter-landlord trading is most pronounced among larger investors; institutional landlords (Tier 09) acquired 54.5% (6 of 11 transactions) of their properties from other landlords, suggesting a more active internal market among larger players for portfolio adjustments. Two-property landlords also showed high inter-landlord activity at 46.7% (7 of 15 transactions).

The average purchase price for smaller landlords varies significantly by tier: Tier 03-05 investors paid the least at $97,450, while Tier 06-10 investors paid the most at $271,634. This suggests diverse acquisition strategies and property types targeted by different small landlord segments.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Drive Harrison County Market, Securing Discounts While Institutions Balance Portfolios.
Holdings
Landlords in Harrison County own 11,991 SFR properties, representing 18.9% of the total SFR market of 63,370 properties. Individual investors account for 7,489 properties (62.5%), while companies hold 4,573 properties (38.1%).
Pricing
Landlords paid $225,110 in Q4 2025, securing a substantial $60,165 (21.1%) discount compared to traditional homeowners who paid $285,275. Landlord acquisition prices in Harrison County have appreciated by 7.4% since the 2020-2023 period.
Activity
In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 166 properties, capturing 22.5% of all SFR sales. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, acquiring 97 properties, and 133 new single-property landlord entities entered the market.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties, Tiers 01-04) collectively control a dominant 78.6% (9,735 properties) of Harrison County's investor-owned housing. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties, Tier 09) hold a mere 0.4% (53 properties).
Ownership Type
While individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, owning 85.4% of single-property units, company ownership surpasses individuals at the 6-10 property tier, where they hold 53.6%. Companies further solidify their control in larger portfolios, reaching 90.6% in the 51-100 property tier.
Transactions
All landlords in Harrison County are consistent net buyers, with a 2.71x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025 (222 buys vs 82 sells) and a 2.94x ratio for the full year. Institutional investors, however, demonstrated a net neutral position in Q3 and Q4 2025, with 11 buys and 11 sells in the most recent quarter.
Market Narrative

Harrison County's Single Family Residential (SFR) rental market is substantially shaped by investors, who collectively own 11,991 properties, representing 18.9% of the entire SFR market. This landscape is overwhelmingly dominated by individual "mom-and-pop" landlords, who control 62.5% of all investor-owned properties. The smallest investor segment, those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04), accounts for a remarkable 78.6% of the total investor portfolio, demonstrating a highly decentralized and localized ownership structure. In stark contrast, large institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a minimal 0.4% share, challenging prevalent narratives of corporate dominance.

Landlords in Harrison County exhibit sharp acquisition strategies, consistently securing properties at a significant discount compared to traditional homeowners. In Q4 2025, landlords paid $225,110, a substantial 21.1% ($60,165) less than the $285,275 paid by homeowners. This pricing advantage has widened over the past year, contributing to landlords' 22.5% share of all Q4 SFR purchases. While landlords overall remain strong net buyers (2.71x buy/sell ratio in Q4), institutional investors have shifted to a net neutral transaction stance in both Q3 and Q4 2025, balancing buys with sells and indicating a period of portfolio optimization rather than aggressive expansion.

The market dynamics in Harrison County underscore the critical role of small, individual investors in providing rental housing. Their robust purchasing activity, combined with their ability to acquire properties at significant discounts, ensures a steady supply of rental units. The limited and recently balanced activity of institutional players suggests that the local market is largely driven by smaller-scale, entrepreneurial landlord operations. This pattern highlights a resilient and accessible market for individual investors, further concentrated in key zip codes like MS-Harrison-39501 and MS-Harrison-39503, which exhibit the highest investor ownership rates and property counts in Harrison County.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 04:28 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyHarrison (MS)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail