Calhoun (MS) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Calhoun (MS) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Calhoun (MS)
4,596
Total Investors in Calhoun (MS)
1,856
Investor Owned SFR in Calhoun (MS)
1,903(41.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,578
SFR Owned
1,533
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
278
SFR Owned
375
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,903 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Calhoun County, securing significant discounts amidst low institutional presence.
Landlords in Calhoun County, Mississippi, own 1,903 SFR properties, comprising 41.4% of the total market, overwhelmingly led by individual investors (80.6%). In Q4 2025, landlords secured a substantial 53.2% discount compared to homeowners and were net buyers, while institutional activity remained negligible and net selling.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual investors own 80.6% of Calhoun County's 1,903 landlord-owned SFR properties.
Almost all investor properties are rented (1,885 properties) and were acquired either via cash (1,788 properties) or financing (115 properties). By entity count, individual landlords outnumber companies by over 5.6 times, with 1,578 individuals versus 278 companies.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 53.2% less than homeowners in Q4, securing a $119,403 discount per property.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners has been highly volatile, swinging from a 67.1% landlord premium in Q2 2025 to a 53.2% discount in Q4. For the full year 2025, landlords acquired properties at an average price of $163,793, significantly higher than the 2024 average of $92,974, indicating rising acquisition costs year-over-year.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 58.1% of all SFR purchases in Q4, acquiring 25 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) were solely responsible for Q4 investor activity, accounting for 100.0% of all landlord purchases (25 properties), with institutional investors (Tier 09) making no acquisitions. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, with 25 entities acquiring 18 properties, representing 72.0% of all landlord purchases this quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 95.0% of Calhoun County's investor-owned SFR.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone of this dominance, holding 77.0% of all investor-owned properties. Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have no ownership footprint in Calhoun County, indicating a market entirely shaped by smaller-scale investors. The distribution of ownership heavily favors the smallest portfolios, with 95.0% held by those with 10 properties or fewer.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become majority owners in Tier 11-20 portfolios, surpassing individual investors.
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smallest portfolios, holding 85.1% of single-property (Tier 01) holdings and 84.1% of two-property (Tier 02) holdings. This shifts significantly in larger tiers, with companies accounting for 53.6% of properties in the 11-20 property tier. The highest individual concentration is in Tier 01, while the highest company concentration is in Tier 11-20.
Geographic Distribution
MS-Calhoun-38839 leads Calhoun County with an 81.9% investor ownership rate.
Zip codes MS-Calhoun-38915 and MS-Calhoun-38916 represent significant concentrations of investor-owned properties, combining for 1,271 properties (66.8% of the county's total investor-owned SFR). While 38839 has the highest ownership rate, 38915 and 38916 hold the highest raw counts, indicating both dense and highly penetrated investor markets within the county.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Calhoun County are strong net buyers with an 8.1x buy/sell ratio in 2025.
This strong buying trend is consistent, with Q2 2025 seeing a peak ratio of 14.67x (44 buys vs 3 sells). In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ tier) were net sellers for both 2024 and 2025, divesting 3 properties while acquiring only 1 in each year, highlighting a diverging strategy from the overall landlord market.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for 55.0% of all Q4 transactions, making 33 purchases in Calhoun County.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) drove Q4 activity with 25 transactions at an average price of $112,898. Institutional investors (Tier 09) had no transactions. For Tier 01, 16.0% of transactions involved buying from another landlord, highlighting some inter-landlord market fluidity for smaller portfolios.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual investors own 80.6% of Calhoun County's 1,903 landlord-owned SFR properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Calhoun County, Mississippi, control a significant portion of the housing market, owning 1,903 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, which accounts for 41.4% of all SFR properties in the county.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord landscape, holding 1,533 properties (80.6%) compared to companies owning 375 properties (19.7%). This highlights the prevalence of mom-and-pop operations in the local rental market.

The vast majority of investor-owned properties are utilized as rentals, with 1,885 properties designated as rented, closely aligning with the total investor-owned portfolio of 1,903 SFRs.

Regarding acquisition methods, 1,788 (93.9%) of landlord-owned properties were purchased with cash, while 115 (6.0%) were financed, indicating a strong preference for cash transactions among investors in the county.

At the entity level, individual landlords significantly outnumber company landlords, with 1,578 individual entities comprising 85.0% of all landlords, versus 278 company entities (15.0%). This further underscores the market's reliance on smaller-scale investors.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 53.2% less than homeowners in Q4, securing a $119,403 discount per property.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords demonstrated a significant pricing advantage in Calhoun County, acquiring properties at an average of $105,202—a substantial 53.2% less than traditional homeowners who paid $224,605, representing a $119,403 discount per property.

The pricing dynamics between landlords and homeowners have been markedly inconsistent throughout 2025, with landlords paying a 67.1% premium in Q2 ($292,695 vs $175,131), followed by discounts of 41.0% in Q3 and 53.2% in Q4. This extreme volatility suggests opportunistic buying rather than a consistent price advantage.

Landlord acquisition prices saw a notable increase year-over-year, with the average price for 2025 reaching $163,793, a 76.2% jump from the 2024 average of $92,974, signaling a rapidly appreciating market or shifting purchase strategies.

Comparing Q4 2025 to Q1 2025, the landlord discount expanded dramatically from 19.9% ($24,576) to 53.2% ($119,403), highlighting a widening gap and improved buying conditions for investors towards the end of the year.

Despite the overall trend of landlords securing discounts, the Q2 2025 anomaly where landlords paid a $117,564 premium (67.1%) suggests that certain types of properties or market conditions occasionally lead investors to outbid traditional buyers.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 58.1% of all SFR purchases in Q4, acquiring 25 properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords significantly influenced the Calhoun County housing market in Q4 2025, acquiring 25 SFR properties, which constituted a dominant 58.1% of the total 43 SFR purchases made in the quarter.

The Q4 acquisition landscape was exclusively driven by smaller investors, as mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounted for all 25 landlord purchases (100.0%), underscoring their critical role in the local market dynamics.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) remained entirely absent from the Q4 purchase activity in Calhoun County, registering 0 acquisitions, further emphasizing the market's reliance on smaller-scale investors.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active segment, with 25 entities acquiring 18 properties, representing 72.0% of all landlord purchases this quarter, indicating strong entry-level investment or expansion by small-scale operators.

The distribution of Q4 landlord purchases reveals a clear concentration in smaller tiers: Tier 01 (18 properties), Tier 02 (6 properties), and Tier 06-10 (1 property), collectively forming the entire landlord purchasing activity for the quarter.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 95.0% of Calhoun County's investor-owned SFR.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate the investor-owned housing market in Calhoun County, controlling a remarkable 95.0% of all landlord-held SFR properties.

This market structure is further cemented by single-property landlords (Tier 01), who alone account for 77.0% of the total 1,903 investor-owned SFR properties, totaling 1,475 holdings, signaling a highly fragmented and accessible market.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have no presence in Calhoun County, owning 0 properties. This complete absence challenges common narratives about large corporate dominance, at least at the county level in Mississippi.

The distribution across tiers reveals a steep drop-off after the smallest landlords: while Tier 01 holds 1,475 properties, Tier 02 holds 151 (7.9%), Tier 03-05 holds 130 (6.8%), and tiers above 10 properties combined account for only 5.0% of the total portfolio.

The lack of data on acquisition prices by tier for Calhoun County prevents an analysis of whether larger investors secure better deals, but the ownership concentration strongly suggests that the local market thrives on small-scale investment rather than high-volume purchasing strategies from larger entities.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become majority owners in Tier 11-20 portfolios, surpassing individual investors.
Detailed Findings

A clear shift in ownership structure occurs as portfolio size increases in Calhoun County: individual investors dominate smaller tiers, but companies emerge as majority owners in the 11-20 property tier, holding 53.6% of properties compared to individuals' 46.4%.

Individual investors are the primary force in the mom-and-pop segment, owning 85.1% of single-property portfolios (1,258 properties) and 84.1% of two-property portfolios (127 properties), reinforcing their foundational role in the market.

Even in larger mom-and-pop tiers like 6-10 properties, individuals still maintain a significant majority, controlling 67.2% of properties (43 holdings) compared to companies at 32.8% (21 holdings).

The inverse relationship between individual and company ownership by tier is a critical pattern, indicating that while individuals drive market entry and small-scale investment, companies become more prevalent as portfolio management scales beyond a certain point.

This data highlights that Calhoun County's investor market is not monolithic; individual investors are the prevalent face of small-scale landlording, while companies are focused on accumulating larger, albeit still mid-sized, portfolios, particularly from the 11-20 property range upwards.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
MS-Calhoun-38839 leads Calhoun County with an 81.9% investor ownership rate.
Detailed Findings

Within Calhoun County, MS-Calhoun-38839 stands out with an exceptionally high investor ownership rate of 81.9%, indicating that nearly four out of every five SFR properties in this zip code are owned by landlords.

MS-Calhoun-38915 and MS-Calhoun-38916 collectively account for a substantial portion of the county's investor-owned properties, with 675 and 596 properties respectively, totaling 1,271 properties or 66.8% of all investor-owned SFRs in Calhoun County.

While MS-Calhoun-38839 leads in investor ownership *rate*, MS-Calhoun-38915 leads in the sheer *count* of investor-owned properties (675), demonstrating different aspects of geographic concentration for investors within the county.

Other notable zip codes for investor activity include MS-Calhoun-38878 with 208 properties (27.2% rate) and MS-Calhoun-38951 with 111 properties (33.9% rate), showing a distributed but regionally concentrated landlord presence.

The discrepancy between leading by count and leading by percentage highlights that some zip codes, like 38839, have a smaller overall housing stock but a very high proportion of investor ownership, suggesting unique market dynamics or investment appeal in those specific areas.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords in Calhoun County are strong net buyers with an 8.1x buy/sell ratio in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Calhoun County are aggressively expanding their portfolios, evidenced by a robust net buyer position in 2025 with an 8.1x buy-to-sell ratio, translating to 170 property acquisitions against only 21 dispositions.

This buying momentum has been consistently strong across all quarters of 2025, reaching a peak in Q2 with 44 buys versus just 3 sells, signifying a highly acquisitive period for investors.

In sharp contrast to the overall landlord trend, institutional investors (1000+ tier) have been net sellers, divesting 3 properties while only acquiring 1 in both 2024 and 2025. This indicates a strategic withdrawal or market exit by larger entities in Calhoun County.

The year 2025 saw a substantial increase in landlord acquisition activity compared to 2024, with 170 buys in 2025 versus 115 in 2024, demonstrating accelerating market participation from investors.

The persistent high buy/sell ratios across multiple timeframes suggest a resilient and growing demand for SFR properties among individual and mid-size landlords in Calhoun County, despite any broader market uncertainties.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 55.0% of all Q4 transactions, making 33 purchases in Calhoun County.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were the dominant force in Q4 2025 transactions in Calhoun County, participating in 33 out of 60 total SFR transactions, representing a significant 55.0% share of the market activity.

Transaction volume was heavily concentrated in the smaller tiers, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) leading with 25 transactions at an average purchase price of $112,898, demonstrating strong activity at the entry level of investment.

Tier 02 landlords also contributed to the Q4 transaction volume with 7 transactions, though at a significantly lower average purchase price of $28,239, indicating diverse property values or investment strategies within smaller portfolios.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) had no recorded transactions in Q4 2025, further solidifying the trend of smaller, local investors driving the market activity in Calhoun County.

Inter-landlord trading was present but limited, with 16.0% (4 transactions) of Tier 01 purchases coming from other landlords, suggesting that while the market is active, a large portion of acquisitions are still from traditional sellers.

The substantial price difference between Tier 01 ($112,898) and Tier 02 ($28,239) transactions in Q4 indicates that single-property landlords are acquiring more valuable or higher-priced assets compared to those expanding their portfolios to two properties.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Calhoun County, securing deep discounts amid institutional retreat.
Holdings
Landlords own 1,903 SFR properties in Calhoun County, representing 41.4% of the total SFR market. Individual investors overwhelmingly comprise this portfolio, holding 1,533 properties (80.6%) compared to companies owning 375 properties (19.7%).
Pricing
Landlords in Calhoun County secured a remarkable 53.2% discount compared to traditional homeowners in Q4 2025, paying $105,202 versus $224,605. The price gap has been highly volatile throughout 2025, swinging from premiums to significant discounts.
Activity
Landlords drove Q4 2025 purchase activity, acquiring 25 properties and comprising 58.1% of all SFR sales. This activity was entirely led by mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04), with 25 single-property entities active in Q4.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 95.0% of all investor-owned housing in Calhoun County. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold no market share, underscoring the dominance of small-scale investors.
Ownership Type
Individual investors own 80.6% of landlord-held properties in Calhoun County, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 11-20 properties (53.6%). The smallest tiers, such as single-property portfolios, exhibit the highest individual concentration at 85.1%.
Transactions
Landlords in Calhoun County are strong net buyers with an 8.1x buy-to-sell ratio in 2025 (170 buys vs 21 sells). In contrast, institutional investors were net sellers in both 2024 and 2025 (1 buy vs 3 sells each year).
Market Narrative

Calhoun County, Mississippi, presents a unique real estate investment landscape, characterized by the overwhelming dominance of small-scale, mom-and-pop landlords. These investors collectively own 1,903 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, constituting a significant 41.4% of the county's entire SFR market. Crucially, individual investors command 80.6% of this portfolio (1,533 properties) compared to companies (19.7%, 375 properties), decisively shaping the market structure. The absence of institutional investors (1000+ properties) from the ownership landscape, holding 0.0% of properties, further reinforces that Calhoun County's rental market is driven by local, individual investors.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 highlights a market where landlords are highly active and financially astute. They accounted for 58.1% of all SFR purchases, acquiring 25 properties, and demonstrated a notable ability to secure advantageous pricing, paying 53.2% less than traditional homeowners. This translated to a $119,403 discount per property ($105,202 vs $224,605). Throughout 2025, landlords maintained a strong net buyer position with an 8.1x buy-to-sell ratio, indicating ongoing portfolio expansion. In stark contrast, institutional investors have been net sellers, offloading properties in both 2024 and 2025, signaling a retreat or lack of interest from larger entities in this market.

This data reveals a resilient and locally-driven investment market in Calhoun County, Mississippi, where small landlords are not only the primary owners but also the most active participants in transactions. The significant pricing advantage secured by landlords suggests a sophisticated understanding of local market dynamics or a willingness to pursue properties that traditional homeowners may overlook. The complete absence of institutional ownership and their net-selling position underscores that Calhoun County's SFR market remains primarily an opportunity for individual investors, fostering a highly localized and accessible rental housing environment.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 02:06 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyCalhoun (MS)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail