Stone (MO) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Stone (MO) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Stone (MO)
13,711
Total Investors in Stone (MO)
8,521
Investor Owned SFR in Stone (MO)
5,533(40.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
7,838
SFR Owned
5,131
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
683
SFR Owned
684
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 5,533 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Drive Stone County's SFR Market, Acquiring Half of All Q4 Sales
Landlords in Stone County, MO, own 5,533 SFR properties, representing 40.4% of the market, with individuals holding a dominant 92.7% of this portfolio. In Q4 2025, landlords, predominantly mom-and-pops, purchased 50.9% of all SFR properties, demonstrating significant market activity. While landlords paid a 15.4% premium over homeowners in Q4, they remain strong net buyers with a 12.92x buy/sell ratio, indicating continued market accumulation.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 5,533 SFR properties in Stone County, with individual investors holding 92.7%.
Nearly all landlord-owned properties (99.0%) are rented, confirming their rental-focused strategy. Most properties (67.1%) are acquired with cash, and individual landlords outnumber company landlords by an 11.47:1 ratio.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a 15.4% premium ($61,853) over homeowners for Q4 2025 acquisitions.
This landlord premium has fluctuated quarterly, peaking at 23.7% in Q2 2025, but consistently indicating landlords outbid homeowners. Acquisition prices in Stone County have appreciated significantly, rising from an average of $334,753 during 2020-2023 to $462,277 for landlords in Q4 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 50.9% of all SFR properties purchased in Q4 2025 in Stone County.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) accounted for 99.1% of all landlord purchases in Q4, acquiring 112 properties. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, comprising 85.0% of landlord purchases with 96 properties bought by 147 entities, indicating strong entry-level investment activity.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.2% of investor-owned SFR in Stone County.
The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) alone accounts for 86.4% of all investor-owned properties. Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.0% of the market with only 1 property, defying narratives of corporate dominance.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the Small-medium (21-50) tier, holding 66.7% of properties.
Individual investors dominate the smaller tiers, with 89.5% ownership in Tier 01 and 85.7% in Tier 02. Company concentration remains low in portfolios below 20 properties, but their share increases with tier size, marking a clear shift in ownership structure as portfolios grow.
Geographic Distribution
MO-Stone-64735 and MO-Stone-65675 zip codes show extreme investor concentration with 100.0% and 97.1% ownership rates.
The highest count of investor-owned properties is concentrated in MO-Stone-65737 (1,141 properties), followed by 65686 (870 properties). Zip codes like 65747 and 65681 appear in both top count and top percentage lists, indicating these regions are highly attractive to investors in Stone County.
Historical Transactions
All landlords are strong net buyers in Stone County, with a 12.92x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025.
Landlords consistently purchased far more properties than they sold throughout 2025 and 2024, signaling active portfolio expansion. Institutional investors (Tier 1000+) also exhibited net buying behavior in 2024 (2 buys vs 1 sell), though with very limited transaction volume.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords represented 45.9% of all Q4 2025 transactions in Stone County, totaling 168 trades.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) dominated Q4 transactions with 147 deals, reflecting significant activity from smaller investors. The average purchase price varied widely by tier, from a high of $851,643 for Tier 02 to a low of $130,340 for Tier 06-10, demonstrating diverse pricing strategies.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 5,533 SFR properties in Stone County, with individual investors holding 92.7%.
Detailed Findings

Landlords control a significant portion of the housing market in Stone County, MO, owning 5,533 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, which accounts for 40.4% of the total SFR market.

Individual landlords overwhelmingly dominate the investor landscape, holding 5,131 properties (92.7% of the investor-owned portfolio), while companies own a much smaller share of 684 properties (12.4%). This highlights a market largely driven by smaller, independent investors.

The landlord sector is heavily oriented towards rentals, with 5,480 properties (99.0% of investor holdings) identified as rented, underscoring their primary role in providing housing supply rather than owner-occupancy.

Cash acquisitions are the preferred method for landlords in Stone County, with 3,713 properties (67.1% of holdings) purchased outright, significantly outweighing financed properties at 1,820 (32.9%). This suggests a preference for debt-free ownership or robust capital reserves among investors.

The sheer number of individual landlords, totaling 7,838, compared to just 683 company landlords, translates to an 11.47:1 ratio, further cementing the prevalence of mom-and-pop investors in Stone County's SFR market.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a 15.4% premium ($61,853) over homeowners for Q4 2025 acquisitions.
Detailed Findings

In a notable shift from typical market dynamics, landlords in Stone County paid a significant premium for properties in Q4 2025, with an average acquisition price of $462,277, which is $61,853 (15.4%) higher than the average $400,424 paid by traditional homeowners.

This landlord premium has been a consistent pattern throughout 2025, demonstrating that investors are willing to pay more to secure properties. The premium fluctuated from 16.3% in Q1 to a high of 23.7% in Q2, before settling at 15.4% in Q4, indicating sustained competitive pressure from investors.

Despite zero reported landlord acquisitions in section6-1.csv for 2025-Q4, other data sources confirm 108 landlord purchases, for which these pricing comparisons are relevant. This suggests data reconciliation is needed, but the pricing trends remain observable for transactions that did occur.

The market has seen substantial price appreciation for landlord acquisitions, with average prices increasing from $334,753 during the 2020-2023 period to $462,277 in Q4 2025, reflecting a significant uplift in property values over the past few years.

The consistent landlord premium across quarters suggests a strong demand for investment properties in Stone County, with investors actively pursuing opportunities even if it means outbidding traditional buyers.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 50.9% of all SFR properties purchased in Q4 2025 in Stone County.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were highly active in the Q4 2025 market in Stone County, securing 108 of the 212 total SFR purchases, which represents a dominant 50.9% market share.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) almost exclusively drove investor activity, contributing 112 properties to landlord purchases (99.1% of the total landlord purchase volume), underscoring the fragmented and individual-investor led nature of the market.

The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) was the most dynamic segment, responsible for 96 purchases (85.0% of all landlord-acquired properties) involving 147 entities, suggesting a significant influx of new or expanding small-scale investors.

In contrast to the high activity of smaller investors, institutional investors (Tier 09) made no purchases in Q4 2025, further emphasizing the negligible role of large corporate entities in this county's housing market.

The breakdown of Q4 purchases by tier shows a clear concentration: Tier 01 (96 properties), followed by Tier 6-10 (7 properties), Tier 2 (5 properties), and Tier 3-5 (4 properties), with larger tiers showing minimal to no activity.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.2% of investor-owned SFR in Stone County.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) exert near-total control over the investor-owned SFR market in Stone County, collectively holding 99.2% of all properties, highlighting a highly fragmented ownership structure.

The most dominant segment is the single-property landlord (Tier 01), which accounts for 4,929 properties, representing 86.4% of the entire landlord-owned portfolio.

The presence of larger investors quickly diminishes: Tier 02 holds 6.7% (381 properties), Tier 03-05 holds 5.3% (302 properties), and Tier 06-10 holds 0.8% (48 properties), indicating a rapid fall-off in portfolio size.

Institutional investors (Tier 09), typically defined as owning 1000+ properties, hold only a single property, amounting to 0.0% of investor-owned SFR in Stone County, which strongly contradicts national narratives of widespread corporate investor takeover.

This distribution pattern reveals Stone County as a market fundamentally shaped by small-scale, individual investors, with virtually no penetration by large institutional players across all measured tiers.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the Small-medium (21-50) tier, holding 66.7% of properties.
Detailed Findings

While individual investors overwhelmingly lead in smaller portfolio sizes, a significant shift occurs at the Small-medium (21-50) tier, where companies become the majority owners, controlling 66.7% of properties compared to individuals' 33.3%.

Individual ownership is most pronounced in the smallest tier, with individuals holding 4,611 properties (89.5%) in the single-property (Tier 01) category, and 342 properties (85.7%) in the two-property (Tier 02) category, solidifying their 'mom-and-pop' identity.

The share of company ownership generally increases with tier size, rising from 10.5% in Tier 01 to 38.8% in Tier 06-10 and 34.4% in Tier 11-20, before surpassing individual ownership in the 21-50 property range.

This pattern indicates that individuals typically start and remain at smaller scales, while companies, though fewer in number, build larger portfolios, demonstrating different investment strategies across owner types.

The data clearly outlines a 'crossover point' where portfolio scale dictates the dominant owner type, showcasing that beyond a certain size threshold, corporate structures are more prevalent in managing larger real estate assets in Stone County.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
MO-Stone-64735 and MO-Stone-65675 zip codes show extreme investor concentration with 100.0% and 97.1% ownership rates.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Stone County, MO, exhibits extreme concentration within certain zip codes, with MO-Stone-64735 recording 100.0% investor-owned properties and MO-Stone-65675 showing a staggering 97.1% investor ownership rate.

While these areas lead in percentage, the highest volume of investor-owned properties is found in other zip codes, with MO-Stone-65737 having 1,141 properties and MO-Stone-65686 housing 870 properties, indicating different scales of investor presence.

Certain areas, such as MO-Stone-65747 (551 properties, 55.9% rate) and MO-Stone-65681 (717 properties, 53.4% rate), demonstrate a strong correlation between high property counts and high investor ownership percentages, highlighting particularly active investment zones.

This geographic distribution reveals a market where investors either fully dominate smaller, possibly more niche, sub-markets or significantly penetrate larger, more populous areas, suggesting a strategic approach to property acquisition across the county.

The variation between top count and top percentage regions indicates a diverse investment landscape, where some areas are saturated with investor properties, while others attract high volumes of investment due to overall market size or specific property characteristics.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
All landlords are strong net buyers in Stone County, with a 12.92x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Stone County are overwhelmingly net buyers, demonstrating a robust accumulation strategy with a 12.92x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025 (168 buys vs 13 sells).

This net buying trend is consistent across all reported timeframes, with 577 buys versus 45 sells for the entirety of 2025 (a 12.82x ratio) and 562 buys versus 35 sells in 2024 (a 16.06x ratio), indicating a prolonged period of portfolio expansion.

Despite their minimal overall presence in the county, institutional investors (1000+ tier) also acted as net buyers in 2024, acquiring 2 properties while selling 1, signaling a cautious but accumulative stance.

The sustained high buy-to-sell ratios across multiple quarters and years suggest that market conditions in Stone County remain attractive for landlords, encouraging them to add to their holdings rather than divest.

This strong buyer sentiment from landlords is a key indicator of market confidence and potential for continued growth in the investor-owned housing sector.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords represented 45.9% of all Q4 2025 transactions in Stone County, totaling 168 trades.
Detailed Findings

Landlords significantly influenced the Q4 2025 real estate market in Stone County, participating in 168 transactions, which accounts for 45.9% of all 366 SFR transactions during the quarter.

The majority of this activity originated from mom-and-pop investors, specifically the single-property (Tier 01) landlords, who completed 147 transactions, underscoring their critical role in market liquidity and property turnover.

Transaction prices varied dramatically across investor tiers: Tier 02 landlords paid the highest average of $851,643, while Tier 06-10 landlords secured properties at a considerably lower average of $130,340, indicating distinct market segments or property types targeted by different-sized investors.

Inter-landlord trading was notably high for Tier 06-10, with 87.5% of their 8 transactions (7 properties) bought from other landlords, suggesting active churning within this mid-sized investor segment. In contrast, Tier 01 relied far less on other landlords, with only 2.0% of its transactions being landlord-to-landlord.

This quarter's transaction data reinforces the dominance of smaller investors in Stone County, both in terms of transaction volume and overall market share, with institutional investors showing no Q4 transaction activity.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Drive Stone County's SFR Market, Capturing Half of Q4 Sales
Holdings
Landlords in Stone County, MO, collectively own 5,533 SFR properties, constituting 40.4% of the county's total SFR market. Individual investors dominate this portfolio, holding 5,131 properties (92.7%) compared to companies owning 684 properties (12.4%).
Pricing
Landlords paid an average of $462,277 for acquisitions in Q4 2025, a 15.4% premium ($61,853) over the $400,424 paid by traditional homeowners. This marks a significant appreciation from the 2020-2023 average of $334,753, reflecting a robust price trend.
Activity
Landlords were highly active in Q4 2025, purchasing 108 properties, which accounts for 50.9% of all SFR sales in Stone County. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) led this activity, with 147 entities involved in acquiring 96 properties.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties, Tiers 01-04) overwhelmingly control 99.2% of investor-owned SFR housing, with the single-property tier (Tier 01) alone comprising 86.4%. Institutional investors (Tier 09) hold a negligible 0.0% market share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors hold the majority in smaller portfolio tiers (e.g., 89.5% in Tier 01), but companies become the dominant owners in the Small-medium (21-50) tier, controlling 66.7% of properties in that segment.
Transactions
Overall, landlords in Stone County are strong net buyers with a 12.92x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025 (168 buys vs 13 sells), signaling active accumulation. Institutional investors also show a net buyer position for 2024 (2 buys vs 1 sell), though with minimal transaction volume.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in Stone County, MO, is overwhelmingly shaped by individual, 'mom-and-pop' landlords, who collectively own 5,533 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, representing a substantial 40.4% of the entire SFR market. This dominance is further illustrated by individual investors holding 92.7% of the investor-owned portfolio, starkly contrasting with the mere 12.4% held by companies. Small landlords (Tiers 01-04) control an astounding 99.2% of all investor-owned housing, effectively marginalizing the presence of large institutional investors, who hold a negligible 0.0%.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 underscores a highly active and acquisitive market. Landlords purchased 108 properties, accounting for 50.9% of all SFR sales, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) being the primary drivers. This quarter also revealed a unique pricing trend where landlords paid a 15.4% premium over traditional homeowners for their acquisitions, totaling $462,277 per property. Despite this premium, landlords remain consistent net buyers, with a robust 12.92x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4, signaling continued portfolio expansion rather than divestment. Transaction prices show significant variation by tier, indicating distinct investment strategies among different landlord sizes.

This data portrays Stone County as a dynamic market where grassroots investors are the principal players, actively growing their portfolios and demonstrating strong confidence in the local housing market. The absence of significant institutional ownership suggests a resilient market for small-scale investors, less influenced by large corporate strategies. The consistent net buying activity and willingness to pay a premium indicate that demand for investment properties remains high, reflecting a healthy and competitive environment for individual landlords across Stone County, Missouri.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 01:23 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyStone (MO)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail