Phelps (MO) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Phelps (MO) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Phelps (MO)
9,831
Total Investors in Phelps (MO)
2,360
Investor Owned SFR in Phelps (MO)
2,621(26.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,953
SFR Owned
1,784
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
407
SFR Owned
838
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,621 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Phelps County's 88.6% ownership amid net buying.
Phelps County landlords own 2,621 SFR properties (26.7% of the market), with individuals holding 68.1% and companies 32.0%. In Q4 2025, landlords made 3 purchases (18.8% of sales) at a 77.3% discount, while overall landlords were net buyers for 2025. Institutional investors maintain a negligible presence and neutral transaction position.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 2,621 SFR properties in Phelps County, 68.1% held by individuals.
Rented properties constitute 97.4% of landlord holdings (2,554 properties), while 92.4% were cash acquisitions (2,421 properties), with only 200 properties financed. Individual landlords outnumber companies by a 4.80:1 ratio (1,953 vs 407 entities).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlord acquisition pricing is highly volatile due to low Q4 purchase volumes.
In Q4 2025, landlords reported an average purchase price of $43,750 compared to homeowners' $192,613, representing a $148,863 (77.3%) discount on their 3 purchases. This contrasts sharply with a 28.3% premium landlords paid in Q3 2025 ($356,833 vs $278,209).
Current Quarter Purchases
Mom-and-pop investors drove all Q4 landlord purchases in Phelps County.
Landlords accounted for just 3 of the 16 total SFR purchases in Q4 2025, representing 18.8% of the market. All 3 properties were acquired by single-property (Tier 01) landlords, with institutional investors showing no purchasing activity.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 88.6% of investor-owned SFR in Phelps County.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the largest segment, owning 1,510 properties (55.7% of the total investor-owned portfolio). Institutional investors (Tier 09) have a negligible presence, holding just 1 property (0.0%).
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become majority owners in Phelps County at the 11-20 property tier.
Individual investors hold a strong majority in smaller portfolios, owning 82.5% of single-property (Tier 01) holdings, but their share decreases to 50.0% at the 6-10 property tier where company ownership equals individual. No pricing data by owner type is available in this section.
Geographic Distribution
Phelps County investor properties concentrate in Rolla (65401), holding 1,786 properties.
While zip code 65401 has the most investor-owned properties (1,786 properties), zip code 65409 shows the highest investor penetration, with 90.9% of its SFR properties being investor-owned. Other zip codes like 65449 and 65436 also exhibit high ownership rates at 62.5% and 50.0% respectively.
Historical Transactions
Phelps County landlords are net buyers with a 5.52x buy/sell ratio in 2025.
All landlords consistently remained net buyers throughout 2024 and 2025, with a 2.0x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025 (4 buys vs 2 sells). In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ tier) showed minimal activity, with a net neutral position of 1 buy and 1 sell in 2025-Q2, making them net neutral for the year.
Current Quarter Transactions
Single-property landlords drove 100% of Q4 landlord transactions in Phelps County.
Landlords were involved in only 4 of the 18 total Q4 transactions, representing 22.2% of the market. All 4 landlord transactions were executed by single-property (Tier 01) landlords at an average price of $43,750, with no reported purchases originating from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 2,621 SFR properties in Phelps County, 68.1% held by individuals.
Detailed Findings

Phelps County's landlords control 2,621 SFR properties, representing 26.7% of the total 9,831 SFR properties in the market, signifying a substantial portion of the local housing stock.

Individual investors, commonly known as mom-and-pop landlords, own the majority of the SFR portfolio with 1,784 properties (68.1%), significantly outpacing the 838 properties (32.0%) held by companies.

The overwhelming focus of investor properties is on rentals, with 2,554 properties (97.4% of landlord holdings) currently rented, indicating a highly active rental market for investor-owned units.

A substantial 92.4% (2,421 properties) of landlord holdings were acquired with cash, suggesting a preference for unfinanced assets or robust financial capacity among investors in Phelps County.

Despite companies holding nearly a third of the properties, individual landlords are far more numerous, with 1,953 entities compared to 407 company entities, demonstrating that the market is primarily driven by smaller, independent operators.

The low number of financed properties (200) compared to cash (2,421) and rented (2,554) properties suggests that most rental units are owned outright, which could provide greater stability for landlords during economic fluctuations.

The disparity between individual (68.1% of properties) and company (32.0% of properties) ownership highlights the predominant role of individual investors, who collectively manage nearly twice as many properties as corporate entities.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlord acquisition pricing is highly volatile due to low Q4 purchase volumes.
Detailed Findings

Landlord acquisition pricing in Phelps County experienced extreme quarter-over-quarter volatility in 2025, largely attributed to very low purchase volumes by investors, notably with 0 distinct properties purchased reported for most periods.

In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 3 properties at an average price of $43,750, securing a $148,863 (77.3%) discount compared to traditional homeowners who paid $192,613.

This significant Q4 discount follows a period where landlords paid premiums: a 28.3% premium in Q3 ($356,833 vs $278,209) and a 15.4% premium in Q2 ($312,013 vs $270,287), indicating a lack of consistent pricing strategy or stable market conditions for investor acquisitions.

The average landlord acquisition price for Year 2025 ($308,274 for 0 properties reported acquired) suggests a general market appreciation from the $147,650 average seen during the 2020-2023 period, though these numbers must be interpreted with extreme caution due to minimal underlying transaction data.

The dramatic swings from landlord premiums to discounts in consecutive quarters (e.g., Q3 premium to Q4 discount) underscore the illiquid nature of the market for investor acquisitions in Phelps County during 2025.

While the data on "Distinct SFR Properties Purchased" for landlords shows 0 for Q1-Q4 2025 (in section 6-1), the Q4 transaction data (sections 7 and 12) reports 3 landlord purchases at $43,750, highlighting an internal data inconsistency that necessitates careful interpretation of pricing trends.

Landlords experienced an 8.2% discount in Q1 2025, paying $240,353 compared to homeowners at $261,961, further demonstrating the highly inconsistent price gap over the year.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors drove all Q4 landlord purchases in Phelps County.
Detailed Findings

Landlords made a modest number of acquisitions in Q4 2025, accounting for only 3 of the 16 total SFR purchases in Phelps County, representing 18.8% of the overall market.

The Q4 purchasing activity was exclusively dominated by mom-and-pop landlords, specifically single-property investors (Tier 01), who acquired all 3 of the landlord-owned properties.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) were entirely absent from the purchasing market in Q4 2025, recording 0 acquisitions and demonstrating a clear lack of interest in current market entry or expansion.

Four entities associated with single-property (Tier 01) status made these 3 purchases, highlighting that new or small landlords continue to be the primary drivers of investor activity in the county.

The minimal volume of landlord purchases relative to the overall market (18.8%) suggests that Q4 2025 was a quieter period for investor expansion in Phelps County.

The 100% share of landlord purchases by mom-and-pop investors (Tier 01-04) reinforces their foundational role in the local rental market, in stark contrast to larger corporate entities.

This quarter's purchasing data indicates a market where individual, small-scale investors remain the key players, potentially due to fewer high-volume opportunities or reduced interest from institutional capital.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 88.6% of investor-owned SFR in Phelps County.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) collectively dominate the SFR investment market in Phelps County, controlling a substantial 88.6% of all 2,621 investor-owned properties.

The backbone of this landlord market is the single-property owner (Tier 01), who individually accounts for 1,510 properties, representing 55.7% of the entire investor-owned SFR portfolio.

In stark contrast to the mom-and-pop prevalence, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have a virtually non-existent footprint in Phelps County, owning just 1 property, which translates to a mere 0.0% of the market share.

Even mid-size landlords (Tiers 05-08, 11-1000 properties) hold a relatively small portion, with the largest of these (Tier 08, 101-1000 properties) owning only 3 properties (0.1% of investor-owned SFR).

This distribution underscores that the Phelps County SFR rental market is overwhelmingly governed by individual, small-scale investors rather than large corporations.

The combined "small landlord" tiers (Tier 01-04) hold 2,402 properties, highlighting the highly fragmented nature of investor ownership in this county.

The extreme skew towards smaller portfolios suggests that Phelps County may not present the scale or specific investment characteristics typically sought by large institutional players.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become majority owners in Phelps County at the 11-20 property tier.
Detailed Findings

While individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the entry-level single-property (Tier 01) market, owning 82.5% of properties (1,246 properties), their majority diminishes as portfolio size increases in Phelps County.

The definitive crossover point where companies become the majority owner occurs at the Small-medium (11-20 properties) tier, where companies hold 73.9% (105 properties) compared to individuals at 26.1% (37 properties).

A significant equilibrium is observed at the Small landlord (6-10 properties) tier, where individual and company ownership is perfectly balanced at 50.0% each, with 118 properties held by both types of entities.

Companies demonstrate increasing concentration in larger portfolio sizes, holding 69.7% of properties in the 21-50 tier and becoming the sole owner of the single institutional property (1000+ tier).

The shift from individual to company dominance by portfolio size indicates that while small-scale investing is individual-driven, scaling up often involves corporate entity structures in Phelps County.

Even in the two-property (Tier 02) and three-to-five property (Tier 03) tiers, individual investors maintain a strong lead, owning 68.8% and 66.0% of properties respectively.

This tiered breakdown clearly illustrates that the "mom-and-pop" structure is predominantly individual-owned, while larger, more complex portfolios tend to be corporately managed.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Phelps County investor properties concentrate in Rolla (65401), holding 1,786 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor-owned SFR properties in Phelps County are highly concentrated, with the 65401 zip code leading significantly with 1,786 properties, representing 25.3% of its total SFR housing.

While 65401 has the highest count, the 65409 zip code demonstrates exceptional investor penetration, with an astonishing 90.9% of its SFR properties being investor-owned, indicating a near-complete landlord market.

Other zip codes also exhibit high investor ownership rates, such as 65449 at 62.5%, 65436 at 50.0%, and 65542 also at 50.0%, highlighting specific areas within Phelps County that are heavily influenced by investors.

The top five zip codes by count (65401, 65559, 65550, 65462, 65529) collectively account for 2,569 landlord-owned properties, showcasing a strong geographical clustering of investor activity within Phelps County.

A distinct pattern emerges where zip codes with the highest property counts, like 65401, do not necessarily have the highest investor ownership rates, which are instead found in smaller, more specialized markets such as 65409.

The 65550 zip code stands out for having both a high count of investor properties (221) and a substantial ownership rate of 39.7%, indicating a robust and active investor market.

This varied distribution suggests a nuanced market where investors target both high-volume areas and niche sub-markets with extremely high rental penetration within Phelps County.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Phelps County landlords are net buyers with a 5.52x buy/sell ratio in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Phelps County have consistently been net buyers, demonstrating a strong appetite for acquisitions over dispositions, exemplified by a 5.52x buy/sell ratio for the entire year 2025 (127 buys vs 23 sells).

This buying trend continued into Q4 2025, where landlords completed 4 buys against 2 sells, maintaining a net buyer position with a 2.0x buy/sell ratio, though at a lower overall volume.

In contrast to the overall landlord activity, institutional investors (1000+ tier) exhibited very limited engagement in transactions, recording just 1 buy and 1 sell in Q2 2025, resulting in a net neutral position for the year.

The highest buy-to-sell activity occurred in Q3 2025, where landlords executed 59 buys against only 5 sells, resulting in an exceptionally high 11.8x buy/sell ratio, indicating a period of significant accumulation.

Year-over-year, overall landlord buying activity saw a slight decrease in Q4, from 150 buys in 2024 to 127 in 2025, while selling activity decreased from 32 to 23, suggesting a modest cooling in market velocity.

The persistent net buyer status for all landlords points to a market where investors view SFR properties as favorable long-term assets for accumulation rather than short-term trading.

The near absence of institutional transactions suggests that large-scale players are either not operating significantly in Phelps County or are not actively adjusting their minimal existing portfolios.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Single-property landlords drove 100% of Q4 landlord transactions in Phelps County.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a relatively minor role in Phelps County's Q4 transaction market, participating in only 4 of the 18 total SFR transactions, which accounts for 22.2% of all activity.

All landlord-related transactions in Q4 were exclusively driven by single-property landlords (Tier 01), who completed 4 transactions at an average purchase price of $43,750.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) showed no transaction activity whatsoever in Q4, aligning with their minimal presence in overall holdings and purchases.

Notably, none of the 4 Q4 landlord transactions by single-property investors were identified as having been bought from other landlords, suggesting that these new acquisitions came from traditional homeowners or other non-landlord sellers.

The average purchase price of $43,750 for Tier 01 transactions in Q4 is significantly lower than typical market values, which could indicate distressed sales or unique property types acquired by these smaller investors.

The complete dominance of Tier 01 in Q4 transactions reinforces the finding that the mom-and-pop segment is the primary engine of investor activity in Phelps County.

This quarter's transaction data further emphasizes the low liquidity and limited engagement of larger investor types in the Phelps County SFR market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Phelps County's 88.6% ownership amid net buying.
Holdings
Landlords own 2,621 SFR properties, constituting 26.7% of Phelps County's total SFR market. Individual investors hold the majority with 1,784 properties (68.1%), while companies own 838 properties (32.0%).
Pricing
Landlord acquisition pricing displayed extreme volatility in Q4 2025, averaging $43,750 for 3 purchases—a $148,863 (77.3%) discount compared to homeowners' $192,613. This contrasts sharply with premiums paid in earlier quarters, reflecting a low-volume, inconsistent market.
Activity
Landlords made just 3 purchases in Q4 2025, representing 18.8% of all SFR sales, with all activity concentrated among single-property landlords. Four entities associated with Tier 01 landlords were involved in these purchases, with no institutional buying.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control a dominant 88.6% of investor-owned SFR housing in Phelps County, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a negligible 1 property (0.0%). Single-property owners alone account for 55.7% of the portfolio.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, owning 82.5% of single-property holdings, but company ownership becomes a majority at the 11-20 property tier. At the 6-10 property tier, individual and company ownership is equally split at 50.0%.
Transactions
Landlords are net buyers in Phelps County, with a 5.52x buy/sell ratio for 2025 (127 buys vs 23 sells). Institutional investors, however, showed minimal activity, achieving a net neutral position of 1 buy and 1 sell in 2025-Q2.
Market Narrative

Phelps County's SFR investment market is overwhelmingly shaped by individual, small-scale landlords, often termed "mom-and-pop" investors, who control a substantial 88.6% of the 2,621 investor-owned properties. These properties represent 26.7% of the county's total SFR housing stock. Individual investors account for 68.1% of all landlord-owned properties, significantly outweighing corporate holdings, while institutional investors with 1000+ properties have a nearly non-existent presence with just 1 property. This fragmented ownership structure highlights a market primarily driven by local, independent operators.

Landlord behavior in Q4 2025 was characterized by low volume and extreme pricing volatility; landlords acquired only 3 properties, representing 18.8% of all SFR purchases, at an average $43,750—a remarkable 77.3% discount compared to homeowner prices. This follows quarters where landlords paid premiums, indicating an inconsistent market. Overall, landlords remain net buyers with a strong 5.52x buy/sell ratio in 2025 (127 buys vs 23 sells), signaling a continued strategy of accumulation. However, institutional investors demonstrated minimal transactional activity, ending 2025 with a net neutral position of 1 buy and 1 sell.

The investor landscape in Phelps County reflects a robust, mom-and-pop driven rental market, particularly concentrated in zip codes like 65401 (1,786 properties) and 65409 (90.9% investor-owned rate). The clear dominance of individual investors in smaller tiers, with companies becoming a majority only in larger portfolios (11-20 properties), suggests that local, accessible investment opportunities rather than large-scale corporate strategies define this market. This trend indicates stability for the local rental housing stock, as it is largely held by numerous small investors rather than a few large entities. The relatively high percentage of cash-owned properties also points to a resilient market structure.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 01:10 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyPhelps (MO)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail