Oregon (MO) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Oregon (MO) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Oregon (MO)
3,522
Total Investors in Oregon (MO)
1,491
Investor Owned SFR in Oregon (MO)
1,258(35.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,355
SFR Owned
1,056
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
136
SFR Owned
212
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,258 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly dominate Oregon County, accounting for 96.7% of holdings and all Q4 purchases.
Landlords own 1,258 SFR properties, representing 35.7% of the total SFR market in Oregon County, MO, with individuals holding 83.9%. In Q4, landlords purchased 59.5% of all SFR sales, theoretically securing a 90.1% discount against homeowners, while showing a net buying trend with a 24.14x buy/sell ratio in 2025.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual investors own 83.9% of 1,258 landlord-owned SFR properties in Oregon County, MO.
With 1,355 individual landlords vs. 136 companies, individuals outnumber companies nearly 10-to-1. Most landlord properties are rented (97.2%) and often cash-purchased (89.1%), indicating a strong cash market.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords theoretically secured a substantial 90.1% discount in 2025-Q4, paying $22,610 while homeowners averaged $228,701.
This discount significantly widened from Q3 (56.4%) and Q2 (17.3%), though Q1 saw landlords theoretically pay a 15.8% premium. However, landlord acquisition property counts were reported as zero for these periods in this specific pricing dataset.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords dominated Q4 SFR purchases, acquiring 22 properties which represents 59.5% of all market transactions.
All landlord purchases were made by mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), with single-property landlords (Tier 01) driving 65.2% of this activity (15 properties by 19 entities). Institutional investors (Tier 09) made no purchases.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) dominate, controlling an overwhelming 96.7% of investor-owned SFR housing.
Single-property landlords alone hold 69.5% of the portfolio (917 properties). Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have no presence in this market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate all tiers, peaking at 90.3% in single-property portfolios.
Company ownership gradually increases with portfolio size, reaching 42.5% in the 11-20 property tier, but never achieving majority. There is no crossover point where companies become majority owners.
Geographic Distribution
Zip code 65791 leads in investor-owned properties (493), while 63942 shows the highest ownership rate (53.7%).
Zip codes 65791 and 65606 collectively host 881 investor properties, marking significant geographic concentration. The zip code 65778 is the only one appearing in both top 5 lists, with 82 investor-owned properties and a 41.4% ownership rate.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers, with a 24.14x buy-to-sell ratio in 2025 (169 buys vs 7 sells).
All landlords consistently demonstrated net buying across recent quarters, with Q3 showing a massive 28.0x ratio. Institutional investor transaction data is not available, preventing direct comparison of their activity.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for a dominant 55.4% of Q4 transactions, making 31 out of 56 total deals.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) drove 61.3% of landlord transactions, purchasing properties at an average of $37,240. No inter-landlord trading was observed in Q4, and institutional investors made no transactions.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual investors own 83.9% of 1,258 landlord-owned SFR properties in Oregon County, MO.
Detailed Findings

In Oregon County, MO, landlords collectively own 1,258 SFR properties, representing 35.7% of the total 3,522 SFR properties in the market, showcasing a significant investor presence.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the market, holding 1,056 properties (83.9%) compared to companies which own 212 properties (16.9%) of the landlord-owned portfolio.

The vast majority of landlords are individuals, with 1,355 entities accounting for 90.9% of all landlords, outnumbering the 136 company landlords by a striking 9.96-to-1 ratio.

Oregon County's investor-owned properties are highly rental-focused, with 1,223 properties (97.2% of the landlord portfolio) classified as rented, emphasizing their primary function as income-generating assets.

Cash purchases are a predominant financing strategy for landlords, with 1,121 properties (89.1% of the landlord portfolio) bought with cash, while only 137 properties (10.9%) are financed, indicating a preference for debt-free ownership.

Despite individual landlords being far more numerous, company landlords on average hold slightly more properties (1.56 per company) compared to individual landlords (0.78 properties per individual), suggesting larger average portfolio sizes for companies when they do exist.

Given the definition of a landlord, all 1,258 investor-owned SFR properties are non-owner-occupied, reinforcing that the entire portfolio serves as rental housing.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords theoretically secured a substantial 90.1% discount in 2025-Q4, paying $22,610 while homeowners averaged $228,701.
Detailed Findings

In 2025-Q4, landlords showed a striking theoretical price advantage, with an average acquisition price of $22,610 compared to traditional homeowners who paid $228,701, representing a substantial $206,091 (90.1%) discount.

This dramatic landlord price advantage has not been consistent; while landlords experienced a significant 90.1% discount in Q4, they only received a 56.4% discount ($175,510) in Q3 and a 17.3% discount ($43,152) in Q2.

The trend shows a volatile price gap, as landlords even paid a premium in Q1 2025, theoretically acquiring properties for $240,834 - a 15.8% ($32,932) higher price than traditional homeowners who averaged $207,902.

A critical data point indicates that zero distinct SFR properties were purchased by landlords in 2025-Q4, 2025-Q3, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q1, 2024, or 2020-2023 for the acquisition pricing data, suggesting these average prices may reflect historical or theoretical calculations rather than recent actual transactions from Section 7 and 12.

For the periods where landlord purchases are noted as zero in the acquisition timeframe data, the average prices of $177,586 for Year 2025 and $218,693 for Year 2024 also refer to zero-property acquisition counts, making direct trend analysis challenging without corresponding purchase volumes.

The pandemic-era (2020-2023) theoretical average acquisition price for landlords was $141,233 (also based on zero reported distinct purchases), highlighting a significant potential increase in average prices observed in some subsequent quarters like Q1 2025 ($240,834) before the large Q4 discount.

The fluctuation from a landlord premium in Q1 to substantial discounts in Q2-Q4 reveals an inconsistent and highly dynamic market for investor acquisition pricing, though these figures are tied to periods with zero reported landlord acquisitions within this specific dataset.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords dominated Q4 SFR purchases, acquiring 22 properties which represents 59.5% of all market transactions.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords were highly active in Oregon County, MO, securing 22 SFR properties, which constitutes a significant 59.5% majority of the total 37 SFR purchases in the market.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) entirely accounted for the Q4 investor activity, purchasing 23 properties which represents 100.0% of all landlord acquisitions, with no purchases from institutional investors (Tier 09).

The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) was the most active, responsible for 15 properties or 65.2% of the total landlord purchases, suggesting a strong influx of first-time or small-scale investors.

A notable 19 entities within the single-property tier entered the market in Q4, indicating a healthy rate of new landlord formation within Oregon County, MO.

The concentration of Q4 activity among smaller landlords is evident, with Tier 01, Tier 02 (3 properties by 2 entities), and Tier 03-05 (5 properties by 7 entities) collectively comprising all landlord purchases.

The average properties per entity for Q4 purchases varied: Tier 02 entities acquired an average of 1.5 properties (3 properties / 2 entities), while Tier 01 entities averaged 0.79 properties (15 properties / 19 entities), suggesting individual entities might not always correspond to single-property purchases due to co-ownership or varying definitions.

The absence of institutional investor (Tier 09) purchases underscores that the Q4 market in Oregon County, MO, was exclusively driven by smaller, local investors.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) dominate, controlling an overwhelming 96.7% of investor-owned SFR housing.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) collectively own 1,276 SFR properties, representing an overwhelming 96.7% of the total 1,319 investor-owned properties in Oregon County, MO.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone of the investor market, owning 917 properties, which accounts for 69.5% of all landlord-held SFR properties.

The investor landscape is highly concentrated among smaller portfolios; Tiers 01-05 (1-20 properties) account for 99.5% of all investor-owned housing (1,311 properties out of 1,319).

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have no presence in Oregon County, MO, controlling 0.0% of the investor-owned SFR market, a stark contrast to broader national trends.

Even mid-size landlords (Tier 05-08, 11-1000 properties) are minimal, with Tiers 11-20 holding 40 properties (3.0%) and Tiers 21-50 holding just 3 properties (0.2%), underscoring a market dominated by very small-scale investors.

The distribution reveals a steeply declining number of properties as portfolio size increases, with 91.6% of properties owned by landlords holding 1-5 properties (1,219 properties out of 1,319).

The lack of data for acquisition prices by tier prevents analysis of whether larger or smaller investors pay more, but the ownership distribution clearly indicates the market structure.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate all tiers, peaking at 90.3% in single-property portfolios.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors consistently hold the majority of properties across all investor tiers in Oregon County, MO, with their highest concentration in the single-property tier (Tier 01), where they own 833 properties (90.3%).

Company ownership, while present across tiers, never achieves majority status; its highest share is 42.5% in the Small-medium (11-20 properties) tier, controlling 17 properties compared to individuals' 23 properties (57.5%).

The proportion of company-owned properties generally increases with tier size, moving from 9.7% in Tier 01 to 42.5% in Tier 11-20, indicating that larger portfolios are relatively more attractive to corporate entities.

For mid-size portfolios, individuals still maintain a strong lead; in the 6-10 property tier, individuals own 37 properties (64.9%) compared to companies' 20 properties (35.1%).

The data clearly shows that Oregon County's real estate investor market is fundamentally driven by individual landlords, even as portfolio sizes increase up to 20 properties.

The absence of institutional (1000+ properties) tiers in the ownership breakdown further emphasizes the local, individual-centric nature of the investment landscape.

Without specific pricing data by owner type and tier, it is not possible to determine if individual or company investors pay different prices within each tier.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Zip code 65791 leads in investor-owned properties (493), while 63942 shows the highest ownership rate (53.7%).
Detailed Findings

Oregon County, MO, exhibits significant geographic concentration of investor activity, with the top two zip codes, 65791 and 65606, alone accounting for 881 investor-owned properties.

Zip code 65791 contains the highest count of investor-owned properties at 493, representing 34.7% of its total SFR housing, making it the primary hub for investor holdings in the county.

While 65791 leads in property count, zip code 63942 demonstrates the highest investor ownership rate in the county, with a striking 53.7% of its SFR properties being investor-owned.

Zip code 65778 is a standout, appearing in both top 5 lists, having 82 investor-owned properties and a high ownership rate of 41.4%, indicating both significant volume and market penetration for investors.

The top 5 regions by property count (65791, 65606, 65692, 65778, 65438) collectively hold a substantial share of investor properties, signaling key areas for investment focus.

The investor ownership rates across these top regions are consistently high, ranging from 34.7% to 53.7%, far exceeding the county-wide average of 35.7%, showcasing localized market intensity.

The total SFR inventory in key investor hubs like 65791 (approximately 1,421 properties) and 65606 (approximately 1,099 properties) suggests that investors are active in areas with larger housing stocks.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords are strong net buyers, with a 24.14x buy-to-sell ratio in 2025 (169 buys vs 7 sells).
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Oregon County, MO, are overwhelmingly net buyers, with Year 2025 showing 169 buy transactions against only 7 sell transactions, resulting in a robust 24.14x buy-to-sell ratio and a net gain of 162 properties.

This strong net buying trend is consistent across recent quarters, with 2025-Q3 showing 56 buys vs 2 sells (a 28.0x ratio) and 2025-Q2 recording 45 buys vs 4 sells (an 11.25x ratio), signifying continuous portfolio expansion.

Comparing annual activity, landlords increased their net acquisitions from 109 properties in 2024 (122 buys vs 13 sells) to 162 properties in 2025, reflecting accelerated buying momentum.

The high buy-to-sell ratios indicate a market where existing landlords are aggressively expanding their portfolios, or new investors are entering, with very few properties being divested back into the market by investors.

The provided data does not include information on institutional (1000+ tier) transactions, therefore, their specific buying or selling patterns and net position cannot be assessed or compared to the overall landlord activity.

The absence of data for inter-landlord transactions and average buy/sell prices prevents an analysis of market liquidity among investors or implied profit margins from property sales.

The consistent net buying suggests a high level of confidence in the Oregon County, MO, SFR market among existing and potential landlords.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for a dominant 55.4% of Q4 transactions, making 31 out of 56 total deals.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords were pivotal in the Oregon County, MO, housing market, engaging in 31 out of 56 total SFR transactions, which translates to a commanding 55.4% share of all market activity.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were exclusively active in Q4 transactions, accounting for all 29 tier-specified transactions, with no activity from institutional investors (Tier 09).

The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) dominated transaction volumes, responsible for 19 transactions (61.3% of specified landlord transactions) at an average purchase price of $37,240.

Smaller landlords in the 3-5 property tier (Tier 03-05) completed 7 transactions at a lower average purchase price of $17,733, indicating a potential preference for more affordable properties within this segment.

Remarkably, there was no reported inter-landlord trading activity in Q4; all specified landlord tiers (01, 02, 03-05, 11-20) showed 0.0% of properties bought from other landlords, suggesting acquisitions primarily from traditional homeowners or new builds.

The average purchase price varied significantly among active tiers: Tier 01 paid $37,240, while Tier 03-05 paid $17,733, a difference of $19,507. Tiers 02 and 11-20 had undefined average prices ("$nan avg price") possibly due to very low or aggregated transaction counts.

The high transactional presence of mom-and-pop landlords aligns with their substantial ownership share, solidifying their role as the primary drivers of investor activity in this market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly dominate Oregon County, accounting for 96.7% of holdings and all Q4 purchases.
Holdings
Landlords own 1,258 SFR properties, representing 35.7% of the total SFR market in Oregon County, MO, with individual investors holding 1,056 properties (83.9%) and companies owning 212 properties (16.9%).
Pricing
While data for recent landlord acquisitions indicates zero properties, landlords historically show a theoretical 90.1% discount in Q4 ($22,610 vs homeowners' $228,701), yet Tier 01 Q4 purchases averaged $37,240.
Activity
In Q4, landlords purchased 22 properties, claiming a 59.5% share of all SFR sales, with 19 new single-property landlord entities entering the market, driving 65.2% of landlord acquisitions.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 96.7% of investor housing in Oregon County, MO, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold no properties.
Ownership Type
Individual investors lead all tiers, peaking at 90.3% in single-property portfolios, with companies never reaching a majority in any tier (highest 42.5% in the 11-20 property tier).
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 24.14x buy/sell ratio in Year 2025 (169 buys vs 7 sells); institutional investor transaction data is unavailable, and no inter-landlord trading occurred in Q4.
Market Narrative

Oregon County, MO, presents a distinctive real estate investment landscape, characterized by the significant presence of individual investors. Landlords collectively own 1,258 SFR properties, accounting for 35.7% of the entire SFR market in Oregon County, MO. This portfolio is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors, who hold 1,056 properties (83.9%), compared to companies owning 212 properties (16.9%). The market structure further emphasizes the role of small-scale investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling an astounding 96.7% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold no market share.

Investor activity in Q4 2025 was primarily driven by landlords, who secured 22 properties, representing a significant 59.5% of all SFR purchases in Oregon County, MO. This buying momentum is led by first-time or single-property landlords, with 19 new entities entering the market this quarter. While recent landlord acquisition data in Section 6 indicates zero properties acquired, theoretical pricing shows landlords with a substantial 90.1% discount compared to traditional homeowners in Q4 2025, paying $22,610 against $228,701. Across the board, landlords are net buyers, recording a robust 24.14x buy-to-sell ratio in Year 2025 (169 buys vs 7 sells), signaling strong confidence and expansion in the market.

The patterns observed in Oregon County, MO, contradict narratives of institutional dominance, highlighting a resilient and growing market powered by local, individual investors. The high proportion of cash purchases and rental-focused holdings underscores a stable, income-driven investment strategy among these landlords. Geographic hotspots within the county, such as zip code 65791 with 493 investor properties and 63942 with a 53.7% investor ownership rate, reveal concentrated areas of investment. The consistent net buying and the influx of new small landlords suggest a healthy, expanding rental market sustained by grassroots investment, rather than large-scale corporate activity.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 01:03 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyOregon (MO)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail