Mississippi (MO) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Mississippi (MO) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Mississippi (MO)
3,746
Total Investors in Mississippi (MO)
1,158
Investor Owned SFR in Mississippi (MO)
1,162(31.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,069
SFR Owned
998
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
89
SFR Owned
174
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,162 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mississippi County Sees Mom-and-Pop Domination, Landlord Growth, and Volatile Pricing
Landlords in Mississippi County, MO, control 1,162 SFR properties, representing 31.0% of the market. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate, holding 90.1% of these investor-owned properties, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) account for a mere 0.2%. Q4 saw landlords securing 45.1% of SFR purchases, with significant price volatility relative to homeowners, ranging from deep discounts to premiums across quarters.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individuals Own 85.9% of Mississippi County's 1,162 Investor-Owned SFR Properties
A vast majority of landlord-owned properties, 1,122, are rented, indicating a strong rental focus, with 1,035 properties acquired fully in cash and only 127 financed. Individual landlords outnumber companies by over 10:1, with 1,069 individual entities compared to 89 companies.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Q4 Landlords Paid $283,521, a 69.1% Premium Over Homeowners in Mississippi County
Landlord acquisition prices in Mississippi County, MO, have shown extreme volatility, swinging from a 74.5% discount in Q1 2025 to a 69.1% premium in Q4 2025. This quarterly fluctuation is stark, with landlords paying $266,398 less than homeowners in Q1 but $115,858 more in Q4.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords Captured 45.1% of Q4 SFR Purchases in Mississippi County, Driven by Mom-and-Pops
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) dominated Q4 purchases, acquiring 22 properties which represents 95.7% of all landlord purchases. A total of 18 new single-property landlords entered the market, making Tier 01 the most active by entity count in Q4.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 90.1% of Investor-Owned SFR Properties in Mississippi County
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone of the market, holding 731 properties or 59.4% of all investor-owned SFR. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) maintain a minimal presence, controlling only 3 properties, which accounts for just 0.2% of the total investor portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual Investors Dominate All Tiers, Comprising 93.6% of Single-Property Ownership in Mississippi County
No tier currently shows companies as the majority owner; even in the Small-medium (11-20) tier, individuals retain a 52.5% majority. Company concentration grows steadily with tier size, but individuals still hold 76.6% of properties in the 6-10 property tier.
Geographic Distribution
Zip Code 63882 Leads in Investor Ownership Rate at 83.1% in Mississippi County
Zip Code 63845 holds the most investor-owned properties with 471, while Zip Code 63882, despite having fewer properties (108), shows the highest concentration of investor ownership. Overall, investor-owned properties account for 31.0% of the entire SFR market in Mississippi County, MO.
Historical Transactions
Mississippi County Landlords are Strong Net Buyers with a 3.53x Buy/Sell Ratio in 2025
All landlords collectively bought 113 properties while selling 32 in 2025, maintaining a consistent net buyer position across quarters. Institutional investors, however, showed minimal activity, being net buyers by a narrow margin (3 buys vs 2 sells) in 2025 after a neutral position in 2024.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords Accounted for 46.4% of Q4 Transactions in Mississippi County, with Tier 01 Leading Purchases
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) drove Q4 transaction volume with 18 transactions, acquiring properties at a significantly higher average price of $363,821 compared to other active tiers. Tier 06-10 showed 100.0% inter-landlord trading, indicating high internal market liquidity for this segment.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individuals Own 85.9% of Mississippi County's 1,162 Investor-Owned SFR Properties
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Mississippi County, MO, hold a significant market presence, owning 1,162 SFR properties which constitutes 31.0% of the total 3,746 SFR properties in the market. This high penetration underscores the importance of investor activity in the local housing landscape.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord segment, controlling 998 properties or 85.9% of all investor-owned SFR. In contrast, company-owned SFR properties represent a much smaller share at 174 properties, or 15.0%.

The ownership structure is further emphasized by entity counts, with 1,069 individual landlords compared to just 89 company landlords, highlighting that the vast majority of rental housing providers are smaller, individual operators rather than large corporate entities.

A strong rental market focus is evident as 1,122 of the investor-owned properties are rented, demonstrating that the vast majority are utilized for their primary investment purpose. This indicates a high rate of non-owner-occupied properties within the landlord portfolio.

Regarding acquisition methods, cash purchases are predominant among landlords, with 1,035 properties being cash-owned, significantly outnumbering financed properties at 127. This suggests a preference for unencumbered assets or a market where cash buyers have an advantage.

The ratio of individual to company landlords, standing at approximately 12:1 (1,069 individual vs. 89 company entities), further reinforces the 'mom-and-pop' character of the investor market in Mississippi County, MO.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Q4 Landlords Paid $283,521, a 69.1% Premium Over Homeowners in Mississippi County
Detailed Findings

Landlord acquisition prices in Mississippi County, MO, demonstrate significant volatility when compared to traditional homeowners. In Q4 2025, landlords paid an average of $283,521, a striking $115,858 (69.1%) premium over traditional homeowners who paid $167,663, suggesting a highly specific or limited set of transactions at higher values.

This Q4 premium marks a dramatic shift from earlier in the year. In Q1 2025, landlords secured properties for $91,281, representing a substantial $266,398 (74.5%) discount compared to homeowners' $357,679, indicating a highly opportunistic buying strategy or access to distressed assets at the start of the year.

The quarterly price gap between landlords and homeowners has fluctuated wildly throughout 2025. Landlords bought at a 54.1% discount in Q2 ($75,429 vs $164,455) and a 3.0% premium in Q3 ($158,251 vs $153,654), highlighting extreme market swings within the year.

The lack of reported distinct properties purchased in the provided landlord acquisition timeframe data (0 properties for all timeframes 2020-2025) makes it challenging to assess true acquisition velocity and average prices across longer periods. However, given that Q4 landlord purchases were 23 properties per Section 7, the reported average price for Q4 from Section 6 likely reflects these few, potentially high-value transactions.

This pattern suggests that while landlords can find significant discounts in certain quarters, their activity might be concentrated on specific, potentially unique, property types or market conditions that can lead to inverse pricing trends compared to the broader homeowner market.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords Captured 45.1% of Q4 SFR Purchases in Mississippi County, Driven by Mom-and-Pops
Detailed Findings

Landlords were highly active in Mississippi County, MO, during Q4 2025, accounting for 23 of the total 51 SFR purchases, a significant 45.1% share of the market. This indicates a robust presence of investors in the current quarter's buying activity.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) were the primary drivers of this activity, acquiring 22 properties, which represents an overwhelming 95.7% of all landlord purchases in Q4. This reinforces their critical role in shaping the local housing market.

The market saw a substantial influx of new single-property landlords (Tier 01) in Q4, with 18 entities making purchases. This group collectively acquired 12 properties, representing 52.2% of all landlord purchases for the quarter, highlighting accessibility for new entrants.

Conversely, institutional investors (Tier 09) showed no purchasing activity in Q4, acquiring 0 properties. This starkly contrasts with the high activity of smaller landlords and suggests a complete absence of large-scale corporate buying in Mississippi County, MO, this quarter.

Beyond single-property owners, other mom-and-pop tiers also contributed significantly: small landlords with 3-5 properties purchased 6 properties (26.1% of landlord purchases), and those with 6-10 properties bought 2 properties (8.7%). This diversified activity among smaller investors underscores the breadth of mom-and-pop engagement.

The tier distribution of Q4 purchases reveals a strong concentration at the lower end, with 95.7% of landlord purchases falling within the mom-and-pop segment. This pattern is consistent with the overall market structure and indicates that smaller investors are the active core of the acquisition market.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 90.1% of Investor-Owned SFR Properties in Mississippi County
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) collectively dominate the SFR investment landscape in Mississippi County, MO, controlling 1,108 properties, which accounts for a substantial 90.1% of all investor-owned housing. This strong concentration in smaller portfolios directly challenges the perception of corporate dominance in the rental market.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) represent the largest segment, owning 731 properties or 59.4% of the total investor-owned portfolio. This highlights that first-time and individual investors are the predominant force in the local SFR rental market.

In stark contrast to the mom-and-pop prevalence, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold a negligible share, owning just 3 properties which translates to a mere 0.2% of the total landlord-owned SFR in Mississippi County, MO.

The distribution shows a clear inverse relationship between tier size and property count: as portfolio size increases, the number of properties held dramatically decreases. For example, while Tier 01 holds 731 properties, Tier 05-08 collectively hold significantly fewer, indicating a 'long tail' distribution where small investors comprise the vast majority.

Unfortunately, data for acquisition prices by tier is not provided, preventing a detailed analysis of whether larger investors pay more or less than smaller landlords. This limits insights into potential strategic pricing differences across investor tiers.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual Investors Dominate All Tiers, Comprising 93.6% of Single-Property Ownership in Mississippi County
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate ownership across all tiers in Mississippi County, MO, particularly in the smaller portfolios. For instance, single-property landlords (Tier 01) are 93.6% individual-owned, totaling 691 properties, while companies own only 47 properties or 6.4% in this tier.

While company presence increases in larger portfolio tiers, there is no distinct crossover point where companies become the majority owners. In the small-medium (11-20) tier, individuals still hold a 52.5% majority (52 properties) compared to companies at 47.5% (47 properties), indicating individual investors maintain significant control even as portfolios grow.

In the two-property (Tier 02) segment, individuals control 88 properties (90.7%) versus companies with 9 properties (9.3%), further solidifying the individual investor's foundational role in the market.

For slightly larger mom-and-pop portfolios, such as the small landlord (6-10 properties) tier, individual ownership remains strong at 85 properties (76.6%), despite companies showing a notable presence with 26 properties (23.4%).

The pattern across tiers reveals that while company ownership percentage generally increases with portfolio size, individual investors consistently represent the majority. This indicates that even mid-size portfolios in Mississippi County, MO, are primarily managed by individuals rather than corporate entities.

The absence of tier pricing data by owner type prevents a comparison of acquisition price strategies between individual and company buyers within each portfolio size segment.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Zip Code 63882 Leads in Investor Ownership Rate at 83.1% in Mississippi County
Detailed Findings

Investor-owned properties in Mississippi County, MO, are significantly concentrated within a few zip codes, with MO-Mississippi-63845 leading by count with 471 properties. This indicates key areas of high investor activity and property accumulation within the county.

However, when evaluating investor penetration, MO-Mississippi-63882 stands out with a remarkable 83.1% of its SFR properties being investor-owned, even though it ranks third in total investor-owned count with 108 properties. This zip code shows an extremely high reliance on or appeal to investors.

MO-Mississippi-63820 also demonstrates a very high investor ownership rate at 80.0%, suggesting pockets within the county where almost all SFR properties are held for investment purposes rather than by traditional owner-occupiers.

The distinction between count leaders and rate leaders is important; for instance, while 63845 and 63834 have the highest absolute numbers of investor-owned properties (471 and 442 respectively), 63882 and 63820 showcase the highest market penetration percentages (83.1% and 80.0%), revealing areas profoundly shaped by investor activity.

These concentrated pockets highlight specific sub-markets within Mississippi County, MO, where dynamics are likely heavily influenced by investor strategies and demand for rental housing. The overall county investor-owned rate is 31.0%, showing that certain zip codes significantly exceed the county average.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Mississippi County Landlords are Strong Net Buyers with a 3.53x Buy/Sell Ratio in 2025
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Mississippi County, MO, have consistently operated as net buyers, demonstrating strong acquisition activity over the past two years. In 2025, they purchased 113 properties and sold only 32, resulting in a robust buy/sell ratio of 3.53x and a net gain of 81 properties.

This net buyer trend is consistent across individual quarters of 2025, with Q4 showing 32 buys against 10 sells (a 3.2x ratio), Q3 with 25 buys against 5 sells (a 5.0x ratio), and Q2 with 30 buys against 10 sells (a 3.0x ratio), indicating sustained market accumulation.

Historical data reinforces this pattern, as landlords in 2024 also exhibited net buying behavior, acquiring 96 properties and selling 28, translating to a 3.43x buy/sell ratio and a net increase of 68 properties. This two-year trend signals a growing landlord presence in the county.

In contrast to overall landlord activity, institutional investors (1000+ tier) maintained a very minimal footprint. In 2025, they were marginal net buyers with 3 purchases and 2 sales, resulting in a net gain of only 1 property.

Institutional activity in 2024 was entirely neutral, with 2 buys and 2 sells, indicating no net accumulation or divestment. This highlights that large-scale institutional players are not a significant force in shaping the transaction volume in Mississippi County, MO.

The absence of data for inter-landlord transaction percentages and average buy/sell prices within this section limits a deeper understanding of market liquidity and potential implied profit margins across different timeframes for all landlords.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords Accounted for 46.4% of Q4 Transactions in Mississippi County, with Tier 01 Leading Purchases
Detailed Findings

Landlords were major players in Mississippi County's Q4 2025 transaction market, participating in 32 of the total 69 SFR transactions, which accounts for a substantial 46.4% share. This demonstrates a significant investor influence on overall property sales activity.

Transaction volume was highly concentrated within the mom-and-pop segment (Tiers 01-04), which collectively accounted for 31 transactions. Notably, single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, conducting 18 transactions.

Average purchase prices varied dramatically by tier: Tier 01 landlords paid an average of $363,821, significantly higher than Tier 02 at $86,100 and Tier 06-10 at $79,441. This suggests that new or small landlords are acquiring more valuable or premium properties.

Inter-landlord trading activity also differed by tier. Tier 06-10 landlords bought 100.0% of their properties from other landlords (2 transactions), while Tier 02 had a 50.0% inter-landlord rate (2 transactions from landlords out of 4 total), indicating a healthy internal market for these segments.

In contrast, single-property landlords (Tier 01) showed very low inter-landlord trading, with only 1 transaction (5.6%) from another landlord out of their 18 total. This indicates they are primarily acquiring properties directly from traditional homeowners or other non-investor sources.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) showed no transaction activity in Q4 2025, consistent with their minimal purchasing presence in the quarter and highlighting their continued low engagement in Mississippi County's market.

The wide price spread, from $79,441 for Tier 06-10 to $363,821 for Tier 01, highlights distinct purchasing strategies or market segments being targeted by different investor sizes.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Holdings
Landlords in Mississippi County, MO, collectively own 1,162 SFR properties, constituting 31.0% of the market. Individual investors account for 998 properties (85.9%), far outnumbering the 174 properties (15.0%) held by companies.
Pricing
Landlords in Q4 2025 paid an average of $283,521, a significant 69.1% premium compared to traditional homeowners at $167,663, marking an extreme shift from earlier quarters that saw deep discounts.
Activity
Landlords captured 45.1% of Q4 SFR purchases in Mississippi County, acquiring 23 properties. This quarter saw 18 new single-property landlords enter the market, with mom-and-pop tiers driving 95.7% of all landlord purchases.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 90.1% of investor-owned SFR housing in Mississippi County, MO, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a minimal 0.2% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors maintain a dominant position across all portfolio tiers in Mississippi County, MO, including 93.6% ownership in the single-property tier, with no clear crossover point where companies become the majority owners.
Transactions
Landlords in Mississippi County, MO, are strong net buyers with a 3.53x buy/sell ratio in 2025 (113 buys vs 32 sells), while institutional investors exhibited minimal net buying with a 1.5x ratio (3 buys vs 2 sells) for the year.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in Mississippi County, MO, is predominantly shaped by small-scale, mom-and-pop landlords. These individual investors collectively own 1,162 SFR properties, representing a significant 31.0% of the total SFR market. Individual owners account for an overwhelming 85.9% of these investor-owned properties, reinforcing their foundational role in the local rental housing supply. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 90.1% of the total investor-owned portfolio, starkly contrasting the minimal 0.2% held by institutional investors.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 was marked by significant activity and volatile pricing. Landlords acquired 23 properties, constituting 45.1% of all SFR purchases in the quarter. This strong buying was led by mom-and-pop landlords, who were responsible for 95.7% of these acquisitions, including 18 new single-property landlords entering the market. While landlords showed consistent net buying trends throughout 2024 and 2025, Q4 2025 saw landlords paying a substantial 69.1% premium over homeowners, a dramatic shift from the significant discounts observed in earlier quarters, indicating highly specific market conditions or properties being targeted.

The overall market in Mississippi County, MO, continues to be characterized by the accumulation of properties by smaller investors. The sustained net buying behavior by landlords, coupled with the absence of significant institutional activity, indicates a robust local market driven by individual and small-scale entities. The extreme volatility in landlord pricing relative to homeowners suggests that investor strategies are highly responsive to specific property types or market niches, rather than broad market trends, pointing to a dynamic yet localized investment environment.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 12:59 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyMississippi (MO)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail