Livingston (MO) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Livingston (MO) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Livingston (MO)
4,310
Total Investors in Livingston (MO)
1,373
Investor Owned SFR in Livingston (MO)
1,292(30.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,210
SFR Owned
992
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
163
SFR Owned
324
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,292 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate in Livingston County, Securing Deep Discounts
Landlords in Livingston County, MO, own 1,292 SFR properties, comprising 30.0% of the market, with individuals holding 76.8%. These investors, predominantly mom-and-pop landlords who control 93.8% of the market, consistently acquire properties at significant discounts, paying 46.8% less than traditional homeowners in Q4 2025. Landlords were strong net buyers in Q4 2025, with 30 buys against 4 sells, indicating continued accumulation.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords Own 1,292 SFR Properties in Livingston County, 76.8% Held by Individuals
The vast majority of investor-owned properties, 97.4%, are rented, with 76.2% acquired with cash. Individual landlords constitute 88.1% of all landlord entities, reaffirming their dominant presence in the market.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords Paid 46.8% Less Than Homeowners in Q4 2025, Securing $101,558 Discount
This significant discount is consistent, with landlords paying between 39.0% and 51.8% less than homeowners across all quarters of 2025. The Q4 2025 average acquisition price for landlords was $115,441, a stark contrast to homeowner's average of $216,999.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords Captured 38.4% of Q4 2025 SFR Purchases in Livingston County, MO
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounted for 46.4% of all landlord purchases, totaling 13 properties, while no institutional investors made purchases. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) remain active, with 10 entities adding to their portfolios this quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 93.8% of Investor-Owned SFR Properties in Livingston County
This substantial share, totaling 1,251 properties across Tiers 01-04, highlights the market's reliance on small-scale investors. Institutional investors (Tier 09) hold a mere 0.1%, with just 1 property.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies Become Majority Owners at the 6-10 Property Tier, Shifting from Individual Dominance
While individuals hold 88.2% of single-property portfolios, company ownership jumps to 69.7% for portfolios of 6-10 properties. Institutional companies are nearly absent, with 0 properties in the 1000+ tier, confirming individual investor prevalence.
Geographic Distribution
Livingston County's 64601 Zip Code Leads with 1,050 Investor-Owned Properties
Zip code 64601 also shows a 28.4% investor ownership rate. However, 64686 has the highest investor ownership rate at 69.7% with 69 properties, indicating a higher concentration of landlord activity in certain localized areas.
Historical Transactions
All Landlords are Strong Net Buyers, with a 7.5x Buy/Sell Ratio in Q4 2025
This trend of accumulation is consistent, as landlords maintained a 5.38x buy/sell ratio for the entirety of 2025. Institutional investors (1000+ tier) were also net buyers in 2024, acquiring 5 properties against 3 sells.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords Accounted for 30.3% of All Q4 2025 Transactions in Livingston County
Single-property (Tier 01) transactions recorded an average price of $82,350, while Tier 02 transactions saw a higher average of $226,100. No inter-landlord transactions were reported across the tracked tiers, indicating a direct market for purchases.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords Own 1,292 SFR Properties in Livingston County, 76.8% Held by Individuals
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Livingston County, MO, control 1,292 single-family residential properties, accounting for a significant 30.0% of the entire SFR market, highlighting a substantial investor footprint.

Individual investors are the backbone of this market, owning 992 properties, which represents 76.8% of all landlord-held SFR, significantly outpacing company ownership at 324 properties (25.1%).

The ownership split by entity type shows individual landlords account for 1,210 (88.1%) of the 1,373 total landlord entities, contrasting with just 163 (11.9%) company landlords, indicating a market primarily driven by smaller-scale investors.

A dominant 97.4% of landlord-owned properties (1,259 properties) are rented, underscoring the strong rental-focused strategy among investors in the county.

Cash acquisitions are highly prevalent among landlords, with 985 properties (76.2%) purchased without financing, suggesting a preference for unencumbered assets or a strong capital base, especially among individual investors.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords Paid 46.8% Less Than Homeowners in Q4 2025, Securing $101,558 Discount
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Livingston County secured properties for an average of $115,441, a remarkable 46.8% less than the $216,999 paid by traditional homeowners, resulting in an average discount of $101,558 per property.

This substantial price advantage for landlords is a consistent trend throughout 2025, with discounts ranging from 39.0% in Q3 to an impressive 51.8% in Q1, indicating landlords possess a consistent ability to acquire properties below market rates compared to traditional buyers.

The average landlord acquisition price fluctuated across 2025, from a low of $93,092 in Q1 to a high of $132,465 in Q2, while homeowner prices generally remained higher, illustrating landlords' strategic purchasing patterns.

Despite the lack of recorded distinct landlord purchases in `section6-1.csv` for Q4 2025, `section7-1.csv` indicates 28 landlord purchases, and the average price of $115,441 for landlords compared to $216,999 for homeowners in `section6-2.csv` still provides a valuable comparative insight into market pricing dynamics.

Comparing Q4 2025 ($115,441) with Q1 2025 ($93,092) for landlords, there's a 23.9% increase in landlord average acquisition prices over the year, suggesting a modest appreciation in the types of properties landlords are acquiring or overall market shifts.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords Captured 38.4% of Q4 2025 SFR Purchases in Livingston County, MO
Detailed Findings

Landlords were significant players in the Q4 2025 market in Livingston County, completing 28 SFR purchases, which represents 38.4% of all 73 SFR properties sold, indicating a strong investor presence.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were the primary drivers of investor activity, making 13 purchases that accounted for 46.4% of all landlord acquisitions this quarter, far surpassing institutional involvement which remained at 0 purchases.

The Tier 01 (single-property) segment saw 10 new entities entering the market by purchasing 8 properties, underscoring the continuous entry of first-time or small-scale investors.

While mom-and-pop landlords were active, a single small-medium landlord (Tier 11-20) entity made a substantial impact, acquiring 15 properties and representing 53.6% of all landlord purchases in Q4, demonstrating concentrated buying power within the mid-size segment.

The stark absence of institutional investor (Tier 09) purchases in Q4 2025, at 0 properties, indicates a lack of significant large-scale corporate buying activity in Livingston County during this period.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 93.8% of Investor-Owned SFR Properties in Livingston County
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords, encompassing Tiers 01-04, overwhelmingly dominate the investor-owned SFR market in Livingston County, controlling 1,251 properties, which represents 93.8% of the total landlord-owned housing stock.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the largest segment, owning 804 properties, accounting for 60.3% of all investor-owned SFR, making them the most prevalent type of landlord in the county.

In stark contrast to the mom-and-pop dominance, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold a negligible share of just 1 property, representing 0.1% of the total investor-owned portfolio, challenging narratives of large-scale corporate takeover.

Mid-size landlords (Tiers 05-08) hold a small but significant portion, with Tiers 11-20 and 21-50 collectively owning 81 properties (1.6% and 4.5% respectively), indicating some concentration beyond the smallest portfolios.

The distribution reveals a highly fragmented market structure where individual and small entities are foundational, demonstrating that local, smaller investors are the primary force shaping the rental market in Livingston County.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies Become Majority Owners at the 6-10 Property Tier, Shifting from Individual Dominance
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smaller portfolio tiers, holding 88.2% of single-property (Tier 01) holdings and 74.6% of two-property (Tier 02) holdings, signifying their strong presence at the market's entry points.

The crossover point where company ownership surpasses individual ownership occurs in the small landlord (6-10 properties) tier, where companies control 69.7% of properties compared to individuals at 30.3%, indicating a shift in investor type with increasing portfolio size.

Even in mid-size tiers such as 21-50 properties, individual investors still maintain a notable presence, holding 58.3% of properties, though this is a significant decrease from the single-property tier, demonstrating companies are gaining ground.

Large institutional companies (1000+ properties) are virtually non-existent in Livingston County's investor landscape, owning 0 properties in this tier, reinforcing the narrative of a market dominated by individual and smaller-scale company investors.

The proportion of company ownership systematically increases with portfolio size, from 11.8% in Tier 01 to 69.7% in Tier 06-10, suggesting that as portfolios grow, the likelihood of company entities managing them significantly rises.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Livingston County's 64601 Zip Code Leads with 1,050 Investor-Owned Properties
Detailed Findings

The 64601 zip code within Livingston County, MO, stands out as the primary hub for investor-owned properties, accounting for 1,050 SFR properties, which represents a substantial 28.4% investor ownership rate within that specific area.

While 64601 leads in absolute property count, the 64686 zip code exhibits the highest concentration of investor ownership, with 69.7% of its properties being landlord-owned, although with a smaller total of 69 properties.

The top three identifiable zip codes by investor ownership percentage (64686 at 69.7%, 64656 at 44.8%, and 64643 at 34.3%) reveal specific areas where landlords have a particularly strong market presence within Livingston County.

There's a clear distinction between regions with high property counts and those with high ownership rates, as 64601 (28.4%) leads in total properties but 64686 (69.7%) demonstrates a much higher penetration of investor ownership.

The data suggests that investor activity in Livingston County is not uniformly distributed but rather concentrated in specific zip codes, indicating targeted investment strategies within these sub-geographies.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
All Landlords are Strong Net Buyers, with a 7.5x Buy/Sell Ratio in Q4 2025
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Livingston County were robust net buyers in Q4 2025, executing 30 purchases against only 4 sales, resulting in a strong buy-to-sell ratio of 7.5x and signaling a period of significant portfolio expansion.

This accumulation trend extends across the entire year 2025, where landlords completed 113 buys versus 21 sells, yielding a substantial 5.38x buy-to-sell ratio, indicating consistent growth in their holdings throughout the year.

Looking at 2024, landlords also demonstrated strong buying activity with 105 acquisitions against 32 sales, resulting in a 3.28x buy-to-sell ratio, showing a sustained long-term pattern of net buying.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) show a similar pattern of accumulation in 2024, albeit at a smaller scale, with 5 buys versus 3 sells, establishing them as net buyers with a 1.67x ratio during that period.

The consistent net buying behavior across multiple timeframes for all landlords suggests an ongoing belief in the value and potential for growth within the Livingston County SFR market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords Accounted for 30.3% of All Q4 2025 Transactions in Livingston County
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a substantial role in Q4 2025's real estate market, participating in 30 transactions, which constituted 30.3% of the total 99 SFR transactions in Livingston County, highlighting their active market presence.

Transaction volumes varied significantly by tier, with Tier 01 (single-property) showing 10 transactions and Tier 11-20 (small-medium) registering the highest activity with 15 transactions, indicating diverse engagement across investor sizes.

Average purchase prices also varied by tier, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) paying an average of $82,350, while two-property landlords (Tier 02) paid a much higher average of $226,100, suggesting different property types or market segments are targeted by different tier sizes.

A notable finding is the complete absence of inter-landlord trading activity across all reported tiers in Q4 2025, as 0% of transactions were bought from other landlords, suggesting that landlords are primarily acquiring properties directly from traditional sellers or non-landlord entities.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) collectively accounted for 15 transactions, demonstrating their continued activity in Q4, aligning with their overall dominant ownership share in the county.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Livingston County SFR Market: Mom-and-Pops Dominate, Securing Deep Discounts as Net Buyers
Holdings
Landlords in Livingston County, MO, own 1,292 SFR properties, representing 30.0% of the total SFR market, with individual investors holding a commanding 992 properties (76.8%) compared to companies.
Pricing
Landlords consistently achieved significant discounts in Q4 2025, paying $115,441—an exceptional 46.8% less than traditional homeowners who averaged $216,999, securing a $101,558 discount per property.
Activity
In Q4 2025, landlords completed 28 purchases, capturing 38.4% of all SFR sales, with 10 new single-property landlords (Tier 01 entities) entering the market, driving significant activity among smaller investors.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 93.8% of investor-owned housing in Livingston County, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.1% share, comprising just 1 property.
Ownership Type
Individual investors account for 76.8% of all landlord-owned properties, but company ownership becomes dominant in portfolios of 6-10 properties, controlling 69.7% in that tier.
Transactions
Landlords were strong net buyers in Q4 2025 with a 7.5x buy/sell ratio (30 buys vs. 4 sells), and overall in 2024, institutional investors were also net buyers with 5 buys versus 3 sells.
Market Narrative

The single-family residential (SFR) market in Livingston County, MO, is significantly influenced by investors, who collectively own 1,292 properties, representing a substantial 30.0% of the entire SFR market. This market is overwhelmingly dominated by individual landlords, who own 992 properties (76.8% of the investor-owned portfolio), far outweighing company ownership. The mom-and-pop segment (1-10 properties) further reinforces this structure, controlling an impressive 93.8% of all investor-owned housing, with institutional investors holding a minimal 0.1%, effectively debunking widespread narratives of large-scale corporate control.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 demonstrated strong acquisition activity, with landlords purchasing 28 properties, accounting for 38.4% of all SFR sales. A key aspect of their strategy is a consistent ability to secure significant discounts, as landlords paid an average of $115,441 in Q4—a remarkable 46.8% less than traditional homeowners. This quarter also saw the entry of 10 new single-property landlords, indicating continued interest and accessibility for smaller investors. Overall transaction patterns reveal landlords are robust net buyers, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 7.5x in Q4, signaling ongoing expansion of their portfolios.

These findings paint a clear picture of a decentralized and accessible investor market in Livingston County, where individual, small-scale landlords are the primary drivers of activity and ownership. Their ability to acquire properties at deep discounts suggests either strong local market knowledge or a focus on value-driven opportunities. The continued net buying trend indicates confidence in the long-term rental market, ensuring a steady supply of rental housing, predominantly managed by local, smaller entities rather than large corporations.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 12:54 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyLivingston (MO)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail