DeKalb (MO) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the DeKalb (MO) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in DeKalb (MO)
1,620
Total Investors in DeKalb (MO)
604
Investor Owned SFR in DeKalb (MO)
529(32.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
540
SFR Owned
450
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
64
SFR Owned
84
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 529 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate DeKalb County with 98.7% Ownership Amidst Landlord Buying Trend
Landlords in DeKalb County, MO, own 529 SFR properties, representing 32.7% of the total SFR market. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 98.7% of this investor-owned housing, with institutional investors holding a mere 0.6%. In Q4 2025, landlords secured 52.9% of all SFR purchases, typically paying 47.2% less than traditional homeowners, while overall landlords remain strong net buyers with a 4.58x buy/sell ratio.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 529 SFR properties in DeKalb County, with individuals holding 85.1% compared to companies at 15.9%.
Nearly all landlord-owned properties, 525 out of 529 (99.2%), are rented, highlighting a strong focus on rental income. Cash acquisitions are the dominant funding method at 433 properties, significantly surpassing financed properties at 96.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
DeKalb County landlords paid $150,419 in Q4, a striking 47.2% less than homeowners at $285,003.
The landlord discount fluctuated significantly quarter-over-quarter, narrowing from 65.9% in Q3 to 47.2% in Q4, after a much tighter 16.3% in Q2. Landlord average acquisition prices show a slight appreciation of 0.37% from the pandemic-era (2020-2023) average of $149,866 to $150,419 in Q4 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 52.9% of all SFR purchases in DeKalb County during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were overwhelmingly active, accounting for 88.9% of all landlord purchases in Q4. Eight new single-property landlords (Tier 01) entered the market, purchasing 6 properties and driving the majority of current quarter activity.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 98.7% of investor-owned SFR in DeKalb County.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) are the backbone, owning 79.3% of all investor-held SFR properties. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a minimal 0.6% share, possessing only 3 properties in the county. Acquisition price data by tier is not available for this period, preventing a direct comparison of prices paid by different investor sizes within this section.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become majority owners at the 6-10 property tier in DeKalb County, marking a shift from individual dominance.
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate smaller portfolios, holding 91.1% of single-property (Tier 01) and 80.4% of two-property (Tier 02) holdings. Conversely, companies control 91.7% of properties within the 6-10 property tier. Acquisition price differences by owner type are not available from the provided data.
Geographic Distribution
MO-DeKalb-64469 leads with 153 investor-owned SFR properties, dominating local landlord activity.
MO-DeKalb-64497 exhibits the highest investor ownership rate at 65.5%, despite its total property count not being provided. The top 5 regions by investor count range from 41 to 153 properties, while ownership rates in these areas vary from 24.4% to 38.9%.
Historical Transactions
DeKalb County landlords are robust net buyers with a 4.58x buy/sell ratio in Year 2025, while institutional investors remain neutral.
All landlords collectively bought 55 properties and sold 12 in 2025, accumulating 43 properties net. The buy/sell ratio fluctuated throughout 2025, peaking at 5.75x in Q2 (23 buys vs 4 sells) and moderating to 3.25x in Q4 (13 buys vs 4 sells). Institutional investors (1000+ tier) maintained a neutral position, with 1 buy and 1 sell in 2025 resulting in a net change of 0.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for 50.0% of all SFR transactions in DeKalb County during Q4 2025.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, undertaking 8 transactions at an average price of $185,840. The highest inter-landlord trading activity was seen in the two-property (Tier 02) segment, where 100% of purchases (2 transactions) were from other landlords. Pricing strategies varied significantly, with Tier 01 landlords paying $185,840, notably higher than Tier 02 landlords at $44,156, a spread of $141,684.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 529 SFR properties in DeKalb County, with individuals holding 85.1% compared to companies at 15.9%.
Detailed Findings

Landlords collectively own 529 SFR properties in DeKalb County, which constitutes a substantial 32.7% of the total 1,620 SFR properties in the market, indicating a significant investor presence.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord-owned SFR market, holding 450 properties, or 85.1% of the total, while company-owned properties account for 84 properties, or 15.9%.

The prevalence of individual ownership is further underscored by entity counts, with 540 individual landlords compared to just 64 company landlords, establishing an 8.44:1 ratio of individual to company entities in the county.

A striking 99.2% of all landlord-owned SFR properties (525 out of 529) are rented, confirming that the vast majority of investor holdings in DeKalb County are actively generating rental income rather than being held for other purposes.

Cash acquisitions are the preferred method of property ownership among landlords, with 433 properties held outright in cash, significantly outpacing the 96 properties that are financed, signaling a strong preference for unencumbered assets.

The high percentage of rented properties combined with a robust cash ownership indicates a stable and income-focused investor base, less reliant on fluctuating financing markets for their rental portfolios.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
DeKalb County landlords paid $150,419 in Q4, a striking 47.2% less than homeowners at $285,003.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in DeKalb County consistently secure properties at a significant discount compared to traditional homeowners; in Q4 2025, they paid an average of $150,419, which is $134,584 less, or a 47.2% discount, than the homeowner average of $285,003.

The landlord price advantage has been volatile quarter-over-quarter, with the discount widening from 16.3% ($36,674) in Q2 2025 to a substantial 65.9% ($143,938) in Q3 2025, before narrowing to 47.2% in Q4 2025.

Despite the quarter-to-quarter fluctuations, the consistent double-digit percentage discounts underscore landlords' ability to identify and acquire properties at favorable prices relative to the broader market in DeKalb County.

Comparing acquisition prices from the pandemic era, the average landlord price of $149,866 between 2020-2023 has seen a modest appreciation to $150,419 in Q4 2025, representing a minor 0.37% increase.

The average landlord acquisition price for Year 2025 stands at $152,537, indicating a slight decrease compared to the average of $184,771 recorded for Year 2024, suggesting a cooling or more selective buying environment.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 52.9% of all SFR purchases in DeKalb County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in DeKalb County significantly increased their market share in Q4 2025, capturing 9 of the 17 total SFR purchases, which represents a substantial 52.9% of all properties sold during the quarter.

Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were the exclusive drivers of Q4 purchasing activity, acquiring all 8 of the properties bought by landlords in Tiers 01-04, representing 88.9% of total landlord purchases, with institutional investors showing no Q4 purchase activity.

New single-property landlords (Tier 01) were particularly active, with 8 entities collectively purchasing 6 properties, making them the most dominant group for Q4 acquisitions and signaling a continued influx of small-scale investors.

The highest concentration of Q4 activity stems from the single-property landlords (Tier 01), who accounted for 66.7% of all landlord purchases, followed by two-property and small (3-5 properties) landlords each at 11.1% of activity.

The average properties per entity in Q4 purchasing activity suggests a diverse acquisition strategy, with Tier 01 entities averaging 0.75 properties, while entities in Tiers 3-5 and 21-50 each acquired one property on average, indicating focused expansion by some mid-size landlords.

The absence of institutional investor (Tier 09) purchases in Q4 underscores a local market primarily shaped by smaller, individual-driven investment, diverging from narratives of large-scale corporate buying.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 98.7% of investor-owned SFR in DeKalb County.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords, encompassing Tiers 01 through 04 (1-10 properties), collectively dominate the DeKalb County investor market by controlling a remarkable 98.7% of all investor-owned SFR properties, totaling 528 properties.

The vast majority of investor-owned housing is held by single-property landlords (Tier 01), who account for 424 properties, representing 79.3% of the entire landlord-owned portfolio.

In stark contrast to mom-and-pop dominance, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold a negligible share, owning only 3 properties, which translates to a mere 0.6% of the investor-owned market.

The distribution of ownership shows a steep drop-off after the smallest tiers; Tier 02 (two properties) holds 10.5% (56 properties), and Tier 03-05 (3-5 properties) holds 6.7% (36 properties), confirming the market's heavy reliance on smaller-scale investors.

Mid-size landlords (Tiers 11-20 and 21-50) maintain a minimal presence, with 1 and 2 properties respectively, further emphasizing the limited scale of diversified portfolios in DeKalb County.

This extreme concentration of properties within the mom-and-pop segment suggests that individual investors remain the primary force shaping the rental housing market in DeKalb County, contrary to perceptions of widespread institutional control.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become majority owners at the 6-10 property tier in DeKalb County, marking a shift from individual dominance.
Detailed Findings

Individual ownership strongly predominates in the smaller portfolio tiers, accounting for 391 properties (91.1%) in the single-property (Tier 01) segment and 45 properties (80.4%) in the two-property (Tier 02) segment.

A significant shift occurs at the 6-10 property tier, where companies become the majority owners, holding 11 properties (91.7%) compared to individuals who own just 1 property (8.3%), indicating this as the crossover point for ownership type dominance.

Even in the small landlord (3-5 properties) tier, individual investors still maintain a slight majority, owning 19 properties (52.8%) versus companies holding 17 properties (47.2%).

The data reveals a clear pattern: individual investors form the foundation of the smallest investor portfolios, gradually ceding dominance to company entities as portfolio size expands into the mid-range tiers.

The highest concentration of company ownership within the provided data is observed in the 6-10 property tier, where they own over 90% of the properties, demonstrating their preference or capability for slightly larger-scale holdings.

Conversely, the highest individual concentration is unequivocally found in the single-property tier, solidifying the 'mom-and-pop' archetype as driven by individual investors starting with one property.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
MO-DeKalb-64469 leads with 153 investor-owned SFR properties, dominating local landlord activity.
Detailed Findings

The zip code MO-DeKalb-64469 is the epicenter of investor activity in DeKalb County, boasting the highest number of investor-owned properties at 153, representing 38.9% of its SFR market.

While MO-DeKalb-64469 leads in property count, MO-DeKalb-64497 shows the most intense investor penetration, with a significant 65.5% of its SFR properties being investor-owned, indicating a highly concentrated landlord presence.

Other key areas for investor concentration by count include MO-DeKalb-64429 with 105 properties (24.4% ownership rate) and MO-DeKalb-64490 with 87 properties (29.9% ownership rate), highlighting a multi-faceted geographic spread of investor holdings.

The top 5 regions by investor ownership percentage, ranging from 31.4% to 65.5%, demonstrate varied levels of market saturation, with MO-DeKalb-64497 standing out as a particularly landlord-heavy market.

There's a clear overlap between regions with high investor property counts and high ownership rates, as MO-DeKalb-64469 and MO-DeKalb-64494 appear in both top 5 lists, signifying strong correlation in these specific sub-geographies.

The data indicates distinct pockets of investor focus within DeKalb County, with some areas attracting a higher volume of properties and others experiencing a higher proportion of investor ownership relative to their total SFR inventory.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
DeKalb County landlords are robust net buyers with a 4.58x buy/sell ratio in Year 2025, while institutional investors remain neutral.
Detailed Findings

All landlords in DeKalb County are firmly in a net buyer position for Year 2025, acquiring 55 properties while selling only 12, resulting in a strong buy/sell ratio of 4.58x and a net accumulation of 43 properties.

This buying trend is consistent quarter-over-quarter, with landlords being net buyers in Q4 (13 buys vs 4 sells, net 9), Q3 (8 buys vs 3 sells, net 5), and Q2 (23 buys vs 4 sells, net 19), signaling continuous market accumulation.

Comparing Year 2025 to Year 2024, landlords have increased their buying activity from 42 properties in 2024 to 55 in 2025, while selling volumes remained stable at 11 and 12 properties respectively, indicating accelerated acquisition.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) exhibit a strikingly different transaction pattern; in Year 2025, they registered 1 buy and 1 sell, resulting in a net position of 0 properties, which the data labels as a 'net seller' despite the balanced transactions, suggesting no market accumulation from this segment.

The highest acquisition velocity for landlords occurred in Q2 2025, with 23 properties bought, which represents a significant peak in buying activity compared to 8 in Q3 and 13 in Q4, showing a mid-year surge.

The persistent net buying behavior by overall landlords, coupled with the neutral stance of institutional investors, highlights that smaller investors are the primary drivers of market growth and property accumulation in DeKalb County.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 50.0% of all SFR transactions in DeKalb County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were directly involved in exactly half of all SFR transactions in DeKalb County during Q4 2025, completing 13 out of 26 total transactions, underscoring their significant market presence and influence.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) dominated Q4 transaction volumes, accounting for 8 transactions, which is the highest activity among all tiers and signifies their active role in market fluidity.

Pricing strategies varied dramatically across tiers; Tier 01 landlords paid the highest average purchase price at $185,840, while Tier 02 landlords secured properties at a considerably lower average of $44,156, indicating distinct acquisition approaches or property types targeted.

Inter-landlord trading was particularly high within the two-property (Tier 02) segment, where 100% of their 2 transactions involved purchasing from other landlords, suggesting a localized or specialized sub-market.

In contrast, single-property landlords (Tier 01) acquired 0% of their properties from other landlords, demonstrating a preference for sourcing properties from non-investor sellers.

The significant price spread of $141,684 between Tier 01's average purchase price ($185,840) and Tier 02's ($44,156) highlights a diverse market where property values vary widely depending on the investor size and their acquisition targets.

The distribution of Q4 transaction activity largely mirrors the overall ownership structure, with mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) collectively performing 11 transactions, while institutional investors (Tier 09) registered no transactions.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Fuel DeKalb County Market, Capturing 98.7% Ownership and 52.9% of Q4 Sales
Holdings
Landlords in DeKalb County own 529 SFR properties, which constitutes a significant 32.7% of the total SFR market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly individual-owned, with 450 properties (85.1%) held by individual investors, compared to 84 properties (15.9%) by companies.
Pricing
Landlords paid an average of $150,419 in Q4 2025, securing a substantial 47.2% discount compared to traditional homeowners who paid $285,003. This indicates a modest 0.37% appreciation from the pandemic-era average of $149,866 (2020-2023) to Q4 2025 pricing.
Activity
Landlords captured 52.9% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025, acquiring 9 properties out of 17 total sales. This activity was heavily driven by mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), which accounted for 88.9% of landlord purchases, including 8 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate the investor-owned housing market in DeKalb County, controlling 98.7% of all properties, totaling 528. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a minimal 0.6% share, owning only 3 properties.
Ownership Type
Individual investors hold a dominant position in smaller portfolios, making up 91.1% of single-property owners, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties, controlling 91.7% of properties in that tier. The ratio of individual to company landlords by entity count stands at 8.44:1.
Transactions
Overall landlords in DeKalb County are strong net buyers with a 4.58x buy/sell ratio for Year 2025, accumulating 55 properties while selling 12. Institutional investors (1000+ tier), however, showed a balanced position with 1 buy and 1 sell in 2025, resulting in a net change of 0 (net seller).
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in DeKalb County, MO, is predominantly shaped by small, individual landlords, often termed 'mom-and-pop' investors. They collectively own 529 SFR properties, representing 32.7% of the total SFR market, with individual entities holding 85.1% of this portfolio. This dominance is further underscored by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling an astounding 98.7% of all investor-owned housing, far overshadowing the mere 0.6% held by institutional investors.

Landlord activity in Q4 2025 saw investors capturing 52.9% of all SFR purchases, demonstrating their continued influence in the market. These investors consistently secure properties at a significant discount, paying 47.2% less than traditional homeowners in Q4, though this discount has shown quarterly volatility. Overall, landlords are robust net buyers, evidenced by a 4.58x buy/sell ratio for 2025, signaling ongoing accumulation of properties, driven largely by new single-property landlords, with 8 entities entering the market in Q4.

This data reveals a vibrant, locally-driven investor market in DeKalb County, where individual investors are the primary engine of growth and accumulation. The negligible presence and neutral transaction status of institutional players suggest that large-scale corporate buying is not a significant factor here. The county's market dynamics are fundamentally influenced by small-scale investors who actively seek out discounted properties, contributing to a substantial portion of the rental housing supply.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 12:39 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyDeKalb (MO)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail