Daviess (MO) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Daviess (MO) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Daviess (MO)
3,091
Total Investors in Daviess (MO)
1,505
Investor Owned SFR in Daviess (MO)
1,142(36.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,274
SFR Owned
897
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
231
SFR Owned
282
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,142 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Daviess County, Paying Significant Premiums in a Low-Activity Market
Landlords in Daviess County, MO, own 1,142 SFR properties, comprising 36.9% of the market, with individuals owning a commanding 78.5% of these. In Q4 2025, landlords secured 50.9% of all SFR purchases, predominantly from mom-and-pop tiers, often paying a premium of $152,519 (43.5%) over traditional homeowners. Despite this robust purchase share, the market saw very low transaction volumes, especially from institutional investors who showed no recorded activity, leaving small landlords as net buyers in this quiet market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Daviess County's SFR market is highly investor-owned at 36.9%, with individuals holding 78.5% of landlord portfolios.
Of the 1,142 investor-owned SFR properties, 940 (82.3%) were cash purchases and 202 (17.7%) were financed, demonstrating a strong preference for cash acquisitions. With 1,126 rented properties, nearly all landlord-owned homes are rental-focused, indicating active management within the market.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Daviess County landlords paid a 43.5% premium, or $152,519 more than homeowners, in Q4 2025.
This Q4 premium marks a continued trend of landlords paying significantly more than homeowners, following a 46.7% premium in Q3 2025 and a massive 219.0% premium in Q1 2025. Landlord acquisition activity was notably low, with no distinct properties recorded as acquired in most recent timeframes.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 50.9% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025, with mom-and-pop investors dominating.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounted for 100.0% of all landlord purchases, totaling 27 properties, while institutional investors (Tier 09) showed no purchase activity. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, acquiring 16 properties through 21 distinct entities.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control an overwhelming 97.1% of investor-owned SFR in Daviess County.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone account for 79.2% of all investor-owned properties, while institutional investors (Tier 09) hold a mere 0.1%. This concentration highlights an extreme reliance on small, individual investors in the county's rental housing supply.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become majority owners starting at the 11-20 property tier in Daviess County.
Individual landlords overwhelmingly dominate smaller portfolios, holding 79.7% of single-property (Tier 01) and 73.4% of two-property (Tier 02) assets. Conversely, in the 11-20 property tier, companies own 71.1% (32 properties) compared to individuals' 28.9% (13 properties).
Geographic Distribution
MO-Daviess-64640 leads Daviess County in investor-owned properties, with 542 units.
MO-Daviess-64654 demonstrates the highest investor ownership rate at 100.0%, despite lacking a specified property count. MO-Daviess-64620 has both high count (108 properties) and a significant ownership rate of 51.9%, indicating a highly landlord-penetrated market.
Historical Transactions
Daviess County landlords are net buyers in Q4 2025 with a 3.6x buy/sell ratio (36 buys vs 10 sells).
Landlords have consistently been net buyers throughout 2025 (155 buys vs 22 sells) and 2024 (153 buys vs 15 sells), indicating a steady accumulation of properties. Institutional investors (1000+ tier) showed no recorded transaction activity.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for 42.4% of all Q4 2025 transactions in Daviess County.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, completing 21 transactions at an average price of $705,964. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) collectively drove all 36 landlord transactions, with no institutional activity.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Daviess County's SFR market is highly investor-owned at 36.9%, with individuals holding 78.5% of landlord portfolios.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Daviess County, MO, control a significant portion of the Single Family Residential (SFR) market, owning 1,142 properties, which represents a substantial 36.9% of the total SFR properties available in the county.

Individual landlords are the backbone of this investor market, holding 897 (78.5%) of all landlord-owned SFR properties, significantly outweighing the 282 (24.7%) held by companies and challenging narratives of corporate dominance.

The ownership structure is further solidified by the entity count, with individual landlords making up 1,274 of the 1,505 total landlords, demonstrating that 84.7% of all landlord entities are individuals.

A strong preference for cash transactions is evident within landlord portfolios, with 940 properties (82.3%) being cash-acquired compared to just 202 (17.7%) financed properties, suggesting a conservative investment strategy.

The overwhelming majority of landlord-owned properties are income-generating rentals, as 1,126 properties are rented, reflecting the core business model of investors in Daviess County.

Though individual landlords hold 78.5% of properties, company landlords maintain a notable 24.7% share, highlighting a diverse, albeit individual-dominated, ownership landscape.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Daviess County landlords paid a 43.5% premium, or $152,519 more than homeowners, in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In a striking reversal of typical market trends, landlords in Daviess County consistently paid a premium over traditional homeowners in Q4 2025, with an average acquisition price of $503,301 compared to homeowner prices of $350,782, representing a substantial $152,519 (43.5%) premium.

This landlord premium is not an isolated event, as Q3 2025 saw landlords pay a $119,753 (46.7%) premium, and Q1 2025 an extraordinary $318,526 (219.0%) premium, indicating a unique market dynamic where investors outbid traditional buyers.

The only quarter where landlords secured a discount was Q2 2025, paying $150,846, which was $197,946 (56.8%) less than homeowners at $348,792, showcasing high volatility in pricing trends throughout the year.

Landlord acquisition activity has been minimal, with no distinct properties recorded as acquired by landlords in any quarter of 2025 or 2024, or even during the 2020-2023 period, according to acquisition by timeframe data, making the quoted average prices reflect a very limited number of transactions in some instances.

Despite the lack of recorded distinct acquisitions, the listed average prices for Years 2020-2023 at $247,155 and Year 2024 at $310,718 suggest a notable increase in market value, culminating in the higher prices observed in 2025, even if landlord activity was sporadic.

The significant price appreciation from the 2020-2023 average of $247,155 to the Q4 2025 landlord average of $503,301 indicates a rapid increase in property values over recent years, effectively doubling the acquisition cost for investors.

The erratic nature of the landlord-homeowner price gap—swinging from premiums of 219.0% to discounts of 56.8%—signals an unpredictable market where investor pricing strategies vary wildly quarter-over-quarter.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 50.9% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025, with mom-and-pop investors dominating.
Detailed Findings

Landlords claimed a substantial share of the Daviess County SFR market in Q4 2025, purchasing 27 properties which represented 50.9% of all 53 total SFR purchases, indicating a robust investor presence in the quarter.

All landlord purchasing activity in Q4 2025 originated from mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), who acquired 27 properties, highlighting the absolute dominance of small-scale landlords in this market's recent acquisitions.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active segment, securing 16 properties, which accounted for 59.3% of all landlord Q4 purchases, driven by 21 unique entities entering or expanding their portfolios.

Two-property landlords (Tier 02) followed with 7 properties (25.9%) purchased by 7 entities, demonstrating continued engagement from slightly more established small landlords.

Small landlords in the 3-5 property tier contributed 4 properties (14.8%) through 5 entities, rounding out the entirely mom-and-pop-driven Q4 acquisition landscape in Daviess County.

The complete absence of institutional investor (Tier 09) purchases underscores that Daviess County's investor market remains firmly in the hands of smaller, local landlords.

The ratio of properties to entities in Q4 purchases, particularly for single-property landlords (16 properties by 21 entities), suggests that many entities are likely new entrants acquiring their first rental property.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control an overwhelming 97.1% of investor-owned SFR in Daviess County.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) exert near-total control over the investor-owned SFR market in Daviess County, holding an impressive 97.1% of all properties, totaling 1,142 investor-owned SFR units.

The backbone of this market is the single-property landlord (Tier 01), who collectively own 929 properties, representing a dominant 79.2% of the entire landlord-owned SFR portfolio.

The presence of institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) is negligible, with only 1 property (0.1%) recorded, underscoring that large corporate entities have minimal footprint in this county.

Beyond single-property owners, two-property landlords (Tier 02) contribute 92 properties (7.8%) and small landlords (3-5 properties) hold 90 properties (7.7%), showing a consistent pattern of small-scale investment.

Even the mid-size landlord tiers remain relatively small, with 6-10 property landlords holding 28 properties (2.4%) and 11-20 property landlords holding 32 properties (2.7%), further reinforcing the market's mom-and-pop nature.

The distribution of ownership highlights a highly decentralized investor market, with no significant concentration in larger portfolio sizes, diverging sharply from trends seen in more urban or institutionalized markets.

The extreme dominance of Tier 01-04 demonstrates that the majority of rental housing supply in Daviess County is managed by individual, local owners rather than large investment firms.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become majority owners starting at the 11-20 property tier in Daviess County.
Detailed Findings

While individual investors predominantly own smaller portfolios in Daviess County, there is a clear shift towards company ownership in larger tiers, with companies becoming the majority owner type starting at the 11-20 property tier.

Individual landlords strongly dominate the entry-level market, holding 758 properties (79.7%) in the single-property (Tier 01) category and 69 properties (73.4%) in the two-property (Tier 02) segment, reinforcing their critical role in smaller portfolio sizes.

The crossover point occurs in the Small-medium (11-20 properties) tier, where companies own 32 properties (71.1%) compared to individuals who hold 13 properties (28.9%), indicating a strategic shift towards corporate structures for managing larger portfolios.

For small landlords (3-5 properties), individuals maintain a strong majority with 67 properties (74.4%) versus companies at 23 properties (25.6%), illustrating that the individual landlord model remains prevalent across many small tiers.

Even in the 6-10 property tier, individual ownership remains robust, with 21 properties (75.0%) compared to companies with 7 properties (25.0%), showcasing that companies gradually increase their share as portfolio size grows.

This pattern suggests that individual investors prefer to manage a few properties, while the operational complexities or financial structures of larger portfolios (11+ properties) are more often handled by company entities.

The data underscores a tiered market where individual agility and local knowledge likely drive smaller portfolios, while corporate structures provide the scalability for larger, albeit still mid-sized in this county, investment portfolios.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
MO-Daviess-64640 leads Daviess County in investor-owned properties, with 542 units.
Detailed Findings

Within Daviess County, the ZIP code MO-Daviess-64640 stands out with the highest number of investor-owned properties, totaling 542 units, reflecting a significant concentration of landlord activity in this specific area.

MO-Daviess-64640 also exhibits a high investor ownership rate of 38.8%, placing it as a key region for landlord investment in the county, alongside other highly penetrated areas.

The ZIP code MO-Daviess-64654 boasts the highest investor ownership rate at 100.0%, suggesting a niche market entirely composed of investor-owned properties, even if its total property count is not provided.

MO-Daviess-64620 shows a strong correlation between high count and high percentage, with 108 investor-owned properties and a substantial 51.9% ownership rate, indicating a market where over half of all SFRs are held by landlords.

Other notable regions by count include MO-Daviess-64648 with 170 investor-owned properties (31.9% rate) and MO-Daviess-64670 with 86 properties (33.1% rate), further highlighting areas of significant investor interest.

The concentration of investor activity points to specific micro-markets within Daviess County that are particularly attractive to landlords, potentially due to rental demand, property values, or other local factors.

While MO-Daviess-64601 is listed, its property data is 'nan', preventing an accurate assessment of its investor-owned count or rate, and requiring focus on areas with complete data for robust analysis.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Daviess County landlords are net buyers in Q4 2025 with a 3.6x buy/sell ratio (36 buys vs 10 sells).
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Daviess County are clearly in an accumulation phase, exhibiting a strong net buyer position in Q4 2025 with 36 buy transactions against only 10 sell transactions, resulting in a healthy 3.6x buy-to-sell ratio.

This net buyer trend is consistent across the entire year, as landlords made 155 purchases compared to 22 sales in Year 2025, demonstrating an ongoing strategy of portfolio expansion within the county.

Historical data reinforces this pattern, with Year 2024 also showing landlords as aggressive net buyers, completing 153 purchases against just 15 sales, further highlighting sustained growth in investor holdings.

Quarter-over-quarter analysis reveals significant buying momentum, with Q3 2025 recording 49 buys against only 3 sells, signifying periods of intense acquisition activity by landlords.

The complete absence of transaction data for institutional investors (1000+ tier) in Daviess County suggests that large-scale corporate buying and selling is not a factor in this local market, which remains dominated by smaller players.

The consistent net buying indicates a stable or growing confidence among landlords in the Daviess County market, signaling positive outlooks for rental demand or property value appreciation.

While average buy and sell prices are not provided for all landlords in this section, the sheer volume difference between buys and sells points to an expanding inventory under landlord ownership.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 42.4% of all Q4 2025 transactions in Daviess County.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a dominant role in the Daviess County housing market during Q4 2025, participating in 36 transactions, which represented a significant 42.4% of the total 85 SFR transactions recorded in the quarter.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the primary drivers of this activity, accounting for 21 transactions, showcasing their considerable influence on the quarter's market dynamics.

Notably, Tier 01 landlords paid the highest average purchase price in Q4, at $705,964, indicating a willingness of new or small landlords to invest substantially in individual properties.

Inter-landlord trading activity was observed, with 3 of the 21 Tier 01 transactions (14.3%) and 1 of the 10 Tier 02 transactions (10.0%) involving purchases from other landlords, suggesting some internal market liquidity.

The entirety of landlord transaction volume (36 transactions) originated from mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), with zero transactions from institutional investors (Tier 09), emphasizing the small-scale nature of the Daviess County market.

Small landlord (3-5 properties) transactions registered an average price of $295,360, significantly lower than Tier 01, which suggests differing acquisition strategies or property types favored by various small tiers.

The contrast between Tier 01's high average price and the lower prices in other mom-and-pop tiers indicates a fragmented market where individual transaction values can vary widely depending on the investor's portfolio size and objectives.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Fuel Daviess County Market Amid Premiums and Low Activity
Holdings
Landlords own 1,142 SFR properties (36.9% of Daviess County's SFR market), with individual investors holding 897 (78.5%) and companies owning 282 (24.7%) of these properties.
Pricing
Landlords paid 43.5% more than traditional homeowners in Q4 2025, securing an average price of $503,301 versus $350,782, representing a substantial $152,519 premium per property.
Activity
Q4 landlords purchased 27 properties, representing 50.9% of all SFR sales, with 21 new single-property landlord entities entering or expanding in the market; mom-and-pop tiers dominated all activity.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 97.1% of investor housing in Daviess County, while institutional investors (1000+) own a mere 0.1% of properties.
Ownership Type
Individual investors hold the vast majority of small portfolios (79.7% of Tier 01), but companies become the majority owners in the 11-20 property tier (71.1% ownership).
Transactions
Landlords in Daviess County are strong net buyers with a 3.6x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025 (36 buys vs 10 sells), while institutional investors showed no recorded transaction activity.
Market Narrative

The Daviess County, MO, real estate market is notably characterized by robust investor penetration, with landlords owning 1,142 SFR properties, comprising a significant 36.9% of the total SFR stock. This market is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors, who account for 897 (78.5%) of landlord-owned properties and make up 84.7% of all landlord entities. In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09) hold a negligible 0.1% of properties, firmly establishing Daviess County as a mom-and-pop driven market.

Investor behavior in Daviess County defies national trends, as landlords consistently paid a premium over traditional homeowners in Q4 2025, averaging $503,301—a $152,519 (43.5%) increase. Landlords were highly active in Q4, securing 50.9% of all SFR purchases, primarily through single-property (Tier 01) and two-property (Tier 02) investors. Despite this strong purchase share, overall distinct acquisition activity by landlords remained low in recent timeframes, with a notable absence of institutional transactions, indicating a localized market largely driven by small-scale, individual investment decisions.

This unique market dynamic, where small landlords are active net buyers even while paying significant premiums, suggests strong local demand for rental housing and confidence in property appreciation within Daviess County. The nearly complete absence of institutional activity and the predominance of individual and small-portfolio owners indicate a resilient, decentralized market less susceptible to the large-scale investment forces seen elsewhere. This structural characteristic likely underpins the localized pricing and activity patterns observed, making Daviess County a distinct and compelling case study for small-scale real estate investment.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 12:39 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyDaviess (MO)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail