Camden (MO) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Camden (MO) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Camden (MO)
23,186
Total Investors in Camden (MO)
12,920
Investor Owned SFR in Camden (MO)
11,256(48.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
10,277
SFR Owned
8,828
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
2,643
SFR Owned
2,881
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 11,256 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Drive Camden County Market, Acquiring Majority of SFR at a Premium
Landlords in MO-Camden County own 11,256 SFR properties, representing a substantial 48.5% of the total SFR market. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate, controlling 98.0% of these investor-owned homes. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 53.8% of all SFR purchases, notably paying a 14.0% premium over traditional homeowners, and remain strong net buyers in the market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords control 48.5% of Camden County's SFR market, with individuals owning 78.4% of properties.
Nearly all investor-owned properties, 11,166, are rented, signaling a strong focus on rental income. Cash purchases (9,527 properties) significantly outweigh financed properties (1,729), indicating strong capital deployment among investors.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords pay a significant 14.0% premium over homeowners in Q4, signaling competitive market dynamics.
The landlord premium has narrowed from 52.5% in Q1 2025 to 14.0% in Q4, but landlords consistently outbid homeowners. Unfortunately, specific acquisition counts for these periods were reported as zero in the available data, despite average prices being present.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords dominated Q4 purchases, securing 53.8% of all SFR sales in Camden County.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounted for 97.0% of these purchases (164 properties), with 202 single-property entities driving much of the activity. Institutional investors (Tier 09) had a minimal presence, acquiring only 1 property.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 98.0% of all investor-owned SFR in Camden County, dwarfing institutional holdings.
The 1-property tier alone accounts for 86.8% (9,957 properties) of total landlord ownership, emphasizing single-property investors as the market's foundation. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.0% of the market (just 3 properties).
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, demonstrating a shift in ownership structure.
Individual investors dominate the smaller portfolio tiers, accounting for 77.7% in the single-property tier. However, company ownership surges to 93.8% in the 21-50 property tier, signifying a clear transition to corporate control in larger portfolios.
Geographic Distribution
Zip code 65079 leads in investor-owned properties and investor ownership rate in Camden County.
Zip codes 65079 and 65324 demonstrate strong investor concentration, appearing in both top lists. While 65764 reports 100.0% investor ownership, its low count suggests it's an anomaly, with 65047 and 65326 showing more substantive high rates.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers in Camden County with a 7.97x buy/sell ratio, while institutional investors also accumulate properties.
All landlords executed 1,020 purchases against 128 sales in 2025, resulting in a net gain of 892 properties. Institutional investors (1000+ tier) are also net buyers, with 3 purchases against 1 sale in 2025, accumulating 2 properties.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords drove over half of Q4 transactions, accounting for 50.9% of all SFR activity.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) dominated transaction volumes with 246 activities. Institutional investors (Tier 09) paid significantly less, averaging $201,720 per property, a 58.8% discount compared to single-property landlords who paid $489,610.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords control 48.5% of Camden County's SFR market, with individuals owning 78.4% of properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords hold a substantial market presence in MO-Camden County, owning 11,256 SFR properties, which constitutes a significant 48.5% of the county's total SFR market of 23,186 properties. This high concentration highlights the area's attractiveness to investors seeking rental income opportunities.

Individual investors form the backbone of the landlord market, owning 8,828 SFR properties (78.4% of investor-owned homes), vastly outnumbering the 2,881 properties held by companies (25.6%). This split underscores the market's reliance on smaller-scale, individual landlords rather than large corporate entities.

The ownership structure by entity count further reinforces individual dominance, with 10,277 individual landlords comprising 79.5% of the total 12,920 landlord entities, compared to 2,643 company landlords (20.5%). This high ratio of individual entities suggests a broad base of smaller, local investors actively participating in the market.

The vast majority of investor-owned properties are rented, with 11,166 properties falling into this category, nearly aligning with the total 11,256 investor-owned SFR. This indicates that almost all investor acquisitions are geared towards generating rental income, rather than short-term flips or other uses.

A notable pattern in holdings reveals that cash acquisitions are the predominant financing method, accounting for 9,527 properties, significantly surpassing the 1,729 properties that are financed. This preference for cash purchases suggests a market with robust liquidity and potentially a lower reliance on traditional lending for investor activity.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords pay a significant 14.0% premium over homeowners in Q4, signaling competitive market dynamics.
Detailed Findings

In a surprising reversal of typical market trends, landlords in MO-Camden County consistently paid significantly more than traditional homeowners for SFR properties throughout 2025. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired properties at an average price of $482,995, a notable $59,356 (14.0%) premium over the average homeowner price of $423,639.

This landlord premium has been a persistent feature of the market, peaking earlier in the year. In Q1 2025, landlords paid $551,290, a staggering 52.5% ($189,691) more than homeowners' average of $361,599. Similarly, Q2 saw a 52.6% premium, and Q3 a 40.7% premium, indicating sustained higher spending by investors.

While the percentage premium has narrowed throughout the year, dropping from over 50% in Q1/Q2 to 14.0% in Q4, the trend of landlords paying more than homeowners remains firmly established. This suggests that investors are willing to pay above market rates, possibly for specific types of properties or to secure inventory in a competitive environment.

Despite the presence of average acquisition prices for various timeframes, the `Distinct SFR Properties Purchased` column in the provided data recorded 0 properties for all periods in 2024 and 2025. This peculiar data point means that while we can observe pricing trends, the volume of acquisitions for these specific reporting segments is not reflected here, requiring careful interpretation of these price averages.

The significant premiums paid by landlords in MO-Camden County run counter to national trends where investors often secure properties at a discount. This unique market dynamic suggests strong demand from the investor segment, potentially driving up prices and making the market more challenging for traditional owner-occupant buyers.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords dominated Q4 purchases, securing 53.8% of all SFR sales in Camden County.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were the dominant force in the MO-Camden County SFR market during Q4 2025, acquiring 161 properties, which represents a commanding 53.8% share of the total 299 SFR purchases. This activity level highlights a robust appetite from investors for single-family residential properties in the region.

The overwhelming majority of Q4 landlord purchases came from mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), who collectively bought 164 properties, constituting 97.0% of all landlord acquisitions. This underscores that smaller, individual investors are the primary drivers of market activity, rather than larger corporate entities.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were particularly active, responsible for 132 (78.1%) of the Q4 landlord property acquisitions, driven by 202 distinct entities. This signifies a strong entry point for new or expanding small-scale investors into the market, solidifying the role of first-time landlords.

In stark contrast to mom-and-pop activity, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) had a negligible impact on Q4 purchases, acquiring only 1 property, which represents a mere 0.6% of landlord purchases. This distribution firmly refutes narratives of institutional takeover in this county's SFR market.

The high percentage of landlord purchases, coupled with the overwhelming dominance of mom-and-pop segments, paints a picture of a decentralized and accessible investor market. It suggests that individuals and small-portfolio owners are actively expanding their holdings, likely responding to local market conditions and rental demand.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 98.0% of all investor-owned SFR in Camden County, dwarfing institutional holdings.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04, 1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate the investor-owned SFR market in MO-Camden County, controlling a staggering 98.0% of all landlord-held properties, totaling 11,236 units. This concentration highlights the vital role of small-scale investors in providing rental housing.

The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) is the foundation of this market, holding 9,957 SFR properties, which accounts for 86.8% of the total investor-owned portfolio. This signifies that first-time and individual investors managing a single rental unit represent the vast majority of the county's landlord base.

In sharp contrast to the pervasive mom-and-pop presence, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold a near-nonexistent share of the market, controlling just 3 properties (0.0% of the total). This finding strongly refutes any perception of large corporate entities dominating the SFR landscape in this region.

The distribution across tiers reveals a rapid decline in property share as portfolio size increases; for example, the two-property tier holds 706 properties (6.2%), while the 6-10 property tier drops to just 82 properties (0.7%). This illustrates a highly fragmented market structure, primarily composed of very small investors.

Given the overwhelming concentration in the mom-and-pop tiers and the minimal presence of institutional players, the MO-Camden County market relies heavily on individual entrepreneurial activity to supply and manage its rental housing stock. This structure could imply different market dynamics, potentially less susceptible to the large-scale investment strategies seen in other regions.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, demonstrating a shift in ownership structure.
Detailed Findings

The ownership landscape in MO-Camden County undergoes a significant shift at the mid-size portfolio tiers. While individual investors overwhelmingly dominate smaller portfolios, companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, holding 61.0% of properties compared to individuals at 39.0%.

For the smallest portfolios, individual investors are the predominant owner type: 77.7% in the single-property (Tier 01) category (8,003 properties) and 75.2% in the two-property (Tier 02) category (536 properties). This confirms that the entry point into the landlord market is primarily individual-driven.

As portfolio sizes increase, company ownership rapidly gains ground. By the 11-20 property tier, companies own 76.7% of properties (79 units), and this concentration further intensifies to 93.8% in the 21-50 property tier (45 properties). This suggests that while small landlords are predominantly individuals, growth into larger portfolios often involves corporate structuring.

The distinct crossover point at the 6-10 property tier highlights a strategic decision for investors as they expand their holdings. Beyond this point, the operational complexities or tax advantages of incorporating likely lead to a preference for company ownership, allowing for more scalable and formalized management of properties.

This pattern indicates a segmented market: the vast numerical majority of landlords and properties are individual-owned within smaller tiers, yet companies effectively take over the larger portfolio management, demonstrating different strategies and capacities across the investor spectrum.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Zip code 65079 leads in investor-owned properties and investor ownership rate in Camden County.
Detailed Findings

The geographic distribution of investor-owned properties in MO-Camden County reveals significant concentration, with zip code 65079 leading in both sheer count and a high investor ownership rate. This zip code holds 2,467 investor-owned properties, representing 58.9% of its total SFR market.

Following 65079 in property count are 65020 with 2,328 properties (39.8% rate), 65049 with 1,540 properties (50.1% rate), 65065 with 1,457 properties (49.3% rate), and 65324 with 749 properties (56.6% rate). These top five zip codes demonstrate where investor capital is most heavily deployed within the county.

When examining investor ownership rates, MO-Camden-65764 stands out with 100.0% investor-owned properties, though this is likely an anomaly given its unspecified low property count. More substantively, 65047 has 69.1%, 65326 has 64.5%, and the aforementioned 65079 boasts 58.9%, indicating high market penetration in these areas.

A clear correlation exists between high property counts and high ownership percentages, as seen with zip codes 65079 and 65324 appearing in both top-five lists. This dual leadership signifies that these specific sub-geographies are not only popular for investment but also highly saturated with investor-owned housing.

The varying rates and concentrations across zip codes suggest that investors are targeting specific micro-markets within Camden County, likely based on factors such as rental demand, property values, and potential for appreciation, leading to a patchwork of investor activity rather than uniform distribution.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are strong net buyers in Camden County with a 7.97x buy/sell ratio, while institutional investors also accumulate properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in MO-Camden County are overwhelmingly net buyers, demonstrating a strong appetite for property acquisition. In Q4 2025 alone, they purchased 254 properties while selling only 34, resulting in a net gain of 220 properties for the quarter.

Throughout 2025, the trend of aggressive buying persisted, with all landlords accumulating 1,020 properties against just 128 sales, resulting in a remarkable net acquisition of 892 properties. This translates to an impressive buy/sell ratio of 7.97x (1,020 buys / 128 sells), indicating a robust expansion phase for the investor segment.

Even institutional investors (1000+ tier), often perceived as cautious, mirrored this net buying trend, albeit on a much smaller scale. In Q4 2025, they bought 2 properties and sold 1, and for the entirety of 2025, they completed 3 purchases against 1 sale, resulting in a net acquisition of 2 properties.

Comparing Q4 activity to previous quarters in 2025, the buy volume shows consistency, with 254 purchases in Q4, 300 in Q3, and 292 in Q2. Sell volumes remain low across all quarters, reinforcing the long-term holding strategy prevalent among landlords in the county.

The sustained pattern of high purchase volume coupled with low sell volume across all landlord segments, including institutional players, signals a confident and growing investor market in MO-Camden County. This indicates a belief in the long-term value and rental income potential of SFR properties in the region.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords drove over half of Q4 transactions, accounting for 50.9% of all SFR activity.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a central role in the MO-Camden County SFR market during Q4 2025, participating in 254 transactions, which represents a substantial 50.9% of the total 499 SFR transactions for the quarter. This highlights their significant influence on market liquidity and activity levels.

The bulk of this transaction activity was driven by mom-and-pop investors, with Single-property (Tier 01) landlords alone responsible for 204 transactions. Collectively, Tiers 01-04 (mom-and-pop) accounted for 246 transactions, indicating that smaller investors are the primary engines of market turnover.

A notable price disparity emerged in Q4 transactions: single-property landlords (Tier 01) paid an average of $489,610 per property. In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) acquired properties at an average price of $201,720, representing a significant 58.8% discount compared to Tier 01 buyers.

Inter-landlord trading activity varied significantly by tier. While Single-property (Tier 01) and Two-property (Tier 02) landlords bought only 6.4% and 3.7% of their properties from other landlords, respectively, larger tiers showed much higher reliance. The 6-10 property tier, Large (101-1000), and Institutional (1000+) tiers all sourced 100.0% of their Q4 purchases from other landlords, suggesting that larger players primarily acquire properties within the existing investor ecosystem.

This dynamic indicates that smaller, individual investors are often purchasing properties from traditional homeowners or new builds, while larger investors are more likely to be consolidating portfolios through transactions with other established landlords. The institutional discount suggests they may be acquiring distressed assets or entire portfolios in bulk, which would naturally come at a lower per-unit cost than individual market purchases.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Dominate Camden County SFR; Investors Pay Premium, Drive Q4 Acquisitions
Holdings
Landlords own 11,256 SFR properties, representing 48.5% of MO-Camden County's total SFR market. Individual investors hold 8,828 properties (78.4% of investor-owned), while companies own 2,881 (25.6%).
Pricing
Landlords paid 14.0% more than traditional homeowners in Q4 2025, securing properties at an average of $482,995 compared to homeowners' $423,639, a significant $59,356 premium.
Activity
Q4 2025 saw landlords purchase 161 properties, accounting for 53.8% of all SFR sales. The vast majority of these purchases were by mom-and-pop landlords (97.0%), with 202 single-property entities entering or expanding in the market.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.0% of investor-owned housing in MO-Camden County, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) own a negligible 0.0% (3 properties).
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, holding 77.7% in the single-property tier, but companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, signifying a shift to corporate control for larger portfolios.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 7.97x buy/sell ratio in 2025 (1,020 buys vs 128 sells). Institutional investors are also net buyers (3 buys vs 1 sell in 2025).
Market Narrative

The MO-Camden County SFR market is heavily influenced by investor activity, with landlords owning 11,256 properties, representing a substantial 48.5% of the total SFR market. This market is overwhelmingly dominated by mom-and-pop landlords, who collectively control 98.0% of all investor-owned properties, totaling 11,236 units. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a near-negligible 0.0% share, owning just 3 properties. The ownership structure further shows individuals owning 8,828 properties (78.4% of investor-owned homes), while company entities own 2,881 properties (25.6%), indicating a fragmented market powered by local, individual investors.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 was marked by high acquisition levels and unique pricing dynamics. Landlords purchased 161 properties, capturing 53.8% of all SFR sales, with mom-and-pop segments driving 97.0% of this activity. Unusually, landlords paid a significant premium of 14.0% over traditional homeowners, with an average price of $482,995 versus $423,639, a trend of higher investor prices observed throughout 2025. This willingness to pay more, coupled with a 7.97x buy/sell ratio for all landlords in 2025, signals a robust and aggressive investor expansion, with institutional players also net buyers. A notable strategy difference emerged in Q4 transactions where institutional investors acquired properties at a 58.8% discount compared to single-property landlords, suggesting different acquisition channels or asset types.

These findings collectively paint a picture of a highly active and localized investor market in MO-Camden County, largely insulated from the influence of large institutional players. The significant mom-and-pop dominance and their aggressive buying, even at a premium over homeowners, indicates strong confidence in local market conditions and rental income potential. The preference for cash purchases and the high proportion of rented properties further reinforce a long-term, income-focused investment strategy among the county's landlord base, suggesting a stable and growing rental housing supply primarily sustained by small-scale entrepreneurs.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 12:27 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyCamden (MO)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail