Stevens (MN) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Stevens (MN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Stevens (MN)
2,871
Total Investors in Stevens (MN)
433
Investor Owned SFR in Stevens (MN)
471(16.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
367
SFR Owned
365
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
66
SFR Owned
106
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 471 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Stevens County Landlords are Net Buyers Amid Low Transaction Volume and Significant Discounts
Landlords in Stevens County, MN, own 471 SFR properties, representing 16.4% of the market, with individuals holding the vast majority at 77.5%. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 5 properties, securing a substantial 64.6% discount compared to traditional homeowners, while remaining net buyers across the year with a 3.86x buy-to-sell ratio.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual investors dominate Stevens County's 471 landlord-owned SFR properties, holding 77.5% of the portfolio.
The vast majority of landlord-owned properties, 458 out of 471, are non-owner-occupied and rented, indicating a strong focus on rental income. A significant 372 properties are owned outright in cash, highlighting substantial equity within landlord portfolios.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a significant 64.6% discount in Q4 2025, paying $76,600 compared to homeowners' $216,598.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners fluctuated substantially quarter-over-quarter, ranging from a 42.7% discount in Q3 to a 74.8% discount in Q1. Despite the attractive pricing, landlord acquisition activity was low, with only 5 properties purchased in Q4 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords comprised a minority of Q4 2025 SFR purchases in Stevens County, acquiring 5 properties (17.9% of the market).
All landlord purchases in Q4 2025 were made by mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who acquired 5 properties, with no activity from institutional investors. Tiers 2 (two-property landlords) and Tiers 3-5 (small landlords) dominated Q4 purchases, each accounting for 40.0% of the landlord acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 84.6% of investor-owned SFR in Stevens County.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the largest segment, owning 55.1% of investor-owned properties. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have no presence in the county, controlling 0.0% of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate all landlord tiers in Stevens County, maintaining majority ownership even in mid-size portfolios.
There is no tier where companies become majority owners, with the highest company concentration at 34.5% in Tier 3-5. Individual landlords reach their peak concentration in Tier 21-50, holding 96.4% of properties within that segment.
Geographic Distribution
Zip codes 56221, 56235, and 56244 lead in landlord-owned property counts across Stevens County, MN.
Zip codes 56343 (28.6%), 56323 (27.3%), and 56207 (22.3%) exhibit the highest landlord ownership rates by percentage. There is some correlation, with 56207 and 56235 appearing in both top counts and top percentages, indicating areas of dense investor activity.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Stevens County are consistent net buyers, with 27 purchases versus 7 sells in Year 2025, yielding a 3.86x buy/sell ratio.
The buy/sell ratio fluctuated significantly quarterly, with Q3 2025 showing the highest net buying at 5.5x (11 buys vs 2 sells). No transaction data is available for institutional investors (1000+ tier), indicating their continued absence from this market.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for a modest 12.8% of all Q4 2025 SFR transactions in Stevens County.
All Q4 landlord transactions (5 properties) were by mom-and-pop tiers, with no institutional activity. Tiers 3-5 paid the highest average price at $96,500, while also engaging in inter-landlord trading for 50.0% of their purchases.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual investors dominate Stevens County's 471 landlord-owned SFR properties, holding 77.5% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord landscape in Stevens County, holding 365 (77.5%) of the 471 investor-owned SFR properties, significantly outpacing companies which own 106 (22.5%). This highlights the mom-and-pop nature of the local rental market.

The landlord portfolio is heavily concentrated on rentals, with 458 properties identified as rented, indicating that 97.2% of investor-owned SFR are actively generating rental income. This high percentage underscores the market's focus on providing housing for tenants.

A substantial portion of landlord holdings, 372 properties, are owned outright in cash, demonstrating a strong financial position among investors in the county. In contrast, 99 properties are financed, suggesting a blend of financing strategies but a preference for unencumbered assets.

With 367 individual landlords compared to 66 company landlords, the ratio of individual to company entities is 5.56:1, further emphasizing the fragmented nature of ownership. However, individual entities hold an average of 0.99 properties each, while company entities hold an average of 1.61 properties, indicating companies may hold slightly larger, albeit still small, portfolios on average.

The market structure in Stevens County clearly shows a foundation built on small, individually-owned, rental-focused portfolios. This defies common narratives of large corporate dominance, instead portraying a market supported by local investors primarily generating rental income and holding significant equity.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a significant 64.6% discount in Q4 2025, paying $76,600 compared to homeowners' $216,598.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Stevens County demonstrated a remarkable pricing advantage, acquiring properties at an average of $76,600. This represents a substantial $139,998 discount, or 64.6% less than the average $216,598 paid by traditional homeowners, showcasing a highly opportunistic buying strategy.

The price differential between landlords and homeowners has seen considerable volatility throughout 2025. Discounts for landlords ranged from a high of 74.8% in Q1 ($56,840 vs $225,460) to a low of 42.7% in Q3 ($134,390 vs $234,582), indicating that market conditions allowed for varying levels of savings for investors.

Despite the attractive discounts, landlord acquisition activity remained low across all specific quarters of 2025 and 2024, with only 5 properties purchased in Q4 2025 and 27 in Year 2025 overall. This signals either a cautious investment approach or limited suitable inventory in Stevens County, despite the appealing price points for landlords.

Comparing across annual timeframes, average landlord acquisition prices stood at $100,421 for Year 2025 and $142,480 for Year 2024, both significantly lower than the average homeowner prices. The consistent ability for landlords to acquire properties at a lower price point than the general market underscores their strategic advantage or access to different property segments.

The data suggests that while landlords in Stevens County are capable of securing significant discounts, their actual acquisition volume is limited. This pattern indicates that opportunities for deep discounts exist, but are not necessarily translating into high-volume purchasing activity in this market.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords comprised a minority of Q4 2025 SFR purchases in Stevens County, acquiring 5 properties (17.9% of the market).
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Stevens County were responsible for a modest share of the SFR purchase market, acquiring 5 properties, which represented 17.9% of the total 28 SFR purchases. This indicates that other buyers, primarily traditional homeowners, were the dominant force in the market this quarter.

All landlord purchasing activity in Q4 2025 originated from mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who collectively purchased 5 properties, making up 100.0% of all landlord acquisitions for the quarter. This reinforces the local, small-scale nature of real estate investment in the county.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) were completely absent from the Q4 2025 purchase landscape, recording 0 acquisitions. This further emphasizes that larger, corporate entities are not actively expanding their portfolios in Stevens County, leaving the market to smaller investors.

The Q4 purchasing activity was concentrated among established small landlords, with Two-property (Tier 2) and Small landlord (Tier 3-5) tiers each acquiring 2 properties, representing 40.0% of landlord purchases respectively. An additional 1 property was purchased by a Small landlord (Tier 6-10).

Notably, there were no recorded purchases by new single-property landlords (Tier 01) in Q4 2025. This suggests a lack of new entrants into the rental market at the lowest tier during this period, despite the activity from slightly larger mom-and-pop investors.

The market's Q4 activity was driven by three entities across Tiers 2, 3-5, and 6-10, acquiring 5 properties in total. This implies a targeted and limited expansion among existing small and mid-size landlords rather than widespread or new investor engagement.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 84.6% of investor-owned SFR in Stevens County.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords, encompassing those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04), collectively command 84.6% of all investor-owned SFR properties in Stevens County, totaling 433 properties. This highlights the significant role small, local investors play in the county's rental housing market.

The single-property landlord (Tier 01) segment is the backbone of investor ownership, accounting for 282 properties, or 55.1% of the entire investor-owned portfolio. This strong concentration in the lowest tier underscores that individual, first-time, or very small-scale landlords are the dominant market participants.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have no discernible presence in Stevens County, controlling 0.0% of the investor-owned SFR market. This definitively refutes any notion of large corporate landlords influencing the local housing supply.

Beyond single-property owners, smaller-to-medium landlords also contribute substantially to the portfolio: Tiers 3-5 own 84 properties (16.4%), Tiers 11-20 own 41 properties (8.0%), and Tiers 21-50 own 28 properties (5.5%). These tiers represent the growth path for local investors in the county.

The distribution reveals a deeply localized and accessible investment landscape, where the vast majority of rental housing is managed by individuals or small entities. This structure contrasts sharply with markets experiencing heavy institutional investment, offering a unique dynamic in Stevens County.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate all landlord tiers in Stevens County, maintaining majority ownership even in mid-size portfolios.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors consistently hold the majority of properties across all investor tiers in Stevens County, demonstrating their foundational role in the local rental market. For instance, in the 6-10 property tier, individuals own 31 properties (91.2%) compared to companies with just 3 properties (8.8%).

The data reveals no crossover point where company ownership surpasses individual ownership in any tier. Even in the relatively larger tiers such as 3-5 properties, individuals own 55 properties (65.5%) while companies hold 29 properties (34.5%), which is the highest company share observed.

Single-property landlords (Tier 1) are predominantly individuals, controlling 242 properties (85.8%), while companies own 40 properties (14.2%) in this tier. This pattern solidifies the mom-and-pop nature of new or initial investments in the county.

Individual investor concentration peaks in the Tier 21-50 category, where they account for 27 properties (96.4%) compared to just 1 property (3.6%) owned by companies. This suggests that even as portfolios grow into the small-medium range, individual ownership remains overwhelmingly prevalent.

The consistently low proportion of company ownership across all tiers indicates that Stevens County's investor market is largely insulated from large-scale corporate influence. This structure promotes a locally-driven, entrepreneur-centric rental housing ecosystem.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Zip codes 56221, 56235, and 56244 lead in landlord-owned property counts across Stevens County, MN.
Detailed Findings

Within Stevens County, MN, landlord-owned properties are most concentrated in specific zip codes. MN-Stevens-56221 leads with 46 investor-owned properties, followed closely by MN-Stevens-56235 with 41 properties, and MN-Stevens-56244 with 35 properties, highlighting key investment hotspots.

Beyond sheer volume, some zip codes demonstrate a higher penetration of investor ownership as a percentage of total SFR. MN-Stevens-56343 boasts the highest rate at 28.6% investor-owned, with MN-Stevens-56323 at 27.3% and MN-Stevens-56207 at 22.3%, indicating markets with a significant portion of rental housing.

A notable overlap exists between the top regions by count and by percentage. MN-Stevens-56207, with 21 investor-owned properties and a 22.3% rate, and MN-Stevens-56235, with 41 properties and a 19.9% rate, appear in both top lists, signaling areas that are both popular for investors and have a high proportion of investor-owned homes.

The geographic distribution underscores that investor activity in Stevens County is not uniform but concentrated in certain areas, likely driven by local market dynamics, property availability, and rental demand within those specific zip codes.

This pattern of localized concentration is crucial for understanding the ground-level impact of investor activity, suggesting that housing market pressures or rental availability might vary significantly even within a single county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords in Stevens County are consistent net buyers, with 27 purchases versus 7 sells in Year 2025, yielding a 3.86x buy/sell ratio.
Detailed Findings

Across all reported timeframes, landlords in Stevens County have consistently been net buyers. In Year 2025, they acquired 27 properties while selling 7, resulting in a robust buy/sell ratio of 3.86x, signaling continued portfolio expansion.

The buy/sell ratio has varied across recent quarters, demonstrating dynamic market engagement. Q3 2025 saw the highest net buying activity with a 5.5x ratio (11 buys vs 2 sells), while Q2 2025 had the lowest at 1.67x (5 buys vs 3 sells), reflecting quarter-specific market opportunities or landlord strategies.

For Q4 2025, landlords maintained their net buyer status with 5 acquisitions against 2 dispositions, resulting in a 2.5x buy/sell ratio. This consistent accumulation, even in lower volume quarters, indicates a long-term strategy of growth among Stevens County investors.

Year-over-year trends show similar activity, with Year 2024 also recording 27 buys against 10 sells, resulting in a 2.7x buy/sell ratio. This sustained net buying pattern over multiple years highlights the county's appeal for long-term real estate investment.

Crucially, there is no available transaction data for institutional investors (1000+ tier) across any timeframe. This suggests that large-scale corporate entities are not participating in property transactions in Stevens County, reinforcing the dominance of smaller, local landlords.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for a modest 12.8% of all Q4 2025 SFR transactions in Stevens County.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlord activity represented a minority of the overall transaction volume in Stevens County, participating in 5 of the 39 total SFR transactions, which accounts for 12.8%. This indicates that the majority of market movement was driven by non-landlord buyers or sellers.

All landlord transactions in Q4 were confined to mom-and-pop investor tiers. Specifically, Two-property (Tier 2) and Small landlord (Tier 3-5) tiers each accounted for 2 transactions, and the Small landlord (Tier 6-10) tier contributed 1 transaction. No institutional transactions were observed.

Average purchase prices varied across the active tiers, with Tier 3-5 landlords paying the highest average of $96,500 per property. Tier 6-10 landlords paid an average of $70,000, and Tier 2 landlords paid the lowest at $60,000, revealing diverse pricing strategies or property types acquired by different investor sizes.

Inter-landlord trading activity was significant for some segments in Q4. For the Tier 6-10 landlords, 100.0% of their single transaction was bought from another landlord, while Tier 3-5 landlords sourced 50.0% (1 of 2 transactions) from other landlords, indicating an internal market for investor properties.

The price spread between the highest ($96,500 for Tier 3-5) and lowest ($60,000 for Tier 2) average purchase price among active landlord tiers was $36,500 in Q4, reflecting notable differences in acquisition costs or property values sought by different small landlord segments.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Drive Stevens County Market Amidst Low Activity and Significant Price Advantage
Holdings
Landlords in Stevens County, MN, own 471 SFR properties, comprising 16.4% of the county's 2,871 total SFR market. Individual investors hold 365 (77.5%) of these properties, while companies own 106 (22.5%).
Pricing
Landlords in Stevens County paid an average of $76,600 in Q4 2025, which is 64.6% less than traditional homeowners who paid $216,598, securing a $139,998 discount per property.
Activity
Q4 2025 saw landlords purchase 5 properties, representing 17.9% of all SFR sales, with no new single-property landlords (Tier 01) entering the market. Activity was solely driven by existing small landlords in Tiers 2, 3-5, and 6-10.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties, Tiers 01-04) overwhelmingly control 84.6% of investor-owned housing in Stevens County, while institutional investors (1000+ properties, Tier 09) hold no properties (0.0%).
Ownership Type
Individual investors maintain majority ownership across all tiers in Stevens County; no tier shows companies as majority owners, with company concentration peaking at 34.5% in the 3-5 property tier.
Transactions
Landlords in Stevens County are net buyers with a 3.86x buy/sell ratio in Year 2025 (27 buys vs 7 sells), but institutional investors show no recorded transaction activity.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in Stevens County, MN, is predominantly shaped by mom-and-pop landlords, who collectively own 433 SFR properties, representing an overwhelming 84.6% of the investor-owned market. This local ownership structure is further underscored by individual investors holding 77.5% of the total 471 landlord-owned SFR properties, which constitutes 16.4% of the county's entire SFR housing stock. The complete absence of institutional investors (Tier 09) in both ownership and transaction data highlights a market fundamentally different from highly corporatized regions, emphasizing a community-driven rental housing sector.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 indicated opportunistic buying amidst low volume; landlords purchased only 5 properties, accounting for 17.9% of total SFR purchases. Notably, these acquisitions were secured at a significant advantage, with landlords paying an average of $76,600—a 64.6% discount compared to traditional homeowners' $216,598. This deep discount was part of a broader pattern of landlords being consistent net buyers across 2025, achieving a 3.86x buy-to-sell ratio. However, the lack of new single-property landlords entering the market suggests a consolidation or cautious approach among existing small-to-mid-size investors (Tiers 2, 3-5, 6-10) who drove all Q4 purchase activity.

These trends paint a picture of a robust, locally-supported rental market in Stevens County, where small landlords continue to expand their portfolios strategically, capitalizing on significant pricing advantages when properties become available. The enduring dominance of individual, mom-and-pop investors ensures that the housing market largely remains under local control, potentially fostering a more stable and community-focused rental environment. The notable absence of institutional players allows local market dynamics, driven by smaller, agile investors, to dictate investment patterns and housing supply.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 12:29 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyStevens (MN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail