Dodge (MN) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Dodge (MN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Dodge (MN)
6,770
Total Investors in Dodge (MN)
360
Investor Owned SFR in Dodge (MN)
314(4.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
295
SFR Owned
225
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
65
SFR Owned
100
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 314 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Dodge County's Investor Market Dominated by Mom-and-Pops, Q4 Sees Landlords as Net Sellers
Landlords hold 314 SFR properties, making up 4.6% of Dodge County's market, with individual investors owning 71.7%. Mom-and-pop landlords control 92.8% of investor-owned housing. In Q4 2025, landlords were net sellers, making only one purchase at a significant premium to homeowner prices, highlighting unique market dynamics.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords in Dodge County hold 314 SFR properties, with individuals owning 71.7% and companies 31.8%.
A vast majority, 93.3% of investor-owned properties (293 properties), are rented, indicating a strong rental focus. Notably, 68.8% of investor holdings (216 properties) are owned outright with cash, while 31.2% (98 properties) are financed.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q4 2025, landlords paid $950,000 for a single property, a 187.1% premium over homeowner prices.
Landlord acquisition data for most of 2025 shows 0 purchases, making quarter-over-quarter price gap trends inconsistent for landlords. However, homeowners saw fluctuating prices, dropping from $390,040 in Q2 to $330,849 in Q4. Due to limited landlord acquisition data across timeframes, comparisons between individual and company investor prices are not feasible.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords accounted for a minimal 1.7% of all Q4 2025 SFR purchases in Dodge County, securing just one property.
The sole landlord purchase in Q4 was made by a mom-and-pop landlord (Tier 01-04), representing 100.0% of all landlord acquisitions for the quarter. No institutional investors (Tier 09) made any purchases in Q4, highlighting the dominance of small-scale investors in recent activity.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 92.8% of investor-owned SFR housing in Dodge County.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the largest segment, owning 67.3% (216 properties) of all investor-owned SFR. Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold a minimal 1.6% (5 properties), showing their limited presence. Due to data limitations, acquisition prices by tier are not available for Dodge County, MN, preventing comparison of investor pricing strategies across different portfolio sizes.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors dominate the smaller portfolio tiers, but companies take majority control in the 6-10 property tier in Dodge County.
Individuals comprise 85.1% of single-property owners, while companies make up 72.7% of owners with 6-10 properties. Due to data limitations, individual versus company acquisition prices within each tier are not available. The data does not provide specific property counts for institutional companies (Tier 09) broken down by owner type, but overall, institutional ownership is very low.
Geographic Distribution
MN-Dodge-55944 leads with 97 investor-owned properties, while MN-Dodge-55946 boasts the highest ownership rate at 16.7%.
MN-Dodge-55944, 55927, 55924, and 55940 are the top four zip codes by count, together holding 220 investor-owned properties. MN-Dodge-55946 (16.7%) and MN-Dodge-55920 (14.3%) exhibit the highest landlord penetration rates. The zip code MN-Dodge-55924 appears on both lists, indicating a region with both high investor count and a high ownership rate.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Dodge County were net sellers in Q4 2025 with a 0.25x buy/sell ratio (1 buy vs 4 sells), a shift from being net buyers earlier in the year.
The buy/sell trend fluctuated significantly; landlords were net buyers with high ratios in Q2 (6.0x) and Q3 (3.67x) before the Q4 shift to selling. Overall for Year 2025, landlords remain net buyers with a 1.92x buy/sell ratio (25 buys vs 13 sells). Data for institutional investor transactions and inter-landlord trade percentages are not provided, limiting a full market liquidity analysis.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords comprised a minimal 1.1% of all Q4 2025 transactions in Dodge County, with only one recorded transaction.
The single landlord transaction in Q4 was by a mom-and-pop investor (Tier 01) at an average purchase price of $950,000. This investor did not acquire the property from another landlord. There were no institutional investor transactions in Q4, so no price comparisons can be made for them.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords in Dodge County hold 314 SFR properties, with individuals owning 71.7% and companies 31.8%.
Detailed Findings

The landlord-owned SFR portfolio in Dodge County, MN, comprises 314 properties, representing 4.6% of the total SFR market. This indicates a relatively small but active investor presence within the county's housing landscape.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the market, holding 225 SFR properties, which accounts for 71.7% of all investor-owned housing. In contrast, company investors own 100 properties, representing a 31.8% share, showcasing a clear preference for individual ownership models in this county.

The strong focus on rental income is evident as 93.3% (293 properties) of landlord-owned SFR properties are non-owner-occupied and rented out. This highlights that the vast majority of investor activity is aimed at generating rental revenue.

A significant portion of landlord holdings, 68.8% (216 properties), were acquired with cash, while 31.2% (98 properties) are financed. This high percentage of cash purchases suggests a preference for unburdened assets or the ability to leverage substantial capital within the investor community in Dodge County.

When considering entity counts, individual landlords (295 entities) outnumber company landlords (65 entities) by a ratio of 4.54 to 1. This emphasizes the prevalence of smaller, individual operations over larger, corporate entities in the county.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q4 2025, landlords paid $950,000 for a single property, a 187.1% premium over homeowner prices.
Detailed Findings

Landlord acquisition pricing in Dodge County, MN, presented an anomaly in Q4 2025, with a single landlord purchase recorded at an average price of $950,000. This represented an extraordinary 187.1% premium, or $619,151 more, compared to the average homeowner purchase price of $330,849 in the same quarter.

Analysis of landlord acquisition trends across earlier quarters in 2025 is limited due to zero recorded purchases for landlords in Q1, Q2, and Q3. This lack of consistent acquisition data makes it challenging to establish reliable quarter-over-quarter price gap trends for landlords.

Conversely, traditional homeowner acquisition prices have shown fluctuations throughout 2025, starting at $326,485 in Q1, peaking at $390,040 in Q2, and then settling at $330,849 by Q4. This indicates a dynamic market for traditional buyers despite the lack of consistent landlord activity.

Without consistent acquisition activity from landlords, especially across individual and company owner types, it is not possible to determine if different investor types pay different prices in Dodge County. The single Q4 landlord purchase at an exceptionally high price could be an outlier or reflect a very specific market condition for that property.

The absence of landlord acquisition data for years 2020-2023 also prevents any assessment of price appreciation or decline for investors from the pandemic era to the current Q4. This data gap limits a comprehensive understanding of long-term investor pricing strategies and market evolution in the county.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords accounted for a minimal 1.7% of all Q4 2025 SFR purchases in Dodge County, securing just one property.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlord activity in Dodge County, MN, was exceptionally low, with only 1 SFR property purchased. This accounted for a mere 1.7% of the total 58 SFR purchases made in the quarter, indicating that the vast majority of transactions were driven by non-landlord buyers.

The single landlord acquisition in Q4 was by a mom-and-pop landlord from Tier 01 (single-property owners). This means that 100.0% of all landlord purchases were attributed to mom-and-pop investors, underscoring their continued, albeit minimal, participation in the market.

New landlords entering the market, specifically those acquiring their first property (Tier 01), represented the entire landlord purchase activity with 1 entity making 1 purchase. This points to very limited new investor entry in Q4, or the single purchase being an outlier.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) showed no purchasing activity in Q4, reinforcing the pattern of market entry and activity being concentrated among smaller-scale landlords in Dodge County. Their absence suggests a strategic withdrawal or lack of suitable opportunities for large-scale acquisitions.

The average properties per entity for Q4 purchases stands at 1.0 for Tier 01, given that 1 entity acquired 1 property. This indicates that the entities active in this quarter were focused on single property acquisitions.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 92.8% of investor-owned SFR housing in Dodge County.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords, encompassing Tiers 01 through 04 (1-10 properties), collectively dominate the investor-owned SFR market in Dodge County, MN, controlling a substantial 92.8% of all such properties. This concentration highlights the foundational role of small-scale investors.

Within the mom-and-pop segment, single-property landlords (Tier 01) are the most significant group, owning 216 properties, which represents 67.3% of all properties categorized by tier. This solidifies their position as the backbone of the SFR rental market in the county.

In stark contrast to mom-and-pop prevalence, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold a very minor share, owning only 5 properties, which accounts for 1.6% of all investor-owned SFR. This suggests a limited appetite or opportunity for large-scale corporate investment in Dodge County.

The distribution shows a steep drop-off after the mom-and-pop tiers, with mid-size landlords (Tiers 05-08) collectively holding only 7.2% of the properties (23 properties). For example, Tiers 05-06 (11-50 properties) account for only 2.2% of properties (7 properties).

Unfortunately, data regarding acquisition prices by tier for Dodge County, MN, is not available. This prevents an analysis of whether larger or smaller investors typically pay more or less for properties, and thus limits insights into tier-specific pricing strategies or market efficiencies.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors dominate the smaller portfolio tiers, but companies take majority control in the 6-10 property tier in Dodge County.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smaller investor tiers in Dodge County, MN, holding 85.1% of properties in the Single-property (Tier 01) category and 54.5% in the Two-property (Tier 02) category. This reinforces the prominence of individual, often first-time, landlords.

A significant crossover point occurs within the 'Small landlord' categories: individual ownership still holds a slight majority in the 3-5 property tier (51.9%), but companies take a decisive majority in the 6-10 property tier, owning 72.7% of properties compared to individuals' 27.3%.

Companies exhibit increasing concentration as portfolio size grows; while only 14.9% of Tier 01 properties are company-owned, this percentage rises to 48.1% in the 3-5 property tier and spikes to 72.7% in the 6-10 property tier.

Due to the absence of specific pricing data by owner type and tier, it is not possible to analyze how individual and company acquisition prices differ within each portfolio size or compare their growth patterns over time.

While Tier 09 (1000+ properties) holds 5 properties overall, the breakdown by individual versus company ownership for this institutional tier is not provided in the data. However, given the low overall institutional presence, it's clear neither type of institutional owner has a significant footprint in Dodge County.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
MN-Dodge-55944 leads with 97 investor-owned properties, while MN-Dodge-55946 boasts the highest ownership rate at 16.7%.
Detailed Findings

Within Dodge County, MN, zip code 55944 stands out with the highest number of investor-owned properties, totaling 97 SFRs. This concentration makes it a key area for landlord activity by volume.

Following 55944, other significant zip codes by property count include 55927 with 64 properties, 55924 with 30 properties, and 55940 with 29 properties. These four zip codes collectively account for 220 investor-owned properties, highlighting specific areas of geographic concentration within the county.

When examining investor ownership rates, zip code 55946 leads with 16.7% of its SFR properties owned by investors, indicating a high penetration of landlord activity relative to its total housing stock. Zip code 55920 follows with 14.3% investor ownership.

The zip code 55924 demonstrates a correlation between high investor count and high ownership rate, appearing among the top regions for both metrics with 30 investor-owned properties and a 9.3% ownership rate. This suggests a particularly active and dense investor market in this area.

Conversely, while specific data for the lowest investor ownership rates is not provided, the varying percentages across zip codes, from 3.7% to 16.7%, imply a diverse landscape of investor presence, with some areas having significantly lower landlord penetration.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Dodge County were net sellers in Q4 2025 with a 0.25x buy/sell ratio (1 buy vs 4 sells), a shift from being net buyers earlier in the year.
Detailed Findings

All landlords in Dodge County, MN, collectively transitioned to being net sellers in Q4 2025, executing 1 buy transaction against 4 sell transactions. This results in a buy/sell ratio of 0.25x, indicating a strategic shift towards divesting properties at the end of the year.

This Q4 selling trend marks a significant change from earlier in 2025, where landlords were net buyers. In Q3, they purchased 11 properties against 3 sells (3.67x ratio), and in Q2, they acquired 6 properties while selling only 1 (6.0x ratio), demonstrating strong acquisition momentum in the middle of the year.

Despite the Q4 net selling, the overall trend for Year 2025 shows landlords as net buyers, with 25 purchases versus 13 sales, yielding a buy/sell ratio of 1.92x. This indicates a general growth in landlord portfolios over the year, even with the recent slowdown in buying activity.

Comparing 2025 to 2024, landlord activity shows a consistent net buyer position. In Year 2024, landlords bought 23 properties and sold 13, for a 1.77x buy/sell ratio, slightly less active than 2025 but still indicative of portfolio expansion.

Unfortunately, transaction data for institutional investors (1000+ tier) is not provided for Dodge County, preventing any analysis of whether larger entities are accumulating or divesting and how their patterns compare to the overall landlord market.

Furthermore, information on the percentage of buy or sell transactions that occur between landlords (inter-landlord trading) is not available in this section, limiting insights into the internal liquidity and dynamics of the investor market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords comprised a minimal 1.1% of all Q4 2025 transactions in Dodge County, with only one recorded transaction.
Detailed Findings

Landlord involvement in the Dodge County, MN, real estate market during Q4 2025 was exceptionally low, accounting for only 1 transaction out of a total of 94 SFR transactions. This represents a mere 1.1% share, indicating that non-landlord activity dominated the quarter.

The single landlord transaction recorded in Q4 was attributed to a mom-and-pop investor from Tier 01 (single-property owner). This highlights that the limited investor activity in the quarter came from the smallest segment of the landlord community.

The average purchase price for this Tier 01 transaction was $950,000, which is significantly higher than typical homeowner prices in the quarter. This outlier price for a single purchase suggests it might have been a unique, high-value property or a specialized transaction.

No institutional investors (Tier 09) engaged in transactions during Q4, reinforcing the pattern of minimal large-scale investor activity in Dodge County. Consequently, no comparisons of average purchase prices between institutional and mom-and-pop tiers can be made for this quarter.

Notably, the Tier 01 landlord who made the Q4 purchase did not acquire the property from another landlord, indicating a 0.0% inter-landlord transaction rate for this specific purchase. This suggests that the limited landlord buying activity was directed towards non-landlord sellers.

The overall volume of transactions by tier in Q4 was heavily skewed, with only 1 mom-and-pop transaction and no institutional transactions. This contrasts with the broader ownership distribution, where mom-and-pops hold a significant share but showed very little transaction activity in the most recent quarter.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Dodge County, Q4 sees Landlords turn net sellers.
Holdings
Landlords own 314 SFR properties (4.6% of Dodge County's market), with individual investors holding 225 (71.7%) and companies owning 100 (31.8%).
Pricing
In Q4 2025, a single landlord purchase occurred at $950,000, a dramatic 187.1% premium over the homeowner average of $330,849, signaling an atypical market event.
Activity
Q4 landlords purchased just 1 property, representing a mere 1.7% of all SFR sales, with this single acquisition coming from a new single-property landlord.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 92.8% of investor housing in Dodge County, while institutional investors (1000+) own a minimal 1.6%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors hold majority ownership in portfolios up to 5 properties, but companies become majority owners once portfolios reach 6-10 properties.
Transactions
Landlords were net sellers in Q4 2025 with a 0.25x buy/sell ratio (1 buy vs 4 sells), despite being net buyers for the full year with a 1.92x ratio; institutional activity is not available.
Market Narrative

In Dodge County, MN, the real estate investor market is predominantly shaped by small-scale, individual landlords. A substantial 4.6% of the county's total SFR properties, amounting to 314 homes, are investor-owned. This portfolio is largely controlled by individual investors, who possess 225 properties (71.7%), in stark contrast to companies owning 100 properties (31.8%). The dominance of mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) is unequivocal, as they command 92.8% of all investor-owned housing, with institutional investors (1000+ properties) holding a negligible 1.6% share, challenging the narrative of large corporate control in this specific county.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 saw a notable shift, with landlords as net sellers in Dodge County, recording only 1 purchase against 4 sales. This single landlord acquisition in Q4, made by a new single-property landlord, stood at an extraordinary $950,000 – a 187.1% premium over the traditional homeowner average price of $330,849. This pricing disparity in Q4 suggests a highly specific, perhaps outlier, transaction rather than a general market trend for investor acquisitions. Overall, for 2025, landlords remained net buyers, but the Q4 activity signals a change in market posture, with very limited new purchases.

The data reveals that Dodge County's investor market is highly concentrated among smaller, individual players, with institutional presence being almost non-existent. The pivot to net selling by landlords in Q4, combined with a single, high-priced acquisition, indicates a cautious and perhaps opportunistic market for investors. This structure suggests that local market dynamics, influenced by individual decisions rather than corporate strategies, are the primary drivers of investor activity in Dodge County, MN.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 11:51 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyDodge (MN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail