Clearwater (MN) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Clearwater (MN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Clearwater (MN)
2,422
Total Investors in Clearwater (MN)
319
Investor Owned SFR in Clearwater (MN)
327(13.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
290
SFR Owned
274
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
29
SFR Owned
54
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 327 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Clearwater County's Investor Market: Dominated by Cash-Heavy, Mom-and-Pop Landlords with 97% Control
Investors own 327 single-family residential properties in Clearwater County, representing 13.5% of the total market. This landscape is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (96.7% of holdings), with no institutional presence. In Q4, landlords comprised 100% of market purchase activity, with the sole transaction being a new landlord entering the market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 327 properties, with individuals comprising 83.8% of the holdings.
The portfolio is overwhelmingly cash-based, with 305 properties owned outright compared to just 22 financed. Individual landlords (290) vastly outnumber company landlords (29), reflecting a local, non-corporate market structure.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
The sole landlord purchase in Q4 was for $100,000; no homeowner data was available for comparison.
Due to a lack of traditional homeowner transactions in Q4, a price gap cannot be calculated. The Q4 purchase price of $100,000 represents a significant drop from the 2020-2023 average landlord acquisition price of $156,546.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 100% of the market, making the single SFR purchase in Q4.
Mom-and-pop investors were responsible for 100% of landlord buying activity. The purchase was made by one new, single-property landlord, highlighting the market's reliance on new, small-scale entrants.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 96.7% of investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone own 58.4% of all investor-held housing. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have absolutely no presence in this market, owning 0.0% of the portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the dominant force across all portfolio sizes in Clearwater County.
Individuals own 91.3% of single-property portfolios and 80.0% of portfolios in the 3-5 property tier. A crossover point where companies become the majority owner does not exist in this market.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is most concentrated in the 56621 zip code, holding 166 properties.
The highest rate of investor ownership is in the 56557 zip code, where 33.3% of homes are investor-owned. This demonstrates a clear split between the centers of investor volume and investor penetration.
Historical Transactions
Landlords were net neutral in Q4 with one buy and one sell, but net buyers for 2025 overall.
For the full year 2025, landlords were net buyers with 2 acquisitions versus only 1 sale. There was no transaction activity from institutional investors to analyze.
Current Quarter Transactions
The sole Q4 market transaction was a landlord-to-landlord deal, representing 100% of activity.
This transaction involved a new single-property landlord purchasing a home for $100,000. Institutional investors were completely absent from Q4 transactions.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 327 properties, with individuals comprising 83.8% of the holdings.
Detailed Findings

In Clearwater County, investors hold a significant 13.5% of the single-family residential market, totaling 327 properties.

Ownership is heavily skewed towards individuals, who control 274 properties (83.8%), dwarfing the 54 properties (16.5%) owned by companies. This highlights a market driven by local investors rather than large corporations.

The number of individual landlords (290) is ten times greater than company landlords (29), reinforcing the 'mom-and-pop' character of the local rental market.

A striking financial pattern emerges from the data: investor properties are predominantly owned with cash. A total of 305 properties are held free and clear, compared to only 22 that are financed, signaling a low-leverage, high-equity investor base.

The vast majority of investor-owned properties (299) are classified as rented, confirming that the portfolio is actively used to supply rental housing to the community.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
The sole landlord purchase in Q4 was for $100,000; no homeowner data was available for comparison.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Q4 2025 was limited to a single acquisition at a price of $100,000. This single data point serves as the benchmark for landlord pricing in the quarter.

A direct price comparison to traditional homeowners is not possible for Q4, as there were no recorded homeowner purchases in the dataset, preventing the calculation of a price gap.

The Q4 acquisition price of $100,000 is notably lower than historical averages. Landlords paid an average of $156,546 for properties acquired during the 2020-2023 period, indicating a potential market cooling or a shift in the type of assets being acquired, though this is based on very low transaction volume.

For the full year of 2025, the average landlord acquisition price stands at $79,000 based on the few transactions recorded, further suggesting a downward price trend compared to the pandemic-era boom years.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 100% of the market, making the single SFR purchase in Q4.
Detailed Findings

Landlords completely dominated the Clearwater County housing market in Q4 2025, accounting for 100% of the single SFR purchase recorded.

The entire volume of investor activity came from the smallest investor segment, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) responsible for 100% of the purchase.

The quarter's activity was driven by a new market entrant. One new single-property landlord acquired one home, signaling that growth, while minimal, is happening at the grassroots level.

In stark contrast to national trends, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) had zero purchasing activity, holding 0.0% of the Q4 acquisition market share.

This low-volume, high-concentration activity underscores a market characterized by individual decisions rather than broad market forces, where a single transaction can define the entire quarter's statistics.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 96.7% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Clearwater County is unequivocally defined by small-scale owners. Mom-and-pop landlords, who own between 1 and 10 properties, control a staggering 96.7% of the entire investor-owned SFR housing stock.

The foundation of this market is built on single-property landlords (Tier 01), who alone account for 195 properties, representing 58.4% of all investor holdings.

Mid-size landlords are a minor segment, with investors owning 11-50 properties controlling just 3.3% of the market combined.

There is a complete absence of institutional capital in Clearwater County's SFR market. Investors with portfolios of 1,000 or more properties hold a 0.0% share, underscoring the hyper-local and non-corporate nature of real estate investment here.

This distribution reveals a market with a very low barrier to entry, dominated by local individuals rather than large, professionalized real estate firms.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
Individual investors are the dominant force across all portfolio sizes in Clearwater County.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the backbone of ownership across every investor tier in Clearwater County. In the largest segment, single-property landlords, individuals own 179 properties (91.3%) compared to just 17 for companies (8.7%).

This pattern of individual dominance continues as portfolio sizes increase. For landlords owning 3-5 properties, individuals hold 52 homes (80.0%), while companies own 13 (20.0%).

Unlike larger metropolitan markets, there is no 'crossover point' where corporate ownership overtakes individual ownership. The data shows individuals maintain a strong majority in every active tier.

The prevalence of individual ownership, even in the slightly larger portfolios of 6-10 properties (78.6% individual-owned), suggests that local investors prefer to operate under their own names rather than forming complex corporate structures.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is most concentrated in the 56621 zip code, holding 166 properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals that investor ownership in Clearwater County is not evenly distributed. The 56621 zip code serves as the epicenter for investor holdings by volume, containing 166 investor-owned properties, which is 12.9% of that area's housing stock.

However, the highest concentration rate is found elsewhere. In the 56557 zip code, investors own 33.3% of the homes, making it the most saturated area for rental properties on a percentage basis, despite having only 7 investor-owned homes.

Following 56621 in total count is the 56634 zip code, with 47 investor properties and a 12.5% ownership rate, showing another significant pocket of investor activity.

This distinction between highest count (56621) and highest percentage (56557) is critical, indicating different market dynamics. One area attracts a larger number of investors, while the other has a smaller housing stock where investors have a proportionally larger footprint.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
Landlords were net neutral in Q4 with one buy and one sell, but net buyers for 2025 overall.
Detailed Findings

Transaction data for Q4 2025 shows a market in equilibrium, with landlords executing one purchase and one sale, resulting in a net neutral position for the quarter.

However, zooming out to the full year of 2025 reveals a net acquisitive stance. Landlords purchased 2 properties while only selling 1, making them net buyers for the year and signaling a slight expansion of rental portfolios.

The complete lack of institutional (1,000+ tier) transactions means all recorded activity stems from smaller, local investors, whose behavior defines the market's direction.

The low transaction volume throughout the year—just three transactions in total—points to an illiquid market where properties are held for the long term and transactions are infrequent.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
The sole Q4 market transaction was a landlord-to-landlord deal, representing 100% of activity.
Detailed Findings

The transaction market in Clearwater County was entirely self-contained within the investor community during Q4 2025. Landlords were involved in 100% of the quarter's 1 total transaction.

The single transaction was conducted by a new, single-property landlord, highlighting that market liquidity, however minimal, depends on new entrants acquiring properties from existing owners.

Crucially, 100% of landlord purchases in Q4 were sourced from other landlords. This indicates a closed-loop system where rental properties are trading hands between investors rather than being acquired from the traditional homeowner market.

The purchase price for this transaction was $100,000, setting the price benchmark for the single-property tier in the fourth quarter.

Institutional and mid-size landlords recorded zero transactions, reinforcing that all market movement is happening at the smallest end of the investor spectrum.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Clearwater County's investor market is 100% locally driven, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling 96.7% of rental homes.
Holdings
In Clearwater County, MN, landlords own 327 single-family properties, accounting for 13.5% of the market. Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate, holding 274 of these properties (83.8%) compared to just 54 (16.5%) for companies.
Pricing
The single landlord purchase in Q4 was for $100,000; a lack of homeowner transactions prevented a direct price comparison, but this is well below the historical landlord average of $156,546.
Activity
Landlords represented 100% of Q4 purchase activity, with the market's single transaction creating one new single-property landlord.
Market Share
Small, mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control of the market with a 96.7% ownership share, while institutional investors have a 0.0% presence.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority owners in every active portfolio tier, meaning a 'crossover point' where companies dominate does not exist in this market.
Transactions
Landlords were net neutral in Q4 with a 1-to-1 buy/sell ratio (1 buy vs 1 sell). Institutional investors were completely inactive and had no transactions.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Clearwater County, MN is a distinctly local affair, characterized by small-scale, individual ownership. Investors hold 327 SFR properties, or 13.5% of the county's housing stock. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who own 96.7% of all investor-held homes. Individual investors make up the vast majority of this group, owning 83.8% of the properties, while institutional investors with 1,000+ homes have no footprint here whatsoever.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 reflected this small-scale structure, with landlords accounting for 100% of the market's single purchase. This transaction was conducted by a new, single-property landlord who acquired a home for $100,000. Transactionally, landlords were net neutral for the quarter with one purchase and one sale, though they remain slight net buyers for the year. A defining characteristic of the investor base is its reliance on cash, with 305 properties owned outright versus only 22 with financing.

The key takeaway is that Clearwater County's SFR market operates entirely outside the influence of large-scale corporate capital. It is a stable, slow-moving market where growth comes from new, individual entrants and properties are typically traded between existing landlords. The high prevalence of cash ownership suggests a low-risk, long-term holding strategy among local investors, creating a rental market that is insulated from broader financial market volatility but also has very low liquidity.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 01:22 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyClearwater (MN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail