Clay (MN) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Clay (MN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Clay (MN)
17,808
Total Investors in Clay (MN)
1,295
Investor Owned SFR in Clay (MN)
1,387(7.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,074
SFR Owned
840
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
221
SFR Owned
550
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,387 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Clay County SFR, Maintaining Net Buyer Status
Landlords in Clay County own 1,387 SFR properties, with individuals holding 60.6% and mom-and-pop investors controlling 84.6% of the market. Despite no recorded landlord acquisitions in Q4 2025, overall landlords remain net buyers with a 2.04x buy/sell ratio in 2025, indicating sustained accumulation by smaller investors.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Clay County Landlords Own 1,387 SFR Properties; Individuals Hold 60.6%
Cash properties (739) slightly surpass financed properties (648) in total landlord holdings. An overwhelming 96.0% (1,331 properties) of landlord-owned SFR are rented, underscoring a strong focus on generating rental income.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords’ Reported Q4 Acquisition Price Represents 40.7% Discount to Homeowners
Landlord average acquisition prices are based on 0 recorded purchases across all 2025 quarters, making price comparisons unrepresentative of actual market activity. However, the reported Q4 2025 landlord price of $176,580 was a substantial $121,048 less than homeowner prices, which averaged $297,628.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords Captured 9.9% of Q4 2025 SFR Purchases in Clay County
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounted for 28.6% (6 properties) of all landlord purchases in Q4 2025. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) made no purchases, indicating a market primarily driven by smaller and mid-size investors.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control a Dominant 84.6% of Investor-Owned SFR in Clay County
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) comprise the largest segment, owning 55.2% (780 properties) of the market. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.1% (1 property), demonstrating a highly fragmented ownership landscape.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Company Ownership Surpasses Individuals at the 3-5 Property Tier in Clay County
Individual investors hold 88.0% of single-property portfolios (Tier 01) and 62.2% of two-property portfolios (Tier 02). However, companies take a decisive majority starting from the 3-5 property tier, comprising 56.2% of holdings, and rising to 92.3% in the 11-20 property tier.
Geographic Distribution
Zip Code MN-Clay-56560 Leads Clay County in Investor-Owned Property Count with 957
MN-Clay-56554 exhibits the highest investor penetration at 23.8% of its SFR market, significantly higher than the 8.1% rate in the count-leading MN-Clay-56560. MN-Clay-56585 is notable for both high count (39 properties) and high rate (14.6%), indicating concentrated investor activity.
Historical Transactions
Clay County Landlords Remain Net Buyers with 2.04x Buy/Sell Ratio in 2025
Landlord buy volumes have notably increased from 115 in 2024 to 141 in 2025. Institutional investors (1000+ tier) show a net neutral position in 2025 with 1 buy and 1 sell, indicating no net accumulation or divestment at that scale.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords Accounted for 7.3% of All Q4 2025 Transactions in Clay County
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01) were most active in inter-landlord trades, with 33.3% of their purchases coming from other landlords. Institutional investors had no Q4 transaction activity, while mom-and-pop purchase prices varied significantly, from $120,000 (Tier 6-10) to $397,400 (Tier 3-5).

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Clay County Landlords Own 1,387 SFR Properties; Individuals Hold 60.6%
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Clay County own 1,387 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, representing 7.8% of the total SFR market of 17,808 properties. This highlights a measurable but not overwhelming presence of investors in the local housing landscape.

Individual investors form the backbone of the landlord market, owning 840 (60.6%) of all investor-held SFR properties. Company-owned portfolios account for the remaining 550 properties (39.7%), demonstrating a significant, though smaller, corporate presence.

The distinction between owner types is even starker when considering entities: individual landlords outnumber company landlords by nearly 5 to 1, with 1,074 individual entities compared to 221 company entities. This solidifies the market's reliance on smaller, individual-led operations.

A dominant 96.0% (1,331) of landlord-owned properties are designated as rented, indicating a strong and consistent focus on non-owner-occupied, income-generating assets. This aligns with the core definition of investor activity and a rental-centric market strategy.

Cash-acquired properties slightly outnumber financed ones within the overall landlord portfolio, with 739 cash properties compared to 648 financed properties. This suggests a preference for unencumbered assets or a strong capital base among investors.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords’ Reported Q4 Acquisition Price Represents 40.7% Discount to Homeowners
Detailed Findings

A critical observation for Clay County is the absence of recorded landlord SFR acquisitions across all reported timeframes in this data, including Q4 2025, Q3 2025, Q2 2025, Q1 2025, and all of 2024 and 2025. This indicates a period of dormancy in new property acquisition for investors within this specific dataset.

Despite the lack of transactions, the reported average acquisition price for landlords in Q4 2025 was $176,580, which stands as a significant 40.7% discount when compared to traditional homeowners who purchased properties for an average of $297,628. This $121,048 difference suggests a hypothetical price advantage for investors, were they active in the market.

The comparison of landlord-reported average prices against homeowner prices reveals extreme volatility in 2025. Landlords showed a 24.0% discount in Q1 ($216,446 vs $284,729), shifted to a striking 138.2% premium in Q2 ($745,691 vs $313,069), then an 27.4% premium in Q3 ($405,921 vs $318,527), before returning to a 40.7% discount in Q4. These fluctuations, given zero transactions, highlight data volatility rather than market trends.

Traditional homeowner acquisition prices in Clay County showed a rise from $284,729 in Q1 2025 to a peak of $318,527 in Q3 2025, before moderating to $297,628 in Q4 2025. This indicates a fluctuating but generally robust market for owner-occupants during the year.

The average reported acquisition price for landlords shows an upward trend over longer periods, from $187,981 during 2020-2023 to $240,730 in 2024, and then a significant jump to $466,877 in 2025. However, this trend is heavily qualified by the complete absence of recorded transactions within these periods, meaning these averages likely reflect portfolio revaluation rather than active buying behavior.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords Captured 9.9% of Q4 2025 SFR Purchases in Clay County
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Clay County made 21 SFR purchases in Q4 2025, representing a 9.9% share of the total 213 SFR properties sold during the quarter. This indicates a consistent but not overwhelming presence of investor activity in the local market.

Mid-size landlords (11-20 properties) dominated Q4 acquisitions by properties, accounting for 66.7% of all landlord purchases with 14 properties. This suggests that larger individual investors or smaller companies are currently the most active buying segment.

Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) acquired 6 properties in Q4 2025, representing 28.6% of all landlord purchases. This segment includes new entrants or existing small portfolio holders expanding their footprint.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) accounted for 4 properties purchased by 6 distinct entities in Q4 2025, indicating a small but steady stream of new or first-time investors entering the rental market. This tier represents 19.0% of all landlord purchases.

Institutional investors (1000+ properties) showed no purchasing activity in Q4 2025, holding at 0 properties acquired. This reinforces the local market's reliance on smaller and mid-sized private investors rather than large-scale corporate entities for new acquisitions.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control a Dominant 84.6% of Investor-Owned SFR in Clay County
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04), collectively control a commanding 84.6% of all investor-owned SFR properties in Clay County. This translates to a significant 1,195 properties under their management, highlighting their pervasive influence on the local rental market.

The single-property landlord (Tier 01) segment represents the largest individual share, owning 780 properties, which accounts for 55.2% of the total landlord-owned portfolio. This signifies that first-time or single-property investors are the most common form of landlord in the county.

In stark contrast to smaller investors, institutional investors (Tier 09), those owning 1000+ properties, hold a negligible presence in Clay County, with only 1 property (0.1%) in their portfolios. This challenges the popular narrative of large corporations dominating local housing markets, at least within this specific county.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties), encompassing Tiers 05-08, collectively own 217 properties, making up 15.4% of the total investor-owned portfolio. This segment plays a complementary role to the mom-and-pop base, bridging the gap between small-scale and absent institutional ownership.

The ownership distribution reveals a 'long tail' where the vast majority of properties are held by numerous small investors, with a rapid decrease in property count as portfolio size increases. For example, after Tier 01, the next largest segment is Tier 03-05 with 192 properties (13.6%), reinforcing the fragmented nature of investor holdings.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Company Ownership Surpasses Individuals at the 3-5 Property Tier in Clay County
Detailed Findings

A critical shift in ownership structure occurs in Clay County as portfolio sizes increase: individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners at the 3-5 property tier. Here, companies hold 108 properties (56.2%) compared to individuals' 84 properties (43.8%).

Individual investors overwhelmingly comprise the majority in the smallest tiers, owning 688 properties (88.0%) in the single-property (Tier 01) segment and 61 properties (62.2%) in the two-property (Tier 02) segment. This underscores the individual-driven nature of initial market entry and small-scale investment.

Conversely, company ownership dramatically increases its share in larger tiers. For portfolios ranging from 6-10 properties, companies own 98 properties (78.4%), and their dominance peaks in the 11-20 property tier, where they control 48 properties (92.3%) compared to individuals' 4 properties (7.7%).

The distribution reveals a clear progression: while individuals are the primary force in establishing small portfolios, companies are the predominant owners of mid-size portfolios, indicating a strategic preference for scaling investments through corporate structures in these tiers.

The data clearly illustrates that the 'mom-and-pop' descriptor, though accurate for overall market share, hides a significant corporate presence within the mid-size landlord segments. This crossover point provides a granular understanding of how different owner types structure their investment strategies by portfolio size.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Zip Code MN-Clay-56560 Leads Clay County in Investor-Owned Property Count with 957
Detailed Findings

Within Clay County, the zip code MN-Clay-56560 leads significantly in the sheer volume of investor-owned SFR properties, holding 957 properties. This demonstrates a strong concentration of investment capital within this specific sub-geography.

While MN-Clay-56560 leads by count, MN-Clay-56554 exhibits the highest investor ownership *rate*, with 23.8% of its SFR properties being investor-owned. This indicates that a much larger proportion of its housing stock is dedicated to rental purposes compared to other areas in the county.

The top five sub-geographies by investor-owned property count also include MN-Clay-56529 (104 properties), MN-Clay-56549 (94 properties), MN-Clay-56514 (66 properties), and MN-Clay-56585 (39 properties). These areas represent the primary hubs of landlord activity by volume within Clay County.

Beyond the count leaders, other areas show high investor penetration rates, such as MN-Clay-56546 (18.7%), MN-Clay-56585 (14.6%), MN-Clay-56536 (13.9%), and MN-Clay-56525 (12.5%). These percentages indicate that even in areas with fewer total properties, investors hold a substantial market share.

A key insight is the differentiation between high-count and high-percentage regions. For instance, MN-Clay-56560 has a high count (957 properties) but a lower ownership rate (8.1%), while MN-Clay-56554 has a high rate (23.8%) but is not among the top 5 by count. This illustrates that investor presence manifests differently across sub-markets.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Clay County Landlords Remain Net Buyers with 2.04x Buy/Sell Ratio in 2025
Detailed Findings

Overall landlords in Clay County consistently operated as net buyers throughout 2025, accumulating 141 properties while selling 69, resulting in a strong 2.04x buy/sell ratio. This signals a sustained period of portfolio expansion for the general landlord population.

Looking at quarterly activity in 2025, landlords maintained their net buyer status: 23 buys vs. 9 sells (Q4), 29 buys vs. 26 sells (Q3), and 33 buys vs. 24 sells (Q2). This consistent net acquisition across quarters underscores a positive sentiment towards property investment among landlords.

Comparing year-over-year activity, overall landlord buy volumes increased from 115 transactions in 2024 to 141 in 2025. This 22.6% rise in buying activity, coupled with relatively stable sell volumes, highlights growing investor confidence or opportunity within the market.

In contrast to the broader landlord market, institutional investors (1000+ properties) maintained a net neutral position in 2025, with 1 buy and 1 sell transaction. This indicates that large-scale corporate entities are neither significantly expanding nor divesting their holdings in Clay County.

The sustained net buying behavior by landlords contrasts with the minimal activity from institutional players, reinforcing the narrative that the Clay County SFR investment market is primarily driven by smaller, individual-led portfolios actively seeking growth opportunities.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords Accounted for 7.3% of All Q4 2025 Transactions in Clay County
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Clay County were involved in 23 transactions during Q4 2025, constituting a 7.3% share of the total 316 SFR transactions in the quarter. This demonstrates that investors are a active, albeit smaller, segment of the overall real estate market.

Transaction volumes varied significantly across investor tiers in Q4 2025. Small-medium landlords (11-20 properties) led in activity with 14 transactions, representing the highest volume among active investor segments. This tier also saw 7.1% of its purchases come from other landlords.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were particularly engaged in inter-landlord trading, with 33.3% (2 out of 6) of their Q4 transactions involving properties bought from other landlords. This indicates a notable degree of peer-to-peer property transfer among the smallest investors.

Average purchase prices for landlords in Q4 2025 showed a wide range across tiers, reflecting diverse investment strategies. Prices varied from a low of $120,000 for small landlords (6-10 properties) to a high of $397,400 for small landlords (3-5 properties), with single-property landlords (Tier 01) averaging $161,317.

Institutional investors (1000+ properties) recorded no transactions in Q4 2025, aligning with their overall minimal activity observed in other sections of the report. This underscores their limited direct transactional impact on the Clay County SFR market in the current quarter.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Clay County SFR, Maintaining Net Buyer Status Despite Negligible Institutional Activity
Holdings
Landlords in Clay County own 1,387 SFR properties, representing 7.8% of the total SFR market. Individual investors hold 840 properties (60.6%), while company investors own 550 properties (39.7%) of this portfolio.
Pricing
Despite 0 recorded landlord purchases in Q4 2025, their reported average acquisition price of $176,580 was a 40.7% discount compared to homeowner purchases averaging $297,628, showcasing a theoretical price advantage for investors.
Activity
Landlords acquired 21 properties in Q4 2025, capturing a 9.9% share of total SFR purchases. Six new single-property landlords entered the market, with mid-size landlords (11-20 properties) leading Q4 activity by acquiring 14 properties.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a vast 84.6% of investor-owned housing in Clay County, with single-property landlords alone holding 55.2%. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) own a minimal 0.1% (1 property), demonstrating a highly fragmented market structure.
Ownership Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smallest portfolios, holding 88.0% of single-property (Tier 01) and 62.2% of two-property portfolios (Tier 02). However, company ownership becomes the majority at the 3-5 property tier, comprising 56.2% of those holdings and peaking at 92.3% in the 11-20 property tier.
Transactions
Landlords in Clay County are consistently net buyers, with a 2.04x buy/sell ratio in 2025 (141 buys vs 69 sells), including 23 buys and 9 sells in Q4. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) maintained a net neutral position in 2025 with 1 buy and 1 sell.
Market Narrative

The Clay County, MN, real estate market for Single Family Residential (SFR) properties is characterized by a significant, yet highly fragmented, investor presence. Landlords collectively own 1,387 SFR properties, accounting for 7.8% of the total market. A striking 60.6% (840 properties) of these holdings belong to individual investors, significantly outweighing company-owned portfolios at 39.7% (550 properties). The market is overwhelmingly dominated by mom-and-pop landlords, who control a commanding 84.6% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.1% (1 property), defying common perceptions of corporate dominance.

Investor behavior in Clay County reveals a market driven by smaller players and marked by curious pricing anomalies. Despite a complete absence of recorded landlord acquisition transactions in Q4 2025 and throughout the entire year, reported average prices suggest a substantial 40.7% discount ($176,580 vs $297,628) compared to homeowner purchases. Landlords remain consistent net buyers, with 141 properties acquired versus 69 sold in 2025, achieving a 2.04x buy/sell ratio. Q4 2025 saw landlords account for 9.9% (21 properties) of total purchases, with 6 new single-property landlords entering the market and mid-size investors (11-20 properties) leading Q4 activity with 14 purchases.

This analysis of Clay County's SFR market highlights a deeply rooted landscape of individual and small-scale investors. The sustained net buying behavior of these landlords, coupled with the minimal and neutral activity from institutional players, underscores a localized market where organic growth and smaller portfolio expansion are the primary drivers. The significant market penetration by mom-and-pop investors, along with concentrated activity in specific zip codes, suggests a stable, community-centric rental housing stock, less prone to rapid shifts from large corporate interventions.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 11:50 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyClay (MN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail