Benton (MN) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Benton (MN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Benton (MN)
9,687
Total Investors in Benton (MN)
259
Investor Owned SFR in Benton (MN)
221(2.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
218
SFR Owned
178
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
41
SFR Owned
49
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 221 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Investor Activity Halts in Benton County as Landlords Shift from Net Buyers to Sellers
Investor purchasing in Benton County ceased in Q4 2025, with zero properties acquired. This follows a year where landlords became net sellers (13 buys vs. 29 sells), a stark reversal from being net buyers in 2024. The market remains dominated by small 'mom-and-pop' investors, who control 95.6% of the 221 investor-owned homes.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 221 homes (2.3% of the market), with individuals holding 80.5%.
Of these holdings, 67.0% are owned outright with cash (148 properties), compared to 33.0% that are financed (73 properties). The vast majority of the portfolio, 199 properties, are utilized as rentals.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No landlord purchases occurred in Q4, but prior quarters show extreme price volatility.
Landlord pricing swung dramatically in 2025, from a 46.5% discount ($145,189) below homeowners in Q1 to a 28.7% premium ($92,750) in Q2. This volatility preceded a complete halt in purchasing activity later in the year.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investor purchasing activity halted, accounting for 0% of the 99 SFR sales in Q4 2025.
With zero properties purchased by any investor type, mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) and institutional investors (Tier 09) both recorded no new acquisitions. This indicates a complete market withdrawal for the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords dominate, controlling 95.6% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone account for 62.4% of the investor-owned housing stock, holding 141 properties. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have zero presence in Benton County.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier.
While individuals own 87.5% of single-property portfolios, companies take a 54.5% majority share in the 6-10 property tier. This marks the crossover point where professionalization begins to scale.
Geographic Distribution
The 56304 zip code is the primary hub for investors, holding 100 properties.
The 56304 zip code not only has the highest count of investor-owned homes but also the highest ownership rate at 7.4%. The next most concentrated area, 56330, has a much lower rate of 3.1%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords reversed course in 2025, becoming net sellers after being net buyers in 2024.
In 2025, landlords sold more than twice as many properties as they bought (29 sells vs. 13 buys), resulting in a net divestment of 16 properties. This is a complete turnaround from 2024, when they were net buyers of 16 properties (42 buys vs. 26 sells).
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlord transaction activity ceased in Q4, accounting for 0 of 154 total transactions.
With zero landlord-involved transactions, there was no buying or selling activity from any investor tier, including mom-and-pops and institutions. This indicates a complete pause in portfolio adjustments and inter-landlord trading for the quarter.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 221 homes (2.3% of the market), with individuals holding 80.5%.
Detailed Findings

In Benton County, investors hold a modest 2.3% of the single-family residential market, totaling 221 properties out of 9,687.

Individual 'mom-and-pop' investors are the backbone of the rental market, owning 178 properties, which accounts for 80.5% of all investor-owned SFRs. In contrast, company-owned entities hold the remaining 49 properties (22.2%).

The ownership structure is heavily skewed towards individuals, with 218 individual landlords compared to just 41 company landlords, a ratio of more than 5 to 1.

Cash is the preferred method of ownership, with 148 properties owned free and clear, more than double the 73 properties that are financed. This indicates a low-leverage position for the typical investor in this market.

The portfolio is clearly rental-focused, with 199 properties classified as rented, demonstrating the primary business model for local landlords.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No landlord purchases occurred in Q4, but prior quarters show extreme price volatility.
Detailed Findings

Investor acquisition activity in Benton County came to a complete stop in the latter half of the year, with zero properties purchased in Q3 and Q4 2025.

Pricing behavior earlier in the year was highly erratic. In Q1 2025, landlords secured properties at a steep 46.5% discount compared to traditional homeowners, paying an average of $167,333 versus the homeowner's $312,522.

This trend dramatically reversed in Q2 2025, when landlords paid a surprising 28.7% premium, with an average acquisition price of $416,200 compared to the homeowner average of $323,450—a difference of $92,750.

The Q3 2025 data shows a return to significant discounts, with landlords paying $197,667 versus the homeowner's $305,138, a 35.2% discount, though this was based on very low transaction volume before activity ceased.

Overall price appreciation is evident when comparing recent periods to the pandemic era; the average landlord acquisition price rose from $244,347 in 2020-2023 to an average of $275,980 in 2025.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Investor purchasing activity halted, accounting for 0% of the 99 SFR sales in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords completely withdrew from the Benton County market in Q4 2025, acquiring zero of the 99 single-family properties that were sold during the period.

This lack of activity was universal across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who represent the vast majority of owners, made no new purchases.

Similarly, larger investors, including the institutional tier (1000+ properties), were also completely inactive, making zero acquisitions in Q4.

The absence of new purchases means no new landlords entered the market, a significant shift from typical market dynamics where new single-property investors consistently acquire homes.

This halt in purchasing starkly contrasts with the general market activity, where 99 homes were successfully sold to other buyer types like traditional homeowners.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords dominate, controlling 95.6% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Benton County is overwhelmingly characterized by small-scale landlords. Mom-and-pop investors (owning 1-10 properties) control a massive 95.6% of all investor-owned homes.

First-time or single-property landlords (Tier 01) are the largest single segment, owning 141 properties, which constitutes 62.4% of the entire investor portfolio.

Mid-size investors (11-100 properties) hold a minor stake, with their combined Tiers (05-07) accounting for just 4.0% of properties.

There is no institutional investor (Tier 09) footprint in Benton County, with this tier holding 0.0% of the market share, reinforcing the local, small-scale nature of real estate investment.

The concentration in the smallest tiers is profound, with landlords owning 5 or fewer properties controlling a combined 90.7% of the investor-owned housing stock.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the bedrock of the market, overwhelmingly dominating the entry-level tiers. In the single-property tier, individuals own 126 of the 141 homes (87.5%).

The transition to majority-company ownership occurs in the 6-10 property tier. In this segment, companies own 6 properties (54.5%) compared to the 5 properties (45.5%) held by individuals.

Even as portfolio sizes grow, individuals maintain a significant presence. In the 3-5 property tier, individuals still own 40 properties (75.5%), and they hold an equal 50% share in the 11-20 property tier.

Company ownership is most concentrated in the 6-10 property tier, indicating a specific strategy for small-to-mid-scale professional operations in the county.

The two-property tier remains heavily skewed towards individuals, who own 10 of the 14 properties (71.4%), showing that the initial step of portfolio growth is primarily an individual endeavor.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 56304 zip code is the primary hub for investors, holding 100 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Benton County is highly concentrated geographically, with the 56304 zip code serving as the clear epicenter. This area alone contains 100 of the 221 total investor-owned properties in the county.

The 56304 zip code also boasts the highest investor penetration rate at 7.4%, significantly above the county-wide average of 2.3%.

Following distantly is the 56329 zip code with 17 investor-owned properties, though its ownership rate is a modest 1.2%.

The 56330 zip code has the second-highest investor ownership rate at 3.1%, demonstrating that high penetration doesn't always correlate with the highest absolute count of properties.

Other zip codes like 55319, 55371, and 56301 show negligible or no investor presence, highlighting the targeted nature of investment within the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords reversed course in 2025, becoming net sellers after being net buyers in 2024.
Detailed Findings

A dramatic shift in market behavior occurred in 2025, as Benton County landlords transitioned from accumulators to distributors of property. They ended the year as significant net sellers, with 29 properties sold versus only 13 purchased, a net decrease of 16 properties.

This trend is a stark reversal from 2024, when investors were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 42 properties while selling only 26, for a net gain of 16 properties.

The sell-off intensified as 2025 progressed. After being net sellers by 3 properties in Q2 (7 buys vs. 10 sells), the pace accelerated in Q3 with a net of 4 properties sold (3 buys vs. 7 sells).

The buy-to-sell ratio flipped from a positive 1.62 in 2024 to a negative 0.45 in 2025, clearly illustrating the market's change in direction from expansion to contraction.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) were not a factor in these transactions, as they have no active presence in the county's transaction market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlord transaction activity ceased in Q4, accounting for 0 of 154 total transactions.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, the investor transaction market in Benton County effectively froze, with landlords participating in zero of the 154 total SFR transactions.

This inactivity was consistent across all investor sizes, from single-property landlords (Tier 01) to the largest theoretical tiers, with none reporting any buy-side transactions.

The complete halt in purchases means there was no inter-landlord trading, a key source of liquidity in many markets. No properties were recorded as being bought from other landlords this quarter.

Consequently, it is impossible to analyze pricing strategies by tier for Q4, as the average purchase price for all tiers was $0 due to the lack of activity.

This pause in transactions aligns with the broader finding of zero new acquisitions, signaling a period of deep inaction and potential market uncertainty among local investors.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Benton County's investor market retreats as landlords halt buying and become net sellers
Holdings
Investors own 221 single-family residential properties in Benton County, representing 2.3% of the total market. The portfolio is dominated by individual investors, who hold 178 properties (80.5%), versus 49 properties (22.2%) owned by companies.
Pricing
No landlord purchases occurred in Q4 2025, but pricing earlier in the year was volatile, swinging from a 46.5% discount versus homeowners in Q1 to an anomalous 28.7% premium in Q2.
Activity
Investor purchasing activity completely stopped in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 0% of the 99 homes sold. Consequently, no new landlords entered the market during this period.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with a 95.6% share of investor-owned housing. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have no presence, owning 0.0% of the portfolio.
Ownership Type
Individual investors command the smaller portfolio tiers, but companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property level, where they hold a 54.5% share.
Transactions
Investors became net sellers in 2025, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 0.45 (13 buys vs. 29 sells). This marks a stark reversal from 2024, when they were net buyers with a ratio of 1.62 (42 buys vs. 26 sells).
Market Narrative

The real estate investor market in Benton County, MN, is small, locally focused, and currently in a state of retreat. Investors hold just 221 properties, or 2.3% of the county's single-family housing stock. Ownership is firmly in the hands of 'mom-and-pop' operators, who control 95.6% of these homes, with individuals personally owning 80.5% of the portfolio. Institutional capital has no footprint here, underscoring a market driven entirely by small-scale enterprise.

Investor behavior shifted dramatically in 2025. After being net buyers in 2024, landlords reversed course to become net sellers, divesting a net 16 properties. This culminated in a complete halt of purchasing activity in Q4 2025, where investors acquired zero of the 99 homes sold in the county. Pricing data from earlier in the year revealed extreme volatility, with landlords securing deep discounts in one quarter and paying significant premiums in the next, signaling an unstable environment before their market exit.

The key takeaway for the Benton County housing market is the withdrawal of a key buyer segment. The pivot from net buying to net selling, capped by a total purchasing freeze, suggests local investors perceive market conditions as unfavorable for expansion. This retreat reduces competition for traditional homebuyers but also signals potential concerns about profitability, property values, or the regulatory environment from the perspective of the county's small, independent landlords.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 01:21 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyBenton (MN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price