Newaygo (MI) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Newaygo (MI) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Newaygo (MI)
21,458
Total Investors in Newaygo (MI)
5,957
Investor Owned SFR in Newaygo (MI)
4,962(23.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
5,128
SFR Owned
4,142
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
829
SFR Owned
930
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 4,962 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Newaygo County's Market Stalls in Q4 with Zero Activity; Mom-and-Pops Control 98.7% of Holdings
Landlords in Newaygo County own 4,962 SFR properties (23.1% of the market), overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors (83.5% of holdings). Mom-and-pop landlords control 98.7% of this investor-owned portfolio, while institutional activity remains negligible. Notably, Q4 2025 saw zero SFR purchases and transactions, signaling a complete halt in market movement for the quarter.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Newaygo County landlords own 4,962 SFR properties, with individual investors holding a dominant 83.5%.
The vast majority of these properties (4,888) are rented, with 4,750 being cash purchases and only 212 financed. Individual landlords outnumber companies by a ratio of 6.2:1 (5,128 vs 829 entities).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlord acquisition data is largely absent for Q4 2025; Q1 2025 showed landlords paying a 21.7% premium.
No properties were acquired by landlords in Q2 2025, Q4 2024, or the entirety of 2024 and 2025 based on recorded acquisition data. In Q1 2025, landlords paid $51,422 more than traditional homeowners, an unusual 21.7% premium ($287,887 vs $236,465).
Current Quarter Purchases
Q4 2025 saw no SFR purchases by landlords or other buyers in Newaygo County.
Mom-and-pop landlords and institutional investors both recorded zero purchases in Q4 2025. This quarter shows a complete absence of new landlord activity, including no new single-property landlords entering the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 98.7% of investor-owned SFR in Newaygo County.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) comprise the backbone, owning 82.7% of all investor-owned SFR. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold only 1 property, representing a negligible 0.0% of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 11-20 property tier in Newaygo County, flipping individual dominance.
Individual investors dominate the single-property tier (83.9%) and maintain a strong presence through the 6-10 property tier (78.9%). The transition occurs sharply, with companies owning 75.7% of properties in the 11-20 tier.
Geographic Distribution
MI-Newaygo-49337 leads in investor-owned property count with 1,517, while MI-Newaygo-49336 boasts the highest ownership rate at 55.6%.
MI-Newaygo-49309 demonstrates both high count (951 properties) and a significant ownership rate (50.1%). The top five regions by count collectively hold a substantial share of Newaygo County's investor-owned properties.
Historical Transactions
Newaygo County landlords are net buyers in both 2024 and 2025, accumulating properties over time.
In 2024, landlords bought 239 properties versus 45 sells, reflecting a strong net acquisition trend. For 2025, landlords have bought 22 properties against 3 sells, maintaining a net buyer position. Institutional transaction data for this county is not available.
Current Quarter Transactions
Newaygo County recorded zero total SFR transactions in Q4 2025, indicating a stalled market.
Both landlord and non-landlord transactions were absent in Q4 2025. Consequently, there were no transactions by mom-and-pop or institutional landlords, and no purchase prices to analyze by tier.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Newaygo County landlords own 4,962 SFR properties, with individual investors holding a dominant 83.5%.
Detailed Findings

In Newaygo County, landlords collectively own 4,962 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, representing a significant 23.1% of the total 21,458 SFR properties in the market. This indicates a robust presence of investor-owned housing.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the market, holding 4,142 properties (83.5% of all investor-owned SFR), while companies own a much smaller share of 930 properties (18.7%). This challenges the narrative of corporate dominance, showing the local market is primarily fueled by individual portfolios.

A striking 98.5% of landlord-owned properties are rented (4,888 properties), underscoring a strong focus on generating rental income within the portfolio. Furthermore, 95.7% of properties (4,750) were acquired with cash, indicating a preference for debt-free investment or high capital availability.

The ratio of individual to company landlords is approximately 6.2:1, with 5,128 individual landlords compared to 829 company landlords. This highlights that the vast majority of active landlord entities in Newaygo County are individuals, not corporate entities.

While individuals own 83.5% of properties, they account for an even larger share of entities (86.1%), suggesting that individual landlords typically manage smaller portfolios on average compared to companies, further emphasizing the mom-and-pop structure.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlord acquisition data is largely absent for Q4 2025; Q1 2025 showed landlords paying a 21.7% premium.
Detailed Findings

Newaygo County experienced a notable absence of landlord acquisition activity during the current quarter (Q4 2025), with zero properties recorded. This trend of no recorded activity extends to Q2 2025, Q4 2024, and the entirety of both 2024 and 2025, according to available acquisition data, suggesting a highly stagnant or unreported purchasing environment for landlords.

The most recent available acquisition pricing data for Q1 2025 reveals an anomaly: landlords paid an average of $287,887 per property, which was a significant $51,422 (21.7%) premium compared to the average homeowner price of $236,465. This deviates from the typical pattern where landlords often secure properties at a discount.

Given the zero property acquisitions in most recent timeframes, a quarter-over-quarter trend analysis for the landlord-homeowner price gap is not feasible for Q4 2025, 2024, or 2025 overall. The market appears to be in a holding pattern regarding new purchases.

The lack of recorded acquisitions for the entirety of 2024 and 2025 (0 properties each year) for landlords, contrasted with the $171,639 average price for properties acquired in 2020-2023, suggests a dramatic slowdown in buying activity compared to the post-pandemic boom years, or a significant data reporting gap.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Q4 2025 saw no SFR purchases by landlords or other buyers in Newaygo County.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, Newaygo County recorded zero total SFR purchases, meaning landlords made no acquisitions and other buyers also showed no activity. This indicates a complete halt in market sales for the quarter, rather than a shift in buyer composition.

Consequently, the share of Q4 SFR purchases going to landlords was 0.0%, reflecting the complete lack of purchasing activity by all buyer types. This suggests an unusual market slowdown for new acquisitions in the current quarter.

Both mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) and institutional investors (Tier 09) registered zero purchases in Q4 2025, underscoring the universal stagnation of the market for new acquisitions. There was no buying activity across any investor tier.

As there were no purchases, no new landlords (single-property, Tier 01) entered the market in Q4 2025. This signals a pause in new investment and market expansion at the entry level.

With zero properties acquired in Q4, the average properties per entity by tier is also zero. This quarter provides no insights into active entities or their purchasing intensity due to the absence of transactions.

The complete absence of activity across all tiers means there is no tier showing a higher concentration of Q4 buying activity; the market was entirely inactive in terms of purchases.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 98.7% of investor-owned SFR in Newaygo County.
Detailed Findings

The landscape of investor-owned SFR properties in Newaygo County is profoundly dominated by mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who collectively control an overwhelming 98.7% of the market. This represents a stark contrast to national narratives often focusing on institutional buyers.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the largest segment, owning 4,194 properties, which accounts for 82.7% of the entire investor-owned SFR portfolio. This highlights the significant role of individual, first-time, or small-scale investors in the county’s rental housing market.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold only 1 property, constituting a negligible 0.0% of the total landlord-owned SFR in Newaygo County. This data strongly refutes any notion of institutional market dominance in this geography.

The ownership distribution shows a rapid decline in property count as portfolio size increases; for example, Tier 01 (1 property) has 4,194 properties, while Tier 05 (11-20 properties) drops to just 37 properties, revealing a highly fragmented market structure.

Due to the lack of available data, acquisition prices by tier for All Time, Q4, 2024, and 2020-2023 cannot be determined for Newaygo County. This limits the ability to analyze price variations or strategies across different investor sizes.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 11-20 property tier in Newaygo County, flipping individual dominance.
Detailed Findings

While individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smaller portfolio tiers, a significant crossover point occurs at the 11-20 property tier, where companies become the majority owners. In this tier, companies own 28 properties (75.7%), surpassing individual ownership of 9 properties (24.3%).

Individual ownership is highly concentrated in the single-property tier (Tier 01), where they account for 3,588 properties (83.9%), compared to companies owning 689 properties (16.1%). This reinforces the mom-and-pop structure at the market entry level.

Even in the 3-5 property tier, individuals maintain strong control, owning 281 properties (75.7%) versus companies at 90 properties (24.3%). This pattern holds true up to the 6-10 property tier, where individuals own 60 properties (78.9%) against 16 company-owned properties (21.1%).

The data for Tier + Type Pricing across various timeframes is not available, preventing a detailed analysis of how individual and company acquisition prices differ within each tier or how growth patterns compare over time.

The 11-20 property tier exhibits the highest company concentration (75.7%) relative to individual owners, marking it as the point where corporate investment strategies begin to prevail over individual scaling within Newaygo County.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
MI-Newaygo-49337 leads in investor-owned property count with 1,517, while MI-Newaygo-49336 boasts the highest ownership rate at 55.6%.
Detailed Findings

Newaygo County exhibits clear geographic concentrations of investor-owned properties. The zip code MI-Newaygo-49337 leads in absolute count, with 1,517 investor-owned properties, representing a 25.2% investor ownership rate within that specific area.

When considering investor ownership rates, MI-Newaygo-49336 stands out with a remarkable 55.6% of its properties being investor-owned. This indicates a deeply penetrated market by investors in that sub-geography, despite not being the highest in raw property count.

The zip code MI-Newaygo-49309 appears prominently on both lists, ranking third by count with 951 properties and second by percentage with a significant 50.1% investor ownership rate. This highlights a region with both a high volume of investor properties and a high market penetration.

The top five regions by count (49337, 49349, 49309, 49412, 49327) collectively account for 4,185 investor-owned properties. This indicates that a significant portion of Newaygo County's investor activity is concentrated in a few key zip codes.

There is a strong correlation between high count and high percentage regions, particularly with MI-Newaygo-49309 and 49349 appearing on both top lists, suggesting these areas are hotspots for both the volume and density of investor activity.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Newaygo County landlords are net buyers in both 2024 and 2025, accumulating properties over time.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Newaygo County have consistently been net buyers over the past two years. In 2024, they purchased 239 SFR properties while selling only 45, resulting in a net acquisition of 194 properties. This signifies a strong period of portfolio growth for landlords in the county.

The trend of net buying continued into 2025, with landlords acquiring 22 properties and selling 3, leading to a net gain of 19 properties. This demonstrates ongoing confidence and expansion within the landlord segment.

The buy/sell ratio for all landlords in 2024 was approximately 5.31x (239 buys / 45 sells), indicating a highly acquisitive market. In 2025, the ratio stands even higher at 7.33x (22 buys / 3 sells), suggesting an intensifying focus on buying over selling.

Unfortunately, historical transaction data for institutional investors (1000+ tier) is not available for Newaygo County. Therefore, a comparison of institutional activity versus overall landlord patterns cannot be made, nor can their net buyer/seller position be determined from the provided data.

Due to the absence of average buy and sell prices in the historical transactions data, an implied margin or profitability analysis from transaction prices is not possible for Newaygo County landlords.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Newaygo County recorded zero total SFR transactions in Q4 2025, indicating a stalled market.
Detailed Findings

Newaygo County experienced a complete cessation of SFR transaction activity in Q4 2025, with zero total transactions recorded. This highlights an unusual and significant pause in the housing market for the quarter.

As a direct result of the market's inactivity, landlords did not participate in any transactions, rendering their share of Q4 transactions at 0.0%. This suggests that the lack of activity was broad-based, affecting all buyer types, not just landlords.

Due to the absence of transactions, there is no data to analyze transaction volumes across investor tiers. All tiers, including mom-and-pop (Tier 01-04) and institutional (Tier 09), recorded zero transactions in Q4 2025.

Similarly, with no purchases occurring, average purchase prices by tier cannot be determined for Q4 2025. This prevents any analysis of pricing strategies or market value differences between investor sizes during this period.

Given the complete lack of transactions, there was no inter-landlord trading activity or any percentage of properties bought from other landlords in Q4 2025. The market for investor-to-investor sales was completely dormant.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Newaygo County's Market Stalls in Q4; Mom-and-Pops Dominate 98.7% of Investor-Owned SFR
Holdings
Landlords in Newaygo County own 4,962 SFR properties, representing 23.1% of the total SFR market. Individual investors hold a substantial 4,142 properties (83.5%), while companies own 930 properties (18.7%).
Pricing
Q4 2025 saw no recorded acquisitions; however, in Q1 2025, landlords paid an average of $287,887, which was a significant $51,422 (21.7%) premium compared to traditional homeowners' average of $236,465.
Activity
Q4 2025 recorded zero SFR purchases by landlords, indicating a complete halt in new acquisitions across Newaygo County. Consequently, no new landlords entered the market, and there was no purchasing activity in any investor tier.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties), commonly known as mom-and-pops, control an overwhelming 98.7% of investor-owned housing in Newaygo County. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.0% with just 1 property.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, owning 83.9% of single-property SFR holdings, but companies assume majority control in portfolios ranging from 11-20 properties, where they own 75.7%.
Transactions
Landlords in Newaygo County are net buyers, with 2025 seeing 22 buys versus 3 sells; in Q4 2025, however, total transactions for all landlords, and therefore institutional investors, were zero.
Market Narrative

The Newaygo County real estate market presents a unique landscape characterized by a complete standstill in Q4 2025 activity and overwhelming dominance by small, individual investors. Landlords collectively own 4,962 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, accounting for a significant 23.1% of the county's total SFR market. This portfolio is predominantly held by individual investors, who control 4,142 properties (83.5%), with companies owning a smaller 930 properties (18.7%). Mom-and-pop landlords, owning 1-10 properties, are the bedrock of the market, controlling an expansive 98.7% of all investor-owned housing, effectively marginalizing the presence of institutional investors to a mere 1 property (0.0%).

Investor behavior in Newaygo County shows a marked acquisition slowdown, culminating in zero SFR purchases by landlords or any other buyers in Q4 2025. This points to an unusual market freeze for the quarter. While historical data indicates landlords were strong net buyers in 2024 (239 buys vs 45 sells) and 2025 (22 buys vs 3 sells), the absence of Q4 activity means there were no new market entrants or tier-specific purchasing patterns to analyze. The last available pricing data from Q1 2025 showed an anomalous trend where landlords paid a significant $51,422 (21.7%) premium over traditional homeowners, diverging from typical market dynamics.

This data from Newaygo County, Michigan, challenges conventional narratives of institutional real estate dominance, firmly establishing it as a mom-and-pop driven market with an exceptionally high local ownership rate. The complete lack of purchasing and transaction activity in Q4 2025 signals either a temporary market pause or a data reporting anomaly. This market structure implies that local housing dynamics are largely influenced by individual investment decisions rather than large-scale corporate strategies, making it a distinct case in the nationwide real estate landscape.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 11:07 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyNewaygo (MI)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords