Marquette (MI) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Marquette (MI) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Marquette (MI)
24,294
Total Investors in Marquette (MI)
5,624
Investor Owned SFR in Marquette (MI)
4,395(18.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
5,040
SFR Owned
3,798
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
584
SFR Owned
706
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 4,395 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Marquette County with 98.8% ownership and robust buying activity.
Landlords in Marquette County, MI own 4,395 SFR properties, representing 18.1% of the market, with individual investors holding an overwhelming 86.4%. In Q4 2025, landlords secured properties at an average of $231,294, a 26.2% discount compared to homeowners. This activity is driven by small-scale investors, who were strong net buyers with a 7.33x buy/sell ratio, contrasting with absent institutional activity.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 4,395 SFR properties in Marquette County, with individuals holding 86.4% compared to companies at 16.1%.
A vast majority of landlord properties, 4,274, are rented, signifying a strong focus on non-owner-occupied investments. Cash acquisitions are the predominant funding method, with 3,816 properties purchased via cash, far outweighing the 579 financed properties. The landlord market is heavily individual-driven, with 5,040 individual landlords outnumbering 584 company landlords by a ratio of 8.63:1.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a substantial 26.2% discount in Q4 2025, paying $231,294 compared to homeowners at $313,438.
The price discount for landlords has fluctuated significantly quarter-over-quarter, ranging from a 19.3% discount in Q3 2025 to a peak of 33.9% in Q2 2025. Landlord acquisition activity in Q4 2025 was recorded at 0 properties, indicating either a pause in large-scale purchases or highly selective buying for the distinct transactions reported in this specific timeframe.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 20.2% of Q4 2025 SFR purchases, primarily driven by mom-and-pop investors.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) accounted for an overwhelming 90.9% of all landlord purchases in Q4, totaling 40 properties. In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09) made no purchases (0.0%), reinforcing the market's reliance on smaller players. The single-property tier alone saw 46 entities acquire 30 properties, representing 68.2% of landlord purchases and underscoring the activity of new or expanding small-scale investors.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Marquette County's investor-owned SFR market, controlling 98.8% of properties.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.0% of the investor-owned SFR portfolio, with only 1 property. The vast majority of properties are held by single-property landlords (Tier 01), who own 3,528 properties, comprising 77.7% of the total investor-owned housing.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies assume majority ownership in portfolios of 11-20 properties, marking a clear crossover point from individual dominance.
Individual investors maintain an overwhelming majority in smaller tiers, holding 87.3% of single-property portfolios and 87.5% of two-property portfolios. The 6-10 property tier represents a pivot, showing an equal 50.0% split between individual and company ownership before companies take a commanding 94.7% share in the 11-20 property tier.
Geographic Distribution
MI-Marquette-49855 leads in investor-owned property count with 1,416 properties, while 49819 shows the highest ownership rate at 57.7%.
The zip code MI-Marquette-49855, with 1,416 investor-owned properties, has an ownership rate of 14.4%, indicating a large volume in a potentially broader market. Conversely, MI-Marquette-49819, MI-Marquette-49808, and MI-Marquette-49831 demonstrate exceptionally high investor penetration rates at 57.7%, 49.2%, and 48.8% respectively, suggesting these are highly concentrated investor markets despite possibly lower raw property counts.
Historical Transactions
All landlords are robust net buyers in Marquette County, with a 7.33x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025, while institutional activity remained absent.
In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 66 properties while selling only 9, resulting in a net gain of 57 properties. This strong accumulation trend is consistent throughout Year 2025, with 229 buys against 33 sells (6.94x ratio). Institutional investors (1000+ tier) showed no recorded transactions in Q4 2025, indicating a complete pause or minimal presence in current market churn.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for 20.0% of all Q4 transactions in Marquette County, with single-property investors dominating activity.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, completing 46 transactions and paying an average of $257,555. They also engaged in the most inter-landlord trading, with 10.9% of their purchases (5 properties) coming from other landlords. Institutional investors (Tier 09) recorded no transactions in Q4 2025, highlighting their continued absence from the county's active market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 4,395 SFR properties in Marquette County, with individuals holding 86.4% compared to companies at 16.1%.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Marquette County, MI collectively own 4,395 SFR properties, representing 18.1% of the total SFR market, highlighting a significant investor presence within the local housing sector.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord segment, holding 3,798 properties (86.4% of investor-owned SFR), showcasing that the 'mom-and-pop' model is the prevailing ownership type.

Company investors, while present, own a considerably smaller portfolio of 706 properties, accounting for 16.1% of the landlord-owned SFR, reinforcing the individual-centric nature of the market.

The portfolio is highly rental-focused, with 4,274 properties designated as rented, indicating that approximately 97.2% of investor-owned SFR properties are utilized for rental income, aligning with the definition of a landlord.

Cash purchases significantly outweigh financed acquisitions within the landlord portfolio, with 3,816 properties bought in cash compared to just 579 financed properties, suggesting a preference for unencumbered assets or access to substantial capital reserves.

The individual-to-company landlord ratio of 8.63:1 (5,040 individual vs. 584 company entities) further emphasizes the dispersed nature of property ownership among a large number of smaller, independent investors.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a substantial 26.2% discount in Q4 2025, paying $231,294 compared to homeowners at $313,438.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Marquette County paid an average of $231,294 for SFR properties, securing a notable $82,144 discount or 26.2% less than traditional homeowners, who paid $313,438, signaling landlords' ability to find advantageous deals.

The landlord acquisition price advantage has shown quarterly volatility; the discount narrowed to 19.3% in Q3 2025 ($53,463 difference) from 25.2% in Q1 2025, and peaked at 33.9% in Q2 2025 ($106,776 difference), indicating an inconsistent market for price arbitrage.

Despite the observed pricing, landlord acquisition volume in Q4 2025 was reported as 0 distinct properties, suggesting that while price differences exist, the overall transaction count for newly acquired landlord properties in this specific quarter was minimal or concentrated in areas not fully captured by 'distinct SFR properties purchased' metric for that period.

When examining annual trends, the average landlord acquisition price for Year 2025 stands at $221,297, which represents a 24.1% increase from the pandemic-era average of $178,263 for Years 2020-2023, showcasing significant property value appreciation over recent years.

Comparing Year 2025 ($221,297) to Year 2024 ($246,745), landlord average acquisition prices have decreased by 10.3%, suggesting a potential cooling or shift in the market compared to the previous year's higher average.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 20.2% of Q4 2025 SFR purchases, primarily driven by mom-and-pop investors.
Detailed Findings

Landlords accounted for 43 of the 213 total SFR purchases in Q4 2025, capturing a significant 20.2% share of the overall market activity in Marquette County.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) overwhelmingly dominated Q4 acquisitions, purchasing 40 properties and comprising 90.9% of all landlord purchases, demonstrating their continued influence on market dynamics.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) were entirely absent from purchasing activity in Q4 2025, recording 0 properties acquired, indicating that large-scale corporate buying did not occur in the county during this period.

The single-property tier (Tier 01) was the most active segment, with 46 entities acquiring 30 properties, representing 68.2% of all landlord purchases and highlighting a strong entry point for new or expanding individual investors.

The average properties per entity in Q4 purchases varied across active tiers, from 0.65 for single-property entities (30 properties by 46 entities) to 4 for small-medium entities (4 properties by 1 entity in Tier 11-20), revealing diverse buying intensity by investor size.

The high concentration of Q4 activity in the single-property tier (68.2%) suggests that the current quarter's investor growth in Marquette County is predominantly fueled by smaller-scale, potentially first-time, landlords.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Marquette County's investor-owned SFR market, controlling 98.8% of properties.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), comprising those with 1 to 10 properties, control an overwhelming 98.8% of all investor-owned SFR housing in Marquette County, totaling 4,486 properties, signaling a highly decentralized and small-investor-driven market.

The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) forms the backbone of the investor market, owning 3,528 properties and representing a dominant 77.7% of the entire landlord-owned SFR portfolio.

In stark contrast to media narratives, institutional investors (Tier 09) hold a negligible share of the market, owning just 1 property, which equates to 0.0% of the investor-owned SFR in the county.

The distribution reveals a sharp drop-off in property counts as portfolio size increases: after Tier 01 (77.7%), the next largest is Tier 03-05 with 491 properties (10.8%), demonstrating a rapid decrease in the number of larger landlords.

Even mid-size landlords (Tiers 05-08) hold a minimal presence, with Tiers 11-20, 21-50, 51-100, and 101-1000 collectively owning only 55 properties (1.2% of the market), underscoring the market's concentration among the smallest investors.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies assume majority ownership in portfolios of 11-20 properties, marking a clear crossover point from individual dominance.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate smaller portfolios in Marquette County, holding 3,151 properties (87.3%) in the single-property tier and 356 properties (87.5%) in the two-property tier, demonstrating their foundational role in the market's most common investor sizes.

The shift towards corporate ownership becomes evident as portfolios grow, with the 6-10 property tier marking a crucial crossover point where individual and company ownership reaches an equal 50.0% split (33 properties each).

Companies decisively become the majority owners in the small-medium 11-20 property tier, controlling 18 properties (94.7%) compared to just 1 property (5.3%) held by individuals, illustrating the tier where corporate strategies become dominant.

Even in the small landlord 3-5 property tier, individuals still hold a strong majority with 364 properties (73.2%) versus 133 properties (26.8%) for companies, indicating that companies start to gain traction but do not dominate until larger portfolio sizes.

The data reveals a clear segmentation of the market by owner type and portfolio size: individuals drive the smaller-scale investments, while companies progressively take over larger portfolio management, particularly above 10 properties.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
MI-Marquette-49855 leads in investor-owned property count with 1,416 properties, while 49819 shows the highest ownership rate at 57.7%.
Detailed Findings

Within Marquette County, the zip code MI-Marquette-49855 stands out with the highest count of investor-owned properties, totaling 1,416, representing 14.4% of its SFR market, signifying a major hub for landlord activity.

Other significant sub-geographies by property count include MI-Marquette-49849 with 750 investor-owned properties (15.0% ownership rate) and MI-Marquette-49841 with 546 properties (24.8% ownership rate), highlighting distinct areas of investor concentration.

In contrast to sheer volume, MI-Marquette-49819 boasts the highest investor ownership rate at a remarkable 57.7%, indicating that more than half of its SFR properties are landlord-owned, signaling a highly saturated investor market.

Further high-penetration areas include MI-Marquette-49808 (49.2% investor-owned) and MI-Marquette-49831 (48.8% investor-owned), suggesting specific pockets within Marquette County are exceptionally attractive to landlords.

The distinction between regions with high property counts versus high ownership percentages reveals varied market dynamics; a region like 49855 might have a large overall market, whereas 49819 indicates a market where investors hold a disproportionate share of a potentially smaller inventory.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
All landlords are robust net buyers in Marquette County, with a 7.33x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025, while institutional activity remained absent.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Marquette County are strong net buyers, acquiring 66 properties and selling only 9 in Q4 2025, resulting in a robust buy/sell ratio of 7.33x, clearly signaling accumulation of SFR properties.

This aggressive buying trend is consistent throughout the year, with Year 2025 showing 229 buy transactions against 33 sell transactions, resulting in a net gain of 196 properties for landlords.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ tier) showed no recorded buy or sell transactions in Q4 2025, implying a complete absence from the current quarter's market activity in the county.

Historically, institutional activity has been minimal and balanced; for Year 2024, institutional investors bought 2 properties and sold 2, indicating a neutral net position before their current period of inactivity.

The significant disparity between the high buying volume of all landlords and the non-existent institutional activity underscores that market growth and property accumulation in Marquette County are almost entirely driven by smaller-scale investors.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 20.0% of all Q4 transactions in Marquette County, with single-property investors dominating activity.
Detailed Findings

Landlords participated in 66 of the 330 total SFR transactions in Q4 2025, representing a significant 20.0% share of all property trades in Marquette County.

Transaction volumes varied considerably across investor tiers, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) leading with 46 transactions, followed by two-property landlords (Tier 02) with 9 transactions, and small landlords (Tier 03-05) with 7 transactions.

Average purchase prices in Q4 also showed disparity across tiers; Tier 01 landlords paid the highest average of $257,555, while Tier 02 landlords secured properties at a lower average price of $161,444, revealing different acquisition strategies or market segments.

Inter-landlord trading activity was observed predominantly within the single-property tier (Tier 01), where 5 transactions (10.9% of their purchases) were acquired from other landlords, suggesting a degree of market liquidity among small investors.

The price spread between the highest and lowest purchasing tiers was substantial, with Tier 01 paying $257,555 and Tier 02 paying $161,444, a difference of $96,111, indicating significant variations in property types or market opportunities accessed by different investor sizes.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) recorded zero transactions in Q4 2025, reaffirming their non-participation in current market churn, and reinforcing that activity is overwhelmingly concentrated among smaller-scale landlords.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Marquette County with 98.8% ownership and robust buying.
Holdings
Landlords in Marquette County, MI own 4,395 SFR properties, representing 18.1% of the total SFR market, with individual investors holding 3,798 properties (86.4%) and companies owning 706 properties (16.1%).
Pricing
Landlords paid an average of $231,294 in Q4 2025, securing a substantial 26.2% discount ($82,144) compared to traditional homeowners who paid $313,438.
Activity
In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 43 properties, accounting for 20.2% of all SFR sales, with 46 new single-property landlords actively acquiring 30 properties, making Tier 01 the dominant investor tier.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 98.8% of investor housing in Marquette County, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.0%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors hold majority ownership in most smaller portfolio tiers, with companies only achieving a 50.0% share at the 6-10 property tier and becoming majority owners at 11-20 properties.
Transactions
All landlords are strong net buyers with a 7.33x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025 (66 buys vs 9 sells), while institutional investors showed no activity during the quarter.
Market Narrative

In Marquette County, MI, the SFR market sees significant investor participation, with landlords owning 4,395 properties, comprising 18.1% of the total SFR housing stock. This ownership is heavily skewed towards individual investors, who collectively hold 3,798 properties (86.4%), far surpassing the 706 properties (16.1%) owned by companies. The market's structure is predominantly driven by small-scale investors, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.8% of all investor-owned SFR housing, making them the backbone of the rental market in the county.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 demonstrated a clear advantage in acquisitions, with landlords purchasing properties at an average of $231,294, securing a substantial 26.2% discount ($82,144) compared to traditional homeowners who paid $313,438. Landlords were robust net buyers in Q4 2025, recording a strong 7.33x buy-to-sell ratio (66 buys vs 9 sells), reflecting significant accumulation. Activity was concentrated among smaller investors, with 43 properties acquired by landlords, of which 68.2% (30 properties by 46 entities) were by new single-property landlords, indicating a grassroots expansion of the rental market. Notably, institutional investors showed no transaction activity in Q4 2025.

The data reveals a highly localized and small-investor-dominated real estate market in Marquette County, MI, where the narrative of large institutional ownership appears to be absent. The significant discounts secured by landlords suggest market efficiency for informed buyers, while the strong net buying activity, particularly from mom-and-pop investors, indicates confidence and continued growth in the small-scale rental sector. This dynamic points to a resilient, locally-driven investor market rather than one shaped by corporate entities, with strong activity among smaller portfolio owners and a clear emphasis on rental properties.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 11:01 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyMarquette (MI)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth