Baraga (MI) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Baraga (MI) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Baraga (MI)
4,215
Total Investors in Baraga (MI)
2,125
Investor Owned SFR in Baraga (MI)
1,640(38.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,886
SFR Owned
1,379
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
239
SFR Owned
296
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,640 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Cash-Centric MI-Baraga Market Amidst Zero Q4 2025 Activity
In Baraga County, individual investors control 84.1% of 1,640 landlord-owned SFR properties, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounting for 97.0% of the market. While Q4 2025 saw no landlord acquisitions, 2025-Q1 data indicated a potential 81.7% discount for landlords, continuing a trend of cash-only purchases and strong net buying in 2024.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual investors own 84.1% of 1,640 landlord-held SFR properties in MI-Baraga County.
All 1,640 investor-owned properties are purchased with cash, indicating zero financed holdings and a highly liquid market. Nearly all 1,620 properties are rented, demonstrating a strong focus on generating rental income for landlords.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
With zero Q4 2025 landlord acquisitions, 2025-Q1 saw a theoretical 81.7% landlord discount.
In 2025-Q1, landlords hypothetically paid $32,000 for properties, a significant $143,000 less than the $175,000 average for traditional homeowners, despite zero recorded landlord purchases. This suggests extreme pricing disparities if any transactions were to occur, but highlights a completely dormant acquisition market in Q4 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Zero landlord purchases occurred in MI-Baraga during Q4 2025, signaling a dormant acquisition market.
No new properties were acquired by landlords in Baraga County in Q4 2025, resulting in a 0.0% landlord share of the total market. Consequently, there were no mom-and-pop (Tier 01-04) or institutional (Tier 09) purchases recorded for the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 97.0% of investor-owned SFR in MI-Baraga County, far outpacing institutions.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone, owning 1,380 properties or 81.5% of the total investor portfolio. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a marginal 0.1% share with just one property, indicating minimal corporate presence in the county.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate all landlord tiers in MI-Baraga, comprising 85.9% of single-property owners.
Individual ownership consistently exceeds 82% across all listed tiers, peaking at 87.5% for 6-10 property landlords. Companies never achieve a majority share in any tier, indicating a highly localized and individual-driven market structure in Baraga County.
Geographic Distribution
MI-Baraga-49946 leads in investor-owned SFR count with 604 properties, while 49962 has the highest rate at 56.9%.
Zip codes 49962 and 49861 exhibit high landlord penetration, with over half of all SFR properties (56.9% and 54.5% respectively) owned by investors. The top five zip codes combined account for 1,462 landlord-owned properties, highlighting concentrated activity within Baraga County.
Historical Transactions
MI-Baraga landlords were strong net buyers in 2024, achieving a 38.0x buy/sell ratio (76 buys vs 2 sells).
Baraga County landlords accumulated 74 net properties in 2024, demonstrating robust growth in their portfolios, but Q4 2025 recorded zero transactions. There is no available data on institutional investor transactions or the percentage of landlord-to-landlord trades.
Current Quarter Transactions
Zero landlord transactions were recorded in MI-Baraga during Q4 2025, indicating a frozen market.
Baraga County experienced no landlord buy or sell activity in Q4 2025, resulting in a 0.0% landlord share of total transactions. Consequently, there is no data on tier-specific transaction volumes, average purchase prices, or inter-landlord trading activity for the quarter.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual investors own 84.1% of 1,640 landlord-held SFR properties in MI-Baraga County.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Baraga County collectively own 1,640 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, representing a significant 38.9% of the total SFR market. This high rate of investor ownership highlights a robust rental market within the county.

Individual landlords overwhelmingly dominate the market, holding 1,379 properties, which accounts for 84.1% of all investor-owned SFR. Conversely, company-owned properties total 296, making up only 18.0% of the portfolio, challenging narratives of corporate dominance in this specific county.

The ownership structure is predominantly individual-driven, with 1,886 individual landlords compared to just 239 company landlords. This 7.9:1 ratio of individual to company entities further underscores the prevalence of mom-and-pop operations.

A striking 100% of landlord-owned properties (1,640 properties) were acquired with cash, with no properties listed as financed. This indicates a strong capital base and a preference for debt-free investment among landlords in Baraga County.

The vast majority of landlord holdings, 1,620 properties, are designated as rented, confirming that the primary objective for these investors is income generation through property leasing. The low number of non-rented properties suggests high occupancy or immediate rental conversion for acquired units.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
With zero Q4 2025 landlord acquisitions, 2025-Q1 saw a theoretical 81.7% landlord discount.
Detailed Findings

Baraga County recorded no landlord acquisitions in Q4 2025, signaling a complete halt in new property investments by landlords for the quarter. This absence of activity stands out compared to historical periods.

The most recent comparative pricing data from 2025-Q1 shows a theoretical average landlord acquisition price of $32,000. This is an astounding $143,000 (81.7%) less than the average traditional homeowner price of $175,000 for the same period.

Despite the significant price difference, it's crucial to note that the $32,000 landlord average for 2025-Q1 is based on zero distinct SFR properties purchased. This indicates that while price gaps could be substantial, no actual landlord transactions contributed to this average.

Historical data for Years 2025, 2024, and 2020-2023 also show zero distinct properties purchased by landlords, making it challenging to establish concrete acquisition price trends over time for this county. The $128,262 average for Year 2024 and $134,480 for 2020-2023 are also based on zero property acquisitions.

The lack of consistent acquisition data across multiple timeframes suggests either extremely low market liquidity for investor-type properties or specific reporting limitations for Baraga County.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Zero landlord purchases occurred in MI-Baraga during Q4 2025, signaling a dormant acquisition market.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, Baraga County experienced a complete absence of SFR purchase activity, with both total SFR purchases and landlord SFR purchases recorded at zero. This signifies a profoundly stagnant acquisition market for the quarter.

The lack of any landlord purchases means landlords held a 0.0% share of the market in Q4 2025. This indicates that no new investment properties were added to landlord portfolios during this period.

As a direct consequence of zero landlord purchases, there was no activity from mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04), who accounted for 0.0% of landlord purchases for the quarter. Similarly, institutional investors (Tier 09) also showed 0.0% of landlord purchases.

The absence of any purchase data by tier means no specific tier was more active than others, as all activity ceased. This paints a picture of a market frozen in Q4 2025, offering no insights into recent tier-specific buying trends.

This zero activity extends to the number of entities active in each tier and the average properties per entity, as no new entities entered the market through Q4 purchases, nor did existing entities expand their portfolios.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 97.0% of investor-owned SFR in MI-Baraga County, far outpacing institutions.
Detailed Findings

The investor-owned SFR market in Baraga County is overwhelmingly dominated by mom-and-pop landlords, with Tiers 01-04 (1-10 properties) controlling a combined 97.0% of all landlord-held properties. This structure highlights a local, individual-driven investment landscape.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone account for 1,380 properties, representing a substantial 81.5% of the entire investor portfolio. This makes first-time or single-property investors the most significant segment in the county's rental market.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold only one property, comprising a negligible 0.1% of the total investor-owned SFR. This debunks any notion of significant corporate or large-scale institutional influence in Baraga County.

The distribution reveals a steep drop-off after single-property owners: two-property landlords (Tier 02) own 143 properties (8.4%), and small landlords (3-5 properties, Tier 03) hold 112 properties (6.6%). This concentration indicates a market built on smaller, localized investments.

Despite the clear distribution of properties, the provided data lacks specific acquisition price variations by tier for All Time, Q4, 2024, or 2020-2023. This prevents a detailed analysis of how larger or smaller investors' buying prices might differ over time in this county.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate all landlord tiers in MI-Baraga, comprising 85.9% of single-property owners.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain a commanding presence across all reported landlord portfolio tiers in Baraga County. For single-property owners (Tier 01), individuals comprise 1,209 properties (85.9%), compared to 199 properties (14.1%) held by companies.

This individual dominance extends consistently into larger tiers. For two-property owners (Tier 02), individuals hold 118 properties (82.5%) against 25 company-owned properties (17.5%). Similarly, in the 3-5 property tier, individuals own 94 (82.5%) and companies 20 (17.5%).

Companies do not achieve majority ownership in any tier within Baraga County based on the provided data. The highest individual concentration is observed in the 6-10 property tier (Tier 04), where individuals own 7 properties (87.5%) compared to just 1 property (12.5%) owned by companies.

The consistent pattern of high individual ownership across all tiers underscores the mom-and-pop nature of the investor market in this county, with corporate entities playing a comparatively minor role even in slightly larger portfolios.

Without acquisition price data split by owner type and tier, it is not possible to analyze how individual versus company buying strategies or price points differ within these specific portfolio sizes in Baraga County.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
MI-Baraga-49946 leads in investor-owned SFR count with 604 properties, while 49962 has the highest rate at 56.9%.
Detailed Findings

Investor-owned properties in Baraga County are highly concentrated within specific zip codes. MI-Baraga-49946 leads by count with 604 landlord-owned SFR properties, establishing it as the primary hub for investor activity in the county.

While 49946 has the highest count, MI-Baraga-49962 boasts the highest investor ownership rate, with a remarkable 56.9% of its SFR properties held by landlords. This indicates a very high saturation of rental properties in that specific area.

Other zip codes also show significant investor penetration, such as MI-Baraga-49861 where 54.5% of SFR properties are investor-owned, and MI-Baraga-49919 with 48.9%. These rates are significantly higher than the county average, pointing to key sub-markets for investor focus.

The top five zip codes by count (49946, 49908, 49962, 49861, 49958) collectively represent 1,462 landlord-owned properties. This substantial concentration within a few areas suggests that investment opportunities or existing portfolios are geographically clustered.

There is a notable overlap between zip codes with high property counts and high ownership percentages, such as 49962 and 49861 appearing in both top five lists. This indicates that areas with more investor properties also tend to have a higher proportion of their housing stock controlled by landlords.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
MI-Baraga landlords were strong net buyers in 2024, achieving a 38.0x buy/sell ratio (76 buys vs 2 sells).
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Baraga County were overwhelmingly net buyers in 2024, purchasing 76 SFR properties while selling only 2. This represents an exceptionally high buy/sell ratio of 38.0x, indicating a strong period of portfolio expansion.

The net acquisition of 74 properties in 2024 signals a robust and aggressive investment strategy among landlords in the county during that year. This level of accumulation reflects confidence in the market's long-term potential.

However, the data for Q4 2025 shows a complete absence of buy and sell transactions for all landlords, indicating a sharp cessation of activity in the most recent quarter. This stark contrast suggests a significant shift or reporting gap compared to the prior year.

Information regarding institutional investor (1000+ tier) transactions is entirely absent, precluding any analysis of their net position or how their activity might compare to the overall landlord market in Baraga County.

Similarly, data on the percentage of transactions occurring between landlords (landlord-to-landlord) is not provided, making it impossible to assess the liquidity and internal trading dynamics of the investor market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Zero landlord transactions were recorded in MI-Baraga during Q4 2025, indicating a frozen market.
Detailed Findings

Q4 2025 in Baraga County saw a complete absence of SFR transactions involving landlords, with both total transactions and landlord transactions recorded at zero. This signifies a dormant or entirely halted market activity for the quarter.

As a result of no activity, the landlord share of total Q4 transactions was 0.0%. This means no properties were either bought or sold by landlords in the county during this recent period, offering no insights into current market momentum.

The lack of Q4 transaction data extends across all investor tiers; therefore, there is no information on which tiers were most active, nor are there average purchase prices by tier. This makes it impossible to assess recent buying strategies or price points across different investor sizes.

Similarly, without any transactions, there is no data on inter-landlord trading activity (properties bought from other landlords) for Q4 2025. This prevents an analysis of market liquidity and the prevalence of investor-to-investor sales.

The complete cessation of recorded transaction activity in Q4 2025 stands as a critical finding for Baraga County, suggesting either an extreme market slowdown or a reporting anomaly that impacts recent market insights.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Cash-Centric MI-Baraga Market Amidst Zero Q4 2025 Activity
Holdings
Landlords own 1,640 SFR properties, representing 38.9% of the total SFR market in Baraga County, MI. Individual investors hold the vast majority with 1,379 properties (84.1%), while companies own 296 properties (18.0%).
Pricing
Baraga County recorded no landlord acquisitions in Q4 2025. However, 2025-Q1 data indicated landlords could theoretically secure an 81.7% discount, with an average price of $32,000 compared to homeowners' $175,000, despite zero recorded purchases.
Activity
Q4 2025 saw zero landlord purchases in Baraga County, resulting in a 0.0% landlord share of all sales. Consequently, no new landlords entered the market, and no investor tiers showed purchasing activity for the quarter.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties, Tiers 01-04) control 97.0% of investor-owned housing in MI-Baraga, with institutional investors (1000+ properties, Tier 09) holding a minimal 0.1% of the portfolio.
Ownership Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate all landlord tiers in Baraga County, consistently comprising over 82% of properties and never ceding majority control to companies, even in larger portfolio sizes.
Transactions
Landlords in Baraga County were strong net buyers in 2024, with a 38.0x buy/sell ratio (76 buys vs 2 sells). However, Q4 2025 recorded zero transactions for all landlords, and no institutional activity was reported.
Market Narrative

The real estate investor landscape in Baraga County, MI, is distinctly shaped by a dominant mom-and-pop presence. Landlords collectively own 1,640 SFR properties, accounting for a significant 38.9% of the county’s entire SFR market. This extensive portfolio is largely controlled by individual investors, who own 1,379 properties (84.1%), dwarfing the 296 properties (18.0%) held by companies. Small landlords (Tiers 01-04) further solidify this structure, commanding 97.0% of all investor-owned housing, with institutional investors holding a negligible 0.1% share.

Despite this robust existing portfolio, Baraga County experienced an unprecedented halt in Q4 2025. Zero landlord acquisitions or transactions were recorded for the quarter, indicating a completely dormant market for new investments. While the lack of recent activity prevents an assessment of current pricing trends, historical data from 2025-Q1 showed an extreme theoretical landlord discount of 81.7%, with landlords paying $32,000 compared to homeowners' $175,000. Historically, landlords were net buyers in 2024, acquiring 76 properties against only 2 sales, signaling prior confidence and growth.

The pronounced individual investor dominance and the complete absence of financing for all 1,640 investor-owned properties highlight a cash-centric market driven by local, smaller-scale players. The Q4 2025 market stagnation stands as a critical finding, suggesting a potential pause in acquisition strategies or specific reporting challenges. This structure implies that the Baraga County rental market is primarily sustained by individual endeavors rather than large corporate entities, fostering a potentially stable, community-oriented housing environment despite the recent lack of transaction volume.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 10:31 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyBaraga (MI)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price