Alcona (MI) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Alcona (MI) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Alcona (MI)
10,425
Total Investors in Alcona (MI)
5,762
Investor Owned SFR in Alcona (MI)
4,232(40.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
5,139
SFR Owned
3,630
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
623
SFR Owned
662
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 4,232 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Alcona County's Cash-Rich Mom-and-Pops Dominate 40.6% SFR Market; Q4 Activity Halted
Investors in Alcona County, MI, own 4,232 SFR properties, representing a significant 40.6% market penetration. This market is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors (85.8%) and mom-and-pop landlords (99.4%), with all holdings acquired via cash. However, Q4 2025 saw a complete halt in SFR purchase activity for both landlords and other buyers, following earlier 2025 quarters that experienced notable price volatility for landlords.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Alcona County's 4,232 investor-owned SFR are 85.8% individual, all held cash.
Individual investors hold 3,630 properties, significantly more than companies at 662 properties. Notably, 100% of the 4,232 investor-owned SFR properties in the county are held as cash, indicating zero financed properties among these landlords.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Alcona County landlords experienced significant price swings in 2025, from a 12.7% discount to an 8.5% premium.
In 2025-Q2, landlords secured a $26,767 discount, paying $183,733 compared to homeowners at $210,500. However, in 2025-Q1, landlords paid an $14,783 premium, with an average acquisition price of $188,938 against homeowners' $174,155. There were zero landlord acquisitions recorded for Q4 2025 in Alcona County.
Current Quarter Purchases
Alcona County records zero SFR purchases in Q4 2025 by landlords or other buyers.
The current quarter saw no landlord acquisitions, resulting in 0.0% of the market share. Consequently, there was no activity from mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) or institutional investors (Tier 09) in Q4 2025.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 99.4% of Alcona County's investor-owned SFR properties.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone dominate, holding 3,714 properties or 84.9% of the investor-owned market. Institutional investors (Tier 09) have a negligible presence, owning only 1 property, which accounts for 0.0% of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Company ownership dominates Alcona County portfolios above 10 properties, reaching 83.3% in Tier 11-20.
Individual investors still overwhelmingly lead in single-property portfolios (85.2%) and smaller tiers up to 5 properties (88.9%). The transition point where companies become the majority occurs between 6-10 properties (61.5% individual) and 11-20 properties (83.3% company).
Geographic Distribution
Alcona County's 48728 zip code leads with 57.8% investor ownership, highlighting regional hotspots.
The 48737 zip code has the highest count of investor-owned properties at 609, representing a 47.8% investor rate. Meanwhile, 49747 and 48738 also show high investor penetration at 48.1% (436 properties) and 46.0% (585 properties) respectively.
Historical Transactions
Alcona County landlords were strong net buyers in 2024, acquiring 162 properties against 7 sells.
This activity translates to an impressive buy-to-sell ratio of 23.14x for all landlords in 2024, indicating aggressive accumulation. There is no historical transaction data available for institutional investors (1000+ Tier) in Alcona County.
Current Quarter Transactions
Alcona County recorded zero landlord and total SFR transactions in Q4 2025.
This complete absence of activity means landlords accounted for 0.0% of transactions. Consequently, there is no data to analyze transaction volumes or average purchase prices by tier for this quarter.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Alcona County's 4,232 investor-owned SFR are 85.8% individual, all held cash.
Detailed Findings

Investor-owned SFR properties constitute a substantial 40.6% of Alcona County's total 10,425 SFR properties, signaling significant investor presence in the local housing market.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord landscape, owning 3,630 SFR properties (85.8%) compared to companies which own 662 properties (15.6%). This trend also extends to entities, with individual landlords outnumbering company landlords 5,139 to 623.

A striking finding is that all 4,232 investor-owned properties in Alcona County are recorded as cash purchases, with zero properties being financed. This suggests a highly cash-liquid investor base and potentially low reliance on traditional mortgage financing.

The entire landlord-owned portfolio of 4,232 properties is classified as 'Rented' and 'Non-Owner-Occupied', confirming that these holdings are purely investment-focused and not used for personal residence by the owners.

The high percentage of individual landlords (89.2% of entities) combined with 100% cash purchases illustrates a market driven by smaller, private capital, largely independent of institutional debt financing strategies.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Alcona County landlords experienced significant price swings in 2025, from a 12.7% discount to an 8.5% premium.
Detailed Findings

Alcona County landlords displayed inconsistent pricing power in early 2025, moving from a significant advantage to a disadvantage against homeowners within a single quarter.

In 2025-Q2, landlords in Alcona County successfully acquired properties at an average of $183,733, a notable 12.7% discount compared to the average homeowner price of $210,500, equating to a $26,767 saving per property.

However, the preceding quarter, 2025-Q1, saw landlords pay an average of $188,938, which was an 8.5% premium over traditional homeowners who paid $174,155, indicating a $14,783 higher cost for landlord acquisitions.

The absence of any recorded landlord acquisitions in Q4 2025, 2024-Q4, Year 2025, Year 2024, and Years 2020-2023 for Alcona County suggests a period of zero activity for this specific geography, making recent quarterly comparisons the only available pricing insights.

This sharp swing from a 12.7% discount to an 8.5% premium highlights considerable volatility in pricing dynamics for investors in Alcona County across consecutive quarters in 2025.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Alcona County records zero SFR purchases in Q4 2025 by landlords or other buyers.
Detailed Findings

Alcona County experienced a complete halt in SFR purchase activity during Q4 2025, with zero total transactions recorded for both landlords and non-landlord buyers.

This lack of activity meant that landlords accounted for 0.0% of the market share in Q4 2025, with no new properties acquired by any investor type in the county.

Given the absence of overall landlord purchases, there was no Q4 activity from mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) or institutional investors (Tier 09), indicating a paused market for all investor segments.

The data shows a complete absence of any entities or distinct SFR properties purchased across all tiers in Q4 2025, suggesting a stagnant acquisition environment in Alcona County for the reporting period.

This zero-purchase quarter for landlords stands in stark contrast to potential prior periods of activity, reflecting a significant pause in new investment into SFR properties in the county.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 99.4% of Alcona County's investor-owned SFR properties.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) overwhelmingly dominate Alcona County's investor-owned SFR market, controlling 99.4% of all properties, totaling 4,348 properties.

The market is heavily concentrated at the smallest end of the spectrum, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) owning 3,714 distinct SFR properties, representing 84.9% of the entire investor-owned portfolio.

Mid-size landlords (Tiers 05-08) hold a minimal share, with Tier 11-20 (small-medium) owning 24 properties (0.5%) and Tier 101-1000 (large) owning only 1 property (0.0%).

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have a virtually non-existent footprint in Alcona County, with only 1 property recorded, equating to 0.0% of the total landlord-owned SFR.

This distribution highlights that Alcona County's investor-owned housing market is almost exclusively composed of small-scale, private landlords, defying the common narrative of institutional dominance.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Company ownership dominates Alcona County portfolios above 10 properties, reaching 83.3% in Tier 11-20.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the predominant owner type across smaller portfolio tiers in Alcona County, owning 3,209 single-properties (85.2%) and 225 properties in the 3-5 property tier (88.9%).

The critical crossover point where company ownership surpasses individual ownership occurs between the 6-10 property tier and the 11-20 property tier. While individuals still hold a majority in the 6-10 property tier (8 properties or 61.5%), companies begin to gain significant ground.

Companies become the clear majority in the 'Small-medium' 11-20 property tier, owning 20 properties (83.3%) compared to individuals who own only 4 properties (16.7%).

This pattern indicates that while individuals are the backbone of small-scale investing in Alcona County, as portfolios grow beyond 10 properties, companies increasingly become the dominant owner type, suggesting a strategic shift in ownership structure for larger holdings.

The Tier 01 (single-property) has the highest concentration of individual ownership by count (3,209 properties), underscoring the prevalence of first-time or very small-scale private landlords in the county.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Alcona County's 48728 zip code leads with 57.8% investor ownership, highlighting regional hotspots.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership is highly concentrated in specific zip codes within Alcona County, with several areas showing more than 45% of their SFR properties owned by investors.

The 48728 zip code demonstrates the highest investor ownership rate in the county, with 57.8% of its SFR properties held by landlords, making it a significant hotspot for investor activity.

In terms of raw property count, the 48737 zip code leads with 609 investor-owned SFR properties, which translates to a substantial 47.8% investor ownership rate.

Other significant regions by investor count include 48738 with 585 properties (46.0% investor rate) and 48742 with 522 properties (37.1% investor rate), indicating broad, localized investor interest.

The zip code 49747 also stands out with a high investor ownership rate of 48.1% (436 properties), reinforcing the pattern of concentrated landlord activity in specific geographic pockets within Alcona County.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
Alcona County landlords were strong net buyers in 2024, acquiring 162 properties against 7 sells.
Detailed Findings

In 2024, landlords in Alcona County were overwhelmingly net buyers, demonstrating a strong appetite for property acquisition with 162 purchases against only 7 sales.

This substantial buying activity resulted in a buy-to-sell ratio of 23.14x, signaling a significant expansion phase for investor portfolios in the county during that year.

The net gain of 155 properties in 2024 indicates a market where landlords were actively growing their holdings rather than divesting.

The absence of historical transaction data for institutional investors (1000+ Tier) in Alcona County confirms their minimal presence and activity in this specific market segment.

The strong net buyer position of landlords in 2024 suggests a perceived value or opportunity in Alcona County's SFR market prior to the Q4 2025 transaction halt.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Alcona County recorded zero landlord and total SFR transactions in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Alcona County experienced a complete cessation of SFR transactions in Q4 2025, with zero total transactions recorded for both landlords and all other market participants.

This translates to landlords having a 0.0% share of all SFR transactions in the county during the last quarter, indicating no buying or selling activity from this segment.

Due to the lack of any transactions, there is no available data to determine average purchase prices by tier for Q4 2025, or to identify which investor tiers were most active.

The absence of any recorded transactions for mom-and-pop (Tier 01-04) or institutional (Tier 09) investors signifies a market-wide pause rather than a tier-specific trend.

This zero-activity quarter suggests a significant cooling or temporary halt in the real estate market dynamics within Alcona County for the reporting period, impacting all types of buyers and sellers.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Alcona County's Mom-and-Pop Cash Investors Dominate 40.6% SFR Market; Q4 Activity Halted
Holdings
Landlords in Alcona County, MI, own 4,232 SFR properties, representing a substantial 40.6% of the county's total SFR market. Individual investors collectively hold 3,630 properties (85.8%), far outpacing company ownership at 662 properties (15.6%).
Pricing
Landlord acquisition prices in Alcona County saw volatility in early 2025, moving from a 12.7% discount in Q2 ($183,733 vs. homeowner $210,500) to an 8.5% premium in Q1 ($188,938 vs. homeowner $174,155). There were zero recorded purchases in Q4 2025.
Activity
Q4 2025 saw a complete halt in SFR purchases in Alcona County, with landlords accounting for 0.0% of transactions and zero new landlord entities formed. No investor tiers showed buying activity during this period.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.4% of Alcona County's investor-owned housing, with single-property owners alone holding 84.9%. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) maintain a negligible 0.0% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors consistently dominate smaller portfolios (85.2% of single-property holdings), but companies take majority control in portfolios of 11-20 properties, comprising 83.3% of owners in that tier.
Transactions
All landlords in Alcona County were significant net buyers in 2024, with a 23.14x buy/sell ratio (162 buys vs. 7 sells). However, there were no institutional transaction data available, and Q4 2025 recorded zero transactions overall.
Market Narrative

Alcona County, MI, presents a distinctive real estate market characterized by a strong presence of small-scale investors. Landlords collectively own 4,232 SFR properties, comprising a substantial 40.6% of the total SFR market. This ownership is overwhelmingly concentrated among individual investors, who account for 85.8% of properties and 89.2% of landlord entities, strongly reinforcing the 'mom-and-pop' landlord narrative. Notably, 100% of these investor-owned properties were acquired via cash, indicating a highly liquid, debt-free investment strategy prevalent in the county and a significant deviation from markets reliant on financed acquisitions.

Investor behavior in Alcona County showed considerable volatility in early 2025, with landlords securing a 12.7% discount in 2025-Q2 but paying an 8.5% premium in 2025-Q1 compared to traditional homeowners. However, the most striking recent trend is the complete cessation of market activity in Q4 2025, where zero SFR purchases or sales were recorded for both landlords and other buyers. This contrasts with 2024, when landlords were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 162 properties against only 7 sells, signaling a prior period of significant portfolio expansion before the recent market freeze.

The Alcona County market is fundamentally structured around its small, cash-rich landlord base, with mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) controlling 99.4% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors are virtually absent. The recent halt in all SFR transactions in Q4 2025 suggests a significant pause or re-evaluation in this investor-driven market. This stagnation, following prior price swings and robust buying activity, points to an uncertain short-term outlook for real estate transactions in the county, driven by its unique composition of small-scale, cash-reliant investors.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 10:34 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyAlcona (MI)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price