Franklin (ME) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Franklin (ME) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Franklin (ME)
13,205
Total Investors in Franklin (ME)
8,242
Investor Owned SFR in Franklin (ME)
5,643(42.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
7,788
SFR Owned
5,296
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
454
SFR Owned
483
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 5,643 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Franklin County's Investor Market, Acquiring 65% of Q4 Sales with No Institutional Presence
In Franklin County, investors own 42.7% of all SFRs (5,643 properties), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a near-total 99.8% of this portfolio. These small investors drove Q4 activity, acquiring 65.0% of all properties sold and paying a surprising 48.0% premium over homeowners. The market is defined by aggressive accumulation from local investors, who are net buyers by a 26-to-1 margin, while large institutional firms remain completely absent.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 5,643 properties in Franklin County, with individuals holding a 93.9% majority share.
Cash is the preferred financing method, with cash-owned properties (3,788) outnumbering financed ones (1,855) by more than two to one. The portfolio is almost exclusively dedicated to rentals, with 5,624 of 5,643 properties classified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a 48.0% premium over homeowners in Q4, averaging $348,779 per property.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners has been extremely volatile, swinging from a 148.4% landlord premium in Q1 2025 to a 3.7% discount in Q3, and back to a 48.0% premium in Q4. This indicates a market with low transaction volume where individual sales can heavily skew averages.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords dominated Q4, acquiring 91 properties for a 65.0% share of all SFR sales.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounted for 100% of all investor purchases, with zero activity from institutional firms. The market saw an influx of 125 new single-property landlords, highlighting strong grassroots growth.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords have near-total control of the market, owning 99.8% of investor SFRs.
Institutional investors have zero presence in Franklin County, holding 0.0% of the investor-owned properties. The market is highly fragmented, with single-property landlords alone accounting for 89.5% of all investor-owned housing.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, holding a 59.3% share.
The crossover from individual to corporate majority ownership happens in the 6-10 property tier. Below this threshold, individuals overwhelmingly dominate, holding 93.0% of properties in the single-property tier.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is most concentrated in zip code 04970, with 1,074 investor-owned properties.
Several smaller zip codes, including 04225, 04227, and 04234, exhibit a 100.0% investor ownership rate, suggesting rental-exclusive enclaves. The area with the highest count, 04970, also has a very high ownership rate of 81.1%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Franklin County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 26 properties for every one they sold in Q4.
This strong net buying trend is consistent over time, with landlords adding a net 607 properties in 2025 and a net 548 in 2024. Transaction volume has also increased year-over-year, with 651 purchases in 2025 versus 577 in 2024.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords drove the market in Q4, participating in 62.4% of all transactions with 131 purchases.
New single-property landlords sourced only 1.6% of their acquisitions from other investors, indicating they are primarily buying from homeowners. A significant price gap exists between tiers, with Tier 2 buyers paying an average of $651,000, nearly double the Tier 1 average of $335,406.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 5,643 properties in Franklin County, with individuals holding a 93.9% majority share.
Detailed Findings

Investors have a substantial footprint in Franklin County, owning 5,643 single-family residential properties, which constitutes a significant 42.7% of the total 13,205 SFRs in the market.

The investor landscape is overwhelmingly dominated by individual, small-scale landlords rather than corporations. Individuals own 5,296 properties, accounting for 93.9% of the investor-owned portfolio, compared to just 483 properties (8.6%) owned by companies.

This individual dominance is also reflected in the entity count, where 7,788 individual landlords operate in the market, far outnumbering the 454 company landlords.

When it comes to financing, cash is king for Franklin County investors. There are 3,788 cash-owned properties, more than double the 1,855 properties that are financed, indicating a market with high liquidity and less reliance on traditional lending.

The primary strategy for these investors is clearly rental income. A staggering 5,624 of the 5,643 investor-owned properties are rented, demonstrating that nearly the entire portfolio is actively used for generating rental revenue rather than for personal use or speculative flipping.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a 48.0% premium over homeowners in Q4, averaging $348,779 per property.
Detailed Findings

In a striking departure from typical market behavior, investors in Franklin County paid significantly more than traditional homeowners in Q4 2025. Landlords purchased properties at an average price of $348,779, a substantial 48.0% premium over the homeowner average of $235,612.

This price premium for landlords is not an isolated event but part of a highly volatile trend throughout 2025. In Q1, landlords paid a 148.4% premium ($262,328 more than homeowners), and in Q2 they paid a 115.0% premium ($207,571 more).

The pattern was briefly interrupted in Q3 2025, when landlords secured a modest 3.7% discount, paying $11,507 less than homeowners on average. However, the trend of paying a premium returned forcefully in Q4.

The wild swings in the price gap suggest that the Franklin County market has relatively few transactions, causing high-value or unique property purchases by investors to heavily influence the quarterly averages.

Despite the high premiums paid in 2025, recent acquisition prices remain higher than the pandemic-era average. The 2020-2023 average price for landlords was $328,461, indicating sustained price levels in the current market.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords dominated Q4, acquiring 91 properties for a 65.0% share of all SFR sales.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were the primary drivers of the Franklin County real estate market in Q4 2025, purchasing 91 of the 140 total SFRs sold. This represents a commanding 65.0% market share for investors.

The entirety of this purchasing activity came from small-scale mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), who acquired 100% of the investor-bought properties. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties had no purchasing activity whatsoever.

New entrants fueled the market, with the single-property (Tier 01) category seeing 125 new entities acquire 86 properties. This tier alone accounted for 94.5% of all landlord purchases, signaling a robust and growing base of first-time investors.

Beyond new entrants, activity in other small tiers was minimal. Two-property landlords purchased 4 properties, and those in the 6-10 property tier acquired just one, reinforcing that market momentum is concentrated at the entry level.

The data clearly shows that Q4 growth in the investor market was not driven by large corporations but by a significant number of individuals making their first or second rental property purchase.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords have near-total control of the market, owning 99.8% of investor SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor ownership structure in Franklin County is defined by the complete dominance of small landlords. Mom-and-pop investors (owning 1-10 properties) control a staggering 99.8% of all investor-owned SFRs.

This market is exceptionally fragmented, with the vast majority of ownership concentrated in the smallest tier. Single-property landlords alone own 5,189 properties, representing 89.5% of the entire investor portfolio.

In stark contrast to national narratives, large-scale institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have absolutely no footprint in this market, with 0.0% ownership. This indicates the market is driven entirely by local and small-scale capital.

Mid-size landlords hold a negligible share. For instance, investors with 21-50 properties own just 8 properties, or 0.1% of the portfolio, further underscoring the lack of consolidation in the market.

The ownership distribution demonstrates that the Franklin County rental market is built upon a broad base of thousands of small investors rather than a few large entities, creating a highly decentralized ownership landscape.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, holding a 59.3% share.
Detailed Findings

While individual investors dominate the Franklin County market overall, a clear pattern emerges as portfolios grow: ownership tends to shift toward corporate structures. The critical crossover point occurs in the 6-10 property tier, where companies own a 59.3% majority of the properties.

In the smaller tiers, individual ownership is supreme. Individuals own 93.0% of the properties in the single-property tier (4,925 properties) and 88.1% in the two-property tier (332 properties).

Even in the 3-5 property tier, individuals maintain a strong 77.7% majority. This shows a strong preference for personal ownership among investors with smaller portfolios.

The shift at the 6-10 property tier suggests that as investors scale their operations, they are more likely to incorporate for liability, financial, or organizational reasons.

This trend provides a clear line of demarcation in investor strategy, separating the vast majority of casual, individual landlords from the smaller group of more formalized, business-oriented investors operating under a company structure.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is most concentrated in zip code 04970, with 1,074 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals that investor ownership in Franklin County is highly concentrated in specific zip codes. The zip code 04970 is the epicenter of activity, containing 1,074 investor-owned properties, the highest count in the county.

Following 04970, other key areas for investor ownership by volume include 04938 (983 properties), 04947 (918 properties), and 04936 (583 properties), showcasing where capital is most deployed.

A different pattern emerges when analyzing ownership rates. Five zip codes—04225, 04227, 04234, 04262, and 04992—have a 100.0% investor ownership rate. This indicates these are likely very small areas composed entirely of rental properties.

There is a strong correlation between high volume and high penetration in some areas. The top zip code by count, 04970, also has an extremely high 81.1% ownership rate, while 04936 has an 84.4% rate, making them hotspots for both the number and density of rentals.

This data highlights a dual geographic strategy among investors: large-scale accumulation in core zip codes and complete saturation of smaller, niche areas.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Franklin County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 26 properties for every one they sold in Q4.
Detailed Findings

Transaction data reveals a clear and aggressive accumulation strategy among Franklin County landlords. In Q4 2025, they were overwhelming net buyers, purchasing 131 properties while selling only 5, a buy-to-sell ratio of 26.2 to 1.

This is not a recent phenomenon but a consistent, long-term trend. For the full year of 2025, landlords purchased 651 properties and sold only 44, resulting in a net gain of 607 properties to their portfolios. This follows a similar pattern from 2024, which saw a net gain of 548 properties (577 buys vs 29 sells).

The pace of acquisitions appears to be accelerating. The 651 properties purchased in 2025 represents a 12.8% increase over the 577 properties purchased in 2024, signaling growing investor confidence and activity.

The extremely low sales volume across all periods points to a prevalent 'buy and hold' strategy. Investors are focused on long-term portfolio growth rather than short-term flipping, which contributes to tighter for-sale inventory in the market.

Consistent with other findings, there was no transaction activity recorded for institutional investors, confirming their absence from the market's transactional flow.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords drove the market in Q4, participating in 62.4% of all transactions with 131 purchases.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity defined the Franklin County market in Q4 2025, with landlords being a party to 131 of the 210 total transactions, a dominant 62.4% share.

The transaction volume was driven entirely by mom-and-pop investors, who accounted for all 131 landlord purchases. New, single-property landlords were the most active group, responsible for 125 of these transactions.

New investors are expanding the rental supply rather than just trading existing assets. Only 1.6% of purchases made by single-property landlords came from other landlords, meaning the vast majority of their acquisitions were from the traditional homeowner market.

A stark pricing difference emerged between the most active tiers. Two-property investors paid an average of $651,000 per property, a 94.1% premium over the $335,406 average paid by single-property investors. This suggests larger investors may be targeting different, higher-value assets.

Institutional investors were entirely absent from the Q4 transaction market, registering zero purchases and reinforcing that all market dynamics are being shaped by small-scale investors.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Franklin County's housing market is dominated by small landlords, who own 99.8% of rental SFRs and acquired 65% of Q4 sales.
Holdings
Landlords own 5,643 SFR properties, a 42.7% share of the market in Franklin County, ME. Individual investors hold a commanding 93.9% of these properties (5,296), with companies owning the remaining 8.6% (483).
Pricing
In a surprising reversal of typical trends, Franklin County landlords paid a 48.0% premium over traditional homeowners in Q4 2025, an average of $348,779 versus $235,612.
Activity
Investor activity surged in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 91 properties for a 65.0% market share, driven by an influx of 125 new single-property landlords.
Market Share
The investor market in Franklin County is completely controlled by small landlords (1-10 properties), who own 99.8% of all investor-held housing, while institutional investors have no presence (0.0%).
Ownership Type
While individuals dominate smaller portfolios, companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, controlling 59.3% of properties in that segment, signaling a shift to formal business structures as portfolios grow.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressively accumulating properties with a Q4 buy-to-sell ratio of 26.2 to 1 (131 buys vs 5 sells), while institutional investors remained completely inactive with zero transactions.
Market Narrative

The single-family housing market in Franklin County, ME is profoundly shaped by a large and growing base of small, individual investors. They own 5,643 properties, a substantial 42.7% of the entire SFR market. This landscape is not driven by corporations but by local capital; mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a near-monopolistic 99.8% of the investor-owned portfolio, and individuals personally own 93.9% of these homes. In stark contrast to national headlines, large-scale institutional investors have zero presence in this market.

Investor behavior in Franklin County is characterized by aggressive acquisition and a long-term hold strategy. In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 65.0% of all homes sold, a pace fueled by 125 new single-property investors entering the market. Unusually, they paid a significant 48.0% premium over traditional homeowners, signaling intense competition for available inventory. This accumulation is part of a sustained trend, with landlords acting as strong net buyers, purchasing over 26 properties for every one they sold in the last quarter.

The key takeaway is that the competitive pressures and pricing dynamics in Franklin County's housing market are a grassroots phenomenon, not a product of Wall Street investment. The continuous influx of new mom-and-pop landlords, their willingness to pay a premium, and their 'buy and hold' approach are tightening the for-sale housing supply and fundamentally shaping the local real estate environment. This market structure suggests that future trends will be dictated by the decisions of thousands of small operators rather than a handful of large firms.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 08:49 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyFranklin (ME)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail