Garrett (MD) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Garrett (MD) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Garrett (MD)
13,652
Total Investors in Garrett (MD)
8,083
Investor Owned SFR in Garrett (MD)
5,305(38.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
7,367
SFR Owned
4,757
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
716
SFR Owned
669
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 5,305 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Garrett County, Acquiring 54% of Q4 Homes at a 73% Price Premium
Investors own 5,305 SFR properties in Garrett County (38.9% of the market), with small, individual landlords controlling 99.7% of this portfolio. In Q4, these investors purchased 53.9% of all homes sold, paying an unprecedented 72.8% premium over traditional homeowners. While small landlords are aggressively buying, institutional investors are net sellers, signaling a clear divergence in market strategy.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 5,305 SFR properties in Garrett County, with individuals holding 89.7%.
Cash purchases (3,204) significantly outnumber financed ones (2,101), indicating strong capital deployment. The portfolio is almost entirely rental-focused, with 5,279 of the 5,305 properties classified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a 72.8% premium over homeowners in Q4, averaging $683,805 per property.
This substantial premium is not an anomaly; in Q3, landlords paid an even larger 146.7% premium. This trend directly contradicts the common expectation that investors secure properties at a discount.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investors dominated Q4 activity, purchasing 53.9% of all single-family homes sold.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounted for 100% of these investor purchases. Activity was led by an influx of new market participants, with 126 single-property entities acquiring 84 homes.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a near-total 99.7% of investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone own 87.4% of all investor-held housing, with 4,817 properties. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) own just a single property, representing a 0.0% market share.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies assume majority ownership at the 6-10 property tier, holding 69.2% of assets.
Despite this crossover, individuals remain the dominant force overall, owning 89.0% of single-property portfolios and 82.9% of two-property portfolios. The crossover to corporate control only happens after an investor scales past five properties.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with three zip codes holding 72.3% of all investor-owned properties.
The zip code 21541 has the highest investor saturation at 65.9%, while 21550 has the highest raw count with 1,930 investor-owned homes. This highlights a distinction between investor density and total volume.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 15.1x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4, while institutional investors are net sellers.
For the full year of 2025, landlords maintained a strong net buyer position, purchasing 367 properties while selling only 33. In contrast, institutional investors were net sellers, disposing of more properties than they acquired in 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in nearly half of all Q4 market activity, accounting for 48.2% of transactions.
New, single-property landlords drove this activity with 126 transactions, and they primarily bought from homeowners, with only 7.9% of their purchases coming from other landlords. Unusually, two-property investors paid the highest average price at $800,833.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 5,305 SFR properties in Garrett County, with individuals holding 89.7%.
Detailed Findings

Landlords hold a significant 38.9% share of the single-family residential market in Garrett County, with a total portfolio of 5,305 properties.

Individual investors are the overwhelming force in the market, owning 4,757 properties, which constitutes 89.7% of all investor-owned SFRs. In contrast, company-owned properties number just 669, or 12.6% of the investor portfolio.

The ownership structure is similarly skewed by entity count, with 7,367 individual landlords compared to only 716 company landlords. This highlights that the market is defined by a large number of small, individual players rather than a few large corporations.

In terms of financing, cash is the preferred method for acquisitions. Investors own 3,204 properties outright, compared to 2,101 that are financed, showing a deep pool of private capital driving the market.

The portfolio is clearly geared towards generating rental income, as 5,279 of the 5,305 investor-owned properties are identified as rented, underscoring the business focus of these holdings.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a 72.8% premium over homeowners in Q4, averaging $683,805 per property.
Detailed Findings

In a striking reversal of typical market dynamics, investors in Garrett County paid a substantial premium for properties in Q4 2025 compared to traditional homeowners. The average landlord acquisition price was $683,805, a staggering 72.8% higher than the homeowner average of $395,718.

This amounts to an average overpayment of $288,087 per property, signaling intense competition or a focus on a higher-value segment of the market not being pursued by typical buyers.

This trend of paying a premium is not new and has actually intensified over the past year. In Q3 2025, the premium was an even more dramatic 146.7% ($442,864 difference), and it stood at 46.2% in Q2 and 90.8% in Q1.

The consistency of this premium suggests a deliberate strategy by investors, possibly targeting properties with specific features like vacation rental potential that command higher prices and are less sought after by traditional homebuyers in the area.

This pattern challenges the narrative that investors suppress prices by seeking distressed assets; instead, in Garrett County, they appear to be driving prices up in the market segment where they are most active.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Investors dominated Q4 activity, purchasing 53.9% of all single-family homes sold.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were the primary drivers of market activity in Q4 2025, acquiring 89 of the 165 total SFR properties sold, which represents a commanding 53.9% market share.

The entirety of this purchasing activity came from small-scale mom-and-pop investors. Those owning 1-10 properties made up 100% of landlord acquisitions, with zero properties purchased by mid-size or institutional investors.

A significant wave of new investors entered the market this quarter. The single-property (Tier 01) category alone saw 126 distinct entities purchase 84 properties, accounting for 91.3% of all investor buying activity.

This influx of first-time or small-scale landlords demonstrates a highly accessible and active market at the entry-level, rather than one consolidated by large players.

The concentration of activity at the smallest tiers, with two-property and 3-5 property landlords adding another 8 properties combined, reinforces the narrative of a market defined by widespread, small-scale investment.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a near-total 99.7% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Garrett County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale landlords. Mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04, owning 1-10 properties) collectively own 99.7% of all investor-held SFRs.

First-time and single-holding investors (Tier 01) form the bedrock of the market, controlling 4,817 properties, which accounts for 87.4% of the entire investor portfolio. This highlights the profoundly granular nature of rental housing ownership in the county.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) have a negligible presence, collectively owning just 18 properties, or about 0.3% of the investor market share.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) are virtually non-existent in this market, with a portfolio consisting of a single property. This 0.0% share starkly contrasts with narratives of corporate landlord takeovers in other regions.

The ownership distribution clearly shows a market powered by individuals and small family operations, with market power highly decentralized across thousands of smallholders.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies assume majority ownership at the 6-10 property tier, holding 69.2% of assets.
Detailed Findings

While individual investors dominate the lower tiers, a clear crossover point emerges as portfolios grow. Companies become the majority owners in the small landlord tier of 6-10 properties, holding 27 properties for a 69.2% share compared to individuals' 12 properties.

In the entry-level tiers, individual ownership is overwhelming. Individuals own 4,380 (89.0%) of the single-property landlord portfolios and 291 (82.9%) of the two-property portfolios, establishing them as the primary owner type for new and small investors.

A near 50/50 split occurs in the small-medium tier of 11-20 properties, where both individuals and companies own 3 properties each, suggesting this is a key transition point for formalizing investment operations under a corporate structure.

Even with the crossover to company majority in larger tiers, the absolute number of properties held by companies remains small, reinforcing that the market's center of gravity is with individual owners of smaller portfolios.

This pattern indicates a natural scaling progression where investors may begin as individuals and later incorporate as their portfolio size and complexity increase, particularly once they surpass the five-property mark.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with three zip codes holding 72.3% of all investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Garrett County is not evenly distributed but is instead highly concentrated in a few key areas. The top three zip codes by count—21550 (1,930 properties), 21561 (1,274 properties), and 21541 (1,200 properties)—together account for 4,404 properties, or 72.3% of the entire investor-owned portfolio.

The market with the highest concentration of investors is 21541, where landlords own 65.9% of all single-family homes, indicating a market heavily skewed towards rental and investment properties.

A key distinction exists between the region with the most investor properties and the one with the highest investor share. While 21550 has the largest number of investor-owned homes (1,930), its ownership rate of 33.3% is half that of 21541.

Following the top two, the zip code 21522 also shows significant investor saturation with a 46.2% ownership rate, further demonstrating that certain local markets are investor hotspots.

This geographic clustering suggests that investors are targeting specific neighborhoods or communities, likely driven by local factors such as proximity to amenities, vacation rental demand, or favorable regulations.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 15.1x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4, while institutional investors are net sellers.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Garrett County are operating in aggressive acquisition mode, demonstrating strong confidence in the market. In Q4 2025, they purchased 136 properties while selling only 9, resulting in a buy-to-sell ratio of 15.1 to 1.

This net buyer trend is consistent throughout the year. Across all of 2025, landlords acquired 367 properties and sold just 33, an overall ratio of more than 11-to-1, indicating sustained portfolio growth.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ tier) are divesting from the market. In 2025, this tier was a net seller, with 1 buy versus 2 sells. This represents a complete divergence in strategy from the small landlords who dominate the county.

The transaction data from 2024 shows a similar pattern of strong net buying from the overall landlord pool (384 buys vs. 38 sells), confirming this is a multi-year trend of accumulation by smaller investors.

This dynamic—massive net buying from mom-and-pop investors alongside net selling from the institutional tier—paints a picture of a market consolidating under small, local ownership rather than large, remote corporations.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in nearly half of all Q4 market activity, accounting for 48.2% of transactions.
Detailed Findings

Landlord activity was a defining feature of the Q4 2025 market, with investor-involved transactions numbering 136 out of a total of 282. This gives landlords a substantial 48.2% share of all transaction volume.

The vast majority of this activity was driven by the smallest investors. The single-property (Tier 01) landlord segment alone was responsible for 126 transactions, reinforcing that new market entrants are the most active players.

Investors are primarily acquiring properties from the open market rather than from each other. Only 7.9% of purchases by single-property landlords were from other landlords, suggesting they are buying from traditional homeowners and expanding the overall rental housing stock.

A peculiar pricing pattern emerged this quarter, where two-property (Tier 02) landlords paid the highest average price at $800,833. This was significantly more than the $664,822 average paid by single-property landlords, defying the expectation that larger investors secure better prices.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) recorded zero transactions in Q4, cementing their status as inactive participants in the current market's transactional flow.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Dominate Garrett County, Buying 54% of Q4 Homes at an Unprecedented 73% Price Premium
Holdings
Landlords own 5,305 single-family properties in Garrett County, representing a 38.9% share of the total market. The ownership is overwhelmingly composed of individual investors, who hold 4,757 properties (89.7%), compared to 669 properties (12.6%) owned by companies.
Pricing
Defying national trends, landlords in Garrett County paid a 72.8% premium over traditional homeowners in Q4 2025, with an average acquisition price of $683,805 versus the homeowner average of $395,718, a difference of $288,087 per home.
Activity
Investors were the most active buyer group in Q4 2025, purchasing 89 homes for a 53.9% share of all market sales. This activity was driven by an influx of 126 new single-property landlords, with mom-and-pop investors accounting for 100% of landlord acquisitions.
Market Share
The investor market is controlled by small-scale players, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) owning a near-monopolistic 99.7% of all investor-held housing. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have virtually no presence, owning just one property (0.0%).
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the primary owners in smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners once a portfolio scales to the 6-10 property tier, where they control 69.2% of the properties.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 136 properties while selling only 9 in Q4 2025. In direct contrast, institutional investors are net sellers for the year, signaling a clear strategic withdrawal from the market as smaller investors expand.
Market Narrative

The single-family housing market in Garrett County, MD is fundamentally shaped by a large and active base of small, individual investors. Landlords now own 5,305 properties, comprising a significant 38.9% of the county's entire SFR housing stock. This landscape is not defined by large corporations; rather, it is dominated by individuals, who own 89.7% of the investor portfolio. The market power is highly decentralized, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling an overwhelming 99.7% of investor-owned homes, while institutional ownership is statistically non-existent at 0.0%.

Investor behavior in Garrett County defies conventional wisdom, particularly in pricing and acquisition strategy. In Q4 2025, landlords drove market activity, purchasing 53.9% of all homes sold. Instead of seeking discounts, they paid a staggering 72.8% premium over traditional homeowners, indicating fierce competition for desirable properties, likely for vacation or high-end rentals. This aggressive buying is fueled by new entrants, with 126 single-property landlords entering the market in Q4 alone. While small investors are accumulating properties at a record pace—evidenced by a 15-to-1 buy/sell ratio—institutional players are net sellers, signaling a clear divergence between Wall Street and Main Street strategies.

The key takeaway is that Garrett County's investment market is a story of local, small-scale capitalism. The data paints a picture of a hyper-active market where new mom-and-pop investors are flooding in, willing to pay top dollar to secure properties, and expanding their footprint. This dynamic suggests that the growth in rental housing is organic and granular, driven by thousands of individual decisions rather than a consolidated corporate strategy. This trend has significant implications for local housing affordability and availability, as investors are not just participating in the market but actively leading it in both volume and price-setting.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 08:42 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyGarrett (MD)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail