Dukes (MA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Dukes (MA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Dukes (MA)
12,061
Total Investors in Dukes (MA)
13,436
Investor Owned SFR in Dukes (MA)
9,293(77.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
11,382
SFR Owned
7,842
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
2,054
SFR Owned
2,097
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 9,293 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Dukes County, Owning 77% of SFRs and Driving 69% of Q4 Purchases
In Dukes County, investors own a massive 77.0% of the SFR market (9,293 properties), a landscape dominated by mom-and-pop landlords who control 99.9% of investor housing. In Q4, these small investors drove 68.9% of all purchases and are accumulating properties at a rapid rate, signaling a market heavily geared towards rentals over traditional homeownership.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own a staggering 77.0% of Dukes County's SFR market, with individuals holding 84.4% of the 9,293 properties.
Cash is the preferred funding method, used for 5,542 properties compared to 3,751 that are financed. The portfolio is almost entirely rental-focused, with 9,284 of 9,293 properties (99.9%) classified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 1.1% less than homeowners in Q4 2025, an average discount of $18,232 per property.
The price advantage for landlords is highly volatile, swinging from a 40.8% premium in Q2 to a 19.4% discount in Q3. Acquisition prices show consistent long-term appreciation, rising from an average of $1,303,576 in 2020-2023 to $1,547,649 in 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords dominated Q4 acquisitions in Dukes County, purchasing 51 of 74 SFRs for a 68.9% market share.
Mom-and-pop investors were responsible for 100% of these purchases, with no activity from institutional tiers. The market saw 69 new single-property landlords enter in Q4, acquiring 49 properties.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 99.9% of Dukes County's investor-owned SFR market.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have zero presence in this market. The ownership is highly concentrated at the smallest scale, with single-property landlords alone accounting for 92.9% of all investor-owned homes.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, signaling a shift to professionalization.
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate smaller portfolios, owning 79.9% of single-property holdings. The ownership balance flips at the 6-10 property tier, where companies control two-thirds (66.7%) of the properties.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Dukes County is heavily concentrated in zip codes 02568 (2,814 properties) and 02557 (2,703 properties).
Investor ownership rates are exceptionally high across the county, with 02557 at 88.7% investor-owned and 02575 reaching a full 100% saturation. These areas show a deep penetration of investment properties.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Dukes County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 299 properties while selling only 2 in 2025.
This activity results in a staggering 149.5x buy-to-sell ratio, signaling a strong and sustained accumulation phase. This pattern is consistent with 2024, which saw 333 buys versus only 7 sells (a 47.6x ratio).
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 62.8% of all Q4 transactions in Dukes County, executing 71 deals.
New single-property landlords paid the highest prices, averaging $1,425,990 per home. Notably, 100% of landlord purchases came from non-landlord sellers, indicating market expansion rather than internal portfolio trading.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own a staggering 77.0% of Dukes County's SFR market, with individuals holding 84.4% of the 9,293 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership has reached a remarkable saturation point in Dukes County, with landlords owning 9,293 Single-Family Residential properties, which constitutes 77.0% of the total 12,061 SFRs in the market.

The market is defined by small, individual investors rather than large corporations. Individuals own 7,842 properties, making up a commanding 84.4% of the investor-owned portfolio, compared to 2,097 properties (22.6%) held by companies.

This individual dominance extends to the number of landlords, where 11,382 of the 13,436 total landlords (84.7%) are individuals.

Cash is the primary method of acquisition, with 5,542 properties (59.6%) owned outright, significantly outnumbering the 3,751 properties (40.4%) that are financed. This suggests a market with high liquidity and financially stable investors.

The portfolio's purpose is overwhelmingly for rental income, as 9,284 of the 9,293 investor-owned properties (99.9%) are rented, confirming the region's character as a landlord-driven rental market.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 1.1% less than homeowners in Q4 2025, an average discount of $18,232 per property.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, investors purchased properties at a slight 1.1% discount compared to traditional homeowners. The average landlord acquisition price was $1,597,412, while homeowners paid an average of $1,615,644, giving investors an $18,232 price advantage.

However, this price advantage is extremely volatile and not guaranteed. In Q3 2025, landlords secured a deep 19.4% discount ($378,168), but in Q2, they paid a staggering 40.8% premium ($416,271) over homeowners, suggesting varied market conditions or property types being targeted each quarter.

Despite quarterly fluctuations, overall property values show a strong upward trajectory. The average investor acquisition price has climbed from $1,303,576 during the 2020-2023 period to $1,476,804 in 2024 and further to $1,547,649 in 2025.

The recent Q4 discount of 1.1% is the narrowest price gap observed in the past year, contrasting sharply with the nearly 20% discount seen just one quarter prior.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords dominated Q4 acquisitions in Dukes County, purchasing 51 of 74 SFRs for a 68.9% market share.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity surged in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 51 properties and capturing 68.9% of the total 74 SFR sales in Dukes County. This highlights a market where investors are the primary buyers.

The purchasing activity was exclusively driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) accounted for 100% of all investor acquisitions this quarter.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) were completely inactive, making zero purchases and reinforcing the market's small-investor character.

A significant influx of new participants was observed, with 69 new single-property landlord entities entering the market. These newcomers were the most active group, collectively purchasing 49 of the 51 properties bought by investors.

The remaining activity came from the two-property tier, where 2 entities acquired 2 properties, rounding out a quarter defined entirely by small landlord growth.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 99.9% of Dukes County's investor-owned SFR market.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Dukes County is unequivocally dominated by small landlords. Those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) collectively control 99.9% of all investor-held SFRs.

This market structure defies the narrative of large-scale corporate ownership. Institutional investors with portfolios of 1,000 or more properties have absolutely no footprint, owning 0.0% of the market.

Ownership is most concentrated at the entry level. Landlords with just a single property represent the vast majority, holding 8,794 properties, which is 92.9% of the entire investor portfolio.

The subsequent tiers decline sharply in size: two-property landlords own 4.9% of the portfolio, and those with 3-5 properties hold just 1.8%.

The minimal presence of mid-size landlords and complete absence of large ones illustrates a market composed almost entirely of individuals and small family operations, rather than a professionally scaled rental industry.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, signaling a shift to professionalization.
Detailed Findings

While individual investors form the backbone of the Dukes County market, ownership structure professionalizes as portfolios scale. Companies become the majority owners in the 6-10 property tier, holding 18 properties (66.7%) compared to individuals' 9 properties (33.3%).

At the smaller scales, individual ownership is dominant. Individuals own 7,467 of the single-property holdings (79.9%) and 343 of the two-property holdings (70.7%).

The 11-20 property tier shows an even split, with individuals and companies each owning 2 properties (50.0%), representing a transitional phase before companies take a more significant lead in larger (though still small) portfolios.

This pattern reveals a clear lifecycle: investors typically start as individuals and incorporate into company structures as their holdings and operational complexity grow beyond a handful of properties.

The crossover point at 6-10 properties serves as a key indicator for when real estate investment in this market transitions from a personal holding to a formal business operation.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Dukes County is heavily concentrated in zip codes 02568 (2,814 properties) and 02557 (2,703 properties).
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership is geographically concentrated in a few key areas of Dukes County. The zip code 02568 leads with the highest count of investor-owned properties at 2,814, followed closely by 02557 with 2,703 properties and 02539 with 2,680.

Unlike many markets, the regions with the highest counts also boast some of the highest ownership rates, indicating deep investor saturation. In 02557, investors own 88.7% of all SFRs, and in 02539, they own 75.7%.

The zip code 02575 stands out as a market anomaly, with a 100.0% investor ownership rate, suggesting the area may be composed entirely of vacation rentals or second homes held for investment purposes.

Other areas with high penetration include 02713, where investors own 87.7% of the housing stock.

This data reveals that key zip codes in Dukes County are fundamentally rental and investment markets, with a very small portion of the housing stock available for traditional homeownership.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords in Dukes County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 299 properties while selling only 2 in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Dukes County are operating in a strong accumulation mode, consistently buying far more properties than they sell. In 2025, landlords purchased 299 SFRs while selling only 2, making them overwhelming net buyers.

The buy-to-sell ratio for 2025 stands at an extremely high 149.5-to-1, a clear indicator that investors are focused on portfolio growth rather than divestment or short-term flipping.

This trend is not a recent development. In 2024, a similar pattern emerged with 333 properties bought and only 7 sold, for a buy-to-sell ratio of 47.6-to-1.

Quarterly data from 2025 further confirms this behavior, with 92 buys to 1 sell in Q3 and 72 buys to 1 sell in Q2.

In line with other findings, there was no recorded transaction activity for institutional investors (1,000+ tier), as their presence in the market is nil.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 62.8% of all Q4 transactions in Dukes County, executing 71 deals.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were the driving force in the Q4 2025 market, participating in 71 of the 113 total SFR transactions for a 62.8% market share.

All transaction activity came from mom-and-pop tiers, with new, single-property landlords leading the charge by executing 69 of the 71 investor deals.

A significant pricing disparity emerged between tiers. The newest investors in the single-property tier paid an average of $1,425,990, while the slightly more experienced two-property tier investors paid significantly less, at an average of $750,000.

Investors are expanding the total pool of rental properties rather than trading existing ones among themselves. In Q4, 0% of landlord purchases were from other landlords, meaning all 71 acquisitions were sourced from the traditional homeowner market or new construction.

The complete absence of institutional transactions further solidifies the view of Dukes County as a market shaped exclusively by the actions of small-scale investors.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Dukes County, Owning 77% of SFRs and Driving 69% of Q4 Purchases
Holdings
Investors own 9,293 SFR properties, a staggering 77.0% of the market in Dukes County, with individual investors holding a dominant 84.4% share (7,842 properties) over companies at 22.6% (2,097 properties).
Pricing
In Q4, landlords secured properties at a slight 1.1% discount compared to traditional homeowners, paying an average of $1,597,412 versus the homeowner price of $1,615,644, a difference of $18,232.
Activity
Investor purchasing was robust in Q4, accounting for 68.9% of all SFR sales (51 properties), driven entirely by an influx of small investors, including 69 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
The market is unequivocally controlled by small investors, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own 99.9% of all investor-held housing, while institutional-scale investors (1000+) have no presence.
Ownership Type
Individual investors form the bedrock of the market, but ownership tends to professionalize into company structures as portfolios grow, with companies becoming the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier.
Transactions
Landlords are in a strong accumulation phase, acting as aggressive net buyers with a 149.5x buy-to-sell ratio in 2025 (299 buys vs. 2 sells), while institutional investors posted zero transaction activity.
Market Narrative

The single-family housing market in Dukes County, MA is fundamentally shaped by real estate investors, who own a staggering 9,293 properties, representing 77.0% of the entire SFR stock. This landscape is not driven by Wall Street, but by local and individual players. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) control 99.9% of the investor-owned housing, with individuals comprising 84.4% of all holdings. In stark contrast, institutional investors with 1,000+ properties have zero presence, making this a market defined by small-scale, decentralized ownership.

Investor behavior underscores a theme of aggressive growth and market control. In Q4 2025, landlords were responsible for 68.9% of all property purchases, an effort led by 69 new single-property investors entering the market. While they secured a slight 1.1% price discount ($1,597,412 vs. $1,615,644 for homeowners), their primary focus is accumulation. This is confirmed by their status as overwhelming net buyers, acquiring properties at a 149.5-to-1 ratio over selling them in 2025, consistently absorbing housing stock from the traditional market.

The key takeaway for Dukes County is its status as a deeply saturated rental market dominated by a vast number of small, independent landlords. The high investor ownership rate and intense acquisition activity signal a challenging environment for traditional homebuyers, with a housing stock primarily geared toward investment returns and rental income. This trend shows no signs of slowing, as new investors continue to enter and expand the collective rental portfolio, further solidifying the county's character as a landlord-driven market.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 09:39 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyDukes (MA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail