Bristol (MA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Bristol (MA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Bristol (MA)
124,513
Total Investors in Bristol (MA)
16,394
Investor Owned SFR in Bristol (MA)
11,523(9.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
14,565
SFR Owned
10,140
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
1,829
SFR Owned
1,980
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 11,523 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Bristol County, Controlling 99.8% of Investor Housing
Investors own 11,523 SFR properties in Bristol County, representing 9.3% of the market. The landscape is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (99.8% of holdings), with institutional investors owning just a single property. In Q4 2025, landlords were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 21.2% of all homes sold at a significant 15.1% discount compared to traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 11,523 SFR properties in Bristol County, with individuals holding 88.0%.
The investor portfolio is heavily geared towards rentals, with 98.9% of properties classified as non-owner-occupied. A majority of these properties (56.2%) are owned outright with cash, compared to 43.8% that are financed.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q4, Bristol County landlords paid 15.1% less than homeowners, a deep discount of $88,760.
This significant Q4 price advantage for landlords represents a dramatic widening of the price gap from Q3, when the discount was nearly non-existent at just 0.0% ($31). Overall, landlord acquisition prices have appreciated 8.6% from the 2020-2023 average of $461,102 to $500,825 in Q4 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 21.2% of all single-family homes sold in Bristol County during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords were responsible for nearly all of this activity, making up 98.2% of investor purchases. In contrast, institutional investors with 1,000+ properties made zero acquisitions during the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 99.8% of all investor-owned SFRs in Bristol County.
This dominance by small investors is nearly absolute, as institutional investors with portfolios of 1,000+ properties own just a single property, representing 0.0% of the investor-owned market. The market is overwhelmingly composed of single-property landlords, who alone own 10,641 properties (90.8%).
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners in Bristol County once a portfolio grows beyond 6 properties.
While individuals dominate smaller portfolios, with 85.9% ownership in the single-property tier, companies take a 61.4% majority share in the 6-10 property tier. This indicates a strategic shift to a corporate structure as portfolios scale.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in Fall River (02790), which holds 1,381 investor-owned homes.
While Fall River leads in volume, smaller zip codes like 02722 (100.0%) and 02714 (85.7%) exhibit the highest rates of investor ownership. This highlights a difference between high-volume investor hubs and niche, high-penetration rental markets.
Historical Transactions
Bristol County landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 8.2 properties for every one they sold in Q4.
This strong accumulation trend is consistent over time, with a 7.6x buy-to-sell ratio for all of 2025 and an 8.5x ratio in 2024. Transaction volumes have remained robust, with over 1,100 properties purchased by investors in each of the last two years.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 18.2% of all Bristol County single-family home transactions in Q4 2025.
New, single-property landlords paid the highest average price at $515,506, significantly more than the $239,960 paid by mid-size investors (11-20 properties). These experienced mid-size investors were also more likely to source deals from other landlords (20.0%) compared to new entrants (4.4%).

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 11,523 SFR properties in Bristol County, with individuals holding 88.0%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 11,523 single-family residential properties in Bristol County, accounting for 9.3% of the total 124,513 SFRs in the market.

The ownership landscape is dominated by individual investors, who own 10,140 properties (88.0% of the investor portfolio), dwarfing the 1,980 properties (17.2%) held by companies.

The portfolio is almost entirely composed of rental properties, with 11,396 homes (98.9%) being non-owner-occupied, underscoring the rental-focused strategy of local investors.

Cash is the preferred method of ownership, with 6,476 properties (56.2%) held free and clear, compared to 5,047 properties (43.8%) that carry financing. This indicates a well-capitalized investor base in the county.

The number of individual landlord entities (14,565) far surpasses company entities (1,829), reinforcing the finding that the market is driven by small-scale, local investment rather than large corporate players.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q4, Bristol County landlords paid 15.1% less than homeowners, a deep discount of $88,760.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Bristol County demonstrated a strong pricing advantage in Q4 2025, acquiring properties for an average of $500,825, which is 15.1% less than the $589,585 paid by traditional homeowners.

This equates to a substantial average discount of $88,760 per property, highlighting a key strategic advantage for investors in the market.

The Q4 discount marks a significant shift from previous quarters. In Q3 2025, the price gap was virtually closed, with landlords paying only $31 (0.0%) less than homeowners, suggesting a recent change in market dynamics or investor strategy.

Over a longer period, landlord acquisition prices show steady appreciation. The Q4 average price of $500,825 is 8.6% higher than the average price of $461,102 during the 2020-2023 period.

The ability to secure such a large discount widened considerably throughout 2025, growing from a 4.5% discount in Q2 to the 15.1% gap observed in Q4, indicating increasingly effective acquisition tactics by landlords.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 21.2% of all single-family homes sold in Bristol County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity was a major force in the Q4 2025 market, with landlords purchasing 222 of the 1,047 total SFRs sold, capturing a 21.2% market share.

The quarter was defined by the activity of small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounted for 222 properties, representing 98.2% of all landlord acquisitions.

A significant wave of new investors entered the market, with 270 new single-property entities acquiring 193 homes, making up 85.4% of all investor-bought properties.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) played a very minor role, with the 11-20 property tier purchasing just 4 properties (1.8% of the investor total).

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) were completely absent from the acquisitions market in Q4, purchasing zero properties and ceding the entire quarter's activity to smaller players.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 99.8% of all investor-owned SFRs in Bristol County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Bristol County is defined by hyper-fragmentation and the dominance of small landlords. Investors with 1-10 properties (mom-and-pops) own a staggering 99.8% of all investor-held SFRs.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the rental market, controlling 10,641 properties, which accounts for 90.8% of the entire investor portfolio on its own.

In stark contrast to narratives of corporate consolidation, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible presence, owning only one single property in the entire county (0.0% market share).

Mid-size landlords also hold a very small fraction of the market, with investors in the 11-50 property range combined owning just 24 properties (0.2%).

The data clearly shows that Bristol County's rental housing market is supplied by thousands of individual, small-scale operators, not by large, centralized institutions.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners in Bristol County once a portfolio grows beyond 6 properties.
Detailed Findings

A clear pattern emerges in ownership structure as portfolios scale in Bristol County. Individuals overwhelmingly dominate the smaller tiers, but companies take control as portfolio size increases.

In the entry-level single-property tier, individuals own 9,567 properties, an 85.9% majority, compared to just 1,564 for companies.

The balance remains heavily in favor of individuals for two-property (69.8% individual) and 3-5 property portfolios (61.6% individual).

The crossover point occurs in the 6-10 property tier, where companies become the majority owners for the first time, holding 51 properties for a 61.4% share.

This trend suggests that as investment activity transitions from a passive side-business to a more professional operation, landlords increasingly opt for the legal and financial structure of a company.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in Fall River (02790), which holds 1,381 investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals significant concentration of investor ownership in specific Bristol County zip codes. The 02790 zip code in Fall River is the largest hub, with 1,381 investor-owned properties.

Other areas with high counts of investor properties include 02719 (Attleboro) with 943 properties and 02748 (North Dartmouth) with 749 properties, demonstrating key regional focuses for investment.

A different story emerges when looking at ownership rates. The highest concentrations are in smaller markets, with 02722 (Fall River) showing 100.0% investor ownership, followed by 02714 (Somerset) at 85.7% and 02791 (Swansea) at 76.9%.

The top area by count, 02790, has a high but more moderate ownership rate of 22.3%, indicating that it is a large market with significant investor presence rather than a market entirely dominated by investors.

This distinction between high-volume and high-penetration areas showcases different investment strategies, from targeting large, liquid markets to dominating smaller, specific rental communities.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Bristol County landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 8.2 properties for every one they sold in Q4.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Bristol County are firmly in an accumulation phase, consistently buying far more properties than they sell. In Q4 2025, they purchased 304 properties while selling only 37, a buy-to-sell ratio of 8.2x.

This net-buyer behavior is a long-term trend, not a quarterly anomaly. For the full year of 2025, investors bought 1,152 properties and sold 152 (a 7.6x ratio), closely mirroring 2024's activity of 1,302 buys versus 153 sells (an 8.5x ratio).

The sustained high volume of acquisitions, with more than 1,100 purchases in both 2025 and 2024, signals strong and continued confidence in the Bristol County rental market.

There is no transaction data for institutional investors, which aligns with their near-zero ownership in the county, confirming that market liquidity is driven entirely by smaller investors.

The persistent net buying indicates a strategy of portfolio growth and long-term holds rather than short-term flipping, contributing to the expansion of the local rental housing stock.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 18.2% of all Bristol County single-family home transactions in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords participated in 304 of the 1,668 total SFR transactions, making up 18.2% of all market activity.

A distinct pricing pattern emerged among tiers, with the least experienced investors paying the most. Single-property landlords paid an average of $515,506 per home.

In contrast, more experienced mid-size investors in the 11-20 property tier paid an average of just $239,960, less than half the price paid by new entrants, suggesting a focus on value-add properties or off-market deals.

Inter-landlord trading activity was present but limited. Only 4.4% of properties bought by single-property investors came from other landlords, suggesting they primarily buy from homeowners.

More seasoned investors relied more heavily on the landlord network, as seen with the 11-20 property tier, where 20.0% of their five transactions were sourced from fellow landlords, indicating a more sophisticated deal-sourcing strategy.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Bristol County, Controlling 99.8% of Investor Housing While Institutions Are Absent
Holdings
Investors own 11,523 SFR properties, representing 9.3% of Bristol County's market, with individual investors overwhelmingly controlling the portfolio at 88.0% of holdings compared to 17.2% for companies.
Pricing
Landlords in Bristol County secured a significant 15.1% discount compared to traditional homeowners in Q4 2025, paying an average of $500,825 versus $589,585—a savings of $88,760 per property.
Activity
Landlords were a major force in the market, purchasing 21.2% of all homes sold in Q4, an effort led by the 270 new single-property landlords who entered the market during the quarter.
Market Share
The investor market is almost entirely composed of small landlords (1-10 properties), who control 99.8% of investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own just a single property (0.0%).
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the primary owners in smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners (61.4%) in the 6-10 property tier, marking a clear shift to corporate structures as portfolios scale.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with an 8.2x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 (304 buys vs 37 sells), while institutional investors were completely inactive, showing no buys or sells.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Bristol County, Massachusetts, is fundamentally a story of local, small-scale investment. Landlords own 11,523 properties, comprising 9.3% of the county's SFR housing stock. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties), who own a staggering 99.8% of all investor-held homes. Individual investors make up the vast majority of owners, holding 88.0% of the properties. In stark contrast, institutional investors with 1,000+ properties have a near-zero footprint, owning just a single property in the entire county.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 was characterized by aggressive and strategic acquisition. Landlords purchased 21.2% of all homes sold, driven by an influx of 270 new single-property investors. This activity was bolstered by a significant pricing advantage, as landlords paid an average of 15.1% less than traditional homeowners, a discount of $88,760 per property. The market shows strong signs of accumulation, with landlords acting as decisive net buyers, purchasing 8.2 properties for every one they sold during the quarter, a trend consistent over the past two years.

The key takeaway is that Bristol County's rental landscape defies the national narrative of corporate consolidation. It is a highly fragmented market powered by thousands of individual operators who are actively growing their portfolios and demonstrating sophisticated acquisition strategies. The absence of institutional capital and the continued entry of new small landlords signal a resilient, ground-up market where local knowledge and deal-finding capabilities are paramount to success. This dynamic suggests the local rental supply will continue to be shaped by the decisions of community-level investors rather than large, remote corporations.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 09:39 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyBristol (MA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail