Tensas Parish (LA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Tensas Parish (LA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Tensas Parish (LA)
2,421
Total Investors in Tensas Parish (LA)
1,197
Investor Owned SFR in Tensas Parish (LA)
1,273(52.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,045
SFR Owned
1,099
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
152
SFR Owned
178
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,273 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Investors Own 52.6% of Tensas Parish Homes in a Cash-Only Market Dominated by Small Landlords Amidst a Total Freeze in Sales Activity
Investors own 1,273 single-family residential properties in Tensas Parish, representing a staggering 52.6% of the total market. The landscape is controlled by small, individual landlords who hold 96.2% of the investor portfolio, with zero institutional presence. The market was completely illiquid in Q4 2025, with zero properties purchased or transacted, and all existing investor-owned homes are held in cash.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 52.6% of the SFR market, with individual landlords holding 86.3% of the portfolio.
The entire investor portfolio of 1,273 properties is owned outright with cash, as there are zero financed properties. Nearly all (1,261 of 1,273) investor-owned properties are designated as rentals, underscoring their primary use.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No Q4 2025 pricing data is available as zero landlord or homeowner sales occurred.
The absence of any sales transactions in recent quarters prevents any analysis of pricing trends or the typical price gap between landlords and traditional homeowners. The market appears to be completely illiquid.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investor purchase activity completely halted in Q4 2025, with zero properties acquired.
Landlords accounted for 0.0% of the non-existent Q4 SFR market, with both mom-and-pop and institutional tiers recording zero purchases. This signals a total freeze in investor acquisition activity.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 96.2% of investor-owned homes.
Single-property landlords alone own 80.0% of all investor-held SFRs, a total of 1,023 properties. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have zero presence in this market (0.0%).
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals own the majority of properties in all tiers except one, where ownership is split 50/50.
Companies and individuals reach a 50.0% ownership parity in the 11-20 property tier. In the largest active tier (21-50 properties), ownership is 100% individual, defying typical scaling patterns.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in two zip codes, 71366 and 71357.
In these core areas, investor ownership rates are exceptionally high, reaching 53.9% in 71366 and 52.3% in 71357. Together, these two zip codes contain the vast majority of investor-owned properties in the parish.
Historical Transactions
Historical transaction data is unavailable, preventing analysis of long-term buy/sell trends.
Without historical transaction counts and prices, it is impossible to determine if landlords have been net buyers or sellers over time or to assess landlord-to-landlord trading activity.
Current Quarter Transactions
The landlord transaction market was entirely inactive in Q4 2025, recording zero transactions.
The 0.0% landlord share of a zero-transaction market underscores a complete halt in activity. No inter-landlord trading occurred, and no pricing data is available by tier due to the market freeze.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 52.6% of the SFR market, with individual landlords holding 86.3% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Tensas Parish is remarkably high, with landlords holding 1,273 of the 2,421 available Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, a market penetration of 52.6%.

The market is overwhelmingly characterized by small-scale, individual investors rather than corporations. Individuals own 1,099 properties, accounting for 86.3% of the investor-owned portfolio, compared to just 178 properties (14.0%) owned by companies.

This individual dominance is also reflected in the landlord entity count, where 1,045 of the 1,197 total landlords are individuals (87.3%).

A defining feature of this market is its complete reliance on cash financing. All 1,273 investor-owned properties are held as cash assets, with zero properties recorded as being financed, indicating a market with high barriers to entry for leveraged investors.

The portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to rental purposes, with 1,261 of 1,273 properties classified as rented, confirming the strong rental focus of investors in the parish.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No Q4 2025 pricing data is available as zero landlord or homeowner sales occurred.
Detailed Findings

Analysis of acquisition pricing and comparisons between landlords and homeowners is not possible for Q4 2025 due to a complete lack of sales activity in Tensas Parish.

The dataset records zero properties purchased by landlords, traditional homeowners, or any other buyer type during the quarter, indicating a market that was effectively frozen.

No landlord acquisition price trends can be determined, as no properties were purchased in Q4 2025 or in the preceding quarters shown in the data.

This lack of transactional data prevents the calculation of any price appreciation or the typical discount that landlords might achieve compared to homeowners.

The absence of sales is the most significant finding, pointing to extreme illiquidity or a potential data blackout for this specific period in Tensas Parish.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Investor purchase activity completely halted in Q4 2025, with zero properties acquired.
Detailed Findings

Landlords made no new acquisitions in Tensas Parish during Q4 2025, with their purchases accounting for 0 of the 0 total SFR sales in the market.

This complete standstill in activity means landlords captured 0.0% of the market share for new purchases during the quarter.

The inactivity was universal across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) acquired zero properties, mirroring the lack of activity from mid-size and institutional investors.

Consequently, no new landlords entered the market in Q4, as the single-property tier, which typically represents new entrants, recorded zero purchases and zero new entities.

The data points to a period of extreme market stagnation where no capital was being deployed into the Tensas Parish SFR rental market by investors.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 96.2% of investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Tensas Parish is the epitome of a mom-and-pop market, with landlords owning 1-10 properties controlling a combined 96.2% of all investor-held SFRs.

Dominance is concentrated at the smallest scale, as single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone account for 1,023 properties, representing a massive 80.0% of the entire investor portfolio.

The rest of the small-landlord segment, including those with 2 properties (8.1%), 3-5 properties (6.9%), and 6-10 properties (1.3%), reinforces this granular ownership structure.

In stark contrast to national trends, there is absolutely no institutional investor presence in Tensas Parish. The 1,000+ property tier (Tier 09) holds zero properties, a 0.0% share of the market.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) also have a very small footprint, collectively owning just 3.8% of the investor portfolio, further highlighting the market's reliance on small-scale owners.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
Individuals own the majority of properties in all tiers except one, where ownership is split 50/50.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the primary owners across nearly every portfolio size in Tensas Parish, reinforcing their market-wide dominance.

Even in the smallest tier of single-property landlords, where one might expect a mix of entry strategies, individuals own 89.1% of the properties (914) compared to just 10.9% for companies (112).

A unique crossover point occurs in the 11-20 property tier, where ownership is split exactly 50/50 between individuals and companies, each holding 14 properties. This is the only tier where companies achieve parity.

Surprisingly, in the next largest tier (21-50 properties), ownership reverts entirely to individuals, who hold all 21 properties (100.0%). This runs counter to the typical trend where corporate ownership increases with portfolio size.

Company ownership is most concentrated in the 6-10 property (31.2%) and two-property (26.2%) tiers, but they fail to achieve a majority stake in any segment of the market.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in two zip codes, 71366 and 71357.
Detailed Findings

The investor footprint in Tensas Parish is not evenly distributed, with significant concentration in two primary zip codes: 71366 and 71357.

The zip code 71366 has the highest number of investor-owned properties at 645, which constitutes an investor ownership rate of 53.9%, meaning investors own more than half of the area's SFR housing stock.

Similarly, the 71357 zip code shows a high concentration with 437 investor-owned properties and an ownership rate of 52.3%.

The 71375 zip code also displays a significant, though smaller, investor presence with 188 properties and a 49.3% ownership rate, just shy of a majority.

These figures highlight specific neighborhoods where rental housing is the dominant form of tenure and where traditional homeownership opportunities may be limited.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Key Insight
Historical transaction data is unavailable, preventing analysis of long-term buy/sell trends.
Detailed Findings

A comprehensive analysis of historical transaction dynamics for landlords in Tensas Parish cannot be conducted as the dataset contains no historical buy or sell information.

It is not possible to calculate a buy/sell ratio to determine whether landlords have historically been net accumulators or disposers of property in the region.

Trends in landlord-to-landlord transactions, which indicate market liquidity and portfolio churning, cannot be assessed.

Similarly, any analysis of implied profit margins by comparing average buy prices to average sell prices over time is not feasible with the available data.

The lack of this data means that the current market freeze in Q4 2025 cannot be placed into a broader historical context for Tensas Parish.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
The landlord transaction market was entirely inactive in Q4 2025, recording zero transactions.
Detailed Findings

Q4 2025 was marked by a complete absence of transaction activity involving landlords in Tensas Parish, with 0 landlord transactions out of a total of 0 market transactions.

This lack of activity was consistent across all investor tiers, from single-property owners to the largest landlords in the parish, indicating a market-wide pause.

As a result, no properties were purchased from other landlords during the quarter, bringing inter-landlord trading activity to a standstill.

It is impossible to compare purchase prices across tiers, as no transactions occurred. The average purchase price for every tier was $0.

This data confirms the findings from other sections, painting a picture of a completely illiquid SFR market for both investors and other market participants in Tensas Parish during Q4 2025.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Investors hold over half of Tensas Parish SFRs in a cash-only market completely dominated by small landlords amidst a Q4 sales freeze.
Holdings
Landlords own 1,273 SFR properties, representing a majority 52.6% of the market in Tensas Parish, LA. Ownership is skewed heavily towards individuals, who hold 1,099 properties (86.3%), while companies own the remaining 178 (14.0%).
Pricing
No landlord or homeowner pricing data is available for Q4 2025, as zero sales transactions occurred, indicating a completely illiquid market.
Activity
Investor acquisitions came to a complete halt in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 0 properties and accounting for 0.0% of all sales. Consequently, no new landlords entered the market during this period.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control of the investor market, owning 96.2% of all investor-held housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have zero presence (0.0%).
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate ownership across almost all portfolio sizes. Companies only manage to achieve a 50/50 ownership split in the 11-20 property tier, failing to gain a majority anywhere.
Transactions
Landlords were neither net buyers nor net sellers in Q4 2025, as the market recorded zero buy-and-sell transactions for all investor types, including institutions.
Market Narrative

The single-family residential market in Tensas Parish, LA, is defined by an extraordinary level of investor penetration and a highly fragmented ownership structure. Investors own 1,273 homes, a 52.6% majority share of the entire market. This landscape is not shaped by large corporations but by small-scale operators; 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control 96.2% of the investor portfolio, while institutional firms have no footprint. Furthermore, the market is built on a foundation of cash, with 100% of investor-owned properties held free of financing, and is dominated by individual owners who hold 86.3% of the portfolio.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 was characterized by a complete standstill. The market recorded zero purchases and zero sales transactions by landlords, signaling a period of extreme illiquidity. This lack of activity prevents any analysis of recent pricing advantages or disadvantages compared to traditional homeowners. The data points to a static environment where existing portfolios are being held, but no new capital is being deployed, and no assets are being traded among investors or sold to other market participants.

The key takeaway for Tensas Parish is a unique market structure that is both saturated and stagnant. The high concentration of investor ownership, particularly in specific zip codes like 71366 (53.9% investor-owned), suggests a mature rental market. However, the complete freeze in Q4 2025 transactions indicates profound illiquidity, which could pose challenges for any investor needing to exit a position. The market's future will depend on whether this inactivity is a temporary pause or a sign of a longer-term structural shift in this small, cash-driven environment.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 08:14 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyTensas Parish (LA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct