Taylor (KY) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Taylor (KY) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Taylor (KY)
7,515
Total Investors in Taylor (KY)
1,773
Investor Owned SFR in Taylor (KY)
1,890(25.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,593
SFR Owned
1,487
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
180
SFR Owned
415
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,890 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Taylor County's Real Estate Market, Owning 82.8% of Investor Properties
Investors own 1,890 SFR properties, representing 25.1% of the total market in Taylor County, KY. This landscape is overwhelmingly controlled by individual and small-scale landlords, who paid an average of 22.5% less than traditional homeowners in Q4 2025 and continue to be strong net buyers.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,890 properties in Taylor County, with individuals holding a dominant 78.7% share.
The majority of investor properties, 1,582, are owned outright with cash, while 308 are financed. Investors are highly focused on rentals, with 1,802 properties classified as non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords in Taylor County paid 22.5% less than homeowners in Q4, a discount of $54,551.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners has been substantial all year, ranging from a 12.8% discount in Q3 to a massive 36.5% discount in Q1 2025. This reveals a consistent and significant purchasing advantage for investors.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 32.1% of all SFR purchases in Taylor County during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 88.0% of all investor purchases, acquiring 22 of the 25 properties. Institutional investors made zero acquisitions, showing no activity in the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 82.8% of investor-owned SFRs.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have zero presence, holding 0.0% of the investor-owned housing stock. The market is exclusively composed of small and mid-size investors.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become equal partners with individuals in the 11-20 property tier, holding 50.0% each.
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, owning 91.2% of single-property holdings and 86.9% of two-property portfolios. Companies show their highest concentration (40.3%) in the 6-10 property tier before reaching parity.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is heavily concentrated, with the 42718 zip code holding 1,787 investor-owned properties.
While 42718 has the highest volume, smaller zip codes like 42758 and 42728 have higher penetration rates at 35.7% and 34.4% respectively. The county-wide investor ownership rate is a significant 25.1%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring properties at a rate of 4.5 to 1 over sales in 2025.
This net buying trend has been consistent, with 189 buys versus 42 sells in 2025, and 219 buys versus 28 sells in 2024. The minimal institutional activity consisted of 2 buys and 1 sell in 2024.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 27.5% of all property transactions in Q4 2025.
A significant portion of deals for mid-size landlords were sourced from other investors, with 100% of purchases in the 6-10 tier and 83.3% in the 3-5 tier coming from landlords. New single-property investors paid an average of $174,335.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,890 properties in Taylor County, with individuals holding a dominant 78.7% share.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 25.1% of the 7,515 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties in Taylor County, totaling 1,890 homes.

Individual 'mom-and-pop' investors are the backbone of the rental market, owning 1,487 properties (78.7%) compared to just 415 (22.0%) owned by companies. This is further reflected in the landlord count, where 1,593 of the 1,773 total landlords are individuals.

Cash is the primary acquisition strategy for investors in this market. A substantial 83.7% of the investor-owned portfolio (1,582 properties) is held free and clear, while only 16.3% (308 properties) are financed.

The investor portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to rental housing, with 1,802 properties (95.3%) being non-owner-occupied, signaling a strong focus on generating rental income.

The ratio of individual landlords to the properties they own (1,593 to 1,487) suggests that many are single-property owners, reinforcing the small-scale nature of real estate investment in Taylor County.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords in Taylor County paid 22.5% less than homeowners in Q4, a discount of $54,551.
Detailed Findings

Investors demonstrated a significant pricing advantage in Q4 2025, acquiring properties for an average of $188,157, which is 22.5% less than the $242,708 paid by traditional homeowners. This translates to a direct savings of $54,551 per property.

This investor discount has been a consistent market feature throughout 2025. The gap was at its widest in Q1, when landlords paid 36.5% less ($84,572 discount), and at its narrowest in Q3, with a still-significant 12.8% discount ($26,449).

Acquisition prices in 2025, averaging $176,845 for landlords, show a marked increase from the pandemic-era (2020-2023) average of $138,448. This represents a 27.7% appreciation, highlighting strong market growth.

The persistent, double-digit price gap quarter after quarter suggests that landlords are successfully targeting undervalued properties or employing more aggressive negotiation tactics than the average homebuyer.

While acquisition activity for both landlords and homeowners was recorded as zero in the raw data files for recent periods, the price comparison data reveals underlying trends of investors securing properties well below the typical market rate paid by homeowners.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 32.1% of all SFR purchases in Taylor County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a major force in the Q4 2025 market, purchasing 25 of the 78 total SFR properties sold, which accounts for a 32.1% market share.

Small-scale investors completely dominated acquisition activity. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) purchased 22 properties, making up 88.0% of all investor buys for the quarter.

The market saw an influx of new investors, with 19 new single-property entities entering the market and acquiring 12 properties. This group alone represented 48.0% of all landlord purchases, signaling a healthy entry-level investment environment.

Mid-size investors (Tiers 05-08) showed modest activity, with purchases of 2 properties in the 11-20 tier and 1 in the 21-50 tier.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) were completely absent from the purchasing market in Q4, underscoring that recent market activity is driven entirely by smaller players.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 82.8% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Taylor County is overwhelmingly dominated by small landlords. Mom-and-pop investors (owning 1-10 properties) control 82.8% of all investor-held SFRs.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) are the largest single group, owning 1,061 properties, which constitutes a majority share of 52.4% of the entire investor portfolio.

Mid-size investors (11-1000 properties) hold the remaining 17.2% of the portfolio, with the largest concentration in the 21-50 property tier (179 properties, 8.8%).

There is no institutional investor (Tier 09) ownership in Taylor County, a stark contrast to national narratives. The market structure is entirely composed of small and medium-sized entities.

The ownership distribution clearly shows a highly fragmented market, with thousands of properties spread across a large base of small-scale owners rather than being concentrated in a few large portfolios.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become equal partners with individuals in the 11-20 property tier, holding 50.0% each.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the foundation of the market, overwhelmingly controlling smaller portfolios. They own 970 of the single-property holdings (91.2%) and 139 of the two-property portfolios (86.9%).

A clear crossover point emerges as portfolios grow. In the 11-20 property tier (Small-medium), ownership is split exactly 50/50, with individuals and companies each holding 81 properties.

While individuals maintain a majority in most tiers below 11 properties, company ownership becomes progressively more significant with scale. Companies hold a 30.3% share in the 3-5 property tier and increase that to a 40.3% share in the 6-10 property tier.

Even in the largest active local tier (21-50 properties), individuals still maintain a strong majority, owning 124 properties (69.3%) compared to 55 (30.7%) for companies.

This pattern indicates that while many investors start as individuals, a transition to a corporate structure becomes a common strategy for managing portfolios as they approach and exceed a dozen properties.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is heavily concentrated, with the 42718 zip code holding 1,787 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Real estate investment in Taylor County is geographically concentrated, with the 42718 zip code alone accounting for 1,787 investor-owned properties, representing 94.5% of the county's total investor portfolio.

The investor ownership rate in the dominant 42718 zip code is 25.1%, indicating that one in every four SFR properties in this area is investor-owned.

While 42718 leads by sheer volume, smaller zip codes exhibit even higher investor penetration rates. The 42758 zip code has the highest rate at 35.7%, followed closely by 42728 at 34.4%, showing intense investor focus in these specific micro-markets.

The top five zip codes by investor ownership percentage all show rates above 24%, significantly higher than many national averages and demonstrating a strong rental market presence across the county's key residential areas.

The data reveals a pattern where the largest population center (42718) has the highest count of investor properties, but smaller, possibly more rural or niche markets, have a higher density of investment relative to their size.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring properties at a rate of 4.5 to 1 over sales in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Taylor County are in a strong accumulation phase, consistently buying far more properties than they sell. In 2025, they purchased 189 properties while selling only 42, a buy-to-sell ratio of 4.5x.

This aggressive net buyer stance was even more pronounced in 2024, with 219 purchases against just 28 sales, resulting in a nearly 8-to-1 buy/sell ratio (7.8x).

The most recent quarter (Q4 2025) continued this trend, with 33 properties bought and only 12 sold, maintaining a healthy net acquisition of 21 properties.

Transactional velocity was highest in Q3 2025, when landlords made 61 purchases, the peak for any quarter in the last two years.

Institutional transaction activity is negligible. Over the past two years, the only recorded activity for the 1000+ tier was in 2024, with 2 properties purchased and 1 sold, confirming their insignificant role in market dynamics.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 27.5% of all property transactions in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a key role in Q4 market liquidity, with their 33 purchases accounting for 27.5% of the 120 total SFR transactions in Taylor County.

The vast majority of investor transaction volume came from mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who were responsible for 30 of the 33 investor-involved transactions.

A notable pattern of inter-landlord trading emerged among small landlords. Those in the 6-10 property tier acquired all 3 of their properties from other landlords, and those in the 3-5 tier acquired 5 of 6 properties (83.3%) from their peers, suggesting a market of portfolio consolidation and trading among existing investors.

In contrast, new single-property investors sourced none of their 19 property acquisitions from other landlords, indicating they are primarily buying from traditional homeowners.

Pricing strategies vary by tier, with the smallest landlords (Tier 01) paying an average of $174,335, while the slightly larger 6-10 tier landlords paid a much higher average of $300,000 for their acquisitions in Q4.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Taylor County's rental market is controlled by small investors who own 83% of inventory and are strong net buyers.
Holdings
Investors own 1,890 SFR properties, representing 25.1% of the market in Taylor County, KY. Individual investors hold a commanding 78.7% share (1,487 properties) compared to 22.0% for companies (415 properties).
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords secured a significant 22.5% discount compared to traditional homeowners, paying an average of $188,157 versus $242,708—a savings of $54,551 per property.
Activity
Landlords acquired 32.1% of all SFRs sold in Q4 2025, with 19 new single-property landlords entering the market. Mom-and-pop investors drove 88.0% of this activity.
Market Share
The market is dominated by small-scale landlords (1-10 properties) who control 82.8% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have no ownership stake.
Ownership Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly own smaller portfolios, but companies achieve a 50/50 ownership split in the 11-20 property tier, marking a key transition point for portfolio professionalization.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, with a 2.75x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025 (33 buys vs. 12 sells). Institutional investors remain on the sidelines with no transaction activity.
Market Narrative

In Taylor County, KY, the single-family rental market is fundamentally driven by local, small-scale investors. They own a significant 25.1% of the total SFR housing stock, amounting to 1,890 properties. The ownership structure overwhelmingly favors individuals over corporations, with 78.7% of properties held by individual investors. This dynamic is further highlighted by the tier distribution: 'mom-and-pop' landlords (owning 1-10 properties) control a commanding 82.8% of the investor-owned inventory, while institutional-scale investors have zero presence in the market.

Investor behavior in Taylor County is characterized by strategic acquisitions and consistent growth. In Q4 2025, landlords captured 32.1% of all home sales and demonstrated a keen ability to find value, paying 22.5% less than traditional homeowners—a discount of over $54,000 per property. This purchasing is part of a broader accumulation trend; landlords have been strong net buyers, acquiring properties at a 4.5-to-1 ratio over sales throughout 2025. Activity is concentrated among the smallest investors, with 19 new single-property landlords entering the market in the last quarter alone.

The key takeaway for the Taylor County housing market is its stability and reliance on a broad base of local investors rather than large, external corporations. The market dynamics reveal a healthy ecosystem where new investors can enter, existing small landlords consolidate portfolios through inter-landlord sales, and all investors secure properties at a significant discount. This structure suggests a resilient rental market less susceptible to the sudden strategy shifts of large institutional players, with growth being driven organically from within the community.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 07:36 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyTaylor (KY)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail