Scott (KY) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Scott (KY) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Scott (KY)
16,305
Total Investors in Scott (KY)
2,309
Investor Owned SFR in Scott (KY)
1,991(12.2%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,132
SFR Owned
1,767
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
177
SFR Owned
268
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,991 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Scott County's Market, Owning 94.5% of Investor Properties as Institutions Exit
Investors own 1,991 SFR properties in Scott County (12.2% of the market), with individual investors holding a commanding 88.7% share. In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 26.0% of all homes sold, securing a 16.6% discount compared to homeowners. While mom-and-pop landlords are net buyers, institutional investors are net sellers, signaling a clear shift toward local ownership.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individuals own 88.7% of Scott County's 1,991 investor-held SFR properties.
Of the 1,991 properties, 1,341 are owned outright with cash, while 650 are financed. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 1,883 properties classified as non-owner-occupied. Individual landlords (2,132) vastly outnumber company landlords (177) by more than 12-to-1.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Scott County landlords paid 16.6% less than homeowners in Q4, a $61,336 average discount.
The price gap has been volatile, swinging from a 21.9% landlord premium in Q1 2025 to a deep 18.3% discount in Q3. Average acquisition prices for investors have increased from a 2020-2023 average of $219,708 to $307,717 in Q4 2025, a 40.1% increase.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 26.0% of all SFR properties sold in Scott County during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) drove this activity, accounting for 96.1% of all investor purchases. In contrast, institutional investors with 1000+ properties made zero acquisitions. The market saw 47 new single-property landlords enter in Q4.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 94.5% of all investor-owned SFRs.
In stark contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own just a single property in the county, accounting for 0.0% of the investor-owned market. Single-property landlords alone make up the largest segment, holding 1,338 properties (63.6%).
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owner in portfolios of 11 or more properties.
While individuals dominate smaller tiers (owning 92.5% of single-property portfolios), companies control 62.7% of the 11-20 property tier and 97.5% of the 21-50 property tier. This reveals a clear strategy of incorporation for landlords pursuing growth.
Geographic Distribution
The 40324 zip code contains 86.8% of all investor-owned SFRs in Scott County.
While 40324 dominates by volume with 1,728 properties, other zip codes have higher investor penetration rates, including 40361 (33.3%) and 40370 (24.3%). This highlights a difference between raw count concentration and market saturation.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 4.0 properties for every 1 they sold in Q4.
This trend is consistent, with landlords remaining strong net buyers throughout 2025 (292 buys vs. 51 sells). In sharp contrast, institutional investors are net sellers, having sold more properties than they bought in both 2024 and 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 22.2% of all Scott County real estate transactions in Q4 2025.
First-time landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, conducting 47 transactions at the highest average price of $352,582. Mid-size landlords (11-20 properties) sourced 100% of their two acquisitions from other landlords, showing a reliance on the existing investor market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individuals own 88.7% of Scott County's 1,991 investor-held SFR properties.
Detailed Findings

In Scott County, the investor-owned single-family residential (SFR) market comprises 1,991 properties, representing 12.2% of the total 16,305 SFRs. This indicates a significant but not dominant investor presence in the local housing market.

Ownership is overwhelmingly concentrated in the hands of individual investors, who control 1,767 properties, or 88.7% of the total investor portfolio. Companies own the remaining 268 properties (13.5%), underscoring the market's reliance on small-scale, local landlords rather than large corporations.

The entity count further solidifies this pattern, with 2,132 individual landlords compared to just 177 company landlords. This 12-to-1 ratio of individuals to companies highlights a highly fragmented ownership landscape composed primarily of local operators.

A clear preference for debt-free ownership is evident, as cash-owned properties (1,341) are more than double the number of financed properties (650). This suggests a financially conservative approach among local investors or the use of private capital for acquisitions.

The portfolio's primary purpose is clear, with 1,883 properties designated as rented. This near-total focus on rental housing confirms that these SFRs are active components of the local housing supply for tenants.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Scott County landlords paid 16.6% less than homeowners in Q4, a $61,336 average discount.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords demonstrated a distinct pricing advantage, acquiring properties for an average of $307,717. This was 16.6% less than the $369,053 paid by traditional homeowners, translating to a significant average discount of $61,336 per property.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners has been highly volatile throughout 2025. Landlords paid a surprising 21.9% premium in Q1 ($439,977 vs $360,876) before the market shifted dramatically to deep landlord discounts of 10.1% in Q2, 18.3% in Q3, and 16.6% in Q4.

This quarter-over-quarter fluctuation suggests investors are capitalizing on specific market opportunities and are not consistently paying below market rate, with Q1 indicating potential competition for premium properties.

A strong trend of price appreciation is evident when comparing recent acquisitions to the pandemic era. The average landlord purchase price of $307,717 in Q4 2025 represents a 40.1% increase from the 2020-2023 average of $219,708.

Comparing year-over-year data, the average price for investors in 2025 ($347,038) is 16.7% higher than the 2024 average ($297,343), indicating sustained and robust price growth in the assets targeted by investors.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 26.0% of all SFR properties sold in Scott County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for a substantial portion of the market in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 51 of the 196 total SFRs sold, capturing a 26.0% market share.

The overwhelming majority of this activity was driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) acquired 49 of the 51 properties, representing 96.1% of all landlord purchases for the quarter.

New entrants are a key feature of the current market, as 47 new entities purchased their first investment property in Q4. This group alone bought 33 properties, making up 64.7% of all landlord acquisitions and signaling a healthy influx of new capital from small investors.

Mid-size landlords (11-20 properties) had minimal impact, acquiring just 2 properties (3.9% of the total). This further emphasizes the market's polarization between new entrants and established small landlords.

Notably, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) were completely absent from the purchasing market in Q4, making zero acquisitions. This highlights a market dynamic entirely defined by smaller, local players.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 94.5% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure in Scott County is overwhelmingly dominated by small investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, who own between 1 and 10 properties, collectively control 94.5% of the entire investor-owned SFR portfolio.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the bedrock of this market, owning 1,338 properties. This single tier accounts for 63.6% of all investor-owned housing, highlighting the critical role of first-time and small-scale investors.

As portfolio sizes increase, ownership concentration rapidly diminishes. Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) own a combined 110 properties, just 5.2% of the total. This steep drop-off illustrates the lack of scale-up in the local market.

The presence of large-scale investors is virtually non-existent. Landlords with 101-1000 properties own only 4 homes, and institutional investors (1000+ properties) own just a single property in the entire county.

This distribution definitively proves that the investor market in Scott County is driven by local, small-scale participants, challenging any narrative of large corporate consolidation.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owner in portfolios of 11 or more properties.
Detailed Findings

A distinct crossover point in ownership structure occurs once a portfolio exceeds 10 properties. While individuals overwhelmingly own smaller portfolios, companies become the majority owners in the 11-20 property tier, holding 37 properties (62.7%) compared to individuals' 22 (37.3%).

The dominance of individual ownership is most pronounced at the entry level. In the single-property tier, individuals own 1,263 homes (92.5%), demonstrating that nearly all new landlords begin as individual operators.

Company ownership becomes nearly absolute in larger portfolios. In the 21-50 property tier, companies own 39 of the 40 properties (97.5%), and in the 51-100 tier, they hold 10 of 11 properties (90.9%). This indicates that incorporation is a standard step for scaling operations.

The small landlord tiers (3-10 properties) remain firmly in the hands of individuals, who own 89.3% of the 3-5 property tier and 86.4% of the 6-10 property tier.

This pattern reveals two distinct investor paths in Scott County: a massive base of individual 'mom-and-pop' landlords and a very small group of professional operators who use corporate structures to manage larger, albeit still modest, portfolios.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 40324 zip code contains 86.8% of all investor-owned SFRs in Scott County.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Scott County is heavily concentrated in a single geographic area. The 40324 zip code alone is home to 1,728 investor-owned properties, which represents a staggering 86.8% of the entire county's investor portfolio.

Following distantly are the 40379 and 40370 zip codes, with 109 and 103 investor properties respectively. Together, the top three zip codes account for 98.5% of all investor-owned SFRs, showing an extreme level of geographic focus.

However, the areas with the highest counts do not necessarily have the highest investor ownership rates. The 40361 zip code leads in penetration, with 33.3% of its homes owned by investors, followed by 40370 at 24.3% and 40511 at 20.5%.

The primary zip code, 40324, has a comparatively modest investor ownership rate of 11.6%, indicating that despite its high volume of investor properties, it remains a predominantly homeowner-occupied market.

This distinction between high-volume and high-penetration areas reveals different market dynamics. While investors are heavily clustered in 40324, they represent a larger portion of the housing stock in smaller, surrounding zip codes.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 4.0 properties for every 1 they sold in Q4.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Scott County are overwhelmingly net buyers, signaling strong confidence in the local market. In Q4 2025, they purchased 72 properties while selling only 18, a buy-to-sell ratio of 4-to-1 and a net gain of 54 properties.

This aggressive accumulation has been a consistent trend. Across all of 2025, landlords acquired 292 SFRs and sold only 51, resulting in a net portfolio expansion of 241 properties and a buy/sell ratio of 5.7x.

The transaction data reveals a clear divergence between the broader market and institutional players. While all landlords are accumulating properties, the 1000+ tier investors are actively divesting. In 2025, they sold 3 properties while buying only 1, making them net sellers.

This institutional retreat is not a new phenomenon; in 2024, they also operated as net sellers, with 3 buys and 4 sells. This consistent selling pressure indicates a strategic exit from the Scott County market by the largest class of investor.

The market's growth is therefore entirely fueled by smaller investors who are absorbing inventory, including properties potentially offloaded by institutional owners, and expanding their local portfolios.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 22.2% of all Scott County real estate transactions in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords participated in 72 of the 325 total SFR transactions in Scott County, giving them a 22.2% share of all market activity. This highlights investors as a significant and active component of the local real estate ecosystem.

Transaction volume was heavily skewed towards the smallest investors. The single-property tier (Tier 01) was responsible for 47 transactions, nearly 65% of all landlord activity for the quarter. This tier also paid the highest average price at $352,582, suggesting they compete directly with traditional homebuyers for move-in-ready properties.

A clear pricing hierarchy exists among tiers. As portfolio size increases, the average purchase price decreases significantly. Landlords in the 6-10 property tier paid an average of just $150,550, less than half the price paid by new entrants, indicating a strategy focused on value-add or distressed properties.

Inter-landlord trading is a key sourcing strategy for mid-size investors. The 11-20 property tier acquired 100% of its properties from other landlords, while the 6-10 property tier sourced 50% of its purchases this way. In contrast, new investors sourced only 8.5% of their properties from other landlords, relying more on the open market.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) recorded zero transactions in Q4, reinforcing their complete inactivity in the current market and leaving the field entirely to smaller, more agile operators.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors command 94.5% of Scott County's rental market as institutional players retreat as net sellers.
Holdings
Landlords own 1,991 SFR properties, representing 12.2% of Scott County's total market. Individual investors hold a dominant 88.7% of these properties (1,767 homes), with companies owning the remaining 13.5% (268 homes).
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords paid an average of 16.6% less than traditional homeowners, securing a substantial discount of $61,336 per property ($307,717 vs. $369,053).
Activity
Investors purchased 26.0% of all SFRs sold in Q4 (51 properties), with activity driven by small players as 47 new single-property landlords entered the Scott County market.
Market Share
The market is defined by small investors, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 94.5% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own just a single property (0.0%).
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in tiers of 11 or more properties, controlling 62.7% of portfolios in the 11-20 property range.
Transactions
Landlords in Scott County are strong net buyers with a 4.0x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 (72 buys vs. 18 sells), while institutional investors are confirmed net sellers, divesting more properties than they acquired in 2025.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Scott County, KY, is overwhelmingly characterized by local, small-scale ownership. Investors hold 1,991 single-family properties, or 12.2% of the total SFR market. This portfolio is firmly in the hands of individuals, who own 1,767 homes (88.7%), dwarfing the 268 properties (13.5%) owned by companies. The market structure analysis reveals that mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 94.5% of investor housing, while institutional firms with over 1,000 properties have a negligible presence, owning just a single home.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 underscores the dominance of these small players. Landlords acquired 26.0% of all homes sold, with 47 new single-property landlords entering the market. They demonstrated sharp purchasing tactics, securing a 16.6% price discount compared to traditional homeowners, an average savings of $61,336. Transaction patterns confirm this growth trend, as landlords acted as aggressive net buyers with a 4-to-1 buy-sell ratio. In stark contrast, the data shows institutional investors are net sellers, actively divesting from the market while smaller investors expand their holdings.

The key takeaway for the Scott County housing market is that it is fueled by a decentralized network of individual investors, not corporate consolidation. The influx of new mom-and-pop landlords and the simultaneous retreat of institutional capital signals a resilient, locally-driven rental market. This dynamic suggests that housing supply and rental prices are influenced by the collective actions of hundreds of small operators rather than the strategic decisions of a few large firms, creating a competitive and fragmented investment environment.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 07:34 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyScott (KY)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4