Monroe (KY) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Monroe (KY) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Monroe (KY)
3,326
Total Investors in Monroe (KY)
1,424
Investor Owned SFR in Monroe (KY)
1,252(37.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,373
SFR Owned
1,162
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
51
SFR Owned
103
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,252 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate 98.1% of Monroe County's Rental Market Amid a Complete Halt in Q4 Activity
Investors own 1,252 Single-Family Residential properties in Monroe County, representing a significant 37.6% of the total SFR market. The market is overwhelmingly controlled by small, individual landlords (98.1%), with institutional investors holding zero properties. Following a period of net buying, investor activity came to a complete standstill in Q4 2025, with zero purchases or transactions recorded.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,252 properties (37.6% of market), with individuals holding 92.8%.
The vast majority of investor properties, 1,159 (92.6%), are owned outright with cash, compared to just 93 (7.4%) that are financed. Of the total portfolio, 1,218 properties (97.3%) are non-owner-occupied rentals.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No landlord acquisitions occurred in Q4 2025, but prior data shows significant discounts.
In Q3 2025, landlords paid 29.9% less than traditional homeowners, securing a $51,142 average discount. This followed a massive 55.4% discount ($62,244) in Q2, indicating a pattern of purchasing properties well below the typical market rate.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords made 0% of SFR purchases in Q4 2025, with activity halting completely.
With zero total landlord purchases, both mom-and-pop (Tiers 01-04) and institutional (Tier 09) investors recorded no new acquisitions. This pause in activity means no new landlords entered the market during the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 98.1% of investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone account for 73.6% of all investor-held housing, with 953 properties. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have zero presence, owning 0.0% of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
No Q4 2025 pricing data is available, but ownership data shows individuals dominate all tiers.
Companies have not achieved majority ownership in any tier. Even in the largest active tier (6-10 properties), individuals own 67.9% of the properties (38) compared to 32.1% for companies (18).
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip code 42167 holding 970 properties.
This single zip code, 42167, accounts for 77.5% of all investor-owned SFRs in the county. However, other areas show higher penetration rates, with zip code 42141 reaching 50.0% investor ownership.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are historically strong net buyers, acquiring 12 properties and selling only 1 in Q3 2025.
This net buyer trend was consistent through 2025, with 23 total buys versus only 2 sells. The pattern was even stronger in 2024, which saw 54 buys and 10 sells, demonstrating a multi-year trend of portfolio accumulation.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for 0.0% of all Q4 2025 transactions, as market activity stopped.
With zero transactions, there was no activity to report for any investor tier, from mom-and-pop to institutional. Consequently, no inter-landlord trading occurred during the quarter.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,252 properties (37.6% of market), with individuals holding 92.8%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a substantial 37.6% share of the single-family residential market in Monroe County, with a total of 1,252 properties under their ownership.

The investor landscape is defined by individual ownership, which accounts for 1,162 properties, or 92.8% of the total investor portfolio. In contrast, company-owned properties number just 103, making up the remaining 8.2%.

This individual dominance extends to the entity level, where 1,373 of the 1,424 total landlords (96.4%) are individuals, compared to only 51 companies.

Portfolio financing strategies reveal a strong preference for un-leveraged assets. An overwhelming 92.6% of investor-owned properties (1,159) are held as cash assets, while only 7.4% (93 properties) are financed.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards rental income, with 1,218 properties (97.3%) classified as non-owner-occupied, confirming the primary business focus of these owners.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No landlord acquisitions occurred in Q4 2025, but prior data shows significant discounts.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing activity completely halted in Q4 2025, with zero properties acquired by landlords. This contrasts sharply with previous quarters and indicates a significant market pause.

Historical data reveals a strong pricing advantage for investors. In Q3 2025, landlords acquired properties for an average of $120,091, a 29.9% discount compared to the $171,233 paid by traditional homeowners.

The price gap was even more pronounced in Q2 2025, when landlords paid an average of $50,156, which was 55.4% less than the homeowner average of $112,400. This represents a substantial $62,244 savings per property.

An exception to this trend occurred in Q1 2025, where landlords paid a 6.4% premium, or $10,622 more than homeowners. This volatility suggests a market with low transaction volumes where individual deals can heavily skew quarterly averages.

Overall, despite the Q1 anomaly, the trend in 2025 prior to the Q4 freeze shows investors consistently able to acquire properties at a significant discount compared to the general market.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Landlords made 0% of SFR purchases in Q4 2025, with activity halting completely.
Detailed Findings

The fourth quarter of 2025 was marked by a complete cessation of investor purchasing activity in Monroe County. Landlords acquired zero of the zero total SFR properties sold, representing 0.0% of the market.

This inactivity was universal across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who form the backbone of the local market, made zero purchases.

Similarly, mid-size landlords and institutional investors (1000+ properties) also recorded no acquisition activity, holding their portfolios steady during this period.

The lack of purchases in the single-property tier signifies that no new investors entered the Monroe County SFR market in Q4 2025, a stark contrast to previous periods of active acquisition.

This market-wide pause suggests a potential shift in local market conditions, investor sentiment, or a simple lack of available properties meeting investor criteria during the quarter.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 98.1% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor ownership structure in Monroe County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale, 'mom-and-pop' landlords. Those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) collectively control 98.1% of all investor-owned SFRs.

First-time or single-property investors (Tier 01) represent the largest segment, holding 953 properties, which constitutes 73.6% of the entire investor portfolio. This highlights the market's reliance on small, local participants.

The next largest tiers are also small-scale, with landlords owning 3-5 properties holding an 11.7% share (152 properties) and two-property landlords holding an 8.4% share (109 properties).

Mid-size investors have a negligible footprint. Landlords in the 11-20 and 21-50 property tiers collectively own just 25 properties, representing only 2.0% of the market.

Institutional investors with portfolios of 1,000 or more properties have absolutely no presence in Monroe County, owning 0.0% of the investor-held SFR stock. This market is exclusively driven by smaller operators.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
No Q4 2025 pricing data is available, but ownership data shows individuals dominate all tiers.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the dominant force across every single investor tier in Monroe County, with no crossover point where companies become the majority owners.

In the foundational single-property tier, individuals own 925 of the 957 properties, a commanding 96.7% share, demonstrating that market entry is almost exclusively an individual pursuit.

This pattern continues into larger portfolio sizes. Among two-property landlords, individuals own 93.7% of the properties. For landlords with 3-5 properties, individuals hold an 85.8% majority.

Even in the highest local concentration of company ownership, the 6-10 property tier, individuals still own a 67.9% majority (38 properties) versus the 32.1% held by companies (18 properties).

The data clearly shows that company investment is a minor factor in Monroe County's SFR market, with individuals maintaining control at every scale of operation.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip code 42167 holding 970 properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals extreme concentration of investor ownership within Monroe County. The vast majority of activity is centered in the 42167 zip code, which contains 970 investor-owned properties, or 77.5% of the county's total.

The top five zip codes by sheer volume of investor properties are 42167 (970), 42140 (134), 42133 (76), 42166 (35), and 42157 (19), collectively representing the core of the rental market.

When measured by ownership rate, a different pattern emerges, highlighting areas with high investor penetration. Zip code 42141 leads with 50.0% of its SFRs owned by investors, followed by 42166 (41.7%) and 42133 (40.4%).

The high-volume zip code of 42167 also has a very high ownership rate at 37.7%, indicating it is a large market with deep investor saturation.

This data illustrates that while one zip code dominates in volume, several smaller areas across the county have an even higher proportion of their housing stock controlled by investors.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords are historically strong net buyers, acquiring 12 properties and selling only 1 in Q3 2025.
Detailed Findings

Historically, landlords in Monroe County have been aggressive net buyers, consistently adding more properties to their portfolios than they sell. In Q3 2025, they purchased 12 properties while selling only 1.

This trend of accumulation holds true for the full year of 2025, where landlords acquired 23 SFR properties and sold just 2, resulting in a net gain of 21 properties.

The net buying activity was even more pronounced in 2024. During that year, landlords purchased 54 homes and sold only 10, a buy-to-sell ratio of over 5-to-1 and a net portfolio increase of 44 properties.

This sustained period of net buying activity across 2024 and most of 2025 paints a picture of a confident investor base actively expanding its footprint in the local market.

The complete halt in Q4 2025 transactions represents a sharp and sudden break from this established, multi-year pattern of aggressive portfolio growth.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 0.0% of all Q4 2025 transactions, as market activity stopped.
Detailed Findings

Investor transaction activity in Monroe County came to a complete standstill in the fourth quarter of 2025. Landlords were involved in zero of the zero total SFR transactions, for a 0.0% market share.

This lack of activity was consistent across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who dominate the market, recorded no transactions during this period.

Similarly, there were no transactions from mid-size or institutional investors, reflecting a market-wide pause in both acquisitions and dispositions.

As a result of the halt in activity, there was no inter-landlord trading. The metric for properties 'Bought From Landlords' was zero across all tiers, indicating no portfolio sales between investors.

The Q4 data points to a market in hibernation, with both buying and selling pressures seemingly absent, a significant deviation from the active transaction history of previous quarters.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Command 98.1% of Monroe County's Investor Market Amid a Complete Q4 2025 Freeze
Holdings
Landlords own 1,252 SFR properties, a 37.6% share of the market in Monroe County, KY. Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate, holding 1,162 of these properties (92.8%), while companies own just 103 (8.2%).
Pricing
While no landlord purchases occurred in Q4 2025, data from Q3 shows investors paid 29.9% less than homeowners, securing a significant $51,142 discount per property ($120,091 vs $171,233).
Activity
Investor activity halted in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 0 properties, accounting for 0.0% of all sales. Consequently, zero new single-property landlords entered the market during the quarter.
Market Share
The market is entirely controlled by small investors, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own 98.1% of all investor housing. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have no presence, owning 0.0%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority owners in all portfolio tiers within Monroe County. There is no crossover point where companies take control, with individuals even owning 67.9% of properties in the 6-10 unit tier.
Transactions
While landlords were historically net buyers (23 buys vs. 2 sells in 2025), all transaction activity ceased in Q4 2025, with zero buys and zero sells recorded. Institutional investors are not active in this market.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Monroe County, KY is substantial and uniquely structured, with investors owning 1,252 properties, representing 37.6% of the total SFR housing stock. This market is unequivocally dominated by small, individual investors. Individual landlords own 92.8% of the rental homes, while 'mom-and-pop' investors (1-10 properties) control a staggering 98.1% of the portfolio. In stark contrast, institutional investors have zero footprint here, making it a market defined by local, small-scale ownership.

Investor behavior has been characterized by strategic, discounted acquisitions, followed by a sudden halt. Prior to Q4 2025, landlords consistently paid less than homeowners, securing a 29.9% discount in Q3. Historically, these investors have been strong net buyers, accumulating properties throughout 2024 and 2025. However, this momentum came to an abrupt stop in Q4 2025, when landlord purchasing and transaction activity dropped to zero, signaling a significant pause or shift in the local market.

The key takeaway for the Monroe County housing market is its dependence on the sentiment and financial health of small, individual landlords. The absence of institutional players means the market is not subject to large-scale corporate strategy but is instead driven by local economic conditions. The complete freeze in Q4 activity, following a long period of expansion, is the most critical current trend, suggesting that these small investors have collectively decided to pause, potentially due to interest rates, pricing, or a lack of desirable inventory. The market's future direction hinges entirely on when and why these mom-and-pop investors decide to re-engage.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 07:23 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyMonroe (KY)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords