Logan (KY) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Logan (KY) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Logan (KY)
9,492
Total Investors in Logan (KY)
2,834
Investor Owned SFR in Logan (KY)
2,552(26.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,650
SFR Owned
2,244
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
184
SFR Owned
326
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,552 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Logan County with 95% Share, Driving 35% of Q4 Home Purchases
Investors own 2,552 SFRs in Logan County (26.9% of the market), with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling an overwhelming 94.6% of that portfolio versus just 0.1% for institutional firms. In Q4, landlords were aggressive net buyers, purchasing 34.7% of all homes sold while their price discount compared to homeowners narrowed to a negligible 0.6%.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 2,552 SFR properties in Logan County, with individual investors holding 87.9%.
Cash purchases dominate investor portfolios, outnumbering financed properties more than 3-to-1 (1,941 vs 611). The vast majority of these holdings, 2,466 properties, are classified as rented, representing 96.6% of the portfolio.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
The investor discount evaporated in Q4, with landlords paying just 0.6% ($1,440) less than homeowners.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners has narrowed dramatically, collapsing from a significant 12.7% discount in Q3 to a negligible 0.6% in Q4. Overall, average landlord purchase prices in 2025 ($220,292) are up 9.1% from 2024 ($201,928).
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 34.7% of all Q4 home sales, acquiring 52 properties.
Mom-and-pop investors drove this activity, accounting for 84.9% of landlord purchases (45 properties). In contrast, institutional investors made up only 3.8% of acquisitions, buying just 2 homes.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 94.6% of investor-owned homes.
In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible footprint, owning just 0.1% of the local investor portfolio, which amounts to 2 properties. Single-property landlords alone own 61.8% of all investor SFRs.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals are the primary owners, but companies become the majority in portfolios of 21-50 properties.
The clear crossover point from individual to corporate dominance occurs in the 21-50 property tier, where companies control 79.0% of properties. Below this tier, individuals maintain strong majority ownership, holding over 90% in the 1-5 property range.
Geographic Distribution
The 42276 zip code is the epicenter of investor ownership, with 1,364 properties.
While 42276 leads in volume, the 42339 zip code has the highest investor penetration rate at an astonishing 75.0%. Several other zip codes, including 42202 and 42256, show high concentrations with over 30% of homes being investor-owned.
Historical Transactions
Landlords remain aggressive net buyers, acquiring 4.1 properties for every one sold in Q4 2025.
This accumulation trend is consistent, with landlords adding a net 283 properties in 2025. Institutional investors have reversed course, shifting from net sellers in 2024 to net buyers in 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 33.5% of all property transactions in Q4, acquiring 78 properties.
A massive 45.3% price gap exists between tiers, with institutional investors paying $133,038 while new single-property landlords paid $243,302. Institutional buyers sourced 100% of their acquisitions from other landlords, a stark contrast to new investors (20%).

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 2,552 SFR properties in Logan County, with individual investors holding 87.9%.
Detailed Findings

Investors have a significant footprint in Logan County, owning 2,552 Single-Family Residential properties, which constitutes 26.9% of the total market.

The market is overwhelmingly characterized by individual ownership, with 2,244 properties (87.9%) held by individuals compared to just 326 (12.8%) owned by companies. This is further reflected in the number of entities, where individual landlords (2,650) outnumber company landlords (184) by more than 14 to 1.

A clear rental focus defines investor strategy, as 2,466 properties, or 96.6% of the entire investor portfolio, are classified as rented.

Investors in this market demonstrate a strong preference for all-cash acquisitions. Cash-owned properties (1,941) outnumber financed ones (611) by a ratio of more than 3-to-1, indicating a well-capitalized investor base that is less reliant on traditional lending.

While fewer in number, company landlords tend to operate at a slightly larger scale. Companies average 1.8 properties per entity, whereas individuals, many of whom are single-property owners, average 0.8 properties per entity.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
The investor discount evaporated in Q4, with landlords paying just 0.6% ($1,440) less than homeowners.
Detailed Findings

The traditional pricing advantage for investors has all but disappeared, with the Q4 discount shrinking to just 0.6% ($1,440) below the average homeowner price of $223,759. This suggests a highly competitive market where investors are forced to bid aggressively to secure properties.

This narrowing price gap marks a sharp trend reversal from earlier in the year. The minimal Q4 discount is a stark contrast to the substantial 12.7% ($30,217) and 14.2% ($34,026) discounts landlords achieved in Q3 and Q1 of 2025, respectively.

Significant price appreciation is evident across the market. The average landlord acquisition price in 2025 ($220,292) represents a 42.3% increase from the pandemic-era average of $154,799 seen between 2020-2023.

Year-over-year price growth highlights the market's momentum, with the average 2025 purchase price rising 9.1% from the 2024 average of $201,928.

The quarterly volatility in the landlord-homeowner price gap, swinging from over 14% to under 1% within a single year, points to rapidly changing market dynamics and intense competition for limited housing inventory.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 34.7% of all Q4 home sales, acquiring 52 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investors represented a powerful force in the Q4 market, purchasing 52 of the 150 total SFRs sold, a substantial market share of 34.7%.

The market saw a significant influx of new entrants, with 55 new single-property landlord entities acquiring 34 homes. These first-time or single-holding investors alone accounted for 64.2% of all landlord purchase activity.

Small, local investors were the engine of Q4 acquisition activity. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) purchased a combined 45 properties, representing 84.9% of all investor buying.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) had a minimal but targeted presence, acquiring 2 properties. Their 3.8% share of activity underscores the market's reliance on smaller-scale investment.

Buying activity was heavily concentrated at the entry level of the market. The 34 properties purchased by single-property investors were more than eight times the volume of the next most active tier, highlighting the fragmented nature of market growth.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 94.6% of investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Logan County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale operators. Landlords owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) control a combined 94.6% of all investor-held SFRs.

Ownership is extremely concentrated at the smallest end of the spectrum, with single-property landlords alone holding 1,688 properties, which accounts for 61.8% of the entire investor portfolio.

The narrative of a corporate takeover does not apply here; institutional investors with 1,000+ properties have a nearly invisible presence, owning just 2 properties, or 0.1% of the total.

There is a significant gap between small and mid-size investors. After the mom-and-pop tiers, ownership drops off sharply, with landlords in the 11-50 property range controlling a combined 5.2% of the portfolio.

This ownership structure reveals that the local rental housing supply is overwhelmingly provided by a large number of individuals and small businesses, not by large, consolidated entities.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals are the primary owners, but companies become the majority in portfolios of 21-50 properties.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the bedrock of the rental market, overwhelmingly dominating smaller portfolios. They own 92.7% of single-property holdings and 90.0% of two-property portfolios.

A distinct shift to corporate ownership occurs as portfolios scale. In the 21-50 property tier, companies take decisive control, owning 49 properties and accounting for a 79.0% majority share.

This crossover point suggests a professionalization trend, where investors are more likely to incorporate their holdings as their portfolio grows beyond 20 properties, likely for liability and operational efficiency.

Even as portfolio sizes increase, individual ownership remains significant. In the 6-10 and 11-20 property tiers, individuals still represent the majority owners with 69.0% and 65.0% of properties, respectively.

The data clearly illustrates two parallel tracks: a vast base of individual investors with small holdings and a smaller, more concentrated group of companies that control the larger mid-size portfolios.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 42276 zip code is the epicenter of investor ownership, with 1,364 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership is highly concentrated in specific geographic pockets. The 42276 zip code alone contains 1,364 investor-owned properties, representing 53.4% of all investor holdings in Logan County.

A key distinction exists between the leaders in volume and penetration rate. While 42276 has the most investor properties, the 42339 zip code has the highest ownership rate, with investors owning 3 out of every 4 homes (75.0%).

Multiple areas exhibit heavy investor saturation. The zip codes of 42202 (35.1%), 42204 (33.3%), and 42256 (31.5%) all have investor ownership rates around one-third, indicating a widespread strategy across the county.

The data suggests investors are deploying at least two distinct strategies: high-volume accumulation in core markets like 42276 and high-density ownership in smaller, targeted submarkets like 42339.

The top five zip codes by investor property count all feature ownership rates above 22%, confirming that investor activity is a defining characteristic of the county's primary residential areas.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords remain aggressive net buyers, acquiring 4.1 properties for every one sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors are in a strong accumulation phase, demonstrating high confidence in the market. In Q4 2025, they purchased 78 properties while only selling 19, a buy-to-sell ratio of 4.1x.

This net-buyer behavior has been consistent and accelerating. For the full year of 2025, landlords acquired a net total of 283 properties, a significant increase from the 187 net properties acquired in 2024.

Total transaction velocity has increased notably year-over-year. Investor purchases climbed from 225 in 2024 to 341 in 2025, a 51.6% rise in buying activity.

Institutional investors (1,000+ tier) have pivoted their strategy. After being net sellers in 2024 (1 buy vs. 3 sells), they became net buyers in 2025 (3 buys vs. 1 sell), signaling a renewed interest in the market.

The persistent and growing net acquisition of properties, even amid rising prices, indicates strong investor conviction about the long-term prospects of the Logan County rental market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 33.5% of all property transactions in Q4, acquiring 78 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing strategies vary dramatically by size, revealed by a vast pricing disparity. Institutional investors paid an average of $133,038 in Q4, a 45.3% discount compared to the $243,302 average paid by new single-property landlords.

New market entrants drove transaction volume, with single-property landlords accounting for 55 of the 78 total investor purchases (70.5%) in the fourth quarter.

Sourcing channels highlight different operational models. Institutional investors acquired 100% of their properties from other landlords, suggesting a focus on purchasing existing, stabilized rental assets. In contrast, new landlords primarily bought from homeowners, with only 20% of their purchases coming from other investors.

Contrary to common assumptions, the smallest investors paid the highest prices. This indicates they are competing directly with homeowners in the open market for move-in ready properties, while larger investors may be targeting distressed or off-market deals.

Institutional buyers leveraged inter-landlord transactions exclusively for their acquisitions, indicating a liquid secondary market for rental portfolios among larger players.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small, local investors dominate Logan County's rental market with 94.6% ownership while landlords purchased 34.7% of homes in Q4.
Holdings
Landlords own 2,552 SFR properties in Logan County, representing 26.9% of the total market. Individual investors are the dominant force, holding 2,244 of these properties (87.9%), compared to 326 (12.8%) owned by companies.
Pricing
The traditional investor discount all but vanished in Q4, with landlords paying just 0.6% less than homeowners ($222,319 vs $223,759), a stark reduction from the 12.7% discount seen in Q3.
Activity
Landlords were highly active in Q4, purchasing 52 properties, which accounts for 34.7% of all sales. This activity was led by an influx of 55 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
The market is controlled by small investors, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own 94.6% of all investor housing. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+) hold a negligible 0.1% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the foundation of the market, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios larger than 20 properties, controlling 79.0% of the 21-50 property tier.
Transactions
Landlords are in a strong accumulation phase, acting as net buyers with a 4.1x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 (78 buys vs 19 sells). Institutional investors have also shifted to being net buyers, acquiring 2 properties while selling 1.
Market Narrative

In Logan County, the single-family rental market is defined by its hyper-fragmented and localized nature. Investors own a significant 2,552 properties, constituting 26.9% of the county's SFR housing stock. This ownership is overwhelmingly driven by small-scale, individual investors, who control 87.9% of the rental portfolio (2,244 properties). The market structure heavily favors "mom-and-pop" landlords (1-10 properties), who command a staggering 94.6% of investor-owned homes, while large institutional firms have a nearly non-existent footprint at just 0.1%.

Investor activity accelerated in Q4, with landlords acquiring 34.7% of all homes sold in Logan County. This charge was led by new entrants, as 55 single-property landlords joined the market. A key trend is the evaporating price advantage; the typical investor discount shrank to a mere 0.6% in Q4, indicating intense competition with traditional homebuyers. Transaction data confirms a strong accumulation trend, with landlords collectively acting as aggressive net buyers, purchasing 4.1 properties for every one they sold.

The data paints a clear picture: Logan County's housing market is significantly shaped by a large, growing base of small, local landlords, not distant corporations. This dynamic suggests that rental supply and pricing are influenced more by local economic conditions and individual investment decisions than by national institutional strategies. The fierce competition for housing, evidenced by the shrinking investor price discount, could signal upward pressure on home prices for all buyers. The market's health and stability are therefore intrinsically tied to the financial viability of these thousands of small-scale entrepreneurs who provide the bulk of the area's rental housing.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 07:18 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyLogan (KY)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail