Knott (KY) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Knott (KY) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Knott (KY)
3,526
Total Investors in Knott (KY)
1,329
Investor Owned SFR in Knott (KY)
1,048(29.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,247
SFR Owned
966
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
82
SFR Owned
87
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,048 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Knott County, Acquiring Homes at a 54% Discount
Individual investors own 92.2% of the 1,048 landlord-held properties in Knott County, KY, which constitute 29.7% of the total SFR market. In Q4, these landlords—100% of whom were small 'mom-and-pop' operators—bought 37.5% of all homes sold, paying an average of 53.8% less than traditional homeowners. The market is defined by cash purchases and a near-total absence of institutional activity.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 1,048 SFR properties in Knott County, with individuals holding 92.2%.
The portfolio is overwhelmingly cash-based, with 1,017 properties owned outright versus only 31 financed. A full 98.9% of these properties are non-owner-occupied rentals (1,036 of 1,048), indicating a strong focus on rental income.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q4, landlords paid 53.8% less than homeowners, a staggering $62,607 discount per property.
This massive discount has been a consistent trend, with landlords securing even larger price gaps in Q3 (79.0%) and Q2 (74.7%) of 2025. This suggests investors are targeting properties distinct from those purchased by typical homeowners, likely distressed or off-market deals.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 37.5% of all home purchases in Q4, buying 12 of the 32 properties sold.
Mom-and-pop landlords were responsible for 100% of these acquisitions, with zero properties purchased by institutional investors. Activity was led by new entrants, with 7 new single-property landlords joining the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.6% of investor-owned homes.
Single-property landlords alone own 88.5% of the investor portfolio (947 properties). In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible presence, owning just a single property, or 0.1% of the total.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the dominant force across all small tiers, owning over 92% of properties.
In the single-property tier, individuals own 879 homes (92.3%) versus 73 for companies. There is no crossover point; companies fail to achieve majority ownership in any significant tier, reinforcing the individual-driven nature of the market.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in zip codes 41822 (Hindman) and 41839 (Pippa Passes).
While 41822 (Hindman) has the highest count of investor properties at 143, other smaller zip codes show higher penetration rates. The zip code 41743 leads with a 46.2% investor ownership rate, demonstrating significant rental concentration in specific pockets of the county.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Knott County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 29.5 properties for every one they sold in 2025.
This strong accumulation trend is consistent over time, with landlords purchasing 59 properties while only selling 2 in 2025. In 2024, the pattern was similar with 45 buys and 8 sells. There is no available data on institutional transactions.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 32.6% of all Q4 transactions, entirely driven by mom-and-pop investors.
Interestingly, new single-property investors paid the highest price at $83,000 on average, while more experienced small landlords (2-5 properties) paid significantly less, averaging just $24,000-$25,000. None of the landlord purchases in Q4 were sourced from other investors.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 1,048 SFR properties in Knott County, with individuals holding 92.2%.
Detailed Findings

Landlord-owned properties comprise a significant 29.7% of the total Single-Family Residential market in Knott County, with a total of 1,048 properties held by investors.

The investor landscape is overwhelmingly dominated by 1,247 individual landlords who own 966 properties (92.2%), compared to just 82 company landlords holding 87 properties (8.3%).

A striking financial pattern emerges from the data: 97.0% of all investor-owned properties (1,017 of 1,048) are owned with cash, while only 3.0% (31 properties) are financed, signaling a market with very low leverage among investors.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards generating rental income, as evidenced by the 1,036 properties classified as rented, which accounts for 98.9% of all investor-owned SFRs in the county.

The data reveals a clear profile of the typical Knott County investor: an individual who purchases property with cash for the primary purpose of renting it out.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q4, landlords paid 53.8% less than homeowners, a staggering $62,607 discount per property.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Knott County acquire properties at a deep discount compared to traditional homeowners, paying an average of $53,750 in Q4 2025, which is 53.8% less than the homeowner average of $116,357.

This price advantage for landlords is not a new phenomenon; it represents a consistent market dynamic. In the prior quarter (Q3 2025), the discount was even more pronounced at 79.0%, with landlords paying just $28,188 on average.

The quarter-over-quarter trend shows the discount, while still enormous, has narrowed from its peak of 79.0% in Q3 to 53.8% in Q4, a shift of 25.2 percentage points.

The significant and persistent price gap suggests that landlords and homeowners operate in different segments of the market. Investors appear to be successfully targeting undervalued or distressed assets that are not attracting traditional buyers.

Overall price appreciation shows a volatile trend, with the average landlord acquisition price in 2024 at $166,224 dropping to a 2025 average of $61,248, indicating a shift in the type or condition of properties being acquired by investors.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 37.5% of all home purchases in Q4, buying 12 of the 32 properties sold.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity was highly prominent in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 12 of the 32 total SFR properties sold in Knott County, a market share of 37.5%.

The entirety of this purchasing activity was driven by small-scale 'mom-and-pop' landlords (Tiers 01-04), who accounted for 100% of investor acquisitions, underscoring the grassroots nature of the local rental market.

New investors were the primary driver of Q4 activity. The single-property tier (Tier 01) alone accounted for 58.3% of all landlord purchases (7 properties), all bought by 7 distinct new entities.

Mid-size and institutional investors were completely absent from the market in Q4, with 0 properties purchased by entities owning more than 5 homes.

The data highlights a market where growth is fueled by new, small-scale investors rather than the expansion of large, existing portfolios.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.6% of investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Knott County is defined by the dominance of small landlords. Investors owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) collectively control 99.6% of all landlord-owned SFRs.

The single-property landlord tier is the bedrock of the market, with 947 properties representing 88.5% of the total investor-owned housing stock.

The narrative of large-scale corporate ownership is non-existent in this county. Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1,000+ properties) own just one property, accounting for a mere 0.1% of the investor portfolio.

Ownership concentration dissipates rapidly in larger tiers. Landlords with 2 properties hold 5.7% of the stock, while those with 3-5 properties hold 5.2%.

This distribution reveals a highly fragmented market composed almost entirely of small, local investors rather than a consolidated market controlled by large firms.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors are the dominant force across all small tiers, owning over 92% of properties.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly control the market at every level of small-scale ownership. In the largest tier, single-property landlords, individuals own 879 properties (92.3%) compared to just 73 for companies.

This pattern of individual dominance is consistent across other tiers. For two-property portfolios, individuals own 93.4% of the properties, and for the 3-5 property tier, they own 92.9%.

Unlike in many other markets, there is no 'crossover point' in Knott County where companies become the majority owners. The market structure is firmly rooted in individual ownership from the smallest to mid-size portfolios.

The data clearly indicates that both entry-level investment and portfolio growth are primarily pursued by individuals rather than corporate entities.

Company ownership remains a niche segment, with only 7.7% of single-property portfolios and 7.1% of 3-5 property portfolios held by corporations.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in zip codes 41822 (Hindman) and 41839 (Pippa Passes).
Detailed Findings

The highest raw count of investor-owned properties is in the 41822 zip code (Hindman), with 143 landlord-owned SFRs, representing 32.4% of that area's housing stock.

High investor penetration is not limited to the largest areas. The zip code 41743 has the highest ownership rate in the county, with 46.2% of its SFR properties owned by investors.

Several other zip codes also exhibit high investor concentration, including 41834 (44.0%), 41725 (40.9%), and 41817 (39.6%), indicating widespread rental activity across smaller communities.

This highlights a key geographic pattern: the areas with the most investor properties are not necessarily the ones with the highest saturation, suggesting different investment strategies across the county.

The zip code 41839 (Pippa Passes) stands out for having both a high count (71 properties) and a high ownership rate (36.8%).

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords in Knott County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 29.5 properties for every one they sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

The transaction history reveals a clear and sustained trend of portfolio accumulation among Knott County landlords. In 2025, investors were strong net buyers, purchasing 59 properties while only selling 2.

This behavior is not a recent development. In 2024, landlords also acted as net buyers, with 45 acquisitions compared to just 8 sales, demonstrating a multi-year strategy of growth.

The net buying activity was also strong in the most recent quarter for which data is available, Q3 2025, where landlords bought 11 properties and sold only 2.

The high buy-to-sell ratio, which reached 29.5-to-1 in 2025, signals strong confidence in the local rental market and a long-term hold strategy among investors.

Data for institutional-level transactions (1,000+ tier) is not available, which aligns with their near-zero presence in the county's overall ownership data.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 32.6% of all Q4 transactions, entirely driven by mom-and-pop investors.
Detailed Findings

Investors played a significant role in the Q4 2025 market, participating in 14 of the 43 total transactions, for a 32.6% share of all activity.

All 14 of these transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), with zero activity from institutional investors, mirroring the overall ownership structure in the county.

A distinct pricing pattern emerged among tiers: new, single-property landlords paid the most, with an average purchase price of $83,000. This is over three times higher than the prices paid by landlords with 2-5 properties, who averaged between $24,000 and $25,000.

This price discrepancy suggests that new entrants may be competing for more market-ready properties, while established small investors are targeting lower-priced, value-add opportunities.

The market shows no sign of inter-landlord trading, as 0% of landlord purchases came from other investors. This indicates landlords are acquiring properties from the traditional homeowner market rather than from other investors divesting their assets.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Knott County's real estate market is dominated by individual investors buying cash properties at over 50% discounts.
Holdings
Landlords own 1,048 SFR properties, representing a significant 29.7% of Knott County's market, with individual investors overwhelmingly controlling this stock at 92.2% (966 properties) compared to companies at 8.3% (87 properties).
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords secured properties for 53.8% less than traditional homeowners, paying an average of $53,750 compared to the homeowner price of $116,357—a discount of $62,607 per home.
Activity
Investors purchased 37.5% of all homes sold in Q4 (12 properties), with activity driven entirely by mom-and-pop buyers, including 7 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control of the investor market with a 99.6% share, while institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible presence at just 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the definitive market force, holding the vast majority of properties in every portfolio tier; unlike other markets, there is no point at which companies become the majority owners.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 29.5x buy/sell ratio in 2025 (59 buys vs. 2 sells), signaling strong accumulation, while institutional investors were completely inactive in the transaction market.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Knott County, KY is unequivocally defined by small, individual 'mom-and-pop' landlords. These investors own 1,048 single-family homes, making up 29.7% of the county's entire SFR market. Ownership is highly fragmented and grassroots-driven, with individuals controlling 92.2% of investor properties and those in the 1-10 property tier commanding a 99.6% share. In stark contrast, institutional investors have a virtually nonexistent footprint, owning just 0.1% of the portfolio, challenging any notion of a corporate takeover in this rural market.

Investor behavior is characterized by savvy, value-oriented acquisitions. In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 37.5% of all homes sold, securing them at a remarkable 53.8% discount compared to traditional homeowners. This points to a strategy of targeting distressed or off-market properties. The market operates heavily on cash, with 97% of investor-owned homes held without financing. Furthermore, transaction data shows a clear trend of accumulation, with landlords acting as strong net buyers with a 29.5-to-1 buy-sell ratio in 2025, consistently growing their local portfolios.

The key takeaway for the Knott County housing market is its resilience and dependence on local, individual capital. The market's health is tied to the financial capacity of small investors who provide the bulk of the rental housing supply. The absence of institutional players and leveraged buying insulates it from certain national market shocks but also suggests a reliance on a specific type of undervalued asset. This dynamic creates a distinct ecosystem where local knowledge and the ability to purchase with cash are the primary drivers of success.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 07:08 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyKnott (KY)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail