Hopkins (KY) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Hopkins (KY) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Hopkins (KY)
14,670
Total Investors in Hopkins (KY)
4,513
Investor Owned SFR in Hopkins (KY)
4,460(30.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
4,169
SFR Owned
3,847
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
344
SFR Owned
646
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 4,460 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Hopkins County, Acquiring Half of Homes Sold at a 39% Discount
Investors own 30.4% of the SFR market in Hopkins County, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a staggering 89.5% of that portfolio versus a mere 0.1% for institutional firms. In Q4, landlords purchased 47.5% of all homes sold, paying 39.3% less than traditional homeowners. While small investors are aggressive net buyers, institutional players were net sellers, signaling a clear divergence in market strategy.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 4,460 homes, with individual landlords controlling a dominant 86.3% of the portfolio.
The vast majority of investor properties are cash-owned (3,873) versus financed (587), a ratio of nearly 7-to-1. A high 96.9% of the portfolio (4,321 properties) is identified as rented, indicating a strong focus on rental income generation.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 39.3% less than homeowners in Q4, securing a massive $68,725 discount per property.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners has been substantial all year, peaking at a 59.8% discount in Q2. Landlord acquisition prices in 2025 ($99,214) are trending significantly lower than in 2024 ($117,114), showing increased purchasing discipline.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured a massive 47.5% of all homes purchased in Q4, acquiring 66 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) drove 86.8% of this activity, while institutional investors acquired zero properties. The market saw 51 new single-property landlords enter in Q4, highlighting strong grassroots growth.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own a commanding 89.5% of all investor-held SFRs.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint, owning just 0.1% of the investor housing stock (3 properties). Single-property landlords alone own more than half the market at 56.9% (2,713 properties).
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the majority property owners in every single investor tier, never ceding control to companies.
Even in the 21-50 property tier, individuals maintain a strong 71.8% majority. Companies achieve their highest penetration in the 11-20 property tier but still only account for 37.4% of ownership.
Geographic Distribution
The 42431 zip code is the epicenter of investor ownership with 2,326 properties.
While 42431 has the highest count, the 42440 zip code has the highest concentration, where investors own 60.0% of all SFRs. Several other zip codes, including 42410 (53.9%) and 42453 (51.9%), also have investor ownership rates over 50%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 92 properties while selling only 16 in Q4.
This net-buyer trend has been consistent, with 345 buys versus 88 sells for the full year. In a stark contrast, institutional investors were net sellers in 2025, selling two properties while buying only one.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 43.4% of all Q4 property transactions, with 92 purchases.
First-time landlords (Tier 1) paid the highest average price among active buyers at $114,260. The quarter's most expensive purchase ($230,880) was a landlord-to-landlord deal by a large investor.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 4,460 homes, with individual landlords controlling a dominant 86.3% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 30.4% share of the single-family residential market in Hopkins County, with a total portfolio of 4,460 properties.

Individual 'mom-and-pop' investors are the foundation of the rental market, owning 3,847 properties, which constitutes 86.3% of all investor-owned SFRs, compared to 646 properties (14.5%) owned by companies.

By entity count, the dominance of individual investors is even more pronounced, with 4,169 individuals (92.4% of all landlords) compared to just 344 companies (7.6%).

Cash is overwhelmingly the preferred acquisition method for investors in this market. A staggering 86.8% of investor-owned properties (3,873) are owned outright, while only 13.2% (587) are financed.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards generating rental income, with 4,321 properties, or 96.9% of all investor-owned homes, classified as rented, demonstrating a clear business focus among Hopkins County landlords.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 39.3% less than homeowners in Q4, securing a massive $68,725 discount per property.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Hopkins County demonstrate significant purchasing power, securing properties for 39.3% less than traditional homeowners in Q4 2025. Landlords paid an average of $106,082 while homeowners paid $174,807, a raw discount of $68,725.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners has been substantial throughout 2025, peaking in Q2 when landlords paid an incredible 59.8% less ($83,027 vs. $206,676).

While the Q4 discount of 39.3% is significant, it represents a narrowing of the price gap from mid-year highs, suggesting a potential shift in market dynamics or available inventory.

Landlord acquisition prices in 2025, averaging $99,214 for the year, are notably lower than in 2024 ($117,114) and the 2020-2023 period ($121,270), indicating a cooling in the prices investors are willing to pay.

The consistent, deep discounts achieved by landlords—ranging from 35.9% to 59.8% throughout 2025—suggest a strategic focus on acquiring undervalued or distressed assets not typically pursued by traditional homebuyers.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured a massive 47.5% of all homes purchased in Q4, acquiring 66 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity surged in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 66 of the 139 SFRs sold, capturing a substantial 47.5% of the total market share.

The market's growth is fueled by small, local investors, as mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 86.8% of all investor purchases, totaling 59 properties.

A significant wave of new entrants joined the market, with 51 new single-property landlords acquiring 36 homes, which represents 52.9% of all properties bought by investors in Q4.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09) had zero acquisition activity in Hopkins County this quarter, underscoring that the market is entirely driven by smaller-scale players.

Mid-size landlords (Tiers 05-08) also played a role, with investors holding 11-1000 properties acquiring a combined 9 properties, or 13.2% of the landlord total, showing activity across the smaller end of the investor spectrum.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own a commanding 89.5% of all investor-held SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Hopkins County is defined by small-scale ownership, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling an overwhelming 89.5% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone form the bedrock of the market, owning 2,713 properties, which accounts for 56.9% of the entire investor portfolio.

Institutional ownership (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) is virtually non-existent, comprising only 3 properties, or 0.1% of the total. This challenges any narrative of large corporations dominating the local rental market.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) represent a small but present segment, collectively owning 10.5% of the investor-held properties across 504 homes.

The ownership distribution is heavily skewed towards the smallest investors, with nearly seven out of every ten investor-owned homes (67.5%) being held by landlords with just one or two properties.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors are the majority property owners in every single investor tier, never ceding control to companies.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate ownership across every portfolio size in Hopkins County, with no crossover point where companies become the majority owner.

In the entry-level single-property tier, individuals own a staggering 91.9% of the homes (2,506 properties), demonstrating that the path to landlordship is primarily an individual pursuit.

Company ownership, while always in the minority, sees its greatest market share in the 11-20 property tier, where they own 86 properties, or 37.4% of that segment.

Even as portfolios grow larger, individual ownership remains robust. In the 21-50 property tier, individuals still own 181 properties, a commanding 71.8% share.

The data clearly shows that company formation is not the primary vehicle for scaling a rental portfolio in this market; instead, individuals continue to hold properties under their own names even as they expand their holdings.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 42431 zip code is the epicenter of investor ownership with 2,326 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Hopkins County is highly concentrated, with the 42431 zip code alone accounting for 2,326 investor-owned properties, more than half the county's investor-owned total.

The highest rate of investor saturation occurs in the 42440 zip code, where landlords own a remarkable 60.0% of all single-family residential properties, making it a majority-investor market.

Multiple areas show deep investor penetration, including the 42410 (53.9%) and 42453 (51.9%) zip codes, indicating that certain neighborhoods are heavily defined by rental housing.

The top five zip codes by property count (42431, 42408, 42410, 42442, 42440) collectively hold 3,895 properties, representing 87.3% of all investor-owned homes in the county.

A notable distinction exists between high-volume and high-penetration areas. While 42431 leads in sheer volume (2,326 properties), its ownership rate (27.3%) is much lower than smaller zip codes like 42440 (60.0%) and 42410 (53.9%).

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 92 properties while selling only 16 in Q4.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Hopkins County are in a strong accumulation phase, acting as decisive net buyers. In Q4 2025, they purchased 92 properties while selling only 16, a buy-to-sell ratio of nearly 6-to-1.

This net buying trend has been consistent throughout the year, with a total of 345 properties purchased versus 88 sold in 2025, showing sustained confidence in the local market.

Transaction volume has accelerated through the year, rising from 71 purchases in Q2 to 92 in Q4, indicating growing acquisition activity as the year progressed.

The behavior of institutional investors (1000+ tier) is the complete opposite of the broader market. In 2025, they were net sellers, disposing of more properties (2) than they acquired (1).

Comparing 2025 to 2024 reveals a significant uptick in acquisition velocity, with 345 properties bought in 2025 compared to 295 in the previous year, an increase of 16.9% in purchasing volume.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 43.4% of all Q4 property transactions, with 92 purchases.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were a driving force in the Q4 2025 market, participating in 43.4% of all transactions with 92 total purchases out of 212.

New entrants to the market (Tier 1) dominated transaction volume with 53 purchases and paid the highest average price among the most active tiers, at $114,260 per property.

Inter-landlord activity appears strategic and concentrated at the top end. The single most expensive purchase of the quarter ($230,880) was made by a large investor (101-1000 tier) buying directly from another landlord.

Mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04) dominated transaction volume, accounting for 83 of the 92 landlord purchases (90.2%) in Q4.

The data suggests a tiered pricing strategy, with smaller investors paying higher prices (e.g., Tier 1 at $114,260) and mid-size investors securing lower prices (e.g., Tier 11-20 at $57,200), possibly by targeting different types of assets.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small landlords dominate Hopkins County's market, controlling 89.5% of rentals while institutions retreat as net sellers.
Holdings
Landlords own 4,460 single-family properties in Hopkins County, representing 30.4% of the market, with individual investors holding 3,847 (86.3%) and companies owning just 646 (14.5%).
Pricing
Landlords paid 39.3% less than traditional homeowners in Q4, securing an average discount of $68,725 per property ($106,082 vs $174,807).
Activity
In Q4, landlords purchased 66 properties, a 47.5% share of all sales, with 51 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 89.5% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own a mere 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate every ownership tier, with no crossover point where companies take majority control, even in larger portfolios.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 5.75-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q4 (92 buys vs 16 sells), while institutional investors were net sellers in 2025.
Market Narrative

In Hopkins County, Kentucky, the investor landscape is overwhelmingly defined by local, small-scale players. Investors own 4,460 single-family homes, comprising a significant 30.4% of the total market. This portfolio is firmly in the hands of individuals, who own 86.3% of these properties. The market structure defies the national narrative of corporate dominance; mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 89.5% of all investor-owned housing, while large institutional firms (1,000+ properties) hold a nearly invisible 0.1% share.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 was aggressive and strategic. Landlords acquired nearly half (47.5%) of all homes sold, demonstrating a keen ability to find deals by paying 39.3% less than traditional homeowners—an average discount of $68,725. This activity is driven by accumulation, as landlords acted as strong net buyers with a nearly 6-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio. In a stark divergence, the data shows institutional investors were net sellers for the year, signaling their retreat from a market actively being shaped by smaller competitors.

The key takeaway for the Hopkins County housing market is that it is a small investor's domain. The market's high investor penetration rate is not a product of Wall Street capital but of local individuals and small businesses expanding their portfolios. Their ability to secure substantial discounts suggests a focus on off-market deals or distressed assets, a strategy that allows them to outmaneuver traditional buyers and scale organically. This dynamic indicates a mature, grassroots rental market where local knowledge and deal-sourcing are paramount.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 07:06 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyHopkins (KY)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail