Harrison (KY) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Harrison (KY) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Harrison (KY)
4,381
Total Investors in Harrison (KY)
951
Investor Owned SFR in Harrison (KY)
962(22.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
864
SFR Owned
817
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
87
SFR Owned
152
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 962 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Harrison County's Investor Market is Defined by Small Landlords Acquiring Properties at a Significant 21.9% Discount
Investors own 962 SFRs (22.0% of the market), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a commanding 89.1%. In Q4 2025, these investors acquired 30.9% of all homes sold, paying 21.9% less than traditional homeowners, and remain strong net buyers while institutional players are absent.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 962 SFR properties in Harrison County, with individual investors holding 84.9%.
Cash is the dominant financing strategy, with 884 properties (91.9%) owned outright versus just 78 financed. The investor portfolio is almost entirely rental-focused, with 929 properties classified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Harrison County landlords paid 21.9% less than homeowners in Q4 2025, a $55,664 discount.
The landlord discount has narrowed from its Q3 2025 peak of 38.3% ($102,927). This trend follows an anomalous Q1 2025 where investors briefly paid a 0.3% premium compared to traditional buyers.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 30.9% of all SFR properties sold in Harrison County during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop investors were responsible for 100.0% of all landlord purchases this quarter, with institutional investors making zero acquisitions. New, single-property landlords dominated activity, acquiring 16 of the 17 properties.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 89.1% of all investor-owned housing in Harrison County.
Single-property landlords are the largest investor segment, alone holding 60.2% of the entire investor portfolio. Institutional investors have zero presence in this market, owning 0.0% of properties.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the majority property owners across every single investor tier in Harrison County.
Companies never become the majority owner; even in the 6-10 property tier where company ownership peaks, individuals still hold a 56.2% majority. The highest concentration of company ownership is 43.8% in the 6-10 property tier.
Geographic Distribution
The 41031 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity, holding 816 landlord-owned properties.
The highest investor penetration rate is found in the 41064 zip code, where landlords own 66.7% of all SFRs. The 41003 zip code is a unique hotspot, ranking high in both total count (115 properties) and ownership rate (33.2%).
Historical Transactions
Landlords are consistently strong net buyers, acquiring 5.4 properties for every 1 they sold in Q4 2025.
This net buyer trend has been consistent, with a buy/sell ratio of 3.9 for the full year 2025 (110 buys vs 28 sells). In contrast, institutional investors were neutral in 2024, selling exactly as many properties as they bought (4).
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 29.7% of all Harrison County real estate transactions in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords accounted for all 27 investor transactions this quarter. Landlords in the 3-5 property tier sourced 100% of their new properties from other landlords, while new investors (Tier 1) sourced only 4.3% from landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 962 SFR properties in Harrison County, with individual investors holding 84.9%.
Detailed Findings

Investors have a significant footprint in Harrison County, owning 962 single-family residential properties, which constitutes 22.0% of the total SFR market.

The investor landscape is overwhelmingly characterized by individual ownership, with 817 properties (84.9%) held by individuals compared to just 152 (15.8%) by companies.

This individual dominance is further reflected in the entity count, where there are 864 individual landlords versus only 87 company landlords, indicating a market driven by small-scale operators.

A striking 91.9% of all investor-owned properties (884) are held in cash, demonstrating a low reliance on debt and high liquidity among local investors.

The portfolio's purpose is clear, with 929 properties designated as rented, confirming that the primary strategy for these holdings is generating rental income.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Harrison County landlords paid 21.9% less than homeowners in Q4 2025, a $55,664 discount.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Harrison County demonstrated a significant pricing advantage in Q4 2025, acquiring properties for an average of $198,891 while traditional homeowners paid $254,555.

This price gap represents a substantial 21.9% discount, saving investors an average of $55,664 per property and highlighting a strategic ability to find value.

The investor discount is dynamic, having tightened from a massive 38.3% ($102,927) in Q3 2025, which suggests changing market conditions or competition levels.

The purchasing behavior reversed from early in the year, as investors paid a slight 0.3% premium in Q1 2025, making the current discount a return to a more typical pattern.

Long-term price appreciation is evident, with current acquisition prices far exceeding the 2020-2023 average of $123,719, signaling strong market growth.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 30.9% of all SFR properties sold in Harrison County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors represented a major force in the Q4 2025 market, purchasing 17 of the 55 single-family homes sold, capturing a 30.9% market share of all acquisitions.

All investor purchase activity (100.0%) was driven by small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), indicating the market's complete reliance on small-scale capital for rental housing growth.

The market is being fueled by new entrants, as single-property landlords accounted for 16 of the 17 investor purchases (94.1%), signaling a healthy influx of first-time investors.

A notable pattern of co-ownership appeared among new buyers, with 23 distinct entities involved in the 16 single-property acquisitions.

The total absence of purchases from institutional investors (1000+ properties) confirms that Harrison County's investor market is exclusively local and small-scale, with no 'Wall Street' presence.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 89.1% of all investor-owned housing in Harrison County.
Detailed Findings

The investor market structure in Harrison County is unequivocally dominated by small operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) controlling 89.1% of all investor-held SFRs.

First-time and single-property landlords form the backbone of the rental market, owning 610 properties and representing a 60.2% majority share of all investor holdings.

The market shows a distinct lack of consolidation, with zero properties held by institutional investors (Tier 09) and no landlords owning more than 50 properties.

Mid-size landlords (owning 11-50 properties) comprise a small but distinct segment, collectively holding 110 properties for a combined 10.9% share.

This highly fragmented ownership structure, with a deep base of small landlords, suggests a competitive and localized market environment resistant to large-scale corporate influence.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors are the majority property owners across every single investor tier in Harrison County.
Detailed Findings

Unlike in larger markets, there is no portfolio size in Harrison County where companies overtake individuals as the majority owners. Individual investors maintain control across all nine tiers.

The peak concentration for company ownership occurs in the 6-10 property tier, where they hold a 43.8% share (28 properties), suggesting this is the common point for investors to incorporate.

Individual ownership is most pronounced at the entry level, where individuals own 567 of the single-property holdings, a staggering 92.2% share.

Even as portfolios grow into the small-medium range (21-50 properties), they remain predominantly in individual hands, with individuals controlling 66.7% of properties in this tier.

This pattern indicates that business growth in this market is achieved through individual portfolio expansion rather than corporate consolidation, reinforcing the local, non-corporate nature of real estate investment.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 41031 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity, holding 816 landlord-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership is highly concentrated geographically, with the 41031 zip code alone accounting for 816 properties, or 84.8% of all investor-owned SFRs in Harrison County.

While 41031 leads by sheer volume, the 41064 zip code shows the deepest market saturation, with investors owning two-thirds (66.7%) of the local housing stock.

The 41003 zip code emerges as a key target for investors, ranking second for property count (115) and third for ownership percentage (33.2%), indicating a strong and established investor presence.

A clear distinction exists between volume and penetration, as the area with the most investor properties (41031) has a moderate 21.0% ownership rate, while the highest-rate area (41064) has a small number of total homes.

This data reveals a targeted investment strategy within the county, with capital flowing into specific zip codes rather than being spread evenly across the region.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are consistently strong net buyers, acquiring 5.4 properties for every 1 they sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Harrison County are in an aggressive accumulation phase, demonstrating a strong net-buyer position by purchasing 27 properties while only selling 5 in Q4 2025.

This buying pressure is a sustained trend, not a quarterly anomaly. For the full year 2025, investors added a net 82 properties to their portfolios, matching the net gain from 2024.

Transaction volume remained robust throughout 2025, peaking in Q3 with 34 purchases and continuing with 27 purchases in Q4, signaling ongoing market confidence.

The very limited institutional activity shows a starkly different strategy. In 2024, they were perfectly neutral, with 4 buys and 4 sells, suggesting portfolio management or churning rather than directional bets on the market.

The persistent net buying from the dominant mom-and-pop landlord base is a primary force driving housing demand and activity in the Harrison County market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 29.7% of all Harrison County real estate transactions in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors played a key role in market liquidity during Q4 2025, participating in 27 of the 91 total transactions for a 29.7% share of all activity.

All investor-led transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop landlords, with new, single-property investors driving the bulk of the volume with 23 purchases.

A clear difference in acquisition strategy emerges between new and existing landlords. Those in the 3-5 property tier acquired 100% of their properties from other landlords, suggesting a focus on off-market or targeted deals.

In stark contrast, new single-property investors overwhelmingly purchased from the open market, with only 1 of their 23 acquisitions (4.3%) coming from an existing landlord.

Purchase prices varied significantly by tier strategy, with the 3-5 property tier paying an average of $213,000, while one transaction in the 6-10 property tier closed for just $50,000, pointing to opportunistic buys.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small, individual landlords dominate Harrison County's market, controlling 89.1% of rentals and buying at a 21.9% discount.
Holdings
Landlords own 962 SFR properties, representing 22.0% of the Harrison County market, with individual investors overwhelmingly holding 817 of those properties (84.9%).
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords paid an average of 21.9% less than traditional homeowners, securing a significant discount of $55,664 per property ($198,891 vs $254,555).
Activity
Landlords acquired 30.9% of all homes sold in Q4 (17 properties), an effort driven almost entirely by new single-property investors who accounted for 16 of the purchases.
Market Share
The market is controlled by small investors, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own 89.1% of all investor housing while institutional investors (1000+) have no holdings.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority property owner in every portfolio tier, with no crossover point where companies take control, underscoring the market's non-corporate nature.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 5.4x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 (27 buys vs 5 sells), while the limited institutional activity shows a neutral position.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Harrison County, Kentucky is defined not by large corporations, but by local, individual operators. Landlords own 962 single-family residential properties, a significant 22.0% of the county's total SFR market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by individuals, who own 84.9% of these homes. The market structure is highly fragmented, with 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) commanding an 89.1% share, while institutional investors have zero presence.

Investor behavior is characterized by strategic acquisition and active growth. In Q4 2025, landlords were a driving force of demand, purchasing 30.9% of all homes sold. They demonstrated a distinct pricing advantage, paying an average of 21.9% less than traditional homeowners—a discount of $55,664 per property. This activity is part of a sustained accumulation trend; landlords are strong net buyers with a 5.4-to-1 buy/sell ratio in the last quarter, a pattern consistent with their behavior over the past two years.

The key takeaway is that Harrison County is a quintessential small-investor market, shaped by individual capital and local expertise rather than institutional influence. Growth is fueled by a steady stream of new, single-property landlords entering the market and an ability to secure properties below typical homeowner prices. This dynamic suggests a stable, ground-level rental market that is likely to remain resilient and independent from the broader trends affecting large-scale institutional investors.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 07:02 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyHarrison (KY)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail