Graves (KY) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Graves (KY) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Graves (KY)
12,624
Total Investors in Graves (KY)
3,398
Investor Owned SFR in Graves (KY)
3,511(27.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
3,202
SFR Owned
3,068
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
196
SFR Owned
452
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 3,511 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Graves County's Investor Market, Dominated by Cash-Holding Individuals, Froze in Q4 2025 with Zero Transactions
Investors own a significant 27.8% of Single-Family Residential properties in Graves County, KY, a market overwhelmingly controlled by small, individual landlords who hold 85.0% of the portfolio. After a year of strong acquisition activity in 2024, the market came to a complete standstill in Q4 2025, with zero properties purchased by investors, signaling a dramatic shift in market dynamics.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 3,511 SFRs, with individual landlords controlling a dominant 87.4% share.
The entire investor portfolio of 3,511 properties is owned with cash, with zero properties financed. Indicating a strong rental focus, 95.8% of these homes (3,363) are non-owner-occupied. Individuals represent 3,202 of the 3,398 total landlords.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No Q4 2025 purchase data is available, preventing any price comparison between landlords and homeowners.
The complete absence of transaction data for Q4 2025 makes it impossible to analyze pricing trends, the potential landlord discount, or any valuation differences between various timeframes.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investor purchasing halted in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 0.0% of a non-existent market.
Activity was zero across all investor segments in Q4 2025. Both mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) and all other tiers recorded zero property purchases during this period.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 85.0% of investor housing, with no institutional presence.
Single-property landlords are the largest group, owning 2,027 properties (55.7%) alone. The market has zero ownership by institutional investors (1000+ properties), underscoring its local nature. Pricing data by tier is unavailable due to lack of recent sales.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the majority property owners in every portfolio tier, with companies never achieving control.
Even in the largest active tier (51-100 properties), individuals own a staggering 96.7% of the properties. The closest companies come to parity is in the 21-50 property tier, where they own 46.5%.
Geographic Distribution
The Mayfield zip code 42066 is the epicenter of investor activity, containing 2,412 investor-owned SFRs.
The 42066 zip code has a high investor ownership rate of 29.8%. Smaller, surrounding zip codes show extreme saturation, with 42003 and 42061 reporting 100.0% and 90.0% investor ownership rates, respectively, on very small housing stocks.
Historical Transactions
Landlords were aggressive net buyers in 2024, acquiring over 19 properties for every one they sold.
This strong acquisition trend, with 115 purchases against only 6 sales in 2024, contrasts sharply with the market freeze in Q4 2025, where activity dropped to zero. There were no institutional transactions recorded.
Current Quarter Transactions
The landlord transaction market was frozen in Q4 2025, with a 0.0% share of zero total transactions.
With no transactions occurring, there was no activity across any investor tier, from single-property landlords to larger operators. Consequently, there was no inter-landlord trading and no pricing data is available for the quarter.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 3,511 SFRs, with individual landlords controlling a dominant 87.4% share.
Detailed Findings

Investors have a substantial footprint in Graves County, owning 3,511 Single-Family Residential properties, which constitutes 27.8% of the total 12,624 SFRs in the market.

The market is overwhelmingly characterized by individual ownership, with 3,068 properties (87.4%) held by individuals compared to just 452 (12.9%) owned by companies. This pattern extends to the landlord entities themselves, where individuals (3,202) vastly outnumber companies (196).

A remarkable feature of this market is its complete lack of leverage; 100% of the 3,511 investor-owned properties are held in cash, with zero recorded as being financed. This suggests a market of highly liquid investors who are not reliant on debt for their acquisitions.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards rental income, with 3,363 properties classified as rented, accounting for 95.8% of all investor-owned SFRs.

The data paints a clear picture of a 'Main Street' investor landscape, where the typical landlord is an individual, owns their properties outright, and maintains a strong focus on generating rental revenue.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No Q4 2025 purchase data is available, preventing any price comparison between landlords and homeowners.
Detailed Findings

A critical finding for Q4 2025 is the complete lack of transaction data, which prevents any analysis of acquisition prices for either landlords or traditional homeowners. This absence of activity is a major market signal.

Consequently, it is not possible to calculate the typical price gap or discount that landlords may have achieved compared to other buyers during the quarter.

Analysis of price appreciation or changes from previous periods, such as 2024 or the 2020-2023 timeframe, cannot be performed for Q4 2025.

The lack of pricing data is a direct result of the market halt in investor purchasing, making it the most significant finding for this period.

Without active transactions, key metrics on market health and investor purchasing power remain undetermined for the final quarter of 2025.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Investor purchasing halted in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 0.0% of a non-existent market.
Detailed Findings

The investor acquisition market in Graves County came to a complete standstill in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing zero properties out of zero total SFR sales recorded.

This lack of activity was universal across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who form the backbone of the market, made zero acquisitions.

Similarly, mid-size investors and institutional tiers also recorded zero purchases, indicating a market-wide pause on new investments.

No new landlords entered the market in Q4 2025, as evidenced by the zero properties purchased in the single-property (Tier 01) category.

The data for Q4 2025 points not just to a slowdown, but to a temporary freezing of the investor purchase market in Graves County.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 85.0% of investor housing, with no institutional presence.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Graves County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) control a combined 85.0% of all investor-owned SFRs.

The single-property landlord tier is the bedrock of the market, with 2,027 properties, accounting for 55.7% of the entire investor portfolio on its own.

Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) hold the remaining 15.0% of the portfolio, representing a much smaller but still significant segment.

A defining characteristic of this market is the complete absence of institutional-scale investors. The 1,000+ property tier holds zero properties, reinforcing the narrative that this is a market driven entirely by smaller, local players.

This distribution highlights a highly fragmented ownership structure where the vast majority of rental housing is provided by small, independent landlords rather than large corporations.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors are the majority property owners in every portfolio tier, with companies never achieving control.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain majority ownership across every single portfolio size tier in Graves County, a pattern that demonstrates their dominance at all levels of the market.

There is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners. In the single-property tier, individuals own 94.1% of the homes.

This trend persists even as portfolios grow. In the 11-20 property tier, individuals own 76.5%, and in the small landlord tiers (2-10 properties), their share consistently remains above 83%.

The most competitive tier for corporate ownership is the 21-50 property bracket, where companies hold a significant 46.5% (101 properties), yet still fall short of a majority.

Remarkably, in the largest active portfolio size (51-100 properties), individual ownership spikes to 96.7%, indicating that even the largest local portfolios are personally held rather than incorporated.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The Mayfield zip code 42066 is the epicenter of investor activity, containing 2,412 investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership is heavily concentrated in the Mayfield area, with the 42066 zip code alone accounting for 2,412 properties, representing the vast majority of investor activity in Graves County.

This concentration in 42066 is also reflected in its high investor penetration rate of 29.8%, meaning nearly one in three SFRs in the area is investor-owned.

Several smaller zip codes exhibit hyper-saturation by investors. For instance, 42003 and 42061 report investor ownership rates of 100.0% and 90.0%, respectively, suggesting these are small areas with housing stocks almost entirely composed of rental properties.

Other notable areas of activity include 42088 (202 properties, 23.6% rate) and 42051 (190 properties, 22.3% rate), further demonstrating significant investor presence throughout the county.

The data highlights a clear geographic pattern: a dense core of investor activity in Mayfield surrounded by smaller pockets of extremely high, and sometimes total, investor saturation.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords were aggressive net buyers in 2024, acquiring over 19 properties for every one they sold.
Detailed Findings

Historical data from 2024 reveals a highly active and bullish investor market, with landlords operating as strong net buyers. They purchased 115 SFR properties while selling only 6.

This translates to a buy-to-sell ratio of 19.17-to-1, indicating an aggressive portfolio expansion strategy across the landlord community in the preceding year.

The net gain of 109 properties in 2024 stands in stark contrast to the complete halt in activity seen in Q4 2025, highlighting a dramatic and sudden shift in market sentiment or opportunity.

All recorded historical transaction activity was driven by non-institutional landlords, as the 1,000+ tier registered zero buys or sells.

This trend reversal from aggressive acquisition to a total pause is the most critical dynamic observed in the market over the past two years.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
The landlord transaction market was frozen in Q4 2025, with a 0.0% share of zero total transactions.
Detailed Findings

Confirming data from other sections, the transaction market for investors in Graves County was entirely inactive in Q4 2025. Landlords were involved in zero transactions, representing 0.0% of the market.

This inactivity was consistent across all portfolio sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) did not transact, nor did any mid-size landlords.

The complete halt in sales means there were no opportunities for inter-landlord trading, with the percentage of properties bought from other landlords standing at zero.

As a result of zero transactions, no analysis of purchase prices by tier can be conducted. There is no data to compare the buying strategies of smaller versus larger investors for this period.

The Q4 2025 data paints a picture of a market in a state of pause, with both buying and selling activity by investors coming to a complete stop.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Dominated by cash-buying individuals, Graves County's high-penetration investor market abruptly froze in Q4 2025 with zero sales.
Holdings
Landlords own 3,511 Single-Family Residential properties in Graves County, KY, a significant 27.8% of the market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors, who own 3,068 properties (87.4%) compared to 452 (12.9%) for companies.
Pricing
No landlord or homeowner transactions were recorded in Q4 2025, making a direct price comparison impossible and highlighting a complete halt in market activity.
Activity
Investor purchasing ceased entirely in Q4 2025, with landlords' share of acquisitions falling to 0.0% of all sales. This resulted in zero new landlords entering the market, a stark contrast to the 115 properties purchased by investors during 2024.
Market Share
The market is controlled by small investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) owning 85.0% of all investor-held housing. There is zero presence from institutional investors (1000+ properties).
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority property holders in every single portfolio tier, with companies never reaching a majority. Even among the largest local portfolios (51-100 properties), individuals own 96.7%.
Transactions
After being strong net buyers in 2024 with a 19.17x buy/sell ratio (115 buys vs 6 sells), landlords completely paused activity in Q4 2025, recording zero buys and zero sells.
Market Narrative

In Graves County, KY, the real estate investment market is a significant force, with landlords owning 3,511 single-family homes, equivalent to 27.8% of the total market. This landscape is defined by its 'Main Street' character; individual investors own a commanding 87.4% of the portfolio, and small-scale mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 85.0% of those assets. Further emphasizing financial independence, the entire investor portfolio is owned outright with cash, and there is a complete absence of large-scale institutional ownership.

Investor behavior has undergone a dramatic reversal. After a period of aggressive expansion in 2024, where landlords acted as strong net buyers acquiring over 19 homes for every one sold, the market came to an abrupt halt. In Q4 2025, both purchasing and selling activity by investors ceased entirely, with zero transactions recorded. This freeze prevented any analysis of acquisition pricing against homeowners and signaled a unified pause across all investor types.

The key takeaway from Graves County is a market heavily influenced by the sentiment of local, independent, and financially liquid investors. The sudden shift from aggressive buying to a complete standstill suggests high sensitivity to local economic conditions, interest rate environments, or a lack of desirable inventory. This unanimity in behavior, without the influence of institutional capital, makes Graves County a pure case study of a 'Main Street' investor market hitting the brakes in unison.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 07:03 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyGraves (KY)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price