Grant (KY) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Grant (KY) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Grant (KY)
5,481
Total Investors in Grant (KY)
1,183
Investor Owned SFR in Grant (KY)
917(16.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,030
SFR Owned
748
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
153
SFR Owned
187
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 917 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Grant County, Owning 98% of Rental Homes and Driving Market Activity
In Grant County, investors own 917 SFR properties, making up 16.7% of the market. This sector is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who hold 98.1% of all investor-owned homes, while institutional investors hold just 0.1%. In Q4 2025, landlords were aggressive buyers, acquiring 32.8% of all homes sold and securing deep discounts of 19.1% compared to traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 917 SFR properties in Grant County, with individuals holding 81.6%.
Cash is the preferred purchasing method, used for 73.9% of investor-owned properties (678 homes) compared to just 239 that are financed. The portfolio is highly focused on rentals, with 97.3% of investor-owned homes being non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a significant 19.1% discount in Q4, paying $62,961 less than homeowners.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners has been volatile; the Q4 discount of 19.1% narrowed from a 27.7% discount in Q2. In a surprising reversal, landlords paid a 23.6% premium in Q1 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 32.8% of all homes sold in Grant County during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords were responsible for 100% of all investor purchases this quarter, acquiring 22 properties. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) made zero acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 98.1% of investor-owned SFRs in Grant County.
Institutional investors have a negligible footprint, owning just a single property, which represents 0.1% of the investor market. Single-property landlords alone own 76.1% of all investor-held SFRs.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, but companies assume control in tiers with over 11 properties.
In portfolios of 11-20 properties, companies own 75.0% of the homes. This concentration grows to 92.3% in the 21-50 property tier. Individuals are most dominant among single-property landlords, owning 85.3% of those homes.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Grant County is highly concentrated, with the 41035 zip code holding 345 properties.
The highest rate of investor ownership is in the 41010 zip code, where 23.7% of homes are investor-owned. This contrasts with 41035, which has the highest count but a lower rate of 14.6%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Grant County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 7.7 times more properties than they sold in 2025.
Overall landlord buying momentum remains strong, with 33 acquisitions versus only 2 sales in Q4 2025. In contrast, the sole institutional investor was inactive, having been a net neutral seller in 2024 with 2 buys and 2 sales.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 30.8% of all property transactions in Grant County during Q4 2025.
A wide price disparity exists among buyers, with single-property landlords paying the most ($279,326) and 6-10 property landlords paying the least ($70,000). Only 6.1% of landlord purchases came from other investors.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 917 SFR properties in Grant County, with individuals holding 81.6%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 16.7% of the Single-Family Residential (SFR) market in Grant County, totaling 917 properties out of 5,481.

Individual investors are the primary force in the local market, owning 748 properties, which accounts for 81.6% of the investor-owned housing stock. Companies, while active, hold a smaller share with 187 properties (20.4%).

The ownership base is broad, with 1,183 distinct landlord entities in the county. This is composed of 1,030 individual landlords and 153 company landlords, indicating a market dominated by many small-scale investors rather than a few large ones.

Cash transactions overwhelmingly dominate investor acquisitions. A total of 678 properties (73.9%) were acquired with cash, compared to only 239 that are currently financed, signaling a well-capitalized investor base.

The investor portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to rental purposes, with 892 of the 917 properties classified as rented (non-owner-occupied). This 97.3% rental rate underscores the business focus of these property owners.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a significant 19.1% discount in Q4, paying $62,961 less than homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Grant County demonstrated a strong purchasing advantage, acquiring properties for an average price of $267,200. This was 19.1% less than the $330,161 paid by traditional homeowners, representing a substantial discount of $62,961 per property.

The price advantage for investors has been significant but inconsistent throughout 2025. The discount narrowed from 27.7% in Q2 and 23.5% in Q3 to 19.1% in Q4, suggesting increasing competition or changing market dynamics.

An anomaly occurred in Q1 2025, when landlords paid an average of $314,350, a 23.6% premium over the homeowner price of $254,401. This deviation highlights a period of unusually aggressive bidding by investors.

Comparing recent years, landlord acquisition prices show steady appreciation. The average price paid in 2025 ($260,945) is higher than in 2024 ($250,422) and significantly above the pandemic-era (2020-2023) average of $228,034.

While Q4 2025 landlord purchases were recorded at an average of $267,200, the data indicates zero distinct properties were purchased in that timeframe by the group being tracked, suggesting these prices may reflect prior-period purchases closing in the quarter.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 32.8% of all homes sold in Grant County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity surged in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 22 of the 67 total SFRs sold in Grant County. This represents a substantial 32.8% market share of all purchases for the quarter.

The entirety of this purchasing activity was driven by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who acquired all 22 properties. This highlights the complete dominance of small-scale investors in the current market.

First-time or single-property landlords were the most active group, responsible for purchasing 18 properties, or 81.8% of the investor total. This influx was driven by 27 distinct new landlord entities entering the market.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) were completely absent from the purchasing market in Q4, acquiring zero properties and ceding all activity to smaller players.

The data shows a clear pattern of market entry at the smallest scale, with landlords in the two-property (9.1%), 3-5 property (4.5%), and 6-10 property (4.5%) tiers making up the remaining purchases.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 98.1% of investor-owned SFRs in Grant County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Grant County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) control 98.1% of all investor-owned SFRs, a figure that challenges narratives of corporate dominance.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the bedrock of the rental market, owning 720 properties. This accounts for 76.1% of the entire investor-owned portfolio, demonstrating the market's reliance on first-time and small investors.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have a minimal presence, owning just one property in the entire county. This represents a mere 0.1% of the investor-owned market share.

Mid-size landlords also have a very small footprint. Investors in the 11-50 property range collectively own only 17 properties, or 1.8% of the total, further cementing the market's small-investor character.

The ownership distribution is heavily skewed towards the smallest tiers, with the two-property (7.4%), 3-5 property (10.1%), and 6-10 property (4.4%) tiers rounding out the mom-and-pop category.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, but companies assume control in tiers with over 11 properties.
Detailed Findings

A clear crossover point exists where ownership strategy shifts from individual to corporate structures. While individuals dominate portfolios under 10 properties, companies become the majority owners in the 11-20 property tier, holding 75.0% of the homes (3 properties).

Individual investors form the backbone of the small-scale rental market. They own 85.3% of single-property portfolios (621 homes) and maintain a majority through the 6-10 property tier (57.1%).

Company ownership becomes increasingly concentrated in larger portfolios. In the 21-50 property tier, companies own 12 of the 13 properties, a commanding 92.3% share, indicating that scaling operations in Grant County is typically done under a corporate entity.

Even in the smallest tier, companies have a foothold, owning 107 of the 720 single-property landlord homes (14.7%). This suggests that even new investors are increasingly utilizing corporate structures for liability or financial reasons.

The data reveals a distinct lifecycle for investors in Grant County: individuals typically start and operate small portfolios, while significant expansion is almost exclusively pursued through a company structure.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Grant County is highly concentrated, with the 41035 zip code holding 345 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Grant County is geographically concentrated, with the 41035 zip code serving as the epicenter of activity, containing 345 investor-owned properties.

The region with the highest saturation of investors is the 41010 zip code, where the ownership rate reaches 23.7%. This indicates a market where nearly one in four homes is owned by an investor.

A key distinction exists between total volume and market penetration. While 41035 has the most investor properties (345), its ownership rate of 14.6% is significantly lower than that of 41010 (23.7%), highlighting different market dynamics in each area.

The top three zip codes by investor count—41035 (345 properties), 41030 (109 properties), and 41010 (92 properties)—together account for 546 properties, representing 59.5% of all investor-owned SFRs in the county.

The 41052 zip code also shows a high investor concentration with a 21.7% ownership rate, despite having a much smaller portfolio of only 10 properties.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Grant County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 7.7 times more properties than they sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Grant County shows strong accumulation, with landlords acting as decisive net buyers. Across 2025, they purchased 139 properties while selling only 18, a buy-to-sell ratio of 7.7 to 1.

This aggressive buying behavior accelerated in Q4 2025, where the ratio was even more pronounced at 16.5 to 1 (33 buys vs. 2 sells), signaling confidence and a continued appetite for expansion heading into the new year.

The trend of net buying has been consistent, with landlords adding a net 121 properties to their portfolios in 2025 and a net 89 properties in 2024.

In a sharp contrast to the broader market, institutional investors have been neutral or divesting. In 2024, institutional entities bought 2 properties and sold 2, indicating a halt in portfolio growth or a strategic repositioning.

This divergence reveals two different market stories: small, local landlords are actively and rapidly growing their holdings, while the largest players are on the sidelines or slightly reducing their exposure in Grant County.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 30.8% of all property transactions in Grant County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors played a major role in the Q4 2025 market, participating in 33 of the 107 total SFR transactions, a market share of 30.8%.

All 33 of these transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), with institutional investors making zero transactions. This reinforces that small investors are the sole drivers of current market activity.

New entrants to the market paid the highest prices. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) had an average purchase price of $279,326, substantially more than any other tier.

A dramatic price spread highlights different acquisition strategies, with the average price for the 6-10 property tier at just $70,000—a 75% discount compared to what new landlords paid. This suggests experienced investors are targeting lower-priced, value-add opportunities.

The market for inter-landlord transactions was very limited. Only 2 of the 33 investor purchases (6.1%) were acquired from another landlord, indicating that most acquisitions are coming from the traditional homeowner market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Grant County's Real Estate Market, Owning 98% of Rental Homes While Institutions Remain Absent
Holdings
Investors own 917 Single-Family Residential properties in Grant County, representing 16.7% of the total market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors, who own 748 homes (81.6%), compared to 187 homes (20.4%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords demonstrated significant purchasing power, paying an average of $267,200, which is 19.1% less than the $330,161 paid by traditional homeowners—a discount of $62,961 per property.
Activity
Landlords were a driving force in the Q4 2025 market, purchasing 22 properties, which accounted for 32.8% of all sales. Activity was led by new market entrants, with 27 new single-property landlord entities acquiring 18 homes.
Market Share
The investor market in Grant County is controlled by small-scale landlords (1-10 properties), who own a commanding 98.1% of all investor-held housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible presence, holding just 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the primary owners in smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in tiers of 11 or more properties. In the 11-20 property tier, companies own 75.0% of the assets.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 16.5 properties for every one they sold in Q4 2025 (33 buys vs. 2 sells). This contrasts with institutional investors, who were inactive in Q4 and net neutral sellers in 2024.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Grant County, KY, is defined by the overwhelming dominance of local, small-scale operators. Investors currently own 917 Single-Family Residential homes, comprising 16.7% of the county's housing stock. This market is not controlled by large corporations; rather, 81.6% of these properties are held by individual investors. The distribution is heavily skewed towards mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who command a staggering 98.1% of the investor-owned market, while institutional firms hold a mere 0.1%, challenging common narratives about Wall Street's role in local housing.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 was characterized by aggressive acquisition and savvy pricing. Landlords purchased 32.8% of all homes sold, demonstrating significant market influence. They achieved this while securing a notable 19.1% price discount compared to traditional homeowners, saving an average of $62,961 per home. The market is also expanding, with 27 new single-property landlords entering in Q4 alone. Transaction data confirms this trend, showing landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 16.5 properties for every one they sold, while institutional players remained on the sidelines.

The key takeaway for the Grant County housing market is its foundation upon a broad base of individual and small-scale investors who are actively growing their portfolios. This structure suggests a resilient rental market less susceptible to the strategic shifts of large, national corporations. The high concentration of ownership in specific zip codes like 41010 (23.7% investor-owned) indicates targeted investment strategies. The primary dynamic to watch is the continued influx of new mom-and-pop landlords, who are shaping local market competition and rental availability more than any other force.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 07:00 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyGrant (KY)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail