Franklin (KY) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Franklin (KY) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Franklin (KY)
12,509
Total Investors in Franklin (KY)
2,005
Investor Owned SFR in Franklin (KY)
1,907(15.2%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,700
SFR Owned
1,472
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
305
SFR Owned
456
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,907 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Franklin County, Owning 92.3% of Investor SFRs and Driving Market Activity
In Franklin County, KY, investors own 1,907 Single-Family Residential properties, representing 15.2% of the market. This ownership is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (92.3%), while institutional investors hold a negligible 0.2%. In Q4 2025, landlords were active net buyers, acquiring 28.1% of all homes sold and surprisingly paying a 6.0% premium over traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,907 SFRs, with individuals holding a dominant 77.2% share.
The investor portfolio in Franklin County is heavily cash-based, with 77.1% of properties owned outright (1,470) versus 22.9% financed (437). An overwhelming 96.0% of these properties are non-owner-occupied, signaling a strong focus on rental income.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a 6.0% premium over homeowners in Q4, averaging $290,094 per purchase.
The Q4 premium of $16,306 marks a sharp reversal from previous quarters, where landlords enjoyed significant discounts of 15.5% in Q3 and 16.7% in Q2. This volatility suggests a highly competitive and shifting market landscape.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 28.1% of all Franklin County SFRs sold in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 93.0% of all investor purchases, acquiring 40 properties. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+) purchased only a single property, underscoring the dominance of small-scale investors in current market activity.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 92.3% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a nearly nonexistent footprint, owning just 3 properties, which amounts to only 0.2% of the total investor-owned portfolio. This data directly counters narratives of large-scale corporate dominance in the local rental market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, signaling a professionalization shift.
While individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, companies take a slight 50.4% majority in the 6-10 property tier and expand to a 65.0% majority in the 21-50 property tier. This marks a clear crossover point from personal investment to structured business operations.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 40601 zip code holding 1,880 properties.
While 40601 has the highest volume, it doesn't have the highest saturation. Smaller zip codes like 40347 (22.5% investor-owned) and 40379 (21.3%) exhibit a greater density of investor ownership, revealing different market dynamics.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 3.17 properties for every one they sold in Q4 2025.
This strong accumulation trend is consistent, with a 5.25-to-1 buy/sell ratio for the full year 2025 (247 buys vs 47 sells) and a 6.21-to-1 ratio in 2024. Institutional investors are also net buyers, but their transaction volume is minimal, with only 2 buys and 1 sell in all of 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords participated in 25.8% of all Q4 2025 SFR transactions in Franklin County.
A massive price gap exists between investor tiers, with institutional investors paying 62.7% less than new single-property landlords ($106,000 vs $284,563). Smaller investors rely heavily on acquiring from other landlords, with 45.5% of two-property landlord purchases sourced this way.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,907 SFRs, with individuals holding a dominant 77.2% share.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold 1,907 Single-Family Residential properties in Franklin County, KY, which constitutes 15.2% of the total 12,509 SFRs in the market.

Individual investors are the backbone of the local rental market, owning 1,472 properties (77.2% of the investor-owned total), while companies own the remaining 456 properties (23.9%).

This individual dominance is also reflected in the entity count, with 1,700 individual landlords compared to just 305 company landlords, a ratio of more than 5-to-1.

The portfolio is predominantly held for rental purposes, with 1,831 properties (96.0%) classified as rented, confirming a clear strategy geared towards generating rental income rather than short-term speculation.

Investors in Franklin County favor cash transactions, with 1,470 properties (77.1%) owned free and clear, compared to only 437 properties (22.9%) that are financed. This indicates a well-capitalized investor base less susceptible to interest rate fluctuations.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a 6.0% premium over homeowners in Q4, averaging $290,094 per purchase.
Detailed Findings

In a surprising reversal of typical trends, landlords in Q4 2025 paid an average price of $290,094, which is 6.0% more than the $273,788 paid by traditional homeowners—a premium of $16,306 per property.

This Q4 premium starkly contrasts with the significant discounts landlords secured in the preceding quarters. In Q3, they paid 15.5% less ($47,441 discount), and in Q2, they paid 16.7% less ($45,492 discount), highlighting extreme price volatility in the market.

The market has seen dramatic price appreciation since the pandemic era. The Q4 2025 average landlord purchase price of $290,094 is 69.3% higher than the average of $171,393 during the 2020-2023 period.

The most extreme pricing anomaly occurred in Q1 2025, when landlords paid a staggering 20.1% premium ($57,286) over homeowners, suggesting periods of intense, targeted competition for specific assets.

Comparing year-over-year, the average acquisition price for landlords has surged by 21.6% from $228,779 in 2024 to $278,183 in 2025, indicating accelerating costs for investors looking to expand their portfolios.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 28.1% of all Franklin County SFRs sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a significant force in the Q4 2025 market, purchasing 43 of the 153 total SFRs sold, capturing a 28.1% market share of all transactions.

The market saw a wave of new entrants, with 35 new single-property landlords making their first purchase. These new investors alone accounted for 55.8% (24 properties) of all landlord acquisitions.

Small, local investors overwhelmingly drove purchasing activity. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) acquired 40 of the 43 properties, representing 93.0% of the total investor buy-side volume.

Institutional-scale investors (1000+ properties) had a minimal impact on the Q4 market, purchasing just one property, which accounted for only 2.3% of landlord acquisitions.

The data reveals a clear pattern of grassroots market growth, with the vast majority of buying activity originating from new and small-scale landlords rather than large corporate entities.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 92.3% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Franklin County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) control 92.3% of all investor-held SFRs.

Single-property landlords form the largest segment by a wide margin, owning 1,255 properties, which represents 62.9% of the entire investor-owned housing stock in the county.

In stark contrast, institutional investors with portfolios of 1,000 or more properties have a negligible presence, holding just 3 properties, or 0.2% of the total.

Mid-size landlords (owning 11-1000 properties) collectively own just 7.5% of the investor SFR inventory, further cementing the market structure as one defined by small, independent owners.

This distribution reveals a highly fragmented market where the vast majority of rental housing is provided by local, small-portfolio landlords rather than large, consolidated corporate entities.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, signaling a professionalization shift.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the bedrock of the Franklin County rental market, completely dominating the smaller portfolio tiers. They own 85.4% of single-property rentals and 74.9% of two-property portfolios.

A distinct shift occurs in portfolios of 6-10 properties, which serves as the crossover point where companies (50.4%) first overtake individuals (49.6%) as the majority owners.

As portfolio sizes increase, company ownership becomes more pronounced. In the 21-50 property tier, companies control a decisive 65.0% of the properties, indicating that larger-scale operations are typically managed through formal business structures.

Even at the small-to-mid-size level (11-20 properties), the ownership is nearly evenly split, with individuals holding 52.4% and companies holding 47.6%, showing this as a key transition range.

This pattern illustrates a clear lifecycle of real estate investment in the county: starting with individual ownership and transitioning to a corporate structure as portfolios scale beyond five properties.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 40601 zip code holding 1,880 properties.
Detailed Findings

The vast majority of investor-owned properties in Franklin County are located in a single area, with the 40601 zip code accounting for 1,880 properties. This represents 98.6% of all investor SFRs in the county.

Despite its massive volume, the 40601 zip code has an investor ownership rate of 15.3%, which is not the highest in the county, indicating a large but diverse housing market.

Higher concentrations of investor ownership are found in smaller, more saturated markets. The 40347 zip code leads with a 22.5% investor ownership rate, followed by 40379 at 21.3%.

This highlights a key distinction between markets with the highest count of investor properties versus those with the highest percentage. It suggests that while the bulk of activity is in 40601, investors have achieved deeper market penetration elsewhere.

The geographic data reveals a clear hub-and-spoke pattern, with one dominant zip code for investor volume surrounded by smaller pockets of higher investor saturation.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 3.17 properties for every one they sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Franklin County are in a strong accumulation phase, consistently buying far more properties than they sell. In Q4 2025, they purchased 57 properties while selling only 18, a buy-to-sell ratio of 3.17x.

This net buying behavior has been a sustained trend throughout the year. For all of 2025, landlords acquired 247 properties and sold just 47, demonstrating a clear strategy of portfolio expansion with a net gain of 200 properties.

The acquisition momentum was even stronger in 2024, when landlords bought 174 properties and sold only 28, resulting in a net gain of 146 properties and a buy-to-sell ratio of 6.21x.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) mirror this net buyer trend but at a drastically smaller scale. They acquired 2 properties and sold 1 in 2025, indicating a slight positive accumulation but minimal market impact.

The transaction data consistently shows that the investor market, driven by small operators, is actively growing and absorbing more housing stock over time rather than divesting.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords participated in 25.8% of all Q4 2025 SFR transactions in Franklin County.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords were involved in 57 of the 221 total SFR transactions, accounting for a 25.8% share of all market activity.

A dramatic pricing disparity was evident across investor tiers. The single institutional purchase was for $106,000, while the average for 35 single-property landlord purchases was $284,563. This 62.7% discount suggests institutions target fundamentally different, lower-cost assets.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) dominated transaction volume, conducting 54 of the 57 total investor transactions (94.7%), reinforcing their role as the primary drivers of market activity.

Mid-tier landlords demonstrate a strong reliance on inter-landlord trading. Those in the two-property (45.5%) and small-medium (50.0%) tiers sourced nearly half of their acquisitions from other landlords, suggesting a liquid secondary market for rental properties.

In contrast, new landlords (Tier 01) and institutional buyers sourced a much smaller share of properties from existing landlords (11.4% and 0.0% respectively), indicating they are primarily buying from the traditional homeowner market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Franklin County's SFR market is defined by small landlords who own 92.3% of rentals and are aggressive net buyers.
Holdings
Investors own 1,907 SFR properties, representing 15.2% of Franklin County's market, with individual investors holding 1,472 properties (77.2%) and companies owning 456 (23.9%).
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords paid a surprising 6.0% premium over homeowners, with an average price of $290,094 versus $273,788, a sharp reversal from significant discounts in prior quarters.
Activity
Landlords purchased 28.1% of all homes sold in Q4 (43 properties), a period which saw 35 new single-property landlords enter the market, signaling strong grassroots growth.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control investor housing with a 92.3% share, while institutional investors (1000+) own a negligible 0.2%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties, marking a clear shift toward professionalization at scale.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 3.17x buy/sell ratio in Q4 (57 buys vs 18 sells), while institutional investors are largely inactive, having added only one net property in all of 2025.
Market Narrative

The investor-owned single-family residential market in Franklin County, KY, is characterized by the profound dominance of small, independent operators. Investors hold 1,907 properties, making up 15.2% of the total SFR housing stock. This portfolio is firmly in the hands of 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who control a commanding 92.3% of all investor-owned homes. In stark contrast, institutional investors with 1,000+ properties have a minimal footprint, owning just 0.2%. The ownership base is primarily individuals (77.2%) rather than companies (23.9%), reinforcing the local, non-corporate nature of the rental market.

Investor behavior in Franklin County is defined by active and consistent accumulation. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 28.1% of all homes sold and demonstrated a strong net-buyer position with a 3.17-to-1 buy/sell ratio. Pricing dynamics were volatile; after securing deep discounts in mid-2025, investors paid a surprising 6.0% premium over traditional homeowners in Q4. This activity is driven almost exclusively by small investors, who accounted for 93.0% of Q4 purchases and included 35 brand-new, single-property landlords entering the market for the first time.

The key takeaway from this data is that Franklin County's single-family rental market is not being consolidated by large corporations but is instead expanding through the activity of local individuals and small businesses. The narrative of 'Wall Street' buying up homes does not apply here. Instead, the market's health and growth are tied to the financial capacity of thousands of small operators who are consistently expanding their portfolios, signaling confidence in the local housing economy. This fragmented ownership structure suggests a competitive rental landscape with deep community roots rather than centralized corporate control.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 06:56 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyFranklin (KY)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison