Floyd (KY) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Floyd (KY) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Floyd (KY)
8,337
Total Investors in Floyd (KY)
2,848
Investor Owned SFR in Floyd (KY)
2,272(27.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,612
SFR Owned
2,003
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
236
SFR Owned
288
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,272 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop investors control 99.2% of Floyd County rentals, acquiring properties at a 27.1% discount to homeowners.
Investors own 2,272 single-family properties in Floyd County, KY, representing 27.3% of the market. This ownership is dominated by small-scale individuals (88.2%), not institutions (0.3%). In Q4, landlords were active buyers, securing 33.3% of all homes sold while paying an average of 27.1% less than traditional homeowners, and continue to be strong net buyers across the county.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 2,272 SFRs in Floyd County (27.3% of the market), with individuals holding 88.2%.
Cash is the overwhelmingly preferred funding method, with 1,976 properties owned outright versus only 296 that are financed. The portfolio is highly focused on rentals, with 2,232 properties (98.2%) classified as rented or non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a sharp 27.1% discount in Q4, paying on average $48,082 less than homeowners.
The landlord purchasing advantage is significant but has been volatile, ranging from a 50.9% discount ($102,675) in Q3 2025 to landlords paying a 1.4% premium in Q2 2025. The data does not provide a price breakdown between individual and company investors.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords were highly active in Q4, purchasing 33.3% of all single-family homes sold.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) drove this activity, accounting for 85.7% of all investor purchases (18 properties). In stark contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties acquired just a single property.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords are the market, controlling an overwhelming 99.2% of investor-owned SFRs.
Institutional investors have a negligible presence, owning just 6 properties, which amounts to only 0.3% of the total investor portfolio. Q4 transaction data shows institutional buyers paid 18.5% less per property than new single-property landlords.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the majority owners across all small-to-medium portfolio tiers in Floyd County.
While individuals are dominant, the share of company-owned properties increases with portfolio size, growing from 8.9% in the single-property tier to 40.0% in the 6-10 property tier. Data does not show a tier where companies become the majority.
Geographic Distribution
The 41653 zip code is the primary hub for investor activity, containing 730 investor-owned properties.
While 41653 leads in volume, the 41643 zip code has the highest market penetration, where investors own 50.0% of all SFRs. Several other zip codes, including 41666 and 41601, also show high concentration rates above 36%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Floyd County are strong net buyers, acquiring 7.8 properties for every one sold in 2025.
This accumulation trend has been consistent, with Q4 2025 showing an even more aggressive 14-to-1 buy/sell ratio (28 buys vs. 2 sells). Institutional investors were marginal net buyers in 2025 (2 buys, 1 sell) after being flat in 2024.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 30.8% of all Q4 transactions, acquiring 28 properties.
Institutional investors demonstrated pricing power, paying 18.5% less than new single-property landlords ($113,400 vs. $139,217). Zero percent of landlord acquisitions in Q4 were from other landlords, indicating all purchases came from the open market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 2,272 SFRs in Floyd County (27.3% of the market), with individuals holding 88.2%.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership constitutes a significant portion of the housing market in Floyd County, with landlords holding 2,272 of the 8,337 total Single-Family Residential properties, a market penetration of 27.3%.

The investor landscape is overwhelmingly composed of individuals rather than corporations. Individual landlords own 2,003 properties, accounting for 88.2% of the investor-owned portfolio, compared to just 288 properties (12.7%) owned by companies.

This individual dominance is also reflected in the entity count, with 2,612 individual landlords compared to 236 company landlords, indicating a market driven by small-scale operators.

Cash transactions are the predominant financing strategy for investors in this market. A remarkable 1,976 properties were acquired with cash, dwarfing the 296 properties that are financed, a ratio of nearly 7-to-1.

The investor portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to rental housing. Of the 2,272 investor-owned SFRs, 2,232 are confirmed as rented, demonstrating a clear focus on generating rental income rather than speculation or secondary home ownership.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a sharp 27.1% discount in Q4, paying on average $48,082 less than homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In the fourth quarter of 2025, investors demonstrated a strong purchasing advantage, acquiring properties for an average price of $129,156, which is 27.1% less than the $177,238 paid by traditional homeowners.

This price gap translates to a substantial average discount of $48,082 per property for landlords, highlighting their ability to identify and secure undervalued assets.

However, this discount has not been consistent throughout the year. In Q3 2025, the discount was even more pronounced at 50.9% ($102,675), while in Q2 landlords paid a slight premium of 1.4% ($2,042) more than homeowners.

The Q1 2025 discount was also significant at 35.9% ($53,719), indicating that while the discount fluctuates, investors consistently purchase at prices below the typical homebuyer in most quarters.

The trend of securing properties below market rate suggests that investors in Floyd County are employing sophisticated deal-sourcing strategies, possibly targeting distressed properties or off-market opportunities not typically available to traditional buyers.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords were highly active in Q4, purchasing 33.3% of all single-family homes sold.
Detailed Findings

Investors played a major role in the Q4 2025 market, acquiring 20 of the 60 total SFRs sold, which represents a 33.3% market share of all purchases.

The bulk of this activity was driven by new and small-scale investors. The single-property tier alone accounted for 16 of the 20 properties (76.2% of the total), purchased by 22 new landlord entities entering the market.

Combined, mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) were responsible for 18 properties, or 85.7% of all landlord acquisitions, reinforcing their dominance in market activity.

Institutional activity was minimal, with investors in the 1,000+ property tier purchasing only one property during the quarter, making up just 4.8% of the landlord total.

This distribution of purchasing activity clearly indicates that the market's growth is fueled by an influx of new, small landlords rather than the expansion of large-scale corporate portfolios.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords are the market, controlling an overwhelming 99.2% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Floyd County is unequivocally controlled by small-scale landlords. Those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) hold a combined 99.2% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of this market, with their 1,942 properties representing 84.0% of the entire investor portfolio, a level of concentration that underscores the fragmented, ground-up nature of local rentals.

In stark contrast to national narratives, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a near-zero footprint, owning just 6 properties in total, which constitutes a mere 0.3% of the investor market share.

The mid-size investor category is also exceptionally small, with landlords owning between 11 and 1,000 properties collectively holding less than 1% of the total portfolio.

This ownership structure reveals a market free from corporate consolidation, where the rental housing supply is provided by a large number of local, small-business-style landlords.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors are the majority owners across all small-to-medium portfolio tiers in Floyd County.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain majority ownership across every small landlord tier. In the entry-level single-property tier, individuals own 1,784 properties, a commanding 91.1% share compared to 8.9% for companies.

A clear trend emerges as portfolios grow: the proportion of company ownership increases systematically. The company share rises from 8.9% for single-property owners to 30.1% for two-property owners, and reaches 40.0% for landlords holding 6-10 properties.

Despite this growth, individuals remain the majority stakeholder even in the 6-10 property tier, holding 18 properties (60.0%) versus 12 for companies (40.0%).

The data does not reveal a crossover point within the provided tiers where companies become the dominant owner type, suggesting that even as investors scale, many in Floyd County prefer to operate under individual ownership.

This pattern indicates a tendency to formalize ownership under a company structure as investment size increases, likely for liability and organizational purposes, but the market's foundation remains with individual proprietors.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 41653 zip code is the primary hub for investor activity, containing 730 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Floyd County is highly concentrated, with the 41653 zip code serving as the epicenter, home to 730 investor-owned properties. This single area accounts for nearly a third of all investor holdings in the county.

The zip code with the highest rate of investor ownership is 41643, where landlords own 50.0% of the single-family housing stock, indicating a market with very high rental penetration.

Significant investor presence is also noted in other areas, with the top five zip codes by ownership percentage all having rates above 33.3%, including 41621 (37.3%), 41666 (36.5%), and 41601 (36.5%).

There is an overlap between high-volume and high-penetration areas. For instance, 41666 appears in the top five for both absolute count (80 properties) and ownership rate (36.5%), signaling it as a key target market for investors.

This geographic distribution highlights specific neighborhoods where rental housing is a dominant feature of the local market, driven by concentrated investor purchasing.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords in Floyd County are strong net buyers, acquiring 7.8 properties for every one sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Floyd County are in a clear and aggressive accumulation phase. Across 2025, they purchased 125 SFR properties while selling only 16, resulting in a strong net-buyer position and a buy-to-sell ratio of 7.8-to-1.

This buying momentum accelerated in the most recent quarter, Q4 2025, where landlords acquired 28 properties and sold just 2, pushing the ratio to 14-to-1.

The net-buying trend is persistent over time, with 2024 also showing a positive net acquisition of 73 properties (97 buys vs. 24 sells).

The behavior of institutional investors is far more muted and balanced. In 2025, they were marginal net buyers with 2 purchases and 1 sale. This followed a neutral 2024 where they bought and sold an equal number of properties (4).

This data illustrates that the market's expansion is being driven by the broader landlord community, particularly smaller investors, while the largest players are not significantly expanding their local portfolios.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 30.8% of all Q4 transactions, acquiring 28 properties.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords were a significant force in the market, participating in 28 of the 91 total SFR transactions, for a market share of 30.8%.

A clear pricing disparity exists based on investor size. The single institutional purchase was made at $113,400, while the 22 new single-property landlords paid an average of $139,217, a premium of 18.5%. This suggests more experienced or larger buyers secure more favorable pricing.

Mom-and-pop landlords dominated transaction volumes, with Tiers 01-04 responsible for 25 of the 28 landlord purchases during the quarter.

The market showed no signs of internal churn among investors. One hundred percent of landlord purchases were sourced from outside the investor community, as the 'Bought From Landlords' metric was zero for all tiers.

This indicates that investors are expanding the rental pool by acquiring properties from homeowners or other sources, rather than trading existing rental assets among themselves.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small 'mom-and-pop' investors control 99.2% of Floyd County rentals and are net buyers, acquiring homes at a 27.1% discount.
Holdings
Landlords own 2,272 single-family properties in Floyd County, KY, representing 27.3% of the market. Individual investors hold a dominant 2,003 (88.2%) of these properties, with companies owning the remaining 288 (12.7%).
Pricing
In Q4, landlords paid an average of 27.1% less than traditional homeowners, securing properties for $129,156 compared to the homeowner price of $177,238, an average discount of $48,082.
Activity
Landlords purchased 33.3% of all homes sold in Q4 (20 properties), a period which saw the entrance of 22 new single-property landlord entities into the Floyd County market.
Market Share
The investor market is defined by small operators, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 99.2% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1,000+ properties) own just 0.3%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority property owners across all smaller portfolio tiers, though company ownership share grows from 8.9% in the single-property tier to 40.0% for portfolios of 6-10 properties.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 7.8 properties for every one sold in 2025 (125 buys vs. 16 sells), while institutional investors remained nearly neutral (2 buys vs. 1 sell).
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Floyd County, KY, is fundamentally a local, small-scale phenomenon. Investors own 2,272 properties, a significant 27.3% of the total market, but this is not the work of large corporations. Instead, individual landlords own a commanding 88.2% of these homes. The market structure is exceptionally fragmented; 'mom-and-pop' landlords with 1-10 properties control an overwhelming 99.2% of the investor-owned housing stock, while institutional players with over 1,000 properties have a negligible footprint of just 0.3%.

Investor behavior is characterized by active and strategic acquisition. In Q4 2025, landlords purchased one-third of all homes sold, demonstrating a keen ability to find value by paying an average of 27.1% less than traditional homeowners. This activity is part of a broader accumulation trend, with landlords across the county acting as strong net buyers, purchasing 7.8 properties for every one they sold in 2025. This growth is fueled by new entrants, as 22 new single-property landlords joined the market in the last quarter alone.

The key takeaway for the Floyd County housing market is that its rental landscape is shaped and expanded by a large base of community-level investors, not distant corporations. These landlords leverage local knowledge and financial agility—often purchasing with cash—to secure properties at a discount and steadily grow the rental housing supply. The market's dynamic is one of continuous, ground-level expansion, suggesting that for the foreseeable future, local individuals will remain the primary providers of single-family rental homes.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 06:56 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyFloyd (KY)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4