Calloway (KY) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Calloway (KY) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Calloway (KY)
8,520
Total Investors in Calloway (KY)
2,148
Investor Owned SFR in Calloway (KY)
1,831(21.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,004
SFR Owned
1,665
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
144
SFR Owned
191
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,831 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Calloway County, Acquiring 32.3% of Q4 Homes and Paying a Premium
In Calloway County, investors own 1,831 SFR properties (21.5% of the market), with small mom-and-pop landlords controlling 95.4% of that inventory. In Q4 2025, landlords were aggressive net buyers, purchasing 32.3% of all homes sold and surprisingly paying a 9.3% premium over traditional homeowners. The market shows zero presence from large institutional investors, highlighting a landscape driven entirely by local, individual capital.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,831 SFRs, with individual landlords controlling a dominant 90.9% of the portfolio.
Cash is the preferred method of ownership, with cash-bought properties (1,355) outnumbering financed ones (476) by nearly 3-to-1. The vast majority of the portfolio is rental-focused, with 1,784 properties identified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a surprising 9.3% premium in Q4, averaging $296,365 per home.
This Q4 premium of $25,099 marks a sharp reversal from Q3, when landlords secured a 21.8% discount. The price gap has been highly volatile, swinging from deep discounts to significant premiums within six months.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 32.3% of all Q4 home sales, with 31 properties purchased.
Mom-and-pop investors were responsible for 100% of landlord acquisitions, with zero properties purchased by institutional firms. New market entrants were highly active, as single-property landlords acquired 26 homes, representing 83.9% of all investor buying activity.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 95.4% of Calloway County's investor-owned SFR housing.
Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have zero presence, owning 0.0% of the market. The most common investor is the single-property landlord, with this tier alone accounting for 69.3% of all investor-held homes.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owner in the 11-20 property tier, despite individual dominance overall.
While individuals own over 90% of properties in portfolios under 10 units, companies own 58.1% of homes in the 11-20 property tier. This marks the clear crossover point where corporate structures become preferred for managing larger portfolios.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is most concentrated in zip code 42049, with 104 landlord-owned properties.
However, the highest rate of investor penetration is in zip code 42076, where landlords own 44.3% of all SFRs. Zip code 42049 follows with a high ownership rate of 29.0%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 47 properties while selling only 2 in Q4 2025.
This results in a staggering 23.5x buy-to-sell ratio, demonstrating a strong appetite for acquisition and portfolio growth. This net-buyer trend has been consistent, with landlords purchasing 216 homes and selling just 28 throughout 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlord-involved transactions accounted for 30.9% of all market activity in Q4 2025.
Notably, 0% of landlord purchases were sourced from other landlords, indicating they are acquiring properties from the traditional homeowner market. Q4 pricing varied significantly by tier, with small landlords (3-5 properties) paying the highest average price at $382,000.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,831 SFRs, with individual landlords controlling a dominant 90.9% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

In Calloway County, landlords hold a significant 21.5% of the single-family residential market, totaling 1,831 properties.

The investor landscape is overwhelmingly dominated by individuals rather than corporations. Individual landlords own 1,665 properties, accounting for 90.9% of the investor-owned housing stock, while companies own the remaining 191 properties (10.4%).

This individual dominance extends to the entity level, where 2,004 of the 2,148 landlords (93.3%) are individuals, reinforcing the 'mom-and-pop' nature of the local rental market.

Cash transactions are the primary driver of portfolio building in this market. Landlords own 1,355 properties outright, which is nearly three times the number of financed properties (476), signaling a well-capitalized and low-leverage investor base.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards generating rental income, with 1,784 of the 1,831 properties classified as rented, indicating a strong focus on buy-and-hold strategies.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a surprising 9.3% premium in Q4, averaging $296,365 per home.
Detailed Findings

In a notable market shift, landlords in Calloway County paid more than traditional homeowners in Q4 2025, with an average acquisition price of $296,365 compared to the homeowner average of $271,266.

This represents a significant 9.3% premium, or $25,099 more per property, challenging the common assumption that investors always secure discounts.

The Q4 premium is a dramatic reversal of the trend seen in the prior quarter. In Q3 2025, landlords enjoyed a steep 21.8% discount, paying $52,995 less than homeowners on average, highlighting extreme volatility in pricing dynamics.

This pricing inversion was also seen earlier in the year, with landlords paying a 6.4% premium in Q1 2025 before securing a 9.6% discount in Q2.

The data indicates that landlord purchasing power fluctuates significantly, suggesting they may be competing fiercely for limited inventory or targeting higher-value properties in certain periods, leading them to outbid traditional buyers.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 32.3% of all Q4 home sales, with 31 properties purchased.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accelerated in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 31 of the 96 single-family homes sold, capturing a substantial 32.3% of the total market.

The entirety of this purchasing activity came from small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounted for 100% of the 31 properties acquired by investors, with no activity from mid-size or institutional players.

New and aspiring landlords were the primary drivers of Q4 activity. The single-property (Tier 01) category alone saw 40 distinct entities purchase 26 properties, making up 83.9% of all landlord acquisitions.

Beyond first-time buyers, existing small landlords also expanded their portfolios, with those in the 3-5 property tier adding 4 homes (12.9% of purchases) and two-property owners adding one home (3.2%).

The complete absence of institutional buyers (Tier 09) in Q4 underscores that Calloway County's real estate investment market is exclusively local and driven by small-scale capital.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 95.4% of Calloway County's investor-owned SFR housing.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Calloway County is defined by small, local landlords, with mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) owning a commanding 95.4% of all investor-held SFRs.

This market structure defies the narrative of corporate dominance, as institutional investors (Tier 09) have no footprint, holding 0.0% of the investor-owned properties.

The foundation of the rental market rests on the smallest investors. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) represent the largest segment by a wide margin, owning 1,335 properties, which accounts for 69.3% of the total investor portfolio.

Ownership concentration rapidly declines in larger tiers. Landlords with 2-10 properties collectively own 26.1% of the inventory, while all tiers above 10 properties combined hold just 4.6%.

The data clearly illustrates a highly fragmented market where ownership is distributed across many small-scale participants rather than consolidated among a few large entities.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owner in the 11-20 property tier, despite individual dominance overall.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smaller portfolio tiers in Calloway County. In the single-property tier, individuals own 1,245 homes (92.0%), establishing the baseline for mom-and-pop ownership.

This pattern of individual control persists through the 2-property (90.5% individual), 3-5 property (91.4% individual), and 6-10 property (92.7% individual) tiers.

A significant structural shift occurs at the 11-20 property tier. At this level, companies take majority ownership, holding 36 properties (58.1%) compared to 26 properties (41.9%) held by individuals.

This crossover signals the point at which investors typically adopt a corporate structure for liability protection, financing, and operational efficiency as their portfolios scale.

Interestingly, in the 21-50 property tier, ownership reverts to 100% individual control, although this is based on a smaller sample size of 24 properties, suggesting that even at a mid-size level, some investors prefer to operate personally.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is most concentrated in zip code 42049, with 104 landlord-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals specific pockets of high investor concentration within Calloway County. By sheer volume, zip code 42049 is the top region for investors, containing 104 landlord-owned SFR properties.

Following 42049, the next most active areas by property count are 42020 (69 properties) and 42036 (32 properties), indicating that investor focus is not evenly distributed.

When analyzing by ownership rate, a different leader emerges. Zip code 42076 has the highest market penetration, with investors owning 44.3% of its single-family housing stock.

The areas with the highest property counts also feature high ownership rates. Zip code 42049, the leader in count, also has the third-highest rate at 29.0%, while 42071 (20.9%) and 42040 (20.0%) also show significant investor presence.

This distinction between high-volume and high-penetration areas highlights different market dynamics, from larger regions with many opportunities to smaller areas where investors have a more dominant market share.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 47 properties while selling only 2 in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Transactional data shows Calloway County landlords are in a strong accumulation phase. In Q4 2025, they were aggressive net buyers, with 47 acquisitions compared to only 2 sales.

This activity translates to a buy-to-sell ratio of 23.5-to-1, signaling overwhelming confidence in the local market and a clear strategy of portfolio expansion over divestment.

The net-buyer trend is not a recent phenomenon but a consistent pattern throughout the year. For all of 2025, landlords purchased 216 properties while selling only 28, maintaining a high annual buy/sell ratio of 7.7.

This pattern of accumulation was also evident in 2024, when investors bought 135 properties and sold only 16, resulting in a net gain of 119 properties for the year.

With no institutional transactions recorded, all historical buying and selling activity is attributable to smaller, local landlords who continue to build their holdings in the county.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlord-involved transactions accounted for 30.9% of all market activity in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords were a major force in the Calloway County real estate market, participating in 47 of the 152 total SFR transactions, which constitutes a 30.9% market share.

A key finding from the quarter's activity is that 100% of investor acquisitions came from outside the investor community. With 0% of purchases 'Bought From Landlords', it is clear that investors are sourcing their inventory directly from homeowners and the open market.

New entrants and the smallest investors drove transaction volume, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) responsible for 40 of the 47 investor transactions (85.1%).

Purchase prices in Q4 varied significantly across tiers. Small landlords in the 3-5 property tier paid the highest average price at $382,000, substantially more than the Tier 01 average of $291,893 and the Tier 02 average of $165,000.

This price disparity suggests different acquisition strategies, with slightly larger landlords possibly targeting higher-value assets or facing more competition for move-in-ready properties compared to first-time investors.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Calloway County, Controlling 95.4% of Investor Housing and Driving Market Activity
Holdings
Investors own 1,831 single-family properties in Calloway County, representing 21.5% of the total market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individuals, who own 1,665 properties (90.9%) compared to just 191 (10.4%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In a surprising reversal, landlords paid a 9.3% premium over traditional homeowners in Q4 2025, with an average price of $296,365 versus the homeowner price of $271,266.
Activity
Landlords were highly active in Q4 2025, purchasing 31 properties and capturing 32.3% of all market sales. This activity was driven by new entrants, with single-property landlords acquiring 26 of those homes.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control of the market, owning 95.4% of all investor-held SFRs. In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have zero presence in the county.
Ownership Type
While individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, companies become the majority owner (58.1%) at the 11-20 property tier, marking the crossover point for adopting corporate structures.
Transactions
Landlords are in a strong accumulation phase, acting as net buyers with a 23.5x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 (47 buys vs. 2 sells). Institutional investors were completely inactive, recording zero transactions.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in Calloway County, KY, is defined by the overwhelming dominance of small, local participants. Investors own 1,831 single-family homes, comprising 21.5% of the market, but this share is not controlled by large corporations. Instead, individual 'mom-and-pop' landlords own 90.9% of these properties, with those holding 1-10 properties controlling a massive 95.4% of the investor-owned inventory. The market has zero footprint from institutional investors, painting a picture of a highly fragmented and localized rental economy driven by individual capital.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 was characterized by aggressive acquisition. Landlords purchased 32.3% of all homes sold and were strong net buyers with a 23.5-to-1 buy-sell ratio. In a surprising turn, these investors paid a 9.3% premium over traditional homeowners, reversing a trend of securing discounts seen in previous quarters. This suggests intense competition for limited inventory, with new single-property landlords being particularly active, acquiring 83.9% of all properties bought by investors during the quarter. All purchases were sourced from the open market, not from other landlords.

The key takeaway from this data is that Calloway County's housing market is heavily influenced by a robust and growing class of local landlords who are actively expanding their portfolios. Their willingness to pay a premium and their preference for cash purchases indicate a well-capitalized investor base that is confident in the long-term value of the local market. This dynamic creates a competitive environment for traditional homebuyers and ensures that the local rental supply remains in the hands of small-scale, community-based owners rather than distant corporations.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 06:46 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyCalloway (KY)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail