Bullitt (KY) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Bullitt (KY) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Bullitt (KY)
25,359
Total Investors in Bullitt (KY)
503
Investor Owned SFR in Bullitt (KY)
348(1.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
454
SFR Owned
303
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
49
SFR Owned
55
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 348 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Bullitt County, Paying 22% More Than Institutions While Rapidly Expanding Portfolios
Investors own 348 SFR properties (1.4% of the market), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a commanding 92.9% versus a minimal 1.4% for institutions. In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 17.6% of all homes for sale and were aggressive net buyers, though new small investors paid a 22.4% premium compared to their institutional counterparts.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 348 SFRs in Bullitt County, with individuals holding a dominant 87.1%.
Investor portfolios are almost evenly split between financed (172) and cash-owned (176) properties. An estimated 84.8% of the investor-owned portfolio (295 properties) is actively rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a 3.7% premium over homeowners in Q4, a sharp reversal of prior discount trends.
The price gap is highly volatile, shifting from a 10.7% landlord discount in Q3 to a 3.7% premium in Q4. This trend reversal saw landlords move from paying less to paying significantly more than traditional buyers within a single quarter.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 17.6% of all Q4 home sales in Bullitt County, purchasing 43 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords drove Q4 activity, accounting for 86.0% (37 properties) of all investor purchases. Institutional investors were far less active, acquiring just 3 properties (7.0%) in the same period.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) own a commanding 92.9% of all landlord-held SFRs.
In Q4, new single-property landlords paid significantly more for homes, averaging $351,292, while institutions paid 22.4% less at $272,500. Despite their minimal holdings, institutions remain net buyers for the year.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Data on pricing differences between individual and company buyers is not available for Bullitt County.
Companies and individuals reach an ownership equilibrium in the 11-20 property tier, where each holds a 50.0% share. Individuals overwhelmingly dominate smaller portfolios, controlling 92.3% of single-property holdings.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in zip codes 40165 (141 properties) and 40047 (111 properties).
The 40110 zip code shows an extremely high investor ownership rate of 41.9%, a major outlier in the county. In contrast, areas with the highest property counts, like 40165, have a low ownership rate of just 1.3%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Bullitt County are aggressive net buyers, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 8.8x in Q4 2025.
Landlord purchasing has more than doubled year-over-year, jumping from 100 acquisitions in all of 2024 to 232 in 2025. In contrast, institutional investors are only cautious net buyers, adding 2 properties on net for the year 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 16.3% of all property transactions in Q4, totaling 62 acquisitions.
Institutional buyers secured a significant 22.4% discount compared to new single-property landlords in Q4. Inter-landlord trading was minimal, with new investors sourcing just 3.9% of properties from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 348 SFRs in Bullitt County, with individuals holding a dominant 87.1%.
Detailed Findings

In Bullitt County, investor ownership represents a niche segment of the overall housing market, with 348 single-family residential properties comprising just 1.4% of the total 25,359 SFRs.

The investor landscape is overwhelmingly dominated by individuals rather than corporations. Individual landlords own 303 properties, accounting for 87.1% of the investor-owned market, compared to just 55 properties (15.8%) owned by companies.

This individual dominance is also reflected in entity counts, with 454 individual landlords compared to only 49 company landlords, a ratio of more than 9 to 1.

The primary use for these properties is clear, with 295 of the 348 homes (84.8%) identified as rented, confirming a strong focus on generating rental income.

Investors in the area utilize a balanced financing strategy. The portfolio is nearly evenly split between properties that are financed (172) and those owned outright with cash (176), indicating varied approaches to leverage and capital deployment.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a 3.7% premium over homeowners in Q4, a sharp reversal of prior discount trends.
Detailed Findings

In a surprising reversal of the typical pattern, landlords paid more than traditional homeowners in Q4 2025, with an average acquisition price of $331,328 compared to the homeowner average of $319,619. This represents an $11,709 premium per property, or 3.7%.

This Q4 premium marks a significant and volatile shift in market dynamics. It follows two consecutive quarters where landlords enjoyed substantial discounts, including a 10.7% discount in Q3 ($273,339 vs $306,220) and a 5.3% discount in Q2 ($309,795 vs $326,987).

The first quarter of 2025 also saw landlords paying a premium, and an even larger one at 12.9% ($348,720 vs $308,857), indicating unpredictable and rapidly changing competitive pressures between investors and homeowners.

Overall property values have shown strong appreciation. The average landlord acquisition price during the 2020-2023 period was $241,966, which has since risen to a 2025 yearly average of $312,784.

The fluctuation between discounts and premiums suggests that investor purchasing strategy in Bullitt County is highly responsive to quarterly market conditions, possibly targeting different property types or competing more aggressively in periods of low inventory.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 17.6% of all Q4 home sales in Bullitt County, purchasing 43 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investors represented a significant force in the Q4 2025 market, acquiring 43 of the 245 total SFR properties sold, which amounts to a 17.6% market share of all purchases.

The activity was overwhelmingly driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) purchased 37 homes, making up 86.0% of all landlord acquisitions for the quarter.

A notable surge of new market participants was observed, with 50 new single-property entities entering the market and acquiring 33 properties. This group alone accounted for 76.7% of all investor purchases in Q4.

In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) had a minimal impact, purchasing only 3 properties, a 7.0% share of investor activity. This highlights the localized, small-investor nature of the market.

Mid-size investors also played a role, with those in the 3-5 and 21-50 property tiers acquiring a combined 7 properties, indicating some level of portfolio growth among existing landlords.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) own a commanding 92.9% of all landlord-held SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure of investor-held real estate in Bullitt County is definitively characterized by small-scale landlords. Investors with portfolios of 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) collectively own 92.9% of the entire investor SFR stock.

The market is highly fragmented, with the single-property tier alone accounting for 279 properties, or 79.0% of all investor-owned homes. This underscores the grassroots nature of the local rental market.

Institutional ownership is nearly non-existent. The 1,000+ property tier (Tier 09) controls just 5 properties, representing a mere 1.4% of the investor market and challenging any narrative of corporate dominance.

A significant gap exists between the smallest and largest investors. Mid-size and large landlords (portfolios of 11-1,000) collectively own only 20 properties, or 5.8% of the total, indicating a lack of mid-market consolidation.

This distribution confirms that the supply of single-family rental housing in Bullitt County is overwhelmingly provided by a large number of individual, local investors rather than a small number of large corporations.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Data on pricing differences between individual and company buyers is not available for Bullitt County.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the foundation of the Bullitt County rental market, with their ownership concentrated in smaller portfolios. They own 92.3% of all single-property investor homes and 100% of two-property portfolios.

As portfolio sizes increase, company ownership becomes more prevalent. The share of company-owned properties grows from just 7.7% in the single-property tier to 40.0% in the 6-10 property tier.

The crossover point, where corporate structures become as common as individual ownership, occurs in the 11-20 property tier. In this segment, ownership is split evenly, with individuals and companies each holding 4 properties (50.0%).

This trend suggests a clear life cycle for investors in the region: individuals are more likely to start and manage smaller portfolios, while scaling to a dozen or more properties often coincides with incorporation.

While individuals own the vast majority of properties overall (303 vs. 55 for companies), the data shows that company ownership is the preferred structure for building larger, more scalable rental businesses in the area.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in zip codes 40165 (141 properties) and 40047 (111 properties).
Detailed Findings

Investor holdings in Bullitt County are highly concentrated geographically, with just two zip codes, 40165 and 40047, containing 252 of the 348 total investor-owned properties (72.4%).

A stark contrast exists between areas with the highest number of investor properties and those with the highest investor penetration rate. Zip code 40165 has the most investor properties (141) but a very low ownership rate of 1.3%.

The 40110 zip code stands out as a dramatic outlier with an investor ownership rate of 41.9%. This suggests a unique local market, potentially dominated by rental-specific housing stock or a build-to-rent community, that is fundamentally different from the rest of the county.

Outside of the 40110 outlier, investor penetration is modest across the county, with top regions like 40013 and 40272 showing rates of only 3.5% and 2.8%, respectively.

This data reveals two distinct investor strategies at play: a volume-based approach in larger, homeowner-dominated zip codes and a highly targeted, high-concentration approach in the niche market of 40110.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords in Bullitt County are aggressive net buyers, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 8.8x in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Bullitt County are in a distinct and aggressive accumulation phase, consistently buying far more properties than they sell. In Q4 2025, they purchased 62 SFRs while divesting only 7, resulting in a net gain of 55 properties and a buy-to-sell ratio of nearly 9 to 1.

The pace of acquisitions has accelerated dramatically in the past year. Landlords acquired 232 properties throughout 2025, which is more than double the 100 properties purchased during all of 2024.

This net-buyer trend has been consistent throughout 2025, with strong net gains in every quarter, indicating sustained confidence and a long-term bullish outlook on the local rental market.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) exhibit far more conservative behavior. After being net neutral in 2024 (4 buys, 4 sells), they became only modest net buyers in 2025 with a net gain of just 2 properties (4 buys, 2 sells).

The transactional data clearly shows that the market's rapid growth is fueled by smaller investors, while the largest national players are making only minimal, cautious investments in the area.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 16.3% of all property transactions in Q4, totaling 62 acquisitions.
Detailed Findings

A striking price disparity was evident among investor types in Q4. New single-property landlords paid the highest average price at $351,292, whereas institutional investors acquired properties for an average of just $272,500.

This $78,792 price gap highlights a 22.4% institutional discount compared to market newcomers. This suggests that larger, more experienced buyers may have superior deal-sourcing methods or target undervalued assets more effectively.

Transaction volume in Q4 was dominated by mom-and-pop investors. The single-property tier alone was responsible for 51 of the 62 total investor transactions (82.3%), reinforcing their role as the primary drivers of market activity.

The market for investor-to-investor sales is very thin. Only 3.9% of properties (2 out of 51) bought by single-property investors were purchased from other landlords, indicating that the vast majority of acquisitions come from the traditional homeowner market.

The high prices paid by new entrants could be a sign of intense competition for desirable rental properties, potentially leading new investors to pay a premium to enter the Bullitt County market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Bullitt County, Paying 22% More Than Institutions While Rapidly Expanding Portfolios
Holdings
Investors own 348 SFR properties, representing 1.4% of the Bullitt County market, with individual 'mom-and-pop' landlords overwhelmingly dominant, holding 87.1% of the portfolio (303 properties) compared to 15.8% for companies (55 properties).
Pricing
In a reversal of typical trends, landlords paid a 3.7% premium over traditional homeowners in Q4 2025, averaging $331,328. New single-property investors paid the most ($351,292), a full 22.4% more than institutional buyers ($272,500).
Activity
Landlords significantly increased their market presence in Q4 2025, purchasing 43 homes, which accounted for 17.6% of all SFR sales. The market saw a surge of new entrants, with 50 new single-property landlords acquiring 33 of these homes.
Market Share
The investor market in Bullitt County is highly fragmented, with small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling a commanding 92.9% of all investor-owned housing. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a minimal 1.4% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors form the backbone of the rental market, owning 92.3% of single-property portfolios, but their dominance wanes as portfolio size increases. Companies achieve ownership parity in the 11-20 property tier and are presumed to be the majority in larger portfolios.
Transactions
Landlords are in a strong accumulation phase, acting as aggressive net buyers with an 8.86x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 (62 buys vs. 7 sells). Institutional investors are far more cautious, operating as modest net buyers for the year.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Bullitt County, KY, is fundamentally a story of the small, local landlord. Investors own a modest 348 properties, just 1.4% of the total single-family housing market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties), who own 92.9% of all investor-held homes. Individual landlords vastly outnumber companies, holding 87.1% of properties and reinforcing that the local rental market is highly fragmented and community-based, with institutional investors holding a nearly negligible 1.4% share.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 was defined by aggressive acquisition and a curious pricing dynamic. Landlords purchased 17.6% of all homes sold, driven by a wave of 50 new single-property investors. This activity occurred at a premium, with new mom-and-pop buyers paying an average of $351,292—a striking 22.4% more than the $272,500 paid by more disciplined institutional buyers. Overall, investors are in a strong accumulation phase, buying nearly nine properties for every one they sold in the fourth quarter, signaling deep confidence in the local market's future.

The key takeaway for the Bullitt County housing market is that its growth is being fueled from the ground up. The narrative is not one of Wall Street consolidation but of accelerated purchasing by local individuals, who are competing fiercely and paying top dollar to enter or expand within the market. This intense demand from new entrants may be contributing to price inflation at the entry-level, while the cautious, discount-oriented approach of institutions suggests they perceive risk differently. The defining trend is the rapid, premium-priced expansion of small portfolios, shaping the future of the local rental landscape.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 06:45 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyBullitt (KY)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison