Gove (KS) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Gove (KS) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Gove (KS)
885
Total Investors in Gove (KS)
638
Investor Owned SFR in Gove (KS)
491(55.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
583
SFR Owned
429
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
55
SFR Owned
63
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 491 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Gove County Investors Hold 55.5% of Homes in a Completely Stagnant Market
Investors own 491 SFR properties in Gove County, KS, representing a staggering 55.5% of the total market, with small mom-and-pop landlords controlling 99.8% of this portfolio. The market is defined by a complete lack of sales activity, as zero SFR properties were purchased by landlords or homeowners in Q4 2025, signaling a deeply entrenched buy-and-hold environment.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 55.5% of Gove County homes; 87% are held by individuals.
All 491 investor-owned properties were acquired with cash, with zero properties financed. The portfolio is overwhelmingly rental-focused, with 486 of the 491 properties (99.0%) designated as non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No recent sales data exists, indicating an extremely illiquid housing market.
There were no recorded landlord or homeowner transactions in Q4 2025, preventing any price comparison. The 2020-2023 period also shows zero landlord acquisitions, highlighting a prolonged period of market inactivity.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords made zero SFR purchases in Q4 2025, mirroring a market-wide halt.
With 0 total SFR sales in the county, landlords' market share of purchases was 0.0%. Consequently, no new mom-and-pop or institutional investors entered the market this quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) control 99.8% of Gove County's rental stock.
Single-property landlords alone account for 79.8% of all investor-owned homes, with 402 properties. Institutional investors with 1000+ properties have zero presence in this market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors dominate every portfolio tier; companies never gain majority.
Even in the largest local tier (6-10 properties), individuals own 76.2% of the homes. Companies maintain a small but consistent minority share across all tiers, from 10.9% to 23.8%.
Geographic Distribution
Investor ownership rates exceed 70% in multiple Gove County zip codes.
The zip codes 67738, 67737, and 67736 show investor penetration of 77.0%, 73.0%, and 70.3% respectively. The area with the most investor properties, 67752 (182 homes), has a lower but still substantial rate of 43.0%.
Historical Transactions
No historical transaction data indicates a long-term buy-and-hold market.
The absence of buy/sell records for landlords prevents analysis of net buyer status or inter-landlord trading. This lack of churn suggests investors rarely sell properties in Gove County.
Current Quarter Transactions
Zero landlord transactions occurred in Q4 2025, reflecting a frozen market.
Landlords' share of market transactions was 0.0% as there were no sales at all. This inactivity spans across all investor tiers, from mom-and-pop to larger owners.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 55.5% of Gove County homes; 87% are held by individuals.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Gove County, KS is exceptionally high, with landlords holding 491 of the 885 Single-Family Residential properties, a market penetration of 55.5%.

The market is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors, who own 429 properties, constituting 87.4% of the investor-owned portfolio, compared to just 63 properties (12.8%) owned by companies.

A striking feature of this market is its financing structure; 100% of the 491 investor-owned properties are owned outright with cash, as there are zero recorded financed properties.

The investor portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to rentals, with 486 properties classified as non-owner-occupied, representing 99.0% of all investor holdings.

The landlord landscape mirrors the property ownership split, with 583 individual landlords making up the vast majority compared to just 55 company landlords operating in the county.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No recent sales data exists, indicating an extremely illiquid housing market.
Detailed Findings

A complete absence of sales transactions in Q4 2025 for both landlords and traditional homeowners makes any direct price comparison impossible.

The lack of recent sales activity points to an extremely illiquid and stable housing market, where properties are rarely traded.

Historical data further reinforces this trend, with zero properties recorded as purchased by landlords between 2020 and 2023.

This sustained lack of transactional data suggests a market dominated by long-term buy-and-hold strategies rather than active buying and selling.

Consequently, it is not possible to analyze price trends, appreciation, or the typical discount landlords might achieve in more active markets.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Landlords made zero SFR purchases in Q4 2025, mirroring a market-wide halt.
Detailed Findings

The fourth quarter of 2025 saw a complete standstill in Gove County's real estate market, with zero Single-Family Residential properties purchased by any buyer type.

As a result, landlord acquisitions for the quarter stood at 0, accounting for 0.0% of all market activity.

This lack of activity means there were no new entrants into the landlord market, with zero single-property investors (Tier 01) making purchases.

Both mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) and institutional investors (Tier 09) recorded zero purchases, reflecting the market-wide inactivity.

The data indicates a deeply static market where inventory is not turning over, preventing any new investment activity in the recent period.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) control 99.8% of Gove County's rental stock.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Gove County is the epitome of a mom-and-pop market, with landlords owning 1-10 properties controlling a combined 99.8% of all investor-held SFRs.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the bedrock of this market, owning 402 properties, which represents a massive 79.8% share of the entire investor portfolio.

The next largest tiers are also small-scale, with two-property landlords holding an 11.3% share and those with 3-10 properties collectively owning the remaining 8.8%.

There is virtually no presence from larger investors; the medium-large tier (51-100 properties) holds just a single property (0.2%).

Institutional investors (Tier 09) are entirely absent from Gove County, underscoring its character as a market exclusively for small, local landlords.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
Individual investors dominate every portfolio tier; companies never gain majority.
Detailed Findings

Individual landlords are the definitive majority owners across every single investor tier in Gove County, with no crossover point where companies take control.

In the foundational single-property tier, individuals own 359 of the 402 properties, an 89.1% share, compared to 10.9% for companies.

This pattern of individual dominance continues up the scale; individuals own 84.2% of two-property portfolios and 82.6% of portfolios sized 3-5.

Even in the largest active tier in the county (6-10 properties), individuals own 16 of the 21 properties, a commanding 76.2% share.

While companies have a presence in all tiers, their share remains a distinct minority, peaking at just 23.8% in the 6-10 property tier, confirming the market is driven by personal holdings rather than corporate investment strategies.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor ownership rates exceed 70% in multiple Gove County zip codes.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership is intensely concentrated in specific Gove County communities, with three zip codes showing landlord ownership rates above 70%.

The zip code 67738 leads with the highest penetration, where investors own 114 properties, representing 77.0% of the area's SFR housing stock.

Following closely are 67737, with a 73.0% investor ownership rate (111 properties), and 67736, with a 70.3% rate (52 properties).

The zip code with the highest absolute number of investor-owned homes, 67752 with 182 properties, has a comparatively lower but still very high ownership rate of 43.0%.

This data reveals hyper-local pockets where rental properties, rather than owner-occupied homes, form the vast majority of the residential landscape.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Key Insight
No historical transaction data indicates a long-term buy-and-hold market.
Detailed Findings

The complete lack of historical transaction data for Gove County landlords signals a market defined by long-term holds rather than active trading.

Without buy and sell records, it is impossible to determine if landlords are net buyers or sellers, or to calculate a buy/sell ratio.

This absence of data suggests that market churn is extremely low or nonexistent, with property owners holding onto their assets for extended periods.

Similarly, analysis of inter-landlord transactions is not possible, but the static nature of the market implies such activity is rare.

The data paints a picture of ultimate market stability, where the existing landlord base remains unchanged over time with few, if any, properties changing hands.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Zero landlord transactions occurred in Q4 2025, reflecting a frozen market.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords were involved in zero transactions, as the total number of SFR transactions in Gove County was zero.

This resulted in landlords having a 0.0% share of all market transactions for the quarter.

The inactivity was universal across all investor sizes, with mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) recording zero transactions.

Because there were no purchases, it's not possible to analyze buying patterns, such as the average purchase price by tier or the rate of inter-landlord trading.

The Q4 data confirms a completely frozen transaction market where no properties were bought or sold by investors or any other party.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Gove County Investors Own 55.5% of Homes Amid a Completely Frozen Sales Market
Holdings
In Gove County, KS, landlords own 491 SFR properties, representing a majority 55.5% of the market's 885 homes. Ownership is dominated by individual investors, who hold 429 properties (87.4%), while companies own the remaining 63 (12.8%).
Pricing
A lack of any recorded sales in Q4 2025 for either landlords or traditional homeowners makes a direct price comparison impossible and highlights the market's extreme illiquidity.
Activity
The market was completely inactive in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 0 properties, accounting for 0.0% of all sales. No new single-property landlords entered the Gove County market.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control, owning 99.8% of all investor-held housing. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have no presence in the county.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the dominant owners across all portfolio sizes in Gove County. Unlike in many other markets, there is no tier at which companies become the majority owners.
Transactions
With zero buys and zero sells recorded in recent periods, landlords in Gove County are neither net buyers nor sellers; the market is characterized by a complete absence of transactional activity.
Market Narrative

The real estate landscape in Gove County, KS is defined by an exceptionally high concentration of investor ownership within a uniquely static market. Landlords own 491 Single-Family Residential properties, a staggering 55.5% of the county's total SFR stock. This market is overwhelmingly composed of small-scale, individual investors, who own 87.4% of the rental portfolio. The structure is almost entirely mom-and-pop, with those owning 1-10 properties controlling 99.8% of all investor-held homes, while institutional capital is completely absent.

Investor behavior in Gove County is characterized by long-term holds and a complete lack of recent sales activity. The market saw zero SFR purchases by landlords or homeowners in Q4 2025, underscoring its extreme illiquidity. This transactional halt prevents any analysis of pricing advantages or recent trends. Furthermore, the entire investor portfolio of 491 properties is owned with cash, with no financed assets, pointing to a stable, debt-free ownership base that is not pressured to transact.

The key takeaway for Gove County is that it operates as a closed-loop, buy-and-hold rental market. The high investor penetration, particularly in certain zip codes where ownership exceeds 70%, combined with zero market churn, suggests that properties are passed down or held indefinitely rather than traded. This creates a landscape of extreme stability and predictability but also offers zero opportunity for new investors and indicates a non-existent for-sale market for traditional homebuyers.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 05:17 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyGove (KS)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct