Henry (IN) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Henry (IN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Henry (IN)
14,589
Total Investors in Henry (IN)
1,736
Investor Owned SFR in Henry (IN)
1,982(13.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,453
SFR Owned
1,406
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
283
SFR Owned
583
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,982 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Henry County's Market, Owning 84.6% as Institutions Remain Sidelined
Investors own 1,982 Single-Family Residential properties in Henry County, representing 13.6% of the market. The market is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) who own 84.6% of the investor portfolio, while institutional investors own just 0.4%. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 21.4% of all homes sold, with small investors accounting for all investor purchase activity.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,982 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding 70.9% of the portfolio.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties are held in cash (1,763) compared to just 219 that are financed. Of the 1,982 properties in the portfolio, 1,896 are classified as rented, indicating a 95.7% rental focus.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a staggering 67.1% discount compared to homeowners in Q2 2025, paying $120,652 less per property.
The landlord discount has been volatile, narrowing from a 67.1% advantage in Q2 2025 to 25.7% in Q1 2025. No landlord purchases were recorded in Q4, indicating a pause in activity at year-end. Overall prices have appreciated from a 2020-2023 average of $65,138 to a 2025 average of $90,353.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 21.4% of all Single-Family homes sold in Q4 2025, purchasing 9 of the 42 available properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were the sole drivers of investor activity, accounting for 77.8% of all landlord purchases. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) made zero acquisitions, highlighting their absence from the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 84.6% of Henry County's investor-owned housing.
Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have a negligible footprint, owning just 8 properties, or 0.4% of the landlord portfolio. The most dominant group is single-property landlords, who alone control 1,211 properties (59.9%).
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies assume majority ownership at the 6-10 property tier, signaling a key professionalization threshold.
Individuals dominate the entry-level, owning 88.1% of single-property portfolios and 77.2% of two-property portfolios. The shift to corporate ownership is clear in larger tiers, with companies owning 82.4% of portfolios in the 101-1000 property range.
Geographic Distribution
The 47362 zip code in New Castle is the center of investor activity, holding 1,397 properties, 15.3% of its housing stock.
While 47362 has the highest volume, the 47366 zip code (Spiceland) has the highest investor penetration rate at 20.0%. This highlights a difference between where investors concentrate in number versus where they have the highest market saturation.
Historical Transactions
Investors flipped from net sellers in 2024 to strong net buyers in 2025, with a 2.7x buy-to-sell ratio for the year.
This trend reversal saw landlords go from a net position of -1 properties in 2024 to a net acquisition of 26 properties in 2025. In contrast, institutional investors have been consistent net sellers, divesting a net of 2 properties in 2024 and breaking even in 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords represented 21.4% of all Q4 2025 market transactions, with small investors driving all activity.
Zero percent of landlord acquisitions in Q4 were from other landlords, meaning all 9 purchases were sourced from the traditional market. No pricing data was available for Q4, but institutional investors made zero transactions during the period.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,982 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding 70.9% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

In Henry County, IN, landlords own a significant 1,982 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, making up 13.6% of the total 14,589 SFRs in the market.

Individual investors form the backbone of the rental market, owning 1,406 properties (70.9%) compared to 583 properties (29.4%) owned by companies. This is further reflected in the entity count, where 1,453 individual landlords far outnumber the 283 company landlords.

A striking financial characteristic of this market is the preference for cash ownership. An overwhelming 1,763 investor-owned properties (89.0%) are owned outright, while only 219 (11.0%) are financed, suggesting a low-leverage, high-equity investor base.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards rental income, with 1,896 properties identified as rented. This represents 95.7% of the total investor portfolio, underscoring a clear focus on buy-and-hold strategies rather than speculation.

The data reveals a market dominated by smaller, individual operators who prefer to own their properties without debt, signaling a stable and established local rental landscape rather than one driven by large, leveraged corporate entities.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a staggering 67.1% discount compared to homeowners in Q2 2025, paying $120,652 less per property.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing power was on full display in Q2 2025, the most recent quarter with comparable activity, where landlords paid an average of just $59,200. This was a massive $120,652 less than the average traditional homeowner price of $179,852, representing a 67.1% discount and signaling a strategy of acquiring distressed or undervalued assets.

The price advantage for investors has not been consistent. The 67.1% discount in Q2 2025 was a significant widening from Q1 2025, when landlords paid $114,583 versus the homeowner's $154,227, a much narrower 25.7% discount.

Significantly, there were zero recorded landlord acquisitions in Q4 2025, a stark contrast to the 42 total SFR purchases in the county. This suggests a highly opportunistic and intermittent buying pattern rather than steady acquisition.

Despite quarterly fluctuations, there is a clear long-term price appreciation trend. The average landlord acquisition price has risen from $65,138 during the 2020-2023 period to $90,353 in 2025, an increase of 38.7%.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 21.4% of all Single-Family homes sold in Q4 2025, purchasing 9 of the 42 available properties.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords captured a notable share of the market, purchasing 9 of the 42 total SFRs sold, which equates to a 21.4% market share for the quarter.

The entirety of this Q4 investor activity was driven by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) purchased 7 properties, representing 77.8% of all landlord acquisitions, with the remaining 2 properties bought by mid-size landlords.

A key finding is the continued influx of new investors. Seven new single-property landlords entered the Henry County market in Q4, demonstrating sustained grassroots interest in real estate investment.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) were completely inactive, making zero purchases in Q4. This reinforces the narrative of a market dominated by local investors rather than large, national corporations.

The purchasing activity was highly concentrated at the entry level, with the 7 single-property acquisitions making up the vast majority of transactions and highlighting the market's accessibility for new landlords.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 84.6% of Henry County's investor-owned housing.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Henry County is definitively controlled by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) hold a combined 84.6% of all investor-owned SFRs, a testament to a highly fragmented market.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) are the largest single group, owning 1,211 properties. This represents 59.9% of the entire investor portfolio, indicating that a majority of landlords are just beginning their investment journey or prefer a small-scale approach.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have a minimal presence, owning just 8 properties, which is only 0.4% of the total investor-owned stock. This challenges the common narrative of large corporations dominating local housing markets.

Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) account for a combined 13.4% of the portfolio, serving as a bridge between the smallest and largest owners but still representing a minor share compared to the mom-and-pop segment.

The ownership structure clearly shows that the rental market in Henry County is supplied by a large number of small, local investors rather than a small number of large, institutional ones.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies assume majority ownership at the 6-10 property tier, signaling a key professionalization threshold.
Detailed Findings

A distinct ownership pattern emerges across portfolio sizes in Henry County, with individual investors dominating smaller holdings and companies taking over as portfolios scale.

Individuals overwhelmingly control the entry point of the market, owning 1,071 (88.1%) of single-property portfolios and 98 (77.2%) of two-property portfolios. This demonstrates that most investors begin their journey as individuals.

The critical crossover point occurs in the 'Small landlord (6-10)' tier. At this stage, company ownership surpasses individual ownership for the first time, with companies holding 62 properties (59.6%) versus 42 for individuals (40.4%).

This trend toward professionalization accelerates in larger tiers. Companies own a 65.2% majority in the 11-20 property tier and an 82.4% majority in the 101-1000 property tier, indicating that scaling operations is typically done under a corporate structure for liability and financial purposes.

This data illustrates a clear lifecycle for real estate investors in the county: start small as an individual and incorporate to facilitate growth beyond a handful of properties.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 47362 zip code in New Castle is the center of investor activity, holding 1,397 properties, 15.3% of its housing stock.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Henry County is highly concentrated geographically, with the 47362 zip code (New Castle) serving as the undisputed hub. This single zip code contains 1,397 investor-owned properties, representing 15.3% of its total SFRs.

The next most significant areas for investor presence by count are 47356 (Middletown) and 46148 (Knightstown), with 159 and 149 investor-owned properties, respectively. Both have an identical investor ownership rate of 10.7%.

Interestingly, the area with the highest *rate* of investor ownership is not the one with the highest count. The 47366 zip code (Spiceland) leads in market penetration, with investors owning 20.0% of its SFR properties.

Following Spiceland for high penetration rates are 47351 (Kennard) at 18.4% and 47344 (Greensboro) at 16.9%, showing that smaller communities have a higher density of rental properties relative to their size.

This geographic analysis reveals a dual strategy among investors: achieving scale in the population center of New Castle while also achieving high market saturation in the surrounding smaller towns.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Investors flipped from net sellers in 2024 to strong net buyers in 2025, with a 2.7x buy-to-sell ratio for the year.
Detailed Findings

A significant market shift occurred between 2024 and 2025, as landlords transitioned from a position of net sellers to one of aggressive accumulation. In 2024, sell transactions (43) narrowly edged out buy transactions (42), for a net loss of 1 property.

This trend dramatically reversed in 2025. Landlords purchased 41 properties while only selling 15, resulting in a net gain of 26 properties and a strong buy-to-sell ratio of 2.73, signaling renewed confidence in the market.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) are moving in the opposite direction of the broader market. They were net sellers in 2024 (1 buy vs. 3 sells) and have continued to divest or hold steady in 2025 (1 buy vs. 1 sell), indicating a strategic retreat from the county.

The most active period for buying in the last two years was Q2 2025, when landlords acquired 14 properties while selling only 3. This quarterly activity drove the overall positive trend for the year.

The divergence is clear: smaller, local landlords are actively growing their portfolios in Henry County, while large institutional players are either reducing their exposure or have ceased expansion.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords represented 21.4% of all Q4 2025 market transactions, with small investors driving all activity.
Detailed Findings

Landlord activity accounted for 21.4% of the total 42 SFR transactions in Henry County during Q4 2025, with investors completing 9 purchases.

The transaction activity was exclusively driven by mom-and-pop and mid-size landlords. Single-property investors led the way with 7 transactions, while two mid-size tiers each recorded one transaction.

Notably, none of the 9 landlord purchases in Q4 were sourced from other landlords. This 0% 'Bought From Landlords' rate indicates that investors were acquiring properties from homeowners or new construction, not trading assets amongst themselves.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) were completely absent from the transactional market in Q4, recording zero transactions and reinforcing their passive stance in the county.

The data portrays a Q4 market where new and small-scale landlords were the only active investor segment, focusing their efforts on acquiring inventory from the general housing market rather than from existing investor portfolios.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Command 84.6% of Henry County's Investor Market as Institutions Divest
Holdings
Investors own 1,982 Single-Family Residential properties in Henry County, representing 13.6% of the market, with individual investors holding a dominant 70.9% of the portfolio compared to 29.4% for companies.
Pricing
In the most recent active quarter (Q2 2025), landlords demonstrated significant buying power, paying an average of 67.1% less than traditional homeowners—a discount of $120,652 per property.
Activity
Landlords purchased 21.4% of all homes sold in Q4 2025, an effort driven entirely by small investors, including 7 new single-property landlords entering the market for the first time.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with an 84.6% share of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own a mere 0.4%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, a clear inflection point for professionalization and scaling.
Transactions
Landlords have become strong net buyers in 2025 (net gain of 26 properties) after being net sellers in 2024, while institutional investors have been consistent net sellers over the same period.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Henry County, IN, is fundamentally shaped by local, small-scale investors. Landlords own 1,982 properties, comprising 13.6% of the county's total SFR housing stock. The market structure defies the narrative of corporate dominance; individual investors own 70.9% of these homes, and 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 84.6% of the entire investor-owned portfolio. In stark contrast, institutional firms with over 1,000 properties have a negligible footprint, owning just 0.4% of the rental supply.

Investor behavior in Henry County is characterized by opportunistic acquisition and a clear divergence between small and large players. In Q4 2025, landlords were active, purchasing 21.4% of all homes sold, with every one of those purchases made by a small or mid-sized investor. These buyers often secure significant discounts, paying as much as 67.1% below traditional homeowner prices. A major market reversal occurred in 2025, with the investor community shifting from being net sellers in 2024 to strong net buyers. Meanwhile, institutional investors have been consistent net sellers, signaling a strategic retreat.

The key takeaway is that Henry County's rental landscape is, and will likely remain, a localized ecosystem. The growth is fueled by new, single-property landlords and the scaling of small portfolios, not by Wall Street. This creates a highly fragmented market where success depends on deep local knowledge and the ability to acquire properties from the traditional market. The divestment by large institutions further solidifies the opportunity for local operators to consolidate and define the future of the region's single-family rental housing.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 08:52 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyHenry (IN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail