Gibson (IN) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Gibson (IN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Gibson (IN)
10,944
Total Investors in Gibson (IN)
1,025
Investor Owned SFR in Gibson (IN)
1,182(10.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
850
SFR Owned
760
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
175
SFR Owned
427
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,182 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Gibson County, Buying 10 Properties for Every 1 Sold at a 69% Discount
Investors own 1,182 SFR properties in Gibson County (10.8% of the market), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a commanding 81.3% versus a negligible 0.1% for institutional investors. In Q4, landlords were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 32.3% of all properties sold at an average 69.1% discount compared to homeowners, while institutional investors remained neutral.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,182 SFRs in Gibson County, with individuals holding a dominant 64.3% share.
The vast majority of properties are held in cash (1,135) versus financed (47), showing a low-leverage investor base. Rented properties (1,116) account for 94.4% of the entire investor portfolio, indicating a strong focus on rental income.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q4, landlords acquired properties for $73,231, a massive 69.1% discount compared to homeowners.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners widened significantly in 2025, with the discount growing from 18.4% in Q2 to a peak of 69.1% in Q4. This translates to a $163,968 price difference in the most recent quarter.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords were highly active in Q4, acquiring 61 properties and capturing 32.3% of all SFR market purchases.
A single mid-sized investor in the 21-50 property tier dominated Q4 activity, purchasing 49 properties (80.3% of all landlord buys). In contrast, mom-and-pop landlords acquired 8 properties (13.1%) while institutional investors made zero purchases.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 81.3% of all investor-owned SFRs in Gibson County.
Institutional investors (1000+ tier) have a negligible presence, owning just one property, which constitutes 0.1% of the investor market. Single-property landlords are the largest segment by far, holding 644 properties (53.3% of the total investor portfolio).
Ownership by Tier & Type
Ownership structure shifts dramatically by portfolio size, with companies becoming the majority owners in tiers of 6-10 properties and larger.
The specific crossover point occurs in the 6-10 property tier, where company ownership reaches 62.2%. In the largest non-institutional tier (101-1000 properties), companies own 31 of the 35 properties (88.6%), showing their concentration in scaled portfolios.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 47670 and 47660 zip codes holding 65.9% of all investor-owned properties.
The 47616 zip code has the highest investor penetration rate, where landlords own a majority 51.6% of all SFRs. The 47660 zip code is a unique hotspot, appearing on both top lists with a high property count (277) and a high ownership rate (17.7%).
Historical Transactions
Landlords were aggressive net buyers in Q4, acquiring 10.5 properties for every one they sold.
This buying activity accelerated throughout 2025, flipping from a slight net seller position in Q2 to a strong net buyer position by Q4. In contrast, institutional investors were completely neutral in Q4, with one purchase and one sale.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 24.5% of all property transactions in Q4, participating in 63 of the 257 total sales.
New, single-property landlords paid the highest average price at $146,186, significantly more than larger investors. This group was also the most active in inter-landlord trading, sourcing 40.0% of their purchases from existing landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,182 SFRs in Gibson County, with individuals holding a dominant 64.3% share.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a portfolio of 1,182 single-family residential properties in Gibson County, representing 10.8% of the total 10,944 SFRs in the market.

Individual investors form the backbone of the rental market, owning 760 properties (64.3% of the total), while corporate entities own the remaining 427 properties (36.1%).

This individual dominance is also reflected in the entity count, with 850 individual landlords far outnumbering the 175 company landlords operating in the county.

A striking 96.0% of investor-owned properties (1,135) are owned outright in cash. This leaves a mere 4.0% (47 properties) that are financed, indicating a market characterized by very low debt leverage among property investors.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards generating rental income. Rented properties account for 1,116 units, which is 94.4% of all investor-owned SFRs and signals a clear buy-and-hold strategy across the market.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q4, landlords acquired properties for $73,231, a massive 69.1% discount compared to homeowners.
Detailed Findings

Landlords demonstrated a significant pricing advantage in Q4 2025, paying an average of just $73,231 per property. This is a staggering 69.1% less than the $237,199 average paid by traditional homeowners, translating to a $163,968 discount per home.

The discount landlords achieve has dramatically increased throughout 2025. It started at 18.4% in Q2, expanded to 57.6% in Q3, and reached its highest point of 69.1% in Q4, indicating an accelerating ability for investors to find undervalued properties.

Landlord acquisition prices show high volatility, dropping from $187,582 in Q1 to $73,231 in Q4. In contrast, homeowner prices remained far more stable, fluctuating between $217,509 and $246,090 during the same period.

This substantial and growing price gap suggests investors are not competing for the same turn-key properties as homeowners. Instead, they are likely targeting distressed assets, properties requiring significant renovation, or pursuing off-market deals inaccessible to typical buyers.

Despite the Q4 price drop, the average landlord acquisition price for the full year 2025 ($120,870) remains above the average from the 2020-2023 pandemic era ($105,081), signaling underlying long-term price appreciation in the assets investors target.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords were highly active in Q4, acquiring 61 properties and capturing 32.3% of all SFR market purchases.
Detailed Findings

Investors captured nearly one-third of the market in Q4 2025, purchasing 61 of the 189 total SFR properties sold, a significant market share of 32.3%.

The quarter's activity was overwhelmingly driven by a single mid-sized investor in the 21-50 property tier. This one entity's acquisition of 49 properties accounted for 80.3% of all landlord purchases, showcasing the immense impact a single motivated buyer can have on a local market.

Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) also participated in the market, with 9 different entities purchasing a combined 8 properties. This activity included the creation of 5 new single-property landlords, signaling fresh capital entering the market at the smallest scale.

In stark contrast to the activity from smaller and mid-sized players, institutional investors (1000+ properties) were completely absent from the purchasing market in Q4, acquiring zero properties.

This concentration of buying power reveals a market susceptible to influence from individual large players rather than broad-based institutional trends, with one mid-sized buyer setting the pace for the entire quarter.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 81.3% of all investor-owned SFRs in Gibson County.
Detailed Findings

The rental market in Gibson County is overwhelmingly controlled by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning between 1 and 10 properties, collectively hold 81.3% of all investor-owned SFRs.

The single-property landlord tier is the most significant market segment, with these investors owning 644 properties. This accounts for 53.3% of the entire investor-owned housing stock and underscores the highly fragmented nature of local ownership.

Institutional investors with portfolios exceeding 1,000 properties have a virtually nonexistent footprint in this market. They own just a single property, representing a mere 0.1% of the total investor portfolio, challenging any narrative of a corporate takeover.

Mid-size landlords (owning 11-1000 properties) hold the remaining 18.6% of the portfolio. This group shows a varied distribution, with tiers like '11-20 properties' and '21-50 properties' each accounting for roughly 8.0% and 7.4% respectively.

The ownership distribution clearly indicates a market dominated by local, small-scale participants rather than large, corporate entities. This structure suggests market dynamics are driven by individual investment decisions, not institutional strategies.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Ownership structure shifts dramatically by portfolio size, with companies becoming the majority owners in tiers of 6-10 properties and larger.
Detailed Findings

A clear shift in ownership structure from individual to corporate occurs as portfolio sizes increase. While individuals dominate the 1-5 property range, companies become the majority owners starting in the 6-10 property tier, where they control 62.2% of the assets.

Individual investors overwhelmingly own the smallest portfolios. They account for 86.0% of single-property holdings and 83.1% of two-property portfolios, reflecting the 'mom-and-pop' nature of entry-level real estate investment.

As portfolios scale, company ownership becomes the standard for operational and legal reasons. Companies own 84.5% of properties in the 11-20 tier and a commanding 88.6% in the 101-1000 tier, indicating that professionalization is a key strategy for larger local investors.

This data suggests a strategic threshold exists around the 5-property mark. Beyond this point, investors are far more likely to operate under a corporate structure to manage liability, financing, and operations more effectively.

The 3-5 property tier represents a transition zone. Here, individual ownership remains strong at 64.9%, but company ownership (35.1%) is significantly more present than in the smallest tiers, marking the beginning of the shift toward incorporation.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 47670 and 47660 zip codes holding 65.9% of all investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Gibson County is heavily concentrated in two key zip codes. The 47670 zip code leads with 502 investor-owned properties, followed by 47660 with 277. Together, these two areas account for 779 properties, or 65.9% of all investor-owned SFRs in the county.

The 47616 zip code stands out for having the highest rate of investor penetration. In this area, landlords own a majority 51.6% of the single-family residential properties, indicating a market that is fundamentally shaped by rental housing dynamics.

A key distinction exists between areas with the most properties and those with the highest ownership rates. While 47670 has the highest absolute count of investor properties (502), its ownership rate is a more modest 12.6%.

The 47660 zip code is a notable investor hotspot, appearing on both top-five lists. It combines a high volume of investor properties (277) with a high market penetration rate (17.7%), signaling it as a core market for rental investment.

These geographic patterns suggest that different zip codes offer distinct opportunities. High-count areas represent established rental markets, while high-penetration areas signify zones with housing stock or economic drivers that are uniquely attractive to investors.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords were aggressive net buyers in Q4, acquiring 10.5 properties for every one they sold.
Detailed Findings

Landlords acted as aggressive net buyers in Q4 2025, significantly expanding their portfolios. They purchased 63 properties while selling only 6, a buy-to-sell ratio of 10.5-to-1 that demonstrates high confidence in the Gibson County market.

The net buying trend accelerated sharply throughout 2025. After being slight net sellers in Q2 (16 buys vs. 17 sells), investors became net buyers in Q3 (29 buys vs. 13 sells) before the Q4 surge. For the full year, landlords added a net of 97 properties to their holdings.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) showed a much more cautious and neutral stance. In Q4, they bought one property and sold one, resulting in no net change to their portfolio. This follows their pattern of being net sellers in 2024 (4 buys vs 6 sells).

This data reveals a clear divergence in strategy. The broader landlord market, driven by small and mid-sized players, is in a strong accumulation phase. Meanwhile, the single institutional player is treading water, neither significantly expanding nor divesting.

The strong net buying in 2025 (97 net properties added) represents a more aggressive stance compared to 2024, when landlords added a net of 42 properties, indicating growing investor appetite in the current market environment.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 24.5% of all property transactions in Q4, participating in 63 of the 257 total sales.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a major force in the Q4 2025 real estate market, participating in 63 of the 257 total transactions, which constitutes a 24.5% share of all market activity.

An inverse relationship between investor size and purchase price emerged this quarter. The smallest investors in the single-property tier paid the highest average price at $146,186, substantially more than larger, more experienced tiers like the 101-1000 group ($62,670).

New landlords appear to be a key source of liquidity for existing investors looking to sell. A notable 40.0% of properties purchased by the single-property tier were acquired directly from other landlords, the highest rate of any active tier.

Transaction volume was heavily concentrated, with a single entity in the 21-50 property tier accounting for 49 of the 63 landlord transactions. However, the $0 average price for this tier suggests these were likely part of a portfolio deal or an off-market transaction with unrecorded prices.

The pricing data suggests distinct acquisition strategies. Newcomers are paying near-market rates to enter, while established landlords are leveraging their experience to acquire properties at a significant discount, as evidenced by the lower prices paid by larger tiers.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small-scale investors dominate Gibson County, controlling 81% of rentals and buying properties at a 69% discount to homeowners.
Holdings
Landlords own 1,182 SFR properties, representing 10.8% of Gibson County's market. The portfolio is dominated by individual investors, who hold 760 properties (64.3%), compared to 427 (36.1%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords paid an average of 69.1% less than traditional homeowners, securing a massive discount of $163,968 per property ($73,231 vs. $237,199).
Activity
Investors were highly active in Q4, purchasing 61 properties for a 32.3% share of all market sales. This activity included 5 new single-property landlords entering the market for the first time.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) are the cornerstone of the rental market, controlling 81.3% of all investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own a negligible 0.1%.
Ownership Type
While individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier (62.2%), signaling a shift to corporate structures as portfolios scale.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 10.5x buy/sell ratio in Q4 (63 buys vs. 6 sells), while the lone institutional investor was neutral, with one purchase and one sale.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Gibson County, IN is defined by local, small-scale participants, not large corporations. Investors own 1,182 SFRs, making up 10.8% of the county's total housing stock. This market is overwhelmingly controlled by 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who own a commanding 81.3% of the rental portfolio. In stark contrast, institutional investors have a nearly non-existent footprint at just 0.1%, underscoring a market driven by individual capital.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 was characterized by aggressive acquisition and savvy pricing. Landlords purchased 32.3% of all homes sold, demonstrating a powerful pricing advantage by paying an average of 69.1% less than traditional homeowners. This activity reflects a strong accumulation phase, with landlords collectively acting as strong net buyers, acquiring over 10 properties for every one they sold. This trend signals high confidence among the existing investor base.

The key takeaway is that Gibson County's rental market is a story of Main Street, not Wall Street. The deep discounts investors are achieving suggest they are targeting a different class of asset—likely distressed or value-add properties—thereby improving housing stock without directly competing with retail homebuyers. The rapid accumulation by smaller landlords, while institutional players remain static, signals a bullish outlook from local investors on the future of Gibson County's housing market.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 08:47 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyGibson (IN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail