Stark (IL) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Stark (IL) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Stark (IL)
1,915
Total Investors in Stark (IL)
302
Investor Owned SFR in Stark (IL)
303(15.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
290
SFR Owned
292
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
12
SFR Owned
12
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 303 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Individuals Dominate Stark County's Investor Market, Owning 96% of a Portfolio That is 100% Cash-Owned
Investors own 303 single-family residential properties in Stark County, representing 15.8% of the total market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by individual 'mom-and-pop' landlords (94.9%) who own their properties outright with no financing. After a year of active acquisition in 2024, investor purchasing activity completely halted in Q4 2025, with zero properties bought.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 303 SFR properties, with individuals holding a commanding 96.4% share.
The entire investor-owned portfolio of 303 properties in Stark County is owned outright with cash, as zero properties are financed. A vast majority, 287 of these properties (94.7%), are actively rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No landlord acquisitions occurred in Q4 2025, halting any price comparisons.
Due to zero landlord purchase activity in the recent quarter, no direct price comparison with traditional homeowners is possible. Historically, the average landlord acquisition price increased from $54,190 during 2020-2023 to $63,594 in 2024.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investor purchasing completely ceased, with landlords acquiring 0.0% of the market in Q4 2025.
With zero total purchases, both mom-and-pop (Tiers 01-04) and institutional (Tier 09) investors were inactive. No new landlords entered the Stark County market during the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 94.9% of investor-owned homes.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have zero presence in Stark County. The market is dominated by single-property landlords, who alone own 201 properties, representing 64.0% of the entire investor portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors exclusively own all properties in mid-size tiers (11-20 properties).
Companies have a minimal footprint, owning just 5.0% of single-property portfolios and 4.5% in the 6-10 property tier. Individuals maintain majority ownership across all existing portfolio sizes in Stark County, with no crossover point where companies become dominant.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in zip codes 61491 and 61483, holding 198 properties combined.
While two zip codes contain the bulk of investor properties, the highest investor ownership rates are found elsewhere. Zip codes 61426 (44.8%) and 61345 (41.7%) show the deepest market penetration by investors.
Historical Transactions
After a period of strong net buying in 2024, landlord transaction activity completely stopped.
In 2024, landlords were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 18 properties while selling only 1. This 18-to-1 buy/sell ratio demonstrates a strong acquisitive stance that was completely reversed by the market freeze in Q4 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
The landlord share of transactions in Q4 2025 was 0.0% as the market saw no activity.
With zero transactions recorded for the quarter, there was no buying or selling activity across any investor tier. This lack of liquidity prevented any analysis of inter-landlord trading or price variations by tier.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 303 SFR properties, with individuals holding a commanding 96.4% share.
Detailed Findings

In Stark County, investors hold 303 single-family properties, accounting for 15.8% of the total 1,915 SFRs. This signifies a notable, but not dominant, investor presence in the local housing market.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly dominated by 290 individual landlords, who collectively own 292 properties (96.4%). In contrast, 12 company landlords own the remaining 12 properties, making up just 4.0% of the investor-owned housing stock.

A striking financial characteristic of this market is the complete absence of leverage; 100% of the 303 investor-owned properties are classified as cash-owned, with zero properties financed. This indicates a fiscally conservative or high-equity investor base.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards rental income, with 287 of the 303 properties (94.7%) identified as rented. This high rental penetration underscores the primary business objective of investors in the county.

The data reveals a market defined by small-scale, individual participation. The ratio of individual landlords to company landlords is approximately 24 to 1, reinforcing the 'mom-and-pop' character of real estate investment in Stark County.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No landlord acquisitions occurred in Q4 2025, halting any price comparisons.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing activity in Stark County came to a complete standstill in Q4 2025, with zero properties acquired by landlords. Consequently, no current-quarter pricing data is available for analysis or comparison against other buyer types.

The absence of Q4 2025 transactions prevents any analysis of the typical price gap between landlords and traditional homeowners, a key metric for understanding investor purchasing advantages.

Historical data, however, points to price appreciation in prior periods. The average acquisition price for landlords rose from $54,190 in the 2020-2023 timeframe to $63,594 for the full year of 2024, an increase of 17.3%.

The market's recent inactivity is the most significant pricing trend, suggesting a dramatic shift in market conditions or investor sentiment from 2024 to the end of 2025.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Investor purchasing completely ceased, with landlords acquiring 0.0% of the market in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

The fourth quarter of 2025 was marked by a total lack of investor acquisition activity in Stark County's SFR market. Landlords purchased zero properties, accounting for 0.0% of the quarter's total sales.

This market freeze extended across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who form the backbone of the local market, made no purchases during the quarter.

Similarly, larger-scale and institutional investors were also absent from the market, with zero properties acquired by entities in Tiers 05 through 09.

The halt in purchasing activity also meant no new landlords entered the market. The count of new single-property landlords (Tier 01) for the quarter was zero, indicating a pause in the expansion of the rental market base.

This complete cessation of activity represents a stark contrast to previous periods and is the defining characteristic of the Q4 2025 market, pointing to potential shifts in local economic conditions or investment opportunities.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 94.9% of investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Stark County is unequivocally controlled by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04), hold a combined 94.9% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) are the most significant group, owning 201 properties, which constitutes 64.0% of the total investor portfolio. This highlights the highly fragmented and grassroots nature of the local rental market.

Mid-size investors are a small fraction of the market, with the 11-20 property tier holding just 15 properties (4.8%). The 101-1000 property tier contains only a single property (0.3%).

There is absolutely no institutional investor (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) presence in Stark County. This market structure defies the common narrative of large corporations dominating residential real estate.

The ownership distribution is heavily skewed towards the smallest investors, with those owning 1-5 properties controlling a combined 88.0% of the rental housing stock, reinforcing the community-based character of real estate investment in the area.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors exclusively own all properties in mid-size tiers (11-20 properties).
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the dominant force across every single investor tier in Stark County. There is no portfolio size at which companies assume majority ownership, underscoring the limited corporate presence in the local market.

Even at the smallest scale, individuals prevail. In the single-property tier, 192 of the 201 properties (95.0%) are owned by individuals, compared to just 10 owned by companies.

The minimal corporate footprint is further evident in larger tiers. For instance, in the 6-10 property tier, individuals own 21 properties (95.5%) while a single company owns just 1 property (4.5%).

In several tiers, including the two-property (27 properties), 3-5 property (48 properties), and 11-20 property (15 properties) tiers, ownership is 100% individual.

This data illustrates a market where company investment is opportunistic and small-scale rather than a strategic, widespread effort, with individuals clearly preferring to hold and manage rental properties directly.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in zip codes 61491 and 61483, holding 198 properties combined.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals a high concentration of investor-owned properties within a few specific areas of Stark County. The zip codes of 61491 and 61483 are the clear hubs, containing 101 and 97 investor-owned SFRs, respectively.

The regions with the highest volume of investor properties are not the same as those with the highest rate of investor ownership. This indicates different market dynamics across the county.

The highest saturation of investor ownership is found in zip code 61426, where investors own 44.8% of the SFR housing stock, and zip code 61345, with a 41.7% investor ownership rate.

This divergence between high-count and high-percentage areas suggests investors may be targeting smaller, more niche markets where they can achieve significant market share, while also accumulating properties in larger, more populous zip codes.

Other areas like 61434, 61443, and 61451 show no recorded investor-owned properties, highlighting the uneven distribution of rental investment across the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
After a period of strong net buying in 2024, landlord transaction activity completely stopped.
Detailed Findings

Historical transaction data reveals a dramatic shift in investor behavior in Stark County. During 2024, landlords were unequivocally net buyers, demonstrating strong confidence in the market by purchasing 18 SFR properties while selling only one.

This resulted in a net gain of 17 properties for the investor community in 2024 and an aggressive 18x buy-to-sell ratio, signaling a clear strategy of portfolio expansion during that year.

However, this momentum completely dissipated by Q4 2025, when transaction volume for both buying and selling dropped to zero. This halt suggests a significant change in market dynamics, investor sentiment, or available inventory.

Institutional investors have no recorded transaction history in the area, which aligns with their zero percent ownership share. All recorded activity stems from smaller, non-institutional landlords.

The contrast between the active acquisition in 2024 and the total inactivity in late 2025 is the most critical trend, pointing to a market that has rapidly cooled for investors.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
The landlord share of transactions in Q4 2025 was 0.0% as the market saw no activity.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords were completely absent from the transaction market in Stark County, participating in zero deals. This resulted in a 0.0% share of all transactions for the quarter.

The market shutdown was universal across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who own the vast majority of properties, recorded no transactions.

Similarly, mid-size and institutional-scale investors were also inactive, reflecting a market-wide pause on both acquisitions and dispositions.

Due to the lack of activity, there were no trades between landlords. The percentage of properties bought from other landlords was 0%, indicating a freeze in the circulation of assets within the investor community.

This complete lack of transactional volume in Q4 is the quarter's defining feature, suggesting that investors are currently in a holding pattern, neither expanding nor contracting their local portfolios.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Stark County's Mom-and-Pop Landlords Command 95% of a 100% Cash-Owned Market Amid a Transaction Freeze
Holdings
Investors own 303 single-family properties in Stark County, representing 15.8% of the market. The portfolio is almost entirely held by individual investors, who own 292 properties (96.4%), while companies own just 12 (4.0%).
Pricing
No investor acquisitions occurred in Q4 2025, preventing any current price comparison against homeowners. Prior to this halt, average landlord purchase prices had appreciated from $54,190 (2020-2023) to $63,594 (2024).
Activity
Investor purchase activity in Stark County came to a complete halt in Q4 2025, with landlords' share of purchases at 0.0%. This period of inactivity saw zero new landlords enter the market.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate the market, controlling 94.9% of all investor-owned housing. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have no presence, owning 0.0% of the portfolio.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority owners in every portfolio tier, with no crossover point where companies take control. The entire investor-owned portfolio, regardless of owner type, is 100% cash-owned with no financing.
Transactions
After being strong net buyers in 2024 with an 18-to-1 buy/sell ratio (18 buys vs. 1 sell), all landlord transaction activity ceased in Q4 2025. There were zero institutional transactions recorded.
Market Narrative

The real estate investor market in Stark County, Illinois, is fundamentally a community-driven phenomenon, characterized by small-scale, local ownership. Investors hold 303 single-family homes, making up 15.8% of the county's total SFR stock. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by individual 'mom-and-pop' landlords (owning 1-10 properties), who command a staggering 94.9% share. In stark contrast, institutional investors have zero presence. Financially, the market is exceptionally conservative, with 100% of the 303 investor-owned properties held outright in cash, indicating a complete absence of debt financing among landlords.

Investor behavior has undergone a dramatic shift. After a year of aggressive expansion in 2024, where landlords acted as strong net buyers with an 18-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio, activity came to an abrupt halt. In the fourth quarter of 2025, investors purchased zero properties, bringing their market share of acquisitions to 0.0%. This freeze in activity meant no new landlords entered the market, and the circulation of properties between existing investors also stopped. The lack of recent transactions prevents any current analysis of investor pricing advantages over traditional homeowners.

The key takeaway from Stark County is the portrait of a stable, debt-free, and highly localized rental market that has entered a state of hibernation. The dominance of individual, cash-only landlords suggests a market valued for steady, long-term returns rather than speculative, leveraged growth. The recent cessation of all transaction activity signals a significant shift, potentially driven by local economic factors, interest rate changes affecting the broader market, or a simple lack of available properties for sale that meet investor criteria. This positions the market as one of established holdings, where current owners are holding firm rather than expanding or exiting.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 12, 2026 at 03:03 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyStark (IL)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price