Montgomery (IL) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Montgomery (IL) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Montgomery (IL)
9,513
Total Investors in Montgomery (IL)
1,513
Investor Owned SFR in Montgomery (IL)
1,382(14.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,427
SFR Owned
1,286
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
86
SFR Owned
120
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,382 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Individual Investors Dominate Montgomery County, Acquiring Properties at a 26% Discount While Institutions Remain Absent
Investors now own 14.5% of single-family homes in Montgomery County, with individual 'mom-and-pop' landlords controlling a staggering 95.8% of that portfolio. In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 27.6% of all homes sold, paying an average of 26.4% less than traditional homeowners. The market is characterized by strong net buying from small investors, while institutional-level players have no meaningful presence.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,382 SFR properties in Montgomery County, with individuals holding 93.1%.
Of these holdings, 76.5% were acquired with cash (1,057 properties), while only 23.5% are financed (325 properties). The portfolio is overwhelmingly rental-focused, with 96.0% of investor-owned properties identified as rented (1,327 properties).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 26.4% less than homeowners in Q4, a discount of $44,944 per property.
This price advantage has narrowed significantly from earlier in the year, where discounts were as high as 71.4% in Q2. Landlord acquisition prices have more than doubled from the 2020-2023 average of $62,186 to $125,517 in Q4 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 27.6% of all single-family home purchases in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) drove this activity, accounting for 72.1% of all investor purchases. In contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties made zero acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 95.8% of all investor-owned homes in Montgomery County.
Single-property landlords alone own 66.8% of the investor housing stock (978 properties). In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have no ownership stake in the county, holding 0.0% of the portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors own the vast majority of properties across all portfolio sizes, with no corporate crossover.
Even in the largest active tier (11-20 properties), individuals own 77.8% of the homes. In the dominant single-property tier, individual ownership stands at 94.1%, demonstrating a market completely controlled by personal investors.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in zip codes 62056 and 62049, which hold 47.8% of all investor-owned homes.
Zip code 62056 is the leader by volume with 363 investor-owned properties. However, zip code 62538 has the highest penetration rate, with investors owning 25.3% of its single-family housing stock.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 2.87 properties for every one they sold in 2025.
This net buying activity accelerated through the year, peaking in Q4 with 75 purchases versus just 37 sales. While small landlords accumulate, the only institutional activity recorded was net selling in 2024 (1 buy vs 2 sells).
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlord activity accounted for 31.6% of all market transactions in Q4 2025.
Mid-size landlords in the 11-20 property tier were the most active, conducting 38 transactions at the highest average price of $165,013. Smaller landlords (6-10 properties) relied heavily on inter-landlord deals, with 81.8% of their purchases coming from other investors.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,382 SFR properties in Montgomery County, with individuals holding 93.1%.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership accounts for 14.5% of the total single-family residential market in Montgomery County, totaling 1,382 properties.

The market is overwhelmingly dominated by 1,427 individual landlords who own 1,286 properties, representing 93.1% of the investor-owned housing stock. In contrast, 86 company landlords own just 120 properties (8.7%).

Cash is the preferred method of acquisition for landlords in this market. A significant 1,057 properties (76.5%) are owned outright, compared to just 325 properties (23.5%) that carry financing.

The investor portfolio is heavily geared towards rentals, with 1,327 of the 1,382 properties (96.0%) classified as rented. This indicates a strong focus on generating rental income rather than short-term speculation.

The ratio of individual to company landlords is nearly 17-to-1 (1,427 vs 86), underscoring a market structure built on small-scale, local investment rather than corporate aggregation.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 26.4% less than homeowners in Q4, a discount of $44,944 per property.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords demonstrated a significant pricing advantage, acquiring properties for an average of $125,517 while traditional homeowners paid $170,461. This represents a 26.4% discount, saving investors an average of $44,944 on each purchase.

The landlord discount, while still substantial, has tightened considerably throughout the year. The 26.4% gap in Q4 is much smaller than the massive discounts observed in Q3 (65.0%), Q2 (71.4%), and Q1 (66.7%), signaling increasing price competition.

Property prices for investors have seen dramatic appreciation. The average Q4 2025 acquisition price of $125,517 is more than double the average price of $62,186 paid during the 2020-2023 period.

Year-over-year, landlord acquisition prices have surged from an average of $69,695 in 2024 to $79,563 for all of 2025, with Q4 prices reaching a high of $125,517, indicating accelerating price growth.

The consistent ability of landlords to purchase below homeowner prices quarter after quarter suggests a strategic focus on acquiring undervalued assets or off-market deals not typically available to traditional buyers.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 27.6% of all single-family home purchases in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a major force in the Montgomery County market in Q4 2025, purchasing 42 of the 152 total SFR properties sold, which constitutes a 27.6% market share.

The backbone of this activity was small-scale landlords. Mom-and-pop investors (owning 1-10 properties) acquired 31 properties, making up 72.1% of all landlord purchases for the quarter.

The market saw the entry of 19 new landlords, who purchased 16 single properties, accounting for 37.2% of all investor-bought homes. This highlights a continuous influx of new, small-scale capital.

Mid-size landlords also played a key role, with those owning 6-20 properties purchasing a combined 22 homes, representing 51.2% of the quarter's investor activity.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) were completely inactive, making zero purchases in Q4. This reinforces the narrative that the local market is driven entirely by smaller, independent operators.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 95.8% of all investor-owned homes in Montgomery County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Montgomery County is defined by small operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) controlling a dominant 95.8% share of all investor-owned SFRs.

First-time and single-property investors are the largest segment by a wide margin. This tier alone accounts for 978 properties, representing 66.8% of the entire investor portfolio.

Ownership concentration dissipates quickly as portfolio sizes increase. Landlords with 2 properties hold 9.2%, those with 3-5 properties hold 13.0%, and those with 6-10 properties hold just 6.8%.

The presence of large-scale investors is virtually nonexistent. Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) collectively own just 4.2% of the stock, while institutional investors (1,000+ properties) own zero properties.

This ownership structure reveals a highly fragmented market, with investment capital flowing from numerous small, local individuals rather than a few large, centralized corporations.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors own the vast majority of properties across all portfolio sizes, with no corporate crossover.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain overwhelming control across every single ownership tier in Montgomery County. Unlike other markets, there is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners.

In the foundational single-property tier, individuals own 925 of the 978 properties, a commanding 94.1% share, compared to just 5.9% for companies.

This individual dominance persists even as portfolios grow. In the 6-10 property tier, individuals own 76.8% of the homes, and in the 11-20 property tier, they still hold a 77.8% majority.

Company ownership remains a marginal factor across the board, peaking at just 23.2% in the 6-10 property tier. This indicates that even local investors who scale up tend to do so under personal ownership rather than forming larger corporate entities.

The data clearly shows that the entire spectrum of real estate investment in the county, from entry-level to the largest local portfolios, is fundamentally driven by individual capital and decision-making.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in zip codes 62056 and 62049, which hold 47.8% of all investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

Just two zip codes, 62056 (363 properties) and 62049 (297 properties), serve as the epicenters of investor activity in Montgomery County. Together, they account for 660 properties, representing 47.8% of the total investor portfolio.

While leading in raw count, the top zip codes do not necessarily have the highest market penetration. In 62056, investors own 12.5% of SFRs, and in 62049, they own 13.2%.

Smaller zip codes exhibit much higher investor saturation. Zip code 62538 has the highest rate, with 25.3% of its homes owned by investors, followed by 62017 at 20.4% and 62032 at 16.3%.

This highlights two distinct investment patterns: a strategy of high-volume acquisition in larger, core residential areas and a high-penetration strategy in smaller, potentially more niche markets.

The geographic data reveals that investor ownership is not evenly distributed but is instead highly targeted, with specific communities seeing a disproportionate share of investment activity.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 2.87 properties for every one they sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Montgomery County are in a strong accumulation phase, consistently buying more properties than they sell. Across all of 2025, they purchased 152 properties while selling only 53, resulting in a net gain of 99 properties and a buy-to-sell ratio of 2.87 to 1.

The pace of acquisitions increased steadily throughout 2025. The net gain of 38 properties in Q4 was significantly higher than the net gains in Q3 (21 properties) and Q2 (25 properties), showing growing momentum.

In a stark contrast, the only transaction data for institutional-scale investors (1,000+ properties) shows they were net sellers in 2024, disposing of more properties than they acquired (2 sells vs. 1 buy).

This divergence in behavior is critical: while the market as a whole is expanding its rental portfolio, the largest class of investor is divesting, leaving the field entirely to smaller operators.

The transaction history paints a clear picture of a market where local, smaller-scale landlords are actively building their portfolios, confident in the area's investment potential.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlord activity accounted for 31.6% of all market transactions in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were a pivotal part of the market in Q4, participating in 75 of the 237 total transactions, a share of 31.6%. This highlights investors as a primary source of market liquidity.

Transaction volume was highest among small-to-medium investors, particularly the 11-20 property tier, which was involved in 38 transactions. This group also paid the highest average price at $165,013, suggesting they are targeting higher-quality assets.

A robust internal market exists among landlords. Investors in the 6-10 property tier were the most active traders, with 81.8% of their 11 purchases sourced directly from other landlords, indicating portfolio consolidation and optimization.

In contrast, new investors in the single-property tier are primarily buying from the open market, with only 10.0% of their 20 purchases coming from fellow landlords.

Pricing strategies vary significantly by tier. While the 11-20 property tier paid a premium, the two-property tier acquired homes for an average of just $14,000, showcasing a focus on deeply discounted properties.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Individual investors dominate Montgomery County's market, buying 28% of homes at a 26% discount as institutions exit.
Holdings
Landlords own 1,382 single-family properties in Montgomery County, representing 14.5% of the market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by individual investors, who own 1,286 properties (93.1%), versus just 120 properties (8.7%) held by companies.
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords paid an average of 26.4% less than traditional homeowners, securing a $44,944 discount per property ($125,517 vs. $170,461). This price advantage has been a consistent feature of the market.
Activity
Investors purchased 42 properties in Q4, accounting for 27.6% of all sales activity. The market continues to grow from the ground up, with 19 new single-property landlords entering in the last quarter alone.
Market Share
The market structure is defined by small-scale ownership, as 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control a massive 95.8% of all investor-owned housing. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have no meaningful presence, owning 0.0% of the portfolio.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the dominant force across every portfolio size, maintaining majority ownership even in the largest local tiers. There is no crossover point where companies overtake individuals, cementing the market's 'mom-and-pop' character.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers, with a 2.03-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 (75 buys vs. 37 sells). In stark contrast, the only recorded activity from institutional investors shows them to be net sellers, divesting from the market.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Montgomery County, Illinois is fundamentally shaped by small, individual investors. They own 1,382 homes, comprising 14.5% of the total housing stock. This ownership is highly fragmented; 'mom-and-pop' landlords with 1-10 properties control a staggering 95.8% of the investor portfolio, while institutional-grade investors are entirely absent. The market is overwhelmingly comprised of individual owners (93.1%) rather than corporate entities, underscoring a landscape built on local capital.

Investor behavior is characterized by strategic acquisition and active accumulation. In Q4 2025, landlords captured 27.6% of all home sales and consistently purchased properties at a significant 26.4% discount compared to traditional homeowners. This activity is fueling growth, with 19 new single-property landlords entering the market this quarter alone. Overall, landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring more than two properties for every one they sold in the last quarter, signaling strong confidence in the local market's potential.

The key takeaway for the Montgomery County housing market is that it operates in direct opposition to the national narrative of corporate consolidation. The market's stability and growth are driven by a broad base of local individuals, not Wall Street firms. This dynamic suggests a market with deep community ties, where investment strategies are likely focused on long-term rental income over short-term financial engineering. The complete absence of institutional players, coupled with their status as net sellers in recent history, leaves the field entirely open for continued growth from the ground up.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 12, 2026 at 02:50 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyMontgomery (IL)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail