Edgar (IL) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Edgar (IL) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Edgar (IL)
6,026
Total Investors in Edgar (IL)
1,994
Investor Owned SFR in Edgar (IL)
1,683(27.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,749
SFR Owned
1,438
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
245
SFR Owned
306
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,683 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Edgar County's Investor Market: 97% Mom-and-Pop Owned, 100% Cash-Held, Amid a Frozen Q4
Investors own 27.9% of Edgar County's single-family housing, with a staggering 96.9% of this portfolio controlled by mom-and-pop landlords. The market is characterized by a complete absence of institutional investors and a unique financial profile where 100% of investor properties are owned outright in cash. This stability was reflected in Q4 2025, which saw zero recorded purchase or sale transactions by investors.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,683 SFR properties in Edgar County, with individuals holding 85.4%.
A defining feature of this market is its financing: 100% of investor-owned properties (1,683) are held in cash with zero financed. An extremely high 97.4% of the investor portfolio (1,639 properties) is classified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Pricing comparison data between landlords and traditional homeowners is unavailable for Edgar County.
There is insufficient historical or recent data to analyze pricing trends or the gap between investor and homeowner acquisition prices in this market. The only available data point shows an average price of $57,063 between 2020-2023, but this was associated with zero property purchases.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords made up 0.0% of the market in Q4 2025, with zero SFR purchases recorded.
The complete lack of activity means both mom-and-pop (Tiers 01-04) and institutional (Tier 09) investors acquired zero properties. No new landlords entered the market during this period.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a dominant 96.9% of investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone account for 71.8% of all investor housing. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have zero presence, owning 0.0% of the portfolio. Pricing data by tier is unavailable due to lack of transactions.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Pricing differences between individual and company buyers cannot be determined due to no recent sales.
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, holding 60.0% of properties in that segment. Despite this, individuals dominate the largest part of the market, owning 1,129 single-property holdings (86.5% of that tier).
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip code 61944 holding 1,023 properties.
While 61944 leads by volume, other zip codes show extreme investor saturation. Zip code 61955 has the highest ownership rate at 69.1%, followed by 61949 at 60.5%, indicating hyper-local rental markets.
Historical Transactions
Historical transaction data is unavailable, preventing analysis of net buyer/seller status.
Without buy/sell transaction records, it is not possible to determine landlord-to-landlord sales rates, compare buy versus sell prices, or track market liquidity and volume changes over time for Edgar County.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors' share of Q4 2025 transactions was 0.0%, with zero landlord-involved deals.
With no transactions, there is no pricing data to compare mom-and-pop versus institutional buyers. The data confirms a complete halt in investor market activity for the quarter, including no landlord-to-landlord sales.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,683 SFR properties in Edgar County, with individuals holding 85.4%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant footprint in Edgar County, owning 1,683 single-family residential properties, which constitutes 27.9% of the total 6,026 SFRs in the market.

The ownership landscape is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors, who own 1,438 properties, or 85.4% of the investor-held portfolio. Company-owned properties account for the remaining 18.2%, with 306 properties.

A unique and critical finding is the complete absence of financing in investor portfolios; all 1,683 properties are owned outright in cash. This suggests a market comprised of low-leverage, financially stable landlords, potentially less susceptible to interest rate fluctuations.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards generating rental income, with 1,639 of the 1,683 properties (97.4%) identified as rented. This indicates a mature, buy-and-hold rental market rather than a speculative or fix-and-flip environment.

The entity count mirrors the property ownership split, with 1,749 individual landlords compared to just 245 company landlords, reinforcing the 'mom-and-pop' character of the local investment scene.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Pricing comparison data between landlords and traditional homeowners is unavailable for Edgar County.
Detailed Findings

There is no available data for Q4 2025 to compare the acquisition prices of landlords against those of traditional homeowners in Edgar County.

Analysis of historical pricing trends is not possible due to a lack of sufficient transactional data in the provided datasets.

The absence of recent purchasing activity from both landlords and other buyer types prevents any meaningful comparison of pricing strategies or market discounts.

Without transaction data, it is not possible to determine if a price gap exists between different buyer segments or how it may have changed over time.

Future analysis would require transactional data to understand the pricing dynamics and competitiveness of investors in the Edgar County market.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Landlords made up 0.0% of the market in Q4 2025, with zero SFR purchases recorded.
Detailed Findings

The investor purchase market in Edgar County was completely dormant in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring zero single-family properties.

This lack of activity resulted in investors having a 0.0% market share of the total 0 SFR purchases that occurred in the county during the quarter.

Activity was nonexistent across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) recorded zero purchases, accounting for 0.0% of the investor activity.

Similarly, institutional investors (1000+ properties) were also inactive, with zero properties purchased in Q4 2025.

The data indicates no new landlords entered the market, as the single-property (Tier 01) category, a proxy for new entrants, saw zero acquisition activity.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a dominant 96.9% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Edgar County is defined by the overwhelming dominance of small-scale landlords. Mom-and-pop investors (owning 1-10 properties) control a combined 96.9% of all investor-owned SFRs.

First-time or single-holding landlords are the bedrock of the market, with the Tier 01 (1 property) segment alone accounting for 1,272 properties, or 71.8% of the entire investor portfolio.

Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) hold a marginal share, collectively owning just 3.1% of the investor-owned properties in the county.

The market shows a complete absence of large-scale institutional ownership. Tier 09 investors (1000+ properties) hold zero properties, representing 0.0% of the market and challenging any narrative of corporate landlord takeover in this area.

Due to the lack of recent sales activity, there is no available data to compare acquisition prices across different investor tiers.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
Pricing differences between individual and company buyers cannot be determined due to no recent sales.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the foundation of the Edgar County rental market, owning the vast majority of properties in the smallest tiers. They hold 86.5% of single-property portfolios and 75.5% of two-property portfolios.

A clear crossover point occurs in the 6-10 property tier (Tier 04), where companies become the majority owners, holding 36 properties (60.0%) compared to individuals' 24 properties (40.0%).

In the 11-20 property tier, ownership is split evenly, with both individuals and companies holding 26 properties each (50.0%).

Even in larger portfolios, individuals maintain a presence, with one individual owning a portfolio in the 51-100 property range, showcasing that not all larger portfolios are corporatized.

Due to a lack of transactional data, it's impossible to compare the acquisition prices or buying strategies between individual and company investors within any tier.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip code 61944 holding 1,023 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Edgar County is not evenly distributed, showing significant geographic concentration. The zip code 61944 is the epicenter of investor holdings by volume, with 1,023 investor-owned SFRs.

Following 61944, the highest counts of investor properties are found in 61933 (173 properties), 61924 (146 properties), and 61932 (85 properties).

The analysis of ownership rates reveals pockets of intense investor saturation. Zip code 61955 leads with a 69.1% investor ownership rate, meaning investors own more than two-thirds of the SFR housing stock there.

Other areas with high investor penetration include 61949 (60.5%), 61940 (49.0%), and 61933 (44.7%), highlighting specific neighborhoods that are predominantly rental-focused.

There is a distinction between areas with high counts and high rates. For example, 61944 has the highest count but a more moderate ownership rate of 24.6%, whereas smaller zip codes like 61955 have extreme penetration rates despite lower absolute property counts.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Key Insight
Historical transaction data is unavailable, preventing analysis of net buyer/seller status.
Detailed Findings

There is no historical transaction data available for Edgar County, which prevents a full analysis of long-term market dynamics.

It is not possible to determine if landlords have historically been net buyers or net sellers in this market or to calculate a buy/sell ratio.

The percentage of transactions that occur between landlords cannot be calculated, leaving the level of market churn and inter-investor activity unknown.

Analysis of implied margins through the comparison of average buy and sell prices is not feasible due to the absence of this data.

Similarly, transaction patterns for institutional investors cannot be assessed, though their lack of current holdings suggests their historical activity has been nonexistent or negligible.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors' share of Q4 2025 transactions was 0.0%, with zero landlord-involved deals.
Detailed Findings

The final quarter of 2025 saw a complete freeze in investor transactions in Edgar County, with zero deals involving a landlord as either buyer or seller.

Consequently, the landlord share of all 0 property transactions in the county was 0.0%, underscoring a total lack of market liquidity.

Transactional volume was zero across all investor tiers, from single-property landlords to the largest portfolio owners.

As there were no purchases, it is impossible to analyze acquisition prices by tier or identify any pricing strategies used by different investor sizes.

The lack of activity also means there were no inter-landlord trades, where one investor sells a property to another, a key indicator of rental market fluidity.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Edgar County's Investor Market: 97% Mom-and-Pop Owned, 100% Cash-Held, with Zero Q4 Sales.
Holdings
Landlords own 1,683 single-family properties in Edgar County, representing a significant 27.9% of the market. The portfolio is dominated by individual investors, who hold 1,438 properties (85.4%), while companies own the remaining 306 (18.2%).
Pricing
There is no available data for Q4 2025 in Edgar County to compare landlord acquisition prices against those of traditional homeowners.
Activity
Investor purchasing activity in Edgar County came to a complete standstill in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 0 properties, accounting for 0.0% of all sales. Consequently, no new landlords entered the market during this period.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) exercise overwhelming control, owning 96.9% of all investor-held housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have no presence, holding 0.0% of the portfolio.
Ownership Type
Individual investors command the smaller portfolio tiers, but companies become the majority owners in the 6-10 property segment (Tier 04). A remarkable 100% of all investor properties are owned outright in cash.
Transactions
With zero properties bought and zero sold by landlords in Q4 2025, the investor market was completely static. The net position for all investor types, from mom-and-pop to institutional, was neutral with no activity.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Edgar County, IL, is a specialized ecosystem characterized by significant local investor penetration and extreme stability. Investors own 1,683 properties, a notable 27.9% of the county's total SFR housing stock. This market is overwhelmingly controlled by small-scale, individual landlords, with 'mom-and-pop' investors (1-10 properties) holding 96.9% of the rental portfolio and individuals owning 85.4% of all investor-held homes. The complete absence of institutional (1000+ property) investors underscores the hyper-local nature of this rental landscape.

Investor behavior in Edgar County is defined by a distinct lack of leverage and transactional velocity. A striking 100% of the 1,683 investor-owned properties are held entirely in cash, indicating a financially secure, risk-averse owner base that is insulated from interest rate volatility. This buy-and-hold mentality is further evidenced by the complete freeze in market activity during Q4 2025, when landlords were involved in zero purchases and zero sales. This suggests a mature, illiquid market where assets are held for long-term rental income rather than short-term gains.

The key takeaway for the Edgar County housing market is its profound stability and insulation from broader economic trends that affect more leveraged markets. It is a market dominated by a deeply entrenched base of cash-rich, local landlords who operate with a long-term perspective. While this provides stability for the rental sector, the lack of transactional activity also signals a barrier to entry for new investors and limited liquidity for existing ones. The high concentration of investor ownership in specific zip codes, such as 61955 (69.1% investor-owned), points to established rental neighborhoods that are unlikely to change hands frequently.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 12, 2026 at 02:19 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyEdgar (IL)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct