DeKalb (IL) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the DeKalb (IL) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in DeKalb (IL)
25,657
Total Investors in DeKalb (IL)
3,074
Investor Owned SFR in DeKalb (IL)
2,713(10.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,702
SFR Owned
2,182
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
372
SFR Owned
585
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,713 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate DeKalb County, Acquiring 23% of Q4 Homes at a 15.6% Discount
Investors own 2,713 SFR properties in DeKalb County, IL (10.6% of the market), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a staggering 93.6% versus a mere 0.2% for institutional investors. In Q4, landlords were strong net buyers, purchasing 23.0% of all homes sold and securing them for 15.6% less than traditional homeowners, while institutional investors remained largely inactive or were net sellers in prior periods.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 2,713 SFRs in DeKalb County, with individuals holding a dominant 80.4% share.
The investor portfolio is split between 1,506 properties owned outright with cash and 1,207 that are financed. Of the total portfolio, 2,580 properties are confirmed non-owner-occupied rentals. By entity, the market consists of 2,702 individual landlords compared to just 372 company landlords.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords purchased Q4 properties at a 15.6% discount, paying $50,322 less than homeowners.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners has widened significantly from the 8.2% discount observed in Q3 2025. This discount fluctuated dramatically throughout the year, peaking at 31.4% in Q1. Investor purchase prices have risen from a pandemic-era (2020-2023) average of $198,390 to $272,812 in Q4 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investors purchased 23.0% of all single-family homes sold in DeKalb County during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 97.0% of all landlord purchases. In contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties made zero acquisitions. The market saw an influx of 64 new single-property landlords this quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 93.6% of DeKalb County's investor-owned rental housing.
Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) own just 0.2% of the investor-owned SFRs, a total of only 7 properties. The largest ownership segment is the single-property landlord tier, which alone accounts for 1,842 properties, or 65.5% of the entire investor portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors own 80.4% of rental properties, but companies become the majority in portfolios with over 100 units.
Companies gain a significant foothold in the 6-10 property tier, owning 36.8% of properties. The crossover point where company ownership consistently rivals or exceeds individual ownership occurs in portfolios larger than 10 properties. For the largest tier (101-1000 properties), companies own a commanding 83.3% share.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in DeKalb County is highly concentrated, with zip code 60115 holding 43% of all investor-owned homes.
The top five zip codes by property count (60115, 60178, 60548, 60135, 60112) contain 78% of all investor-owned SFRs. However, the highest investor ownership rate is 25.0% in 60152, which is not a leader by count. This highlights a difference between volume and market saturation.
Historical Transactions
DeKalb County landlords are strong net buyers with a 3.95x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4, while institutions were net sellers.
Landlords have been consistent net buyers all year, acquiring 293 properties and selling only 81 in 2025. This contrasts sharply with institutional investors (1,000+ tier), who were net sellers in 2024, selling 5 properties while only buying 3.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 20.2% of all Q4 transactions, with smaller investors paying higher prices.
Single-property landlords were the most active, conducting 64 transactions at an average price of $264,222. In contrast, the few larger landlords active this quarter paid significantly less, with one in the 101-1,000 tier paying just $120,475. Landlord-to-landlord sales were minimal, accounting for only 3.1% of transactions for new landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 2,713 SFRs in DeKalb County, with individuals holding a dominant 80.4% share.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 10.6% share of the Single-Family Residential market in DeKalb County, totaling 2,713 properties.

The investor landscape is overwhelmingly characterized by individual ownership, with 2,182 properties (80.4%) held by individuals compared to 585 properties (21.6%) owned by companies. This structure challenges the narrative of corporate dominance in the rental market.

A strong majority of investor-owned properties, 2,580 in total, are operated as rentals, confirming that the portfolio is actively used to supply housing rather than held for speculative purposes.

When it comes to financing, investor strategies are nearly evenly split. A slight majority of 1,506 properties are owned free-and-clear with cash, while 1,207 properties are financed, indicating a mix of risk tolerance and capital strategies among landlords.

The landlord population itself is heavily skewed towards individuals. There are 2,702 distinct individual landlords operating in the county, outnumbering the 372 company landlords by a ratio of more than 7-to-1.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords purchased Q4 properties at a 15.6% discount, paying $50,322 less than homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, investors in DeKalb County demonstrated a distinct pricing advantage, acquiring properties for an average of $272,812. This represents a significant 15.6% discount compared to the $323,134 paid by traditional homeowners, saving an average of $50,322 per transaction.

The landlord discount has been a consistent, albeit volatile, feature of the market throughout 2025. After narrowing to 8.2% in Q3, the price gap nearly doubled in Q4, indicating a renewed focus on acquiring properties below market rate.

The Q4 discount is a sharp contrast to Q1 2025, when landlords achieved a massive 31.4% discount, paying $95,883 less than homeowners on average. This volatility suggests landlords are opportunistic buyers, capitalizing on deals as they become available.

Acquisition prices have appreciated substantially since the 2020-2023 period. The average investor purchase price of $272,812 in Q4 2025 is 37.5% higher than the pandemic-era average of $198,390, reflecting broad market appreciation.

Comparing Q4 to Q3 ($297,106), landlords actually paid less in the most recent quarter, suggesting a cooling in the prices they are willing to pay, even as their discount relative to homeowners increased.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Investors purchased 23.0% of all single-family homes sold in DeKalb County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for a substantial portion of the market in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 61 of the 265 total SFRs sold, a market share of 23.0%.

The overwhelming majority of this activity was driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) acquired 65 properties, making up 97.0% of all investor purchases and underscoring their role as the primary engine of investor demand.

New entrants are a key feature of the current market, with 64 new entities purchasing their first investment property in Q4. These single-property landlords alone acquired 47 properties, representing 70.1% of all investor buying activity.

In stark contrast to the activity from small landlords, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) made no purchases in DeKalb County this quarter, highlighting a complete absence of large-scale corporate buying.

Mid-size investors played a minimal role, with landlords owning between 21 and 1,000 properties collectively purchasing only two properties, further cementing the market's reliance on small, local investors for rental housing supply.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 93.6% of DeKalb County's investor-owned rental housing.
Detailed Findings

The investor-owned housing market in DeKalb County is unequivocally dominated by mom-and-pop landlords. Investors owning 1-10 properties control a combined 93.6% of the 2,713 investor-held SFRs.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the market, owning 1,842 properties. This single tier represents 65.5% of all investor-owned housing, indicating that the typical landlord is a small-scale, local participant.

Conversely, the presence of institutional investors (1,000+ properties) is negligible. This tier holds just 7 properties, accounting for only 0.2% of the investor portfolio and challenging any narrative of a large-scale corporate takeover in the county.

The entire mid-to-large segment of investors (owning 11-1,000 properties) collectively owns just 174 properties, or 6.2% of the market, further emphasizing the concentration of ownership among the smallest players.

Even within the mom-and-pop category, ownership is concentrated at the very low end. The 1-5 property tiers combined own 2,506 properties, which is 89.2% of the total investor portfolio, showing that the vast majority of landlords have very small portfolios.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors own 80.4% of rental properties, but companies become the majority in portfolios with over 100 units.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the foundation of DeKalb County's rental market, owning the vast majority of properties in smaller portfolio tiers. For single-property landlords, individuals hold 88.7% of the homes, a pattern that continues into the 3-5 property tier (76.3%).

A clear shift in ownership structure emerges as portfolios grow. In the 6-10 property tier, company ownership rises to 36.8%, and in the 11-20 property tier, it reaches near-parity at 47.6%, signaling the point where investors professionalize under a corporate structure.

Companies definitively become the dominant owner type in larger portfolios. For landlords holding 101-1,000 properties, companies own a commanding 83.3% of the assets (5 of 6 properties), indicating that scale requires a corporate framework.

Even though companies dominate the largest tiers, their overall property count remains low due to the market's structure. The vast number of small individual owners means they control 2,182 properties (80.4%) in total, compared to just 585 for companies (21.6%).

This data illustrates a clear lifecycle: investors typically start as individuals and incorporate as their portfolios expand beyond 5-10 properties to manage complexity and liability.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in DeKalb County is highly concentrated, with zip code 60115 holding 43% of all investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

Geographic concentration is a defining characteristic of real estate investment in DeKalb County. The top zip code, 60115, is the epicenter of activity, containing 1,169 investor-owned properties, which alone accounts for 43.1% of the entire county's investor portfolio.

The top five zip codes by sheer volume (60115, 60178, 60548, 60135, and 60112) collectively hold 2,219 properties. This represents 81.8% of all investor-owned SFRs, indicating that investment is focused on a few key areas rather than being evenly distributed.

A distinction exists between areas with high investor counts and those with high investor saturation. While 60115 has the most properties, zip code 60152 has the highest ownership rate, with investors owning 25.0% of the SFRs there.

High investor penetration is also seen in 60115 (14.2%) and 60548 (12.7%), suggesting these areas are mature rental markets where investors play a major role in the local housing ecosystem.

This data reveals targeted investment strategies, with landlords focusing capital in specific sub-markets, likely driven by factors like proximity to amenities, universities, or favorable rental demand.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
DeKalb County landlords are strong net buyers with a 3.95x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4, while institutions were net sellers.
Detailed Findings

Investors in DeKalb County are in a clear accumulation phase, acting as strong net buyers. In Q4 2025, they purchased 87 properties while selling only 22, resulting in a net gain of 65 properties and a buy-to-sell ratio of 3.95-to-1.

This aggressive buying posture is not a new trend; it has been consistent throughout recent history. For the full year of 2025, landlords added a net of 212 properties to their portfolios (293 buys vs. 81 sells), and in 2024, they added a net of 291 properties (355 buys vs. 64 sells).

A significant divergence in strategy exists between the overall market and the largest institutional players. While the market as a whole is buying, institutional investors (1,000+ tier) were net sellers in 2024, disposing of more properties (5) than they acquired (3).

This suggests that the market's growth is being fueled entirely by mom-and-pop and mid-size investors, while the largest, most capitalized players are either inactive or reducing their exposure in DeKalb County.

The high transaction volume on the buy-side demonstrates sustained confidence among local and regional investors in the county's rental market prospects.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 20.2% of all Q4 transactions, with smaller investors paying higher prices.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords participated in 87 of the 431 total SFR transactions in DeKalb County, capturing a 20.2% share of all market activity.

A distinct pricing pattern emerged among investor tiers, revealing different acquisition strategies. The most active group, single-property landlords, paid the highest average price at $264,222 across 64 transactions.

Conversely, larger investors appeared to target lower-priced assets. The single transaction in the 101-1,000 property tier was for just $120,475, and another in the 21-50 tier was for $153,360, more than $100,000 below what new entrants paid. This suggests larger players may focus on distressed or value-add opportunities.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) dominated transaction volume, accounting for 85 of the 87 total investor transactions, while institutional investors (Tier 09) conducted zero transactions.

The market for inter-landlord trading is very thin. For the most active single-property tier, only 2 of 64 transactions (3.1%) involved purchasing from another landlord, indicating that most acquisitions are sourced from the traditional homeowner market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Command 94% of DeKalb County's Rental Market, Actively Buying at a Discount While Institutions Exit
Holdings
Investors own 2,713 single-family homes in DeKalb County, IL, representing 10.6% of the total market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by individual investors, who own 2,182 properties (80.4%), compared to 585 properties (21.6%) held by companies.
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords paid 15.6% less than traditional homeowners, securing an average discount of $50,322 per property ($272,812 vs. $323,134). This pricing advantage demonstrates a strategic ability to acquire assets below the typical market rate.
Activity
Landlords were highly active in Q4, purchasing 61 homes and capturing 23.0% of all market sales. This activity was fueled by new entrants, with 64 new single-property landlords entering the market, who alone accounted for 70.1% of investor acquisitions.
Market Share
The rental market is dominated by small investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 93.6% of all investor-owned housing. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible footprint, owning just 0.2% of the portfolio.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but a clear shift to corporate ownership occurs as holdings grow. Companies become a significant presence in the 6-10 property tier and achieve majority ownership in portfolios larger than 100 properties (83.3%).
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 3.95-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q4 (87 buys vs. 22 sells). This contrasts sharply with institutional investors, who were net sellers in the prior year, signaling a strategic retreat from the market by the largest players.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in DeKalb County, IL is fundamentally a story of the small, individual investor. Landlords own 2,713 properties, a 10.6% share of the county's SFR housing stock. This portfolio is not controlled by Wall Street; rather, it is overwhelmingly in the hands of local players. Individual investors own 80.4% of these homes, and mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) command a staggering 93.6% of the market. Institutional firms with over 1,000 properties have a nearly non-existent presence, holding a mere 0.2% share.

Investor behavior in DeKalb County is characterized by strategic, discounted acquisitions and consistent growth. In Q4 2025, landlords captured 23.0% of all home sales, paying an average of 15.6% less than traditional homeowners. This activity is driven by new entrants, with 64 new single-property landlords joining the market last quarter. The broader trend shows investors are aggressive net buyers, with a nearly 4-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio, steadily increasing the supply of rental housing. This contrasts with the largest institutional players, who have been net sellers, indicating a clear divergence in strategy.

The key takeaway for the DeKalb County housing market is that its stability and rental supply are provided by a dispersed network of thousands of small-scale landlords, not a handful of large corporations. This structure suggests a resilient market less susceptible to the shocks of a single large firm's strategy shift. The consistent acquisition of properties at a discount by these smaller investors indicates a healthy, functioning market where opportunities are actively sought and capitalized upon, fueling a steady expansion of the rental housing inventory from the ground up.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 12, 2026 at 02:19 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyDeKalb (IL)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail