Washington (ID) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Washington (ID) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Washington (ID)
2,641
Total Investors in Washington (ID)
441
Investor Owned SFR in Washington (ID)
392(14.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
377
SFR Owned
318
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
64
SFR Owned
91
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 392 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Command 97.8% of Washington County's Rental Market, Acquiring Properties at an 18.5% Discount
In Washington County, investors own 392 SFR properties (14.8% of the market), with small, mom-and-pop landlords controlling a staggering 97.8% of that portfolio. In Q4, investors purchased 16.1% of homes sold, paying 18.5% less than traditional homeowners. Landlords remain strong net buyers, while institutional investors are largely absent from the market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 392 SFR properties in Washington County, with individual landlords holding a dominant 81.1%.
Cash-heavy strategies prevail, with 277 properties owned outright versus 115 financed, a 2.4-to-1 ratio. The portfolio is highly focused on rentals, with 380 of the 392 properties (96.9%) designated as non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Investors secured a significant 18.5% discount in Q4, paying $70,977 less than homeowners.
The 18.5% Q4 discount represents a significant narrowing from the massive 29.5% discount observed in Q3. Pricing has been highly volatile throughout the year, with landlords paying a 1.7% premium in Q1 before the market shifted.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 16.1% of all homes sold in Q4, acquiring 5 of 31 available properties.
Mom-and-pop investors drove 100% of landlord acquisitions in Q4, with 5 new entities entering the market as single-property landlords. In sharp contrast, institutional investors made zero purchases, showing a complete absence from the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly dominate the market, controlling 97.8% of all investor-owned housing.
Single-property landlords alone account for 70.5% of the entire investor portfolio, with 282 properties. In stark contrast, institutional investors in the 1000+ property tier own just 1.0% of the local inventory, or 4 properties.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, signaling a strategic shift as portfolios grow.
While individuals dominate smaller portfolios, owning 88.1% of single-property holdings, companies take a 64.7% majority share in the 6-10 property tier. This marks the clear crossover point where business-entity ownership becomes the preferred structure.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 83672 zip code alone holding 300 properties (76.5% of the total).
While 83672 has the highest raw count, the 83610 zip code shows the highest investor saturation, with a 26.8% ownership rate. The entire investor portfolio of 392 properties is located within just three zip codes.
Historical Transactions
Landlords remain strong net buyers, acquiring 41 properties while selling only 23 throughout 2025.
The net buying trend has been consistent, with landlords adding a net 4 properties in Q4 and 18 over the full year. Institutional investors were also net buyers in 2025, but on a much smaller scale, adding a net of just 2 properties.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 13.0% of Q4 market transactions, with all activity driven by mom-and-pop investors.
Half (50.0%) of the purchases made by two-property landlords came from other existing landlords, indicating consolidation. In contrast, new single-property landlords sourced 0% of their acquisitions from other investors, buying instead from the open market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 392 SFR properties in Washington County, with individual landlords holding a dominant 81.1%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 14.8% share of the single-family residential market in Washington County, with a total portfolio of 392 properties.

The investor landscape is overwhelmingly dominated by individuals rather than corporations. Individual landlords own 318 properties, accounting for 81.1% of the portfolio, compared to 91 properties (23.2%) owned by companies.

When examining entities, the individual dominance is even clearer, with 377 individual landlords compared to just 64 companies. This 5.9-to-1 ratio underscores the 'mom-and-pop' nature of the local market.

Investors in this market demonstrate a preference for cash transactions, with 277 properties owned outright compared to 115 that are financed. This suggests a well-capitalized investor base that can move quickly on acquisitions without relying on traditional lending.

The portfolio is almost exclusively dedicated to generating rental income. A total of 380 properties, or 96.9% of all investor-owned homes, are non-owner-occupied, signaling a clear business focus on providing rental housing to the community.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Investors secured a significant 18.5% discount in Q4, paying $70,977 less than homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In Q4, landlords demonstrated superior purchasing power, acquiring properties for an average price of $312,550, which is 18.5% below the $383,527 paid by traditional homeowners. This translates to a substantial discount of $70,977 per property.

The price advantage for investors has been volatile throughout 2025, highlighting a dynamic market. The Q4 discount of 18.5% is a moderation from the massive discounts of 29.5% in Q3 and 29.2% in Q2, suggesting the price gap is narrowing.

In a surprising turn early in the year, landlords actually paid a 1.7% premium over homeowners in Q1, at an average price of $313,334. This fluctuation indicates that investor negotiation power can shift dramatically from quarter to quarter.

The average landlord acquisition price in 2025 stands at $267,419, which is slightly higher than the 2024 average of $248,534, showing modest year-over-year price appreciation for investors.

The significant, albeit fluctuating, discount suggests that investors are adept at identifying undervalued assets, negotiating favorable terms, or purchasing properties that may require improvements, setting them apart from the typical homebuyer.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 16.1% of all homes sold in Q4, acquiring 5 of 31 available properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for 16.1% of all SFR sales in Washington County during Q4, with landlords acquiring 5 of the 31 properties sold.

The entirety of this purchasing activity was driven by the smallest investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) made 100% of the landlord acquisitions, reinforcing their role as the primary engine of investor market growth.

The market welcomed 5 new landlords in Q4, all of whom purchased their first investment property. These new entrants were responsible for acquiring 3 of the 5 investor-bought homes, signaling fresh capital and interest at the grassroots level.

In a clear sign of market dynamics, institutional investors (1000+ properties) were completely inactive, making zero purchases in Q4. This highlights a market exclusively shaped by small-scale, local players.

The acquisition data shows a high degree of co-ownership among new entrants, with 5 distinct entities purchasing a total of 3 properties in the single-property tier.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly dominate the market, controlling 97.8% of all investor-owned housing.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Washington County is definitively controlled by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, hold 97.8% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the market, owning 282 properties. This single tier accounts for an astounding 70.5% of the entire investor portfolio, highlighting the fragmented and decentralized nature of ownership.

In stark contrast to the dominance of small investors, institutional firms with over 1,000 properties have a negligible footprint, owning just 4 properties, which amounts to a mere 1.0% of the investor market.

The ownership distribution reveals a 'missing middle,' with very few landlords operating in the mid-size tiers. After the 6-10 property tier, there is a steep drop-off in ownership until the very small large-investor tiers.

This ownership structure defies the narrative of corporate landlord takeover, proving that the rental market in Washington County is sustained by a broad base of local, small-portfolio investors.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, signaling a strategic shift as portfolios grow.
Detailed Findings

A distinct pattern emerges when analyzing ownership by entity type: as portfolios scale, ownership systematically shifts from individuals to companies. The crossover point occurs in the 6-10 property tier, where companies own a 64.7% majority.

At the entry level, individual investors are the primary players. They own 88.1% of all single-property landlord portfolios and 68.9% of two-property portfolios, establishing them as the foundation of the market.

The presence of companies steadily increases with portfolio size, growing from 11.9% in the single-property tier to 43.1% in the 3-5 property tier, before finally becoming the majority in the next bracket.

This trend suggests a professionalization of operations as landlords expand. Larger portfolios are more likely to be held within a formal business structure like an LLC for liability protection and financial management.

Although companies become dominant in larger tiers, individuals still maintain a presence, holding over a third (35.3%) of properties even in the 6-10 property tier, showcasing the persistence of individual ownership across the spectrum.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 83672 zip code alone holding 300 properties (76.5% of the total).
Detailed Findings

The investor portfolio in Washington County is extremely concentrated geographically. A single zip code, 83672, is home to 300 investor-owned properties, representing 76.5% of the entire county's inventory.

A distinction exists between the highest volume and the highest penetration rate. While 83672 leads by count, the 83610 zip code has the highest saturation of investors, with 26.8% of its homes owned by landlords.

The market is confined to a very small area, with 100% of the 392 investor-owned properties located within just three zip codes: 83672, 83610, and 83645.

The second-largest concentration is found in zip code 83610, with 71 investor-owned properties. This area also boasts the highest investor ownership rate at 26.8%, making it a key rental hub.

This high level of geographic concentration suggests that investors are targeting specific neighborhoods, likely driven by factors like school quality, rental demand, and potential for appreciation, rather than spreading their holdings across the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords remain strong net buyers, acquiring 41 properties while selling only 23 throughout 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Washington County are in a phase of accumulation, consistently acting as net buyers. In 2025, they purchased 41 properties while selling only 23, resulting in a net gain of 18 properties to their collective portfolio.

This growth trend held steady through the end of the year, with Q4 showing 7 purchases versus 3 sales, for a net increase of 4 properties. This follows net gains in both Q3 (+6) and Q2 (+9).

The buy-to-sell ratio for 2025 stands at 1.78, meaning landlords acquired nearly 1.8 properties for every one they sold, signaling strong confidence in the local market.

Institutional investors, while a minor presence, mirrored this trend on a micro scale. They were net buyers in 2025, purchasing 3 properties and selling only 1 for a net gain of 2 properties.

Acquisition activity peaked mid-year with 19 purchases in Q2 before moderating to 8 in Q3 and 7 in Q4, suggesting a cooling but still positive investment pace heading into the new year.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 13.0% of Q4 market transactions, with all activity driven by mom-and-pop investors.
Detailed Findings

Landlord transactions accounted for 13.0% of all market activity in Q4, with a total of 7 transactions involving investors.

All 7 of these transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop investors in the smallest tiers, with 5 transactions from the single-property tier and 2 from the two-property tier. Institutional investors recorded zero transactions.

A pattern of consolidation is emerging among slightly larger small investors. For the two-property tier, one of their two purchases (50.0%) was acquired from another landlord, suggesting a transfer of assets within the investor community.

New entrants are buying from the general market, not from other investors. The single-property tier, representing new landlords, had an inter-landlord purchase rate of 0.0%, indicating they are acquiring properties from homeowners or new construction.

The average purchase price for new single-property landlords in Q4 was $312,550, aligning perfectly with the overall average landlord price and indicating these new buyers are representative of the broader investor market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Washington County with 97.8% Ownership, Securing 18.5% Purchase Discounts
Holdings
In Washington County, landlords own 392 single-family residential properties, representing 14.8% of the total market. Individual investors overwhelmingly lead, holding 318 properties (81.1%) compared to 91 (23.2%) for companies.
Pricing
Investors demonstrated significant purchasing power in Q4, paying an average of 18.5% less than traditional homeowners. This translated to a $70,977 discount per property, with landlords paying $312,550 versus the homeowner price of $383,527.
Activity
Landlords acquired 16.1% of homes sold in Q4, with 5 new single-property landlords entering the Washington County market. All landlord purchasing activity was driven exclusively by mom-and-pop investors.
Market Share
The investor market is overwhelmingly controlled by small operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) owning 97.8% of the rental housing stock. In stark contrast, institutional investors hold a minimal 1.0% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors form the backbone of the market, but companies become the majority owners for portfolios in the 6-10 property tier. This crossover point signals a shift towards professionalization as portfolio size increases.
Transactions
Landlords were firm net buyers throughout 2025, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 1.78 (41 properties bought vs. 23 sold). Institutional investors were also net buyers but with negligible volume, adding a net of just 2 properties.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Washington County, Idaho, is defined by small, independent operators. Landlords control 392 SFR properties, comprising 14.8% of the county's housing stock. This market is overwhelmingly dominated by mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties), who own 97.8% of all investor-held homes, while institutional firms hold a negligible 1.0%. Ownership is heavily skewed towards individuals, who control 81.1% of the properties, reinforcing the local, non-corporate nature of the rental market.

Investor behavior in Washington County is characterized by strategic, value-driven acquisitions. In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 16.1% of all homes sold, securing them at an average 18.5% discount compared to traditional homeowners. The market continues to attract new entrants, with 5 new single-property landlords making purchases this quarter. Throughout 2025, landlords have been consistent net buyers, acquiring 78% more properties than they sold, signaling confidence and a commitment to portfolio growth in the region.

The data paints a clear picture of a rental market sustained by local mom-and-pop investors, not large-scale corporations. This structure suggests a fragmented and competitive environment where market knowledge and negotiation lead to significant price advantages. The continued influx of new, small-scale landlords and the absence of institutional activity indicate that future growth will likely continue from the ground up, maintaining the community-oriented character of the Washington County rental landscape.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 12, 2026 at 02:07 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyWashington (ID)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords