Bingham (ID) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Bingham (ID) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Bingham (ID)
12,090
Total Investors in Bingham (ID)
2,917
Investor Owned SFR in Bingham (ID)
2,506(20.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,626
SFR Owned
2,007
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
291
SFR Owned
576
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,506 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mid-Size and Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Bingham County, Driving 56% of Purchases and Paying Premiums While Institutions Remain Absent
Investors now own 20.7% of single-family homes in Bingham County, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a commanding 86.0% of that portfolio. In Q4 2025, investors acquired 56.5% of all homes sold, paying a 5.1% premium over traditional homeowners and signaling intense local competition. The market is defined by aggressive buying from smaller players, who are net buyers at a 43.5-to-1 ratio, while institutional investors have a negligible presence.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 2,506 SFRs in Bingham County, with individual landlords holding 80.1%.
Cash-backed portfolios dominate, outnumbering financed properties more than 3-to-1 (1,910 vs 596). The vast majority of these holdings, 2,438 properties or 97.3%, are actively rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a 5.1% premium in Q4, spending $438,000 versus a homeowner's $416,744.
This Q4 premium marks a dramatic reversal from previous quarters, where landlords enjoyed significant discounts of 6.1% in Q3 and 17.3% in Q2. Landlord acquisition prices jumped 18.6% from Q3 to Q4.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords dominated Q4 activity, acquiring 140 properties for a 56.5% share of all market purchases.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounted for 28.7% of investor purchases (41 properties). In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+) made zero acquisitions, while just two mid-size entities bought 96 properties.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own a commanding 86.0% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone form the market's foundation, controlling 66.5% of the investor-owned housing stock (1,736 properties). Conversely, institutional investors have a negligible footprint, owning just one property, or 0.0% of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 11-20 property tier, controlling 69.7% of homes.
Individuals overwhelmingly own smaller portfolios, comprising 89.2% of single-property holdings. This flips in the large (101-1000) tier, where companies own 154 properties, a 99.4% share.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Bingham County is highly concentrated, with the 83221 zip code alone holding 1,195 properties.
Several smaller zip codes exhibit extreme investor saturation, with 83203 and 83256 showing 100.0% investor ownership. The 83218 zip code also has a very high concentration at 85.3% investor-owned.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, with a 43.5x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 (261 buys vs 6 sells).
This intense buying has been consistent all year, with 637 acquisitions versus only 32 sales in 2025. In contrast, institutional investors were neutral in 2025, with 2 buys and 2 sells.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords drove Q4 market activity, accounting for 261 transactions for a 59.2% market share.
New single-property landlords paid the highest average price at $547,736, more than double other small landlord tiers. Landlord-to-landlord sales are virtually non-existent, with only one such transaction recorded.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 2,506 SFRs in Bingham County, with individual landlords holding 80.1%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 20.7% share of the single-family residential market in Bingham County, controlling 2,506 of the 12,090 total SFR properties.

Individual investors are the primary force in the local rental market, owning 2,007 properties, which constitutes 80.1% of all investor-owned SFRs. In contrast, company investors hold 576 properties (23.0%).

The market is composed of 2,917 distinct landlords, with individual 'mom-and-pop' style investors making up 90.0% of all landlord entities (2,626 individuals vs. 291 companies).

Cash is the preferred acquisition method for investors in Bingham County. Cash-owned properties (1,910) outnumber financed properties (596) by a ratio of more than 3.2 to 1, indicating a market with high liquidity and less reliance on traditional lending.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards rental income, with 2,438 properties listed as rented. This represents an overwhelming 97.3% of the total investor-owned portfolio, underscoring a clear focus on generating rental yield.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a 5.1% premium in Q4, spending $438,000 versus a homeowner's $416,744.
Detailed Findings

In a significant market shift, landlords paid a premium for properties in Q4 2025, with an average acquisition price of $438,000—5.1% higher than the $416,744 paid by traditional homeowners.

This $21,256 premium per property reverses a long-standing trend of investor discounts. In the prior three quarters, landlords consistently paid less, securing discounts of 6.1% in Q3, a substantial 17.3% in Q2, and 7.6% in Q1.

The average price landlords paid in Q4 ($438,000) represents a sharp 18.6% increase from their Q3 average ($369,249), suggesting heightened competition or a strategic shift towards higher-value properties at year-end.

The homeowner-landlord price gap has been volatile throughout 2025, swinging from a massive $76,505 landlord discount in Q2 to a $21,256 landlord premium in Q4, a total price swing of nearly $98,000.

Comparing recent activity to the pandemic era, the average landlord acquisition price in 2024 ($384,011) was 28.3% higher than the average from 2020-2023 ($299,246), highlighting significant price appreciation in the market.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords dominated Q4 activity, acquiring 140 properties for a 56.5% share of all market purchases.
Detailed Findings

Investors were the primary buyers in Bingham County's Q4 market, purchasing 140 of the 248 total SFRs sold and capturing a majority 56.5% market share.

A surprising concentration of activity came from the mid-size tier, with just two entities in the 51-100 property tier acquiring 96 properties, representing 67.1% of all investor purchases this quarter.

The grassroots of the market remains active, with 34 new single-property landlords entering the market, collectively purchasing 21 properties in Q4.

Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) made a solid showing, acquiring 41 properties in total, which accounts for 28.7% of all landlord purchases.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) were completely absent from the purchasing market in Q4, acquiring zero properties and ceding all activity to smaller and mid-sized players.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own a commanding 86.0% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Bingham County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) control a massive 86.0% of all investor-owned single-family homes.

First-time and single-property investors are the bedrock of the rental market, with the 'Tier 01' category alone accounting for 1,736 properties, or 66.5% of the total investor portfolio.

Despite national narratives, institutional ownership is virtually non-existent in this market. The 1,000+ property tier holds just a single property, representing 0.0% of the investor-owned housing stock.

Ownership concentration drops off sharply after the smallest tiers. The top four tiers (1-10 properties) control 86.0%, while the next five tiers combined (11-1000+ properties) hold the remaining 14.0%.

Mid-size investors in the 51-100 and 101-1000 property tiers represent a small but significant segment, collectively owning 325 properties, or 12.4% of the investor-owned market.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 11-20 property tier, controlling 69.7% of homes.
Detailed Findings

A clear crossover point exists where ownership structure shifts from individual to corporate. While individuals dominate portfolios of 1-10 properties, companies take majority control starting at the 11-20 property tier, owning 69.7% of the properties in that segment.

Individual investors are the backbone of the small-scale rental market, owning 1,595 single-property rentals (89.2% of that tier) and maintaining over 74% ownership across all tiers up to 10 properties.

As portfolio sizes increase, corporate ownership becomes the standard. Companies own 99.4% of properties in the 101-1000 home tier, indicating that scaling requires a more formal business structure.

Even in the mid-size 51-100 property tier, individual ownership remains surprisingly resilient, with individuals still holding a majority 58.2% share (99 properties).

This data illustrates a natural progression in the investor lifecycle: individuals initiate and dominate the entry-level market, while corporate entities are leveraged for managing larger, more complex portfolios.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Bingham County is highly concentrated, with the 83221 zip code alone holding 1,195 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership is heavily concentrated in a few key areas of Bingham County. The 83221 zip code is the epicenter of activity by volume, containing 1,195 investor-owned properties.

The top three zip codes by property count (83221, 83274, and 83210) collectively account for 2,149 properties, representing 85.8% of all investor-owned SFRs in the county.

A distinction exists between high-volume and high-saturation markets. While 83221 has the most properties, its investor ownership rate is a moderate 16.7%. In contrast, smaller zip codes like 83218 have an extreme 85.3% investor ownership rate.

Several zip codes, including 83203 and 83256, appear to be almost entirely investor-controlled, with reported ownership rates of 100.0%, suggesting these may be areas with build-for-rent communities or highly targeted acquisition strategies.

The market in zip code 83210 shows significant investor penetration, with a 38.8% ownership rate on a substantial base of 331 investor-owned properties.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, with a 43.5x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 (261 buys vs 6 sells).
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Bingham County are overwhelmingly net buyers, demonstrating strong confidence in the market. In Q4 2025, they acquired 261 properties while selling only 6, a buy-to-sell ratio of over 43-to-1.

The aggressive acquisition trend has been sustained throughout the year. For the full year of 2025, landlords purchased 637 SFRs and sold just 32, resulting in a net gain of 605 properties to their portfolios.

Buying velocity has accelerated significantly. The 637 properties purchased in 2025 represent a 244% increase over the 185 properties acquired in all of 2024.

While the overall market is in a strong accumulation phase, institutional investors (1,000+ tier) are treading water. In 2025, their activity was neutral, with an equal number of acquisitions and dispositions (2 buys vs. 2 sells).

This divergence in behavior highlights that the market's growth is being driven entirely by small and mid-sized investors, while the largest players remain on the sidelines.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords drove Q4 market activity, accounting for 261 transactions for a 59.2% market share.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity defined the market in Q4, with landlords involved in 261 of the 441 total SFR transactions, capturing a dominant 59.2% share.

A surprising pricing dynamic emerged among tiers. New, single-property landlords paid the highest average price by a wide margin, at $547,736 per property.

This premium price paid by new entrants is more than double the average price paid by more established small landlords in the 2-property ($227,075) and 3-5 property ($219,450) tiers, suggesting new buyers are competing for higher-end inventory.

The most active buyers by volume were the two entities in the 51-100 property tier, who were responsible for 192 transactions, or 73.6% of all landlord activity.

The market for inter-landlord transactions is extremely thin. Only one purchase in Q4 was sourced from another landlord, indicating that investors are primarily acquiring properties from traditional homeowners or new construction.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small and Mid-Size Investors Dominate Bingham County's SFR Market, Controlling 86% of Rentals While Institutions Are Absent
Holdings
Landlords own 2,506 single-family residential properties in Bingham County, representing 20.7% of the total market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors, who own 2,007 properties (80.1%), compared to 576 properties (23.0%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In a surprising reversal, landlords paid a 5.1% premium over homeowners in Q4 2025, with an average price of $438,000 versus $416,744, indicating intense competition for limited inventory.
Activity
Investors were the primary force in the Q4 market, purchasing 140 homes for a 56.5% share of all sales. Activity was led by mid-size players, while 34 new single-property landlords also entered the market.
Market Share
The rental market is controlled by small investors (1-10 properties), who own a commanding 86.0% of all investor housing. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible 0.0% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios larger than 10 properties, taking control at the 11-20 property tier.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 43.5-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q4 (261 buys vs 6 sells). In contrast, institutional investors were completely inactive, posting a net neutral position for the year.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Bingham County, Idaho is fundamentally driven by small and mid-sized local investors, not large corporations. Investors own 2,506 SFRs, a significant 20.7% of the total housing stock. This ownership is dominated by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who control 86.0% of the investor-owned inventory, while institutional investors have virtually no presence (0.0%). The market's composition is heavily skewed towards individuals, who comprise 90.0% of all landlord entities and own 80.1% of the properties.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 points to a highly competitive and confident market. Landlords acquired a majority 56.5% of all homes sold and, in a sharp reversal of previous trends, paid a 5.1% premium over traditional homeowners. This purchasing was highly concentrated, with just two mid-size entities accounting for 67.1% of investor acquisitions. Overall, landlords are in an aggressive accumulation phase, buying 43.5 times more properties than they sold in Q4, while the largest institutional players remained on the sidelines.

The key takeaway for the Bingham County housing market is that its dynamics are dictated by local, smaller-scale capital. The absence of institutional players means the market is less susceptible to national corporate strategies and more reflective of local economic conditions. The willingness of investors, particularly new entrants, to pay premiums suggests a belief in continued rent growth and property appreciation. This intense competition from a diverse base of smaller investors is a primary factor shaping housing affordability and availability across the county.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 12, 2026 at 01:43 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyBingham (ID)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail